| Literature DB >> 35572411 |
Mohamed El-Boshy1,2, Aiman Alsaegh1, Ahmed H Qasem1, Ramya A Sindi1, Abdelghany H Abdelghany1,3, Hossam Gadalla2, Doha Reda2, Firas Azzeh4, Shakir Idris1, Jawwad Ahmad1, Bassem Refaat1.
Abstract
Introduction: Although the synthetic vitamin D analogue, Paricalcitol, and omega-3 Fatty acids (ω-3) alleviated diabetic nephropathy (DN), their combination was not previously explored.Entities:
Keywords: INOS; KIM-1; NGAL; TGF-β; Vitamin D
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35572411 PMCID: PMC9091913 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2021.08.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Res ISSN: 2090-1224 Impact factor: 12.822
Fig. 1Dynamics (mean ± SD) of body weight, fasting blood glucose (FBG), 24hr urine output, 24hr urine flow, urine creatinine (Cr) and urine total proteins concentrations in the different study groups before, during and following therapy (data is shown as mean ± SD; a = P < 0.05 compared with the same week in the NC group; b = P < 0.05 compared with the same week in the PC group; c = P < 0.05 compared with the same week in the Pcal group and d = P < 0.05 compared with the same week in the OM group).
Concentrations (mean ± SD) of serum fasting blood glucose (FBG), insulin, lipid profile, renal biochemical parameters, and calcium in the study groups at euthanasia (week-9 post treatment).
| NC group | PC group | Pcal Group | OM Group | P-OM group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBG (mmol/L)* | 4.6 ± 0.4 | 19.2 ± 2.8b | 12.9 ± 2.4b,d | 16.6 ± 1.9b,c | 9.7 ± 2.8b,d,e,h |
| Insulin (μU/mL)* | 28.9 ± 6.6 | 6.5 ± 1.7b | 11.4 ± 3b,c | 10.2 ± 3.5b,c | 15.9 ± 4.1b,d |
| Total Cholesterol (mmol/L)** | 1.62 ± 0.12 | 2.41 ± 0.13b | 2.06 ± 0.15b,d | 2.05 ± 0.17b,d | 1.8 ± 0.08a,d,f,h |
| LDL (mmol/L)** | 0.63 ± 0.09 | 1.75 ± 0.15b | 1.31 ± 0.16b,d | 1.37 ± 0.16b,d | 0.99 ± 0.1b,d,e,h |
| HDL (mmol/L)** | 0.88 ± 0.06 | 0.56 ± 0.05b | 0.67 ± 0.06b,d | 0.68 ± 0.08b,d | 0.77 ± 0.04b,d,e,g |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L)** | 0.81 ± 0.07 | 1.62 ± 0.1b | 1.31 ± 0.1b,d | 1.26 ± 0.06b,d | 0.97 ± 0.07b,d,f,h |
| Total protein (g/dL)** | 7.2 ± 1.1 | 4.8 ± 0.5b | 5.2 ± 0.6b | 4.8 ± 0.4b | 6.4 ± 0.6d,f,h |
| Albumin (g/dL)** | 4.3 ± 0.6 | 2.9 ± 0.3b | 3.1 ± 0.3b | 2.9 ± 0.2b | 3.9 ± 0.4d.f.h |
| Creatinine (mg/dL)* | 0.48 ± 0.06 | 1.1 ± 0.17b | 0.73 ± .12b,d | 0.72 ± 0.15b,d | 0.46 ± 0.07d,f,h |
| Urea (mg/dL)** | 35.8 ± 6.9 | 73.1 ± 11.9b | 54.8 ± 7.1b,d | 58.1 ± 7.1b,d | 44.4 ± 7.2d,e,h |
| Creatinine clearance (mL/min)** | 0.55 ± 0.12 | 0.28 ± 0.03b | 0.36 ± 0.06b | 0.37 ± 0.08b | 0.51 ± 0.08d,e,g |
| Ca2+ (mg/dL)** | 9.6 ± 0.4 | 9.3 ± 0.4 | 9.7 ± 0.5 | 9.6 ± 0.5 | 9.8 ± 0.4 |
* = Games-Howell post-hoc test was used following ANOVA to compare between the groups.
** = Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test was used following ANOVA to compare between the groups.
a = P < 0.05 compared with NC group b = P < 0.01 compared with NC group.
c = P < 0.05 compared with PC group d = P < 0.01 compared with PC group.
e = P < 0.05 compared with Pcal group f = P < 0.01 compared with Pcal group.
g = P < 0.05 compared with OM group h = P < 0.01 compared with OM group.
Fig. 2(a) Renal histological features by H&E together with the immunofluorescence co-localisation of apoptotic bodies by TUNEL’s technique (green) with cleaved Casp-3 (red) and counterstaining with DAPI in the renal tissue specimens from all the study groups (40 × objective; scale bar = 10 µm). Moreover, (b) the relative expression of Casp-3 mRNA and protein alongside apoptosis index in the renal tissues from all groups are displayed as graph bars (data is shown as mean ± SD; a = P < 0.05 compared with the NC group; b = P < 0.05 compared with the PC group, c = P < 0.05 compared with the Pcal group and d = P < 0.05 compared with the OM group).
