| Literature DB >> 35572795 |
Jeanet Conradie1,2.
Abstract
This data article provides density functional theory calculated structural (bond lengths and angles, coordinates of optimized geometries) and electronic (Mulliken spin population and character of frontier molecular orbitals) data of a series of 4'-substituted bis(2,2';6'2''-terpyridine)manganese complexes in four different oxidation states. The bis-cationic (n = 2) [Mn(tpy)2]2+ complexes are experimentally well known (Sjödin et al., 2008), while little or none experimental structural data of the tetra-cationic (n = 4, Romain et al., 2009, 2009), tris-cationic (n = 3, Romain et al., 2009) and mono-cationic (n = 1, Wang et al., 2014) [Mn(tpy)2]n+ complexes are available. For more insight into the provided data, see related research article "Redox chemistry of bis(terpyridine)manganese(II) complexes - a molecular view" (Conradie, 2022).Entities:
Keywords: Bis(terpyridine)manganese; Broken symmetry; DFT; Jahn-Teller
Year: 2022 PMID: 35572795 PMCID: PMC9092895 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108221
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Scheme 1Bis(2,2’;6’2’’-terpyridine)manganese (1) and the series of 4’-substituted bis(2,2’;6’2’’-terpyridine)manganese complexes (2–6) of this study. Numbering of terpyridine ligands and notation used to distinguish between the Mn-N bonds, indicated.
Fig. 1Graphical presentation of the average B3LYP/6-311G(d,p)/def2tzvpp calculated (a) Mn-N bond lengths and (b) Mulliken spin population on the Mn and the ligands, in [Mn(tpy)2]n+ complexes (1)–(6) in different oxidation states (n = 1, 2, 3 and 4). See Scheme 1 for definition of bonds, L1 and L2.
Fig. 2The B3LYP/6-311G(d,p)/def2tzvpp optimized geometry of the indicated [Mn(tpy)3]n+ in different oxidation states (n = 1, 2, 3 and 4). Color scheme used for atoms (online version): Mn (purple), N (blue), C (black), Cl (green) and H (white) (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.).
Mn-N bond length data of mono-, bis-, tris- and tetra-cationic states of [Mn(tpy)2]n+ complexes (1)–(6).
| L1 | L2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mn-N bonds | distal1-L1 | distal2-L1 | central-L1 | distal1-L2 | distal2-L2 | central-L2 | |
| 1 | [Mn(tpy)2]n+ | 2.279 | 2.285 | 2.123 | 2.313 | 2.314 | 2.287 |
| 2 | [Mn(4′-Cl-tpy)2]n+ | 2.274 | 2.297 | 2.124 | 2.313 | 2.313 | 2.289 |
| 3 | [Mn(4′-OH-tpy)2]n+ | 2.199 | 2.362 | 2.164 | 2.321 | 2.318 | 2.276 |
| 4 | [Mn(4′-pyrr-tpy)2]n+ | 2.189 | 2.371 | 2.176 | 2.328 | 2.330 | 2.259 |
| 5 | [Mn(4′-Ph-tpy)2]n+ | 2.281 | 2.305 | 2.123 | 2.313 | 2.315 | 2.280 |
