The surface processes that control crystal growth from solution can be probed in real-time by in situ microscopy. However, when mass transport (partly) limits growth, the interfacial solution conditions are difficult to determine, precluding quantitative measurement. Here, we demonstrate the use of a thermodynamic feature of crystal surfaces-the critical step length-to convey the local supersaturation, allowing the surface-controlled kinetics to be obtained. Applying this method to atomic force microscopy measurements of calcite, which are shown to fall within the regime of mixed surface/transport control, unites calcite step velocities with the Kossel-Stranski model, resolves disparities between growth rates measured under different mass transport conditions, and reveals why the Gibbs-Thomson effect in calcite departs from classical theory. Our approach expands the scope of in situ microscopy by decoupling quantitative measurement from the influence of mass transport.
The surface processes that control crystal growth from solution can be probed in real-time by in situ microscopy. However, when mass transport (partly) limits growth, the interfacial solution conditions are difficult to determine, precluding quantitative measurement. Here, we demonstrate the use of a thermodynamic feature of crystal surfaces-the critical step length-to convey the local supersaturation, allowing the surface-controlled kinetics to be obtained. Applying this method to atomic force microscopy measurements of calcite, which are shown to fall within the regime of mixed surface/transport control, unites calcite step velocities with the Kossel-Stranski model, resolves disparities between growth rates measured under different mass transport conditions, and reveals why the Gibbs-Thomson effect in calcite departs from classical theory. Our approach expands the scope of in situ microscopy by decoupling quantitative measurement from the influence of mass transport.
The surface of a crystal growing
from solution can be inspected by in situ microscopy
to determine the rates and mechanisms of growth,[1−4] as well as the kinetic and thermodynamic
effects of additives.[5−8] These experimental techniques advance our basic understanding of
crystallization and inform our efforts to control it, e.g. in the
pursuit of new nanomaterials[9] and growth
inhibitors.[10] However, in situ measurements are difficult to interpret when the solution conditions
at the surface of the crystal are unknown. This situation can arise
when a crystal depletes the surrounding solutes to produce a concentration
gradient with a surface supersaturation that deviates from the bulk
value. Under this regime of mixed surface/transport control, the surface
processes become sensitive to variables that influence mass transport.
For example, the distribution, and therefore the history, of steps
across the crystal surface will affect the rate of solute depletion;
confinement[11] and probe geometry[12] can impact convective transport; impurities
can yield kinetic effects with nonmonotonic flow rate dependencies;[13] and mixed control coupled with stochastic step
production can drive kinetic instabilities.[14] Complicated processes may therefore conceal the surface supersaturation.In this work, we identify the critical step length (defined below)
as a readily measurable surface feature that can immediately reveal
the interfacial solution conditions by functioning as a yardstick
for the local supersaturation. We demonstrate how this feature can
be used to recover the true surface-controlled kinetics of a growing
crystal by analyzing atomic force microscopy (AFM) data for calcite
(CaCO3) published across a series of seminal papers.[1−3] These particular data were chosen because they include the most
comprehensive set of critical length measurements available but also
because of the broad importance of calcium carbonate, both in the
real world and as a rich model system. While the significance of mass
transport is well-established in the context of calcite dissolution,[15] its importance to calcite growth has hitherto
been downplayed by the crystal growth community. It will be shown
that flow-through AFM studies of calcite growth are significantly
limited by mass transport and that accounting for this effect can
bridge the gap between experimental observation and basic models of
crystal growth.In situ AFM is usually performed
within a fluid
cell where a flowing solution replenishes the solutes consumed by
the growing crystal. Increasing the flow rate diminishes the concentration
boundary layer until the reaction becomes limited by the surface kinetics.
In practice, this state of surface control is purportedly achieved
once the step velocities have lost their flow rate dependence.[16] However, owing to the complex hydrodynamics
of experimental systems, flow rate dependencies can become too weak
to be resolved even far from conditions of surface control.[17−19] We have demonstrated this with a finite element analysis of the
AFM apparatus in refs (1−3), where solutes
were transported by convection and diffusion through a fluid cell
containing a growing crystal of calcite and a probe (Figure a). Flux boundary conditions
at the crystal surface approximated the experimental crystal growth
rates, and the degree of mass transport to a microscopic scan area
on the crystal surface was characterized by a boundary layer thickness
δ as a function of the flow rate u (δ
≈ 418u–0.27 μm where u is in mL/h, Figure b). In the AFM experiments, the step velocities were reported
to exhibit flow rate independence across 30 ≲ u ≲ 40 mL/h.[16] For comparison, the
surface supersaturation in the model changed by 3% across this flow
range, which is too small to be resolved by AFM measurements of the
step velocity, and yet the surface supersaturation deviated substantially
from the bulk (Figure a).
Figure 1
Finite element model of an AFM fluid cell. (a) A rhombohedral calcite
crystal (2 mm in width), AFM support chip, and the base of a fluid
cell are shown. The colors represent the supersaturation across the
surfaces, and the streamlines show the passage of flow between the
inlet and outlet. The flow rate is 30 mL/h. (b) Dependence of boundary
layer thickness on solution flow rate in the finite element model,
evaluated in a region of the crystal surface under the AFM tip (circles).
The line is a power law fit.
Finite element model of an AFM fluid cell. (a) A rhombohedral calcite
crystal (2 mm in width), AFM support chip, and the base of a fluid
cell are shown. The colors represent the supersaturation across the
surfaces, and the streamlines show the passage of flow between the
inlet and outlet. The flow rate is 30 mL/h. (b) Dependence of boundary
layer thickness on solution flow rate in the finite element model,
evaluated in a region of the crystal surface under the AFM tip (circles).
The line is a power law fit.The true supersaturation at the crystal surface in the AFM experiments
can be revealed by examining the surface thermodynamics. A step segment
on the surface of a crystal is propelled forward by a chemical potential
driving force, where each new ionic row reduces the free energy by
an amount proportional to the step length. Resisting this step advance
is the free energy cost of extending the length of the two orthogonally
adjacent steps. It follows that a finite critical step length L exists at which these competing
effects balance and the step velocity vanishes,where a = 0.32 nm is the
lattice spacing of a single ion in calcite, ϕ is the average
step free energy per ion, k is Boltzmann’s constant, T is the
temperature, and Ssurf