Results of correlation analysis using Pearson’s test for renal apoptosis index in addition to the relative mRNA and protein expression of Casp-3 with the serum and urine concentrations of biochemical parameters at euthanasia (week-9 post treatment).
| Apoptosis index (%) | Relative Casp-3 mRNA expression | Relative Casp-3 protein expression | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) | 0.857* | 0.849* | 0.883* |
| Serum insulin (μU/mL) | −0.760* | −0.663* | −0.822* |
| Total Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 0.856* | 0.800* | 0.878* |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 0.886* | 0.811* | 0.927* |
| HDL (mmol/L) | −0.797* | −0.681* | −0.847* |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 0.915* | 0.797* | 0.917* |
| Serum creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.723* | 0.765* | 0.705* |
| Serum urea (mg/dL) | 0.805* | 0.695* | 0.824* |
| Serum total protein (g/dL) | −0.753* | −0.604* | −0.801* |
| 24hr Urine volume (ml) | 0.921* | 0.816* | 0.931* |
| 24hr urine creatinine (mg/dL) | −0.767* | −0.692* | −0.728* |
| 24hr Creatinine clearance (mL/min) | −0.739* | −0.602* | −0.724* |
| 24hr urine total protein (g/dL) | 0.937* | 0.786* | 0.923* |
* = P < 0.0001.
Fig. 3(a) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) localisation of TGF-β and iNOS in renal tissues (40 × objective; scale bar = 10 µm) alongside (b) their relative mRNA expression and IHC scores in the different study groups are displayed as graph bars (data is shown as mean ± SD; a = P < 0.05 compared with the NC group; b = P < 0.05 compared with the PC group, c = P < 0.05 compared with the Pcal group and d = P < 0.05 compared with the OM group).
Fig. 4(a) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) localisation of NGAL and KIM-1 in renal tissues (40 × objective; scale bar = 10 µm) alongside (b) their relative mRNA expression and IHC scores in the different study groups are displayed as graph bars (data is shown as mean ± SD; a = P < 0.05 compared with the NC group; b = P < 0.05 compared with the PC group, c = P < 0.05 compared with the Pcal group and d = P < 0.05 compared with the OM group).
Renal tissue Concentrations (mean ± SD) of cytokines and oxidative stress markers in the study groups at euthanasia (week-9 post treatment).
| NC group | NC group | PC Group | PCal Group | OM group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNF-α (pg/mL)* | 34.2 ± 5.3 | 105.9 ± 14.7 | 62.4 ± 19.1 | 75.3 ± 22.9 | 35.2 ± 7.4d,e,g |
| IL1β (pg/mL)** | 35.8 ± 9.6 | 274.1 ± 32.7 | 176.4 ± 32.6 | 231.5 ± 24.1 | 97.7 ± 28.6b,d,f,g |
| IL6 (pg/mL)** | 74.2 ± 17.8 | 2267 ± 37 | 203.8 ± 27.3 | 234.7 ± 22.4 | 91.3 ± 23.7d,f,g |
| IL10 (pg/mL)* | 50.4 ± 14.6 | 11.6 ± 2.9 | 29.6 ± 8.8 | 21.2 ± 3.3 | 42 ± 7.9d,e,g |
| GSH (mg/g)** | 41.9 ± 6.6 | 18.7 ± 7.7 | 29.6 ± 4.4 | 25.3 ± 5.4 | 38.6 ± 6.3d,e,f |
| SOD1 (U/g)** | 48.3 ± 6.2 | 26.6 ± 4.3 | 33.9 ± 3.8 | 30.8 ± 3.7 | 42.5 ± 3.6d,f,h |
| CAT (U/mg)** | 288 ± 19.4 | 194.4 ± 24.7 | 229.4 ± 27.9 | 225.7 ± 20.7 | 267.9 ± 20.6d,e,g |
| GPx1 (µg/mg)** | 4.6 ± 1.2 | 2.7 ± 0.9 | 3.5 ± 0.5 | 3.3 ± 0.4 | 4.1 ± 0.9d |
| GR (µg/mg)** | 26.4 ± 4.4 | 16.5 ± 4.2 | 20.2 ± 3.4 | 21.1 ± 4.5 | 22.6 ± 6.7 |
| MDA (nmol/g)** | 29.9 ± 5.1 | 60.9 ± 6.8 | 40.6 ± 7.4 | 49.1 ± 8.8 | 35.7 ± 5.6d,g |
| H2O2 (μM/g)* | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 71.1 ± 10.2 | 52.5 ± 6 | 61.8 ± 5.2 | 17.3 ± 5.4b,d,f,g |
| Protein Carbonyl groups (nmol/g)* | 0.42 ± 0.08 | 6.9 ± 0.35 | 4.66 ± 0.55 | 5.22 ± 0.43 | 2.23 ± 0.83b,d,f,g |
* = Games-Howell post-hoc test was used following ANOVA to compare between the groups.
** = Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test was used following ANOVA to compare between the groups.
TNF-α = Tumour necrosis factor-α IL1β = Interleukin-1β IL6 = Interleukin-6.
IL10 = Interleukin-10 GSH = Glutathione SOD1 = Superoxide dismutase 1.
CAT = Catalase GPx1 = Glutathione peroxidase-1 GR = Glutathione reductase.
MDA = Malondialdehyde H2O2 = Hydrogen peroxide.
a = P < 0.05 compared with NC group b = P < 0.01 compared with NC group c = P < 0.05 compared with PC group.
d = P < 0.01 compared with PC group e = P < 0.05 compared with Pcal group f = P < 0.01 compared with Pcal group.
g = P < 0.01 compared with OM group.