| Literature DB >> 35572292 |
Liangdong Lu1, Weijian Jiang1, Jia Xu1, Fei Wang2.
Abstract
The COVID-19 outbreak has been a public health crisis of international concern, causing huge impact on people's lives. As an important part of social public crisis management, how to quickly and effectively raise resources to participate in emergency relief in the era of self-media is a common challenge faced by global charitable organizations. This article attempts to use empirical evidence from Tencent charitable crowdfunding platform, the largest charitable crowdfunding platform in China, to answer this question. We consider 205 COVID-19 charitable projects and 11,177,249 donors to assess the process by which non-profit organizations raise funds through the information about project descriptions. Based on the effects of information and emotional framing, we explore the effects of the readability (i.e., complexity and understandability) and negative tone of the project description on fundraising amount. We then investigate the mediating role of forwarding times, as affective response to the text might explain forwarding times, which in turn affects money raised by increasing the visibility of the campaign. On this basis, the moderating role of recipient's crisis involvement is tested during this process. The empirical results indicate that the complexity of the description will reduce the fundraising amount, while understandability and negative tone help to improve it. Furthermore, we found that forwarding times played an important mediating role in this process. Then the buffer effect of crisis involvement on the negative effect of complexity was validated, and its amplification on the positive effects of understandability was also verified.Entities:
Keywords: charitable crowdfunding; content analysis; crisis involvement; framing effect; information processing
Year: 2022 PMID: 35572292 PMCID: PMC9093684 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.845198
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1Statistical information of charitable fundraising projects on Tencent and Media reports on web and social media.
FIGURE 2Conceptual framework.
Statistics of charitable fundraising projects.
| Fundraising goal (10 thousand yuan) | Number of projects | Completion rate (%) |
| No clear goal | 43 | – |
| [1–10) | 9 | 30.47 |
| [10–50) | 39 | 23.77 |
| [50–100) | 20 | 20.53 |
| [100–500) | 83 | 40.65 |
| [500–1000) | 27 | 64.78 |
| [1000–3000] | 25 | 66.80 |
| 11000 | 1 | 100.00 |
| 75000 | 1 | 0.02 |
FIGURE 3The function of “donate together”.
Measurement of variables.
| Variable name | Measurement |
| 1. Fundraising amount (FA) | The total fundraising amount of the project by March 31, 2020. |
| 2. Readability |
|
|
| |
| 3. Negative tone |
|
| 4. Forwarding times | Log 10 (the number of donors who initiated “donate together”+1) |
| 5. Crisis involvement |
|
| Where Mi is the cumulative number of confirmed COVID-19 cases from the previous day in the province when the donor target | |
| 6. Fundraising target | Log 10 (the amount initiator seeks to raise) |
| 7. Clear deadline | 1 = Deadline is marked on the page; 0 = Deadline is not marked on the page |
| 8. Description length | Log10 (the number of words contained in project description) |
| 9. Images | Log 10 (the number of images embedded in the project description+1) |
| 10. Plan length | Log 10 (the number of words contained in project plan+1) |
| 11. Initiator experience | Log 10 (the number of projects created by the initiator in the last year+1) |
| 12. Executive expertise | Log 10 (the number of projects successfully executed by the executive in the last year+1) |
| 13. Recommended times | The number of times it was set to “Recommend Items Today” by the platform |
| 14. Other projects | Log 10 (the number of other projects initiated that day+1) |
| 15. Total confirmed cases nationwide |
|
| Where | |
| 16. Total recovered cases nationwide |
|
| Where | |
| 17. Total death cases nationwide |
|
| Where | |
| 18. Media reports |
|
| Where Mediai is the cumulative number of reports online (including the Web and Social media — Sina Blog and Weichat) from the previous day nationwide when the donor |
Estimation results of the mediation effect model.
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 |
| (Constant) | 1.761 | 1.627 | 1.108 |
| RC | −0.138 | −0.098 | −0.099 |
| RU | 0.155 | 0.221 | 0.066 |
| NT | 0.398 | 0.407 | 0.234 |
| FT | 0.402 | ||
| CV | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled |
|
| 0.439 | 0.483 | 0.528 |
| Adj | 0.436 | 0.479 | 0.523 |
| F-statistics | 112.36 | 133.97 | 120.07 |
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Estimated results of the moderated mediation effect model.
| Variables | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 |
| (Constant) | 1.531 | 3.318 | 0.316 |
| RC | −0.153 | −0.058 | −0.141 |
| RU | 0.125 | 0.029 | 0.119 |
| NT | 0.601 | 0.188 | 0.562 |
| CI | 0.111 | 0.417 | 0.024 |
| FT | 0.208 | ||
| RCCI | 0.046 | 0.012 | 0.046 |
| RUCI | 0.051 | 0.046 | 0.050 |
| NTCI | –0.070 | 0.053 | –0.097 |
| FTCI | 0.019 | ||
| CV | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled |
|
| 0.456 | 0.507 | 0.544 |
| Adj | 0.447 | 0.499 | 0.534 |
| F-statistics | 51.07 | 62.77 | 56.31 |
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
FIGURE 4(A) Interaction of complexity and crisis involvement on forwarding times. (B) Interaction of understandability and crisis involvement on forwarding times.
FIGURE 5(A) Interaction of complexity and crisis involvement on fundraising amount. (B) Interaction of understandability and crisis involvement on fundraising amount.