Literature DB >> 14717627

Discrete emotions and persuasion: the role of emotion-induced expectancies.

David DeSteno1, Richard E Petty, Derek D Rucker, Duane T Wegener, Julia Braverman.   

Abstract

The authors argue that specific emotions can alter the persuasive impact of messages as a function of the emotional framing of persuasive appeals. Because specific emotions inflate expectancies for events possessing matching emotional overtones (D. DeSteno, R. E. Petty, D. T. Wegener, & D. D. Rucker, 2000), the authors predicted that attempts at persuasion would be more successful when messages were framed with emotional overtones matching the emotional state of the receiver and that these changes would be mediated by emotion-induced biases involving expectancies attached to arguments contained in the messages. Two studies manipulating discrete negative emotional states and message frames (i.e., sadness and anger) confirmed these predictions. The functioning of this emotion-matching bias in parallel with emotion-induced processing differences and the limitations of a valence-based approach to the study of attitude change are also considered.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14717627     DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  13 in total

1.  Anger suppression, ironic processes and pain.

Authors:  Phillip J Quartana; K Lira Yoon; John W Burns
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2007-08-22

2.  Risk Taking Under the Influence: A Fuzzy-Trace Theory of Emotion in Adolescence.

Authors:  Susan E Rivers; Valerie F Reyna; Britain Mills
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2008-03

Review 3.  Anger inhibition and pain: conceptualizations, evidence and new directions.

Authors:  John W Burns; Phillip J Quartana; Stephen Bruehl
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2008-05-23

4.  Neural Mechanisms of Emotion Regulation Moderate the Predictive Value of Affective and Value-Related Brain Responses to Persuasive Messages.

Authors:  Bruce P Doré; Steven H Tompson; Matthew B O'Donnell; Lawrence C An; Victor Strecher; Emily B Falk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Affective science perspectives on cancer control: strategically crafting a mutually beneficial research agenda.

Authors:  Rebecca A Ferrer; Paige A Green; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-05

6.  Of Mice and Men: Natural Kinds of Emotions in the Mammalian Brain? A Response to Panksepp and Izard.

Authors:  Lisa Feldman Barrett; Kristen A Lindquist; Eliza Bliss-Moreau; Seth Duncan; Maria Gendron; Jennifer Mize; Lauren Brennan
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-09

7.  Syllogisms delivered in an angry voice lead to improved performance and engagement of a different neural system compared to neutral voice.

Authors:  Kathleen W Smith; Laura-Lee Balkwill; Oshin Vartanian; Vinod Goel
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Weekly Fluctuations in Risk Tolerance and Voting Behaviour.

Authors:  Jet G Sanders; Rob Jenkins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluating the Feasibility of Continuing Medical Education for Disseminating Emerging Science on the Breast Cancer and Environment Connection.

Authors:  Brandon M Walling; Daniel Totzkay; Kami J Silk; Josephine K Boumis; Brandon Thomas; Sandi Smith
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2021-07-22

10.  Exploring physiologic reactions to persuasive information.

Authors:  Hanne A A Spelt; Luisa Asta; Els T Kersten-van Dijk; Jaap Ham; Wijnand A IJsselsteijn; Joyce H D M Westerink
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 4.348

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.