| 6 | [Mn(4′-(4-MePh)-tpy)2]n+ | 2.299 | 2.281 | 2.123 | 2.314 | 2.315 | 2.276 |
| average | 2.254 | 2.317 | 2.139 | 2.317 | 2.317 | 2.278 | |
| MAD | 0.040 | 0.033 | 0.021 | 0.005 | 0.004 | 0.007 | |
| 1 | [Mn(tpy)2]n+ | 2.299 | 2.299 | 2.241 | 2.299 | 2.299 | 2.241 |
| 2 | [Mn(4′-Cl-tpy)2]n+ | 2.300 | 2.301 | 2.243 | 2.301 | 2.300 | 2.243 |
| 3 | [Mn(4′-OH-tpy)2]n+ | 2.294 | 2.306 | 2.228 | 2.303 | 2.301 | 2.227 |
| 4 | [Mn(4′-pyrr-tpy)2]n+ | 2.302 | 2.321 | 2.226 | 2.302 | 2.321 | 2.226 |
| 5 | [Mn(4′-Ph-tpy)2]n+ | 2.297 | 2.318 | 2.251 | 2.294 | 2.320 | 2.252 |
| 6 | [Mn(4′-(4-MePh)-tpy)2]n+ | 2.301 | 2.302 | 2.230 | 2.301 | 2.301 | 2.230 |
| average | 2.299 | 2.308 | 2.236 | 2.300 | 2.307 | 2.236 | |
| MAD | 0.002 | 0.008 | 0.009 | 0.002 | 0.009 | 0.009 | |
| 1 | [Mn(tpy)2]n+ | 2.175 | 2.175 | 1.993 | 2.175 | 2.175 | 1.993 |
| 2 | [Mn(4′-Cl-tpy)2]n+ | 2.181 | 2.181 | 1.995 | 2.181 | 2.181 | 1.995 |
| 3 | [Mn(4′-OH-tpy)2]n+ | 2.190 | 2.190 | 1.989 | 2.162 | 2.163 | 1.978 |
| 4 | [Mn(4′-pyrr-tpy)2]n+ | 2.178 | 2.177 | 1.967 | 2.178 | 2.177 | 1.967 |
| 5 | [Mn(4′-Ph-tpy)2]n+ | 2.117 | 2.117 | 1.966 | 2.228 | 2.228 | 2.015 |
| 6 | [Mn(4′-(4-MePh)-tpy)2]n+ | 2.175 | 2.175 | 1.984 | 2.176 | 2.175 | 1.985 |
| average | 2.169 | 2.169 | 1.982 | 2.183 | 2.183 | 1.989 | |
| MAD | 0.017 | 0.017 | 0.010 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.012 | |
| 1 | [Mn(tpy)2]n+ | 2.022 | 2.022 | 1.941 | 2.022 | 2.022 | 1.941 |
| 2 | [Mn(4′-Cl-tpy)2]n+ | 2.022 | 2.021 | 1.938 | 2.022 | 2.022 | 1.938 |
| 3 | [Mn(4′-OH-tpy)2]n+ | 2.024 | 2.024 | 1.936 | 2.022 | 2.025 | 1.921 |
| 4 | [Mn(4′-pyrr-tpy)2]n+ | 2.024 | 2.024 | 1.904 | 2.024 | 2.024 | 1.904 |
| 5 | [Mn(4′-Ph-tpy)2]n+ | 2.022 | 2.022 | 1.925 | 2.022 | 2.021 | 1.925 |
| 6 | [Mn(4′-(4-MePh)-tpy)2]n+ | 2.022 | 2.022 | 1.921 | 2.022 | 2.022 | 1.921 |
| average | 2.023 | 2.022 | 1.927 | 2.022 | 2.023 | 1.925 | |
| MAD | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.011 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.010 | |
See Scheme 1 for definition of L1, L2 and different bonds.
MAD = mean absolute deviation.
Fig. 3The B3LYP/6-311G(d,p)/def2tzvpp spin density plots of the indicated [Mn(tpy)3]n+ in different oxidation states (n = 1, 2, 3 and 4). A contour 0.004 Åe−3 was used for the spin plots. Color scheme used for atoms (online version): Mn (purple), N (blue), C (black), Cl (green) and H (white) (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.).
Mulliken spin density population on Mn and the two ligands (L1 and L2) of mono-, bis-, tris- and tetra-cationic states of [Mn(tpy)2]n+ complexes (1)–(6).
