| Literature DB >> 35573781 |
Lijing Du1,2, Qian Wang3, Shuai Ji4, Yuanfang Sun1,2, Wenjing Huang3, Yiping Zhang2, Shasha Li2, Shikai Yan1,3, Huizi Jin1.
Abstract
Hyperlipidemia refers to a chronic disease caused by systemic metabolic disorder, and its pathophysiology is very complex. Shanmei capsule (SM) is a famous preparation with a long tradition of use for anti-hyperlipidemia treatment in China. However, the regulation mechanism of SM on hyperlipidemia has not been elucidated so far. In this study, a combination of UPLC-Q-TOF/MS techniques and 16S rDNA gene sequencing was performed to investigate the effects of SM treatment on plasma metabolism-mediated change and intestinal homeostasis. The results indicated that SM potently ameliorated high-fat diet-induced glucose and lipid metabolic disorders and reduced the histopathological injury. Pathway analysis indicated that alterations of differential metabolites were mainly involved in glycerophospholipid metabolism, linolenic acid metabolism, α-linoleic acid metabolism, and arachidonic acid metabolism. These changes were accompanied by a significant perturbation of intestinal microbiota characterized by marked increased microbial richness and changed microbiota composition. There were many genera illustrating strong correlations with hyperlipidemia-related markers (e.g., weight gains, GLU, and total cholesterol), including the Lachnospiraceae NK4A136 group and the Lachnospiraceae NK4B4 group. Overall, this study initially confirmed that hyperlipidemia is associated with metabolic disturbance and intestinal microbiota disorders, and SM can be employed to help decrease hyperlipidemia risk, including improving the abnormal metabolic profile and maintaining the gut microbial environment.Entities:
Keywords: Shanmei capsule; hyperlipidemia; intestinal microbial; metabolomics; regulation mechanism
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35573781 PMCID: PMC9094705 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.729940
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 6.073
Figure 1(A) Comparisons in TG, TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C between SM and AT groups. 3 weeks, 15 weeks, and 26 weeks represent before modeling, 12 weeks after modeling, and 11 weeks after drug administration, respectively. “*” represents a significant difference compared to 3 weeks and 15 weeks; “#” represents a significant difference compared to 15 weeks and 26 weeks. (B) Blood glucose levels and areas under the curve (AUC) during the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). (C) Change in insulin level. (D) Histopathologic sections of liver, H&E stain.
Figure 2(A) Principal component analysis (PCA) model results in positive and negative modes. (B) Supervised analysis by PLS-DA. (C) Validation of the PLS-DA model by the 200-time permutation test. (D) KEGG pathway analysis for the identified metabolites.
Identification of representative differential metabolites among different groups.
| No. | Retention time (min) | Ion | Metabolites | Formula | Compound ID | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.257 | Esi+ | MG(15:0/0:0/0:0) | C18H36O4 | HMDB11563 | Down |
| 2 | 6.482 | Esi+ | 3,7-Dihydroxy-12-oxocholanoic acid | C24H38O5 | HMDB00400 | Up |
| 3 | 8.464 | Esi+ | 10,20-Dihydroxyeicosanoic acid | C20H40O4 | HMDB31923 | Up |
| 4 | 12.444 | Esi- | LysoPE[0:0/22:5(7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z,19Z)] | C27H46NO7P | HMDB11495 | Up |
| 5 | 12.516 | Esi+ | LysoPC[16:1(9Z)] | C24H48NO7P | HMDB10383 | Up |
| 6 | 15.616 | Esi- | 3-Ketostearic acid | C18H34O3 | HMDB10736 | Up |
| 7 | 23.066 | Esi- | Punicic acid | C18H30O2 | HMDB30963 | Up |
| 8 | 25.666 | Esi- | Tetracosahexaenoic acid | C24H36O2 | HMDB02007 | Up |
| 9 | 26.476 | Esi+ | PC(18;4(6z, 9Z, 12Z, 15Z)/20;1(11z) | C46H82NO8P | HMDB08242 | Up |
| 10 | 27.279 | Esi- | 11(Z),14(Z)-Eicosadienoic acid | C20H36O2 | HMDB05060 | Down |
| 11 | 30.482 | Esi+ | SM(d18:1/14:0) | C37H75N2O6P | HMDB12097 | Down |
| 12 | 33.861 | Esi+ | PC14:0/20:3(5Z,8Z,11Z)] | C42H78NO8P | HMDB07881 | Up |
| 13 | 39.188 | Esi+ | PG[16:0/16:1(9Z)] | C38H73O10P | HMDB10571 | Down |
Figure 3(A) The box plots of observed operational taxonomic unit (OTU) number. (B) Boxplot of Shannon diversity indices for the four groups. (C) Unweighted UniFrac PCoA results for all samples. (D) Stack bar charts of species distribution at the phylum level. (E) Ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes (F/B). **: significant difference (P < 0.01).
Figure 4(A) Relative abundance of the predominant bacteria at the genus level. (B) Prediction of changed METACYC pathways using PICRUST 2 analysis. * In the Figure represents mean value.
Figure 5(A) Network between abundant sequences at the genus level built from SparCC correlation coefficients. (B) Heatmap of Spearman correlation among hyperlipidemia-related indexes, identified metabolites, and intestinal microbiota at genus level. For P-values of correlations, * indicated statistically significant correlation (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01).