| Literature DB >> 32612375 |
Thuan Huynh Quang1,2, Minh Pham Nguyet3, Diep Pham Thao4, Minh Hoang Thi1,2, Lan Phuong Thi Dam1,2, Hang Ho Thi1,2, Anh Phan Van1,2, Thang Can Luong5, Mai Ngo Thi Tuyet2, Quy Dang Duy1,2, Binh Do Nhu1,2, Thuan Nghiem Duc1,2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was evaluating the early diagnostic value of two specific tubular markers neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) in diabetes nephropathy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study was carried in three groups of patients from 10/2017 to 10/2018 in Military Hospital 103. Group I included 30 healthy peoples with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and urine albumin creatinine ratio (uACR) <30 mg/g. Group II included 30 type 2 diabetic patients having uACR <30 mg/g, eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Group III included 30 type 2 diabetic patients having uACR >30 mg/g, eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2.Entities:
Keywords: albumin urine; diabetic kidney disease; urine albumin creatinin ratio
Year: 2020 PMID: 32612375 PMCID: PMC7322140 DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S258678
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes ISSN: 1178-7007 Impact factor: 3.168
Characteristic of the Population
| Group I (Healthy Control) (1) | Group II T2D with uARC < 30 mg/g (2) | Group III T2D with uACR ≥ 30 mg/g (3) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | 30 | 30 | 30 | |
| Age | 61.67 ± 10.07 | 63.03 ± 10.88 | 64.73 ± 6.13 | p1–2>0.05 |
| Duration of disease | – | 30 (100%) | 30 (100%) | |
| Plasma glucose (mmol/l) | 5.26 ± 0.78 | 9.71 ± 5.24* | 8.19 ± 2.66* | p < 0.05 |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.67 ± 0.26 | 7.38 ± 1.44* | 7.34 ± 1.51* | p < 0.05 |
| Plasma urea (mmol/L) | 5.45 ± 1.17 | 6.35 ± 1.26* | 6.37 ± 0.82* | p < 0.05 |
| Plasma creatinine (µmol/L) | 77.30 ± 12.89 | 86.29 ± 19.24 | 84.26 ± 21.49 | p1–2>0.05 |
| eGFR | 88.73 ± 14.93 | 73.07 ± 12.35* | 75.10 ±14.79* | p < 0.05 |
Notes: Values were represented as mean ± SD, *Significantly different from group I (healthy control) (p <0.05).
Abbreviations: uACR, urine albumin creatinin ratio; T2D, type 2 diabetes; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration.
Urine Albumin, Urine Creatinine, Urine Albumin Creatinine Ratio of the Subjects
| Group II uACR < 30 mg/g (n=30) (3) | Group III uACR ≥ 30 mg/g (n=30) (2) | Group I (n= 30) (1) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albuminurin (mg/l) | 15.08 ± 3.23 | 73.73 ± 68.62 | 4.12 ± 3.86 | p1–2 < 0.05* |
| Urinary creatinine (g/l) | 0.96 ± 0.29 | 0.89 ± 0.29 | 1.35 ± 0.59 | p1–2 > 0.05 |
| uACR | 16.65 ± 4.87 | 84.67 ± 58.63 | 3.49 ± 3.14 | p1–2 < 0.05* |
Note: *Statistically significant difference between the groups.
Figure 1Concentration of urine KIM-1.
Notes: The concentration of KIM-1 in urine increased from healthy control to diabetes groups. The group II was significantly higher than group I and group III had the highest concentration. P-values in Mann–Whitney test were showed in figure.
Figure 2Concentration of urine NGAL.
Notes: The concentration of urine NGAL increased from group I to III. The differences between groups were significant. Mann–Whitney test was used to compare two groups and calculate p value.
Figure 3ROC curves analysis of NGAL, KIM-1, NGAL/Cr, KIM-1/Cr in diabetes patients with nephropathy group versus diabetes patients without nephropathy group.
Notes: Receiver operating characteristic curves for urine markers for diagnosing nephropathy in T2D: (A) Urinary KIM-1 with AUC=0.576; (B) Urinary KIM-1/creatinine (uKIM-1/Cr) with AUC= 0.68; (C) Urinary NGAL with AUC = 0.692; (D) Urinary NGAL/creatinine (uNGAL/Cr) with AUC = 0.697.
Abbreviations: uKIM-1, urinary KIM-1; uKIM-1/Cr, urinary KIM-1/Creatinin; uNGAL, urinary NGAL; uNGAL/Cr, urinary NGAL/Creatinin.
Diagnostic Values of All Markers
| Variables | Cut-Off Value | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|
| KIM-1 (pg/mL) | >174.95 | 62.37 | 73.48 |
| NGAL (ng/mL) | >35.30 | 60.45 | 70.37 |
| KIM-1/Creatinine (pg/g) | >182.06 | 59.46 | 75.69 |
| NGAL/Creatinine (ng/g) | >44.39 | 57.29 | 69.75 |
Note: The sensitivity and specificity were calculated based on the cut-off values.
The Correlations Between Some Characteristic to KIM-1 and NGAL
| KIM-1 | NGAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | r | P | r | |
| Age | >0.05 | 0.05 | ||
| BMI | >0.05 | −0.16 | >0.05 | −0.12 |
| Glucose | >0.05 | −0.05 | >0.05 | −0.05 |
| Urea | >0.05 | −0.09 | >0.05 | −0.20 |
| Creatinine | > 0.05 | −0.15 | >0.05 | −0.07 |
| HbA1c | >0.05 | −0.07 | >0.05 | −0.24 |
| Cholesterol | >0.05 | −0.04 | >0.05 | −0.18 |
| HDL-C | >0.05 | 0.07 | >0.05 | −0.05 |
| LDL-C | >0.05 | 0.05 | >0.05 | −0.11 |
| Triglyceride | >0.05 | 0.16 | >0.05 | −0.28 |
| uACR | ||||
Notes: The bold value showed the variables had correlation to markers with p <0.05. NGAL had correlation to ages and uACR. KIM-1 only had correlation to uACR. r, Pearson correlation coefficient; P-value: correlation is significant at 0.05.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1 concentration; HDL-C, HDL-cholesterol; LDL-C, LDL-cholesterol; uACR, urine albumin creatinin ratio.
Figure 4The correlation between NGAL and KIM-1.
Notes: r, p-value with pearson correlation between urine NGAL and urine KIM-1 were showed on the figure.