| Mn | L1 | L2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [Mn(tpy)2]n+ | 4.747 | -0.825 | 0.078 |
| 2 | [Mn(4′-Cl-tpy)2]n+ | 4.749 | -0.827 | 0.078 |
| 3 | [Mn(4′-OH-tpy)2]n+ | 4.766 | -0.841 | 0.075 |
| 4 | [Mn(4′-pyrr-tpy)2]n+ | 4.770 | -0.843 | 0.073 |
| 5 | [Mn(4′-Ph-tpy)2]n+ | 4.753 | -0.831 | 0.078 |
| 6 | [Mn(4′-(4-MePh)-tpy)2]n+ | 4.752 | -0.830 | 0.078 |
| average | 4.756 | -0.833 | 0.077 | |
| MAD | 0.008 | 0.006 | 0.002 | |
| 1 | [Mn(tpy)2]n+ | 4.834 | 0.083 | 0.083 |
| 2 | [Mn(4′-Cl-tpy)2]n+ | 4.835 | 0.083 | 0.083 |
| 3 | [Mn(4′-OH-tpy)2]n+ | 4.832 | 0.084 | 0.084 |
| 4 | [Mn(4′-pyrr-tpy)2]n+ | 4.831 | 0.084 | 0.084 |
| 5 | [Mn(4′-Ph-tpy)2]n+ | 4.836 | 0.082 | 0.082 |
| 6 | [Mn(4′-(4-MePh)-tpy)2]n+ | 4.832 | 0.084 | 0.084 |
| average | 4.833 | 0.083 | 0.083 | |
| MAD | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.001 | |
| 1 | [Mn(tpy)2]n+ | 3.951 | 0.024 | 0.024 |
| 2 | [Mn(4′-Cl-tpy)2]n+ | 3.947 | 0.027 | 0.027 |
| 3 | [Mn(4′-OH-tpy)2]n+ | 3.930 | 0.053 | 0.017 |
| 4 | [Mn(4′-pyrr-tpy)2]n+ | 3.891 | 0.055 | 0.055 |
| 5 | [Mn(4′-Ph-tpy)2]n+ | 3.935 | -0.036 | 0.102 |
| 6 | [Mn(4′-(4-MePh)-tpy)2]n+ | 3.931 | 0.034 | 0.035 |
| average | 3.931 | 0.026 | 0.043 | |
| MAD | 0.014 | 0.021 | 0.023 | |
| 1 | [Mn(tpy)2]n+ | 3.143 | -0.071 | -0.071 |
| 2 | [Mn(4′-Cl-tpy)2]n+ | 3.109 | -0.054 | -0.055 |
| 3 | [Mn(4′-OH-tpy)2]n+ | 3.081 | -0.054 | -0.028 |
| 4 | [Mn(4′-pyrr-tpy)2]n+ | 2.753 | 0.123 | 0.123 |
| 5 | [Mn(4′-Ph-tpy)2]n+ | 3.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| 6 | [Mn(4′-(4-MePh)-tpy)2]n+ | 2.930 | 0.035 | 0.035 |
| average | 3.003 | -0.003 | 0.001 | |
| MAD | 0.108 | 0.056 | 0.052 | |
See Scheme 1 for definition of L1 and L2.
MAD = mean absolute deviation.
Fig. 4The B3LYP/6-311G(d,p)/def2tzvpp lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals of the indicated [Mn(tpy)3]n+ in different oxidation states (n = 1, 2, 3 and 4). A contour of 0.06 was used for the MO plots. Color scheme used for atoms (online version): Mn (purple), N (blue), C (black), Cl (green) and H (white) (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.).
Fig. 5The B3LYP/6-311G(d,p)/def2tzvpp highest occupied molecular orbitals of the indicated [Mn(tpy)3]n+ in different oxidation states (n = 1, 2, 3 and 4). A contour of 0.06 was used for the MO plots. Color scheme used for atoms (online version): Mn (purple), N (blue), C (black), Cl (green) and H (white). The dx2-dy2 Mn-based MO is stabilized for [MnII(tpy)(tpy)•]1+ of (4)–(6) (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.).
| Subject | Chemistry |
| Specific subject area | Physical and Theoretical Chemistry |
| Type of data | Table, Image, Graph, Figure |
| How the data were acquired | Geometry optimizations and electronic structure calculations were done using the quantum computational chemistry program Gaussian 16, Revision B.01. |
| Data format | Raw, Analyzed, Filtered |
| Description of data collection | DFT calculations were performed using the resources of the High-Performance Computing facility of the UFS, the CHPC of South Africa and the Norwegian Supercomputing UNINETT Sigma2 facility FRAM. |
| Data source location | University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa |
| Data accessibility | Output files of the DFT calculations, containing information on the optimized geometry, Mulliken spin populations and five frontier molecular orbitals (including HOMO and LUMO) are uploaded as four sets to the figshare data repository at the links: |
| Related research article | J. Conradie, Redox chemistry of bis(terpyridine)manganese(II) complexes – A molecular view, J. Electroanal. Chem. 913 (2022) 116,272. |