Literature DB >> 35573916

Surgical Outcomes of Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery in 29 Patients with Craniopharyngioma.

Arad Iranmehr1,2, Mostafa Esmaeilnia1,2, Khashayar Afshari2, Seyed Mousa Sadrehosseini3, Azin Tabari3, Morteza Faghih Jouibari4, Mehdi Zeinalizadeh1,2.   

Abstract

Background  Recently the endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) has been introduced as a modality for the treatment of patients with craniopharyngiomas. In this study, we describe our initial experience in treatment of 29 patients with craniopharyngiomas using this approach. Methods  Twenty-nine consecutive patients with craniopharyngiomas who had undergone EES in a 5-year period were studied retrospectively. Patients underwent preoperative and postoperative endocrinologic and ophthalmologic evaluations. Radiologic characteristics of tumors and extent of resection were determined. The recurrence and complications were evaluated. Results  Pituitary and visual dysfunction were observed preoperatively in 89.7 and 86% of patients, respectively. After EES, visual outcome either showed an improvement or else remained unchanged in 92.3% of the cases; however, pituitary function remained unchanged and even got worsened in 34.6% of the cases. Prevalence of diabetes insipidus before and after surgery was 58.6 and 69.2%. The rate of gross total resection was 62%. Moreover, 86.2% of the tumors were almost totally resected (more than 95% of the tumor size resected). After surgery, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak and meningitis occurred in four (13.8%) and two (6.9%) patients, respectively. Perioperative mortality was seen in two of the cases (6.9%). The mean follow-up was 25 months and tumor recurrence was discovered in four patients (15.3%). Conclusion  The EES with the goal of maximal and safe tumor resection could be used for the treatment of most craniopharyngiomas. Although the rates of visual improvement and gross tumor resection are high, CSF leak, pituitary dysfunction, and meningitis are serious concerns. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complication; craniopharyngioma; endoscopic endonasal surgery; outcome

Year:  2020        PMID: 35573916      PMCID: PMC9100441          DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base        ISSN: 2193-634X


  35 in total

1.  Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery, A Reliable Method for Treating Primary and Recurrent/Residual Craniopharyngiomas: Nine Years of Experience.

Authors:  Ercan Bal; Kamil Öge; Mustafa Berker
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.104

2.  Early outcomes of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for adult craniopharyngiomas.

Authors:  John A Jane; Erin Kiehna; Spencer C Payne; Stephen V Early; Edward R Laws
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.047

3.  Comparing survival outcomes of gross total resection and subtotal resection with radiotherapy for craniopharyngioma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guoqing Wang; Xiaoyang Zhang; Mengzhao Feng; Fuyou Guo
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 4.  Microscopic versus endoscopic approaches for craniopharyngiomas: choosing the optimal surgical corridor for maximizing extent of resection and complication avoidance using a personalized, tailored approach.

Authors:  James K Liu; Ilesha A Sevak; Peter W Carmel; Jean Anderson Eloy
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.047

5.  Long-term neurological, visual, and endocrine outcomes following transnasal resection of craniopharyngioma.

Authors:  Indro Chakrabarti; Arun P Amar; William Couldwell; Martin H Weiss
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Craniopharyngioma in adults and children: a study of 122 surgical cases.

Authors:  Rémy Van Effenterre; Anne-Laure Boch
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Surgical treatment of craniopharyngiomas: experience with 168 patients.

Authors:  R Fahlbusch; J Honegger; W Paulus; W Huk; M Buchfelder
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Outcomes following endoscopic, expanded endonasal resection of suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a case series.

Authors:  Paul A Gardner; Amin B Kassam; Carl H Snyderman; Ricardo L Carrau; Arlan H Mintz; Steven Grahovac; Susan Stefko
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 9.  Surgical management of craniopharyngiomas in adult patients: a systematic review and consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section.

Authors:  Giulia Cossu; Emmanuel Jouanneau; Luigi M Cavallo; Samer K Elbabaa; Lorenzo Giammattei; Daniele Starnoni; Juan Barges-Coll; Paolo Cappabianca; Vladimir Benes; Mustafa K Baskaya; Michael Bruneau; Torstein Meling; Karl Schaller; Ari G Chacko; A Samy Youssef; Diego Mazzatenta; Mario Ammirati; Henry Dufour; Edward Laws; Moncef Berhouma; Roy Thomas Daniel; Mahmoud Messerer
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 10.  Advances in the management of craniopharyngioma.

Authors:  Lillie O'steen; Daniel J Indelicato
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-10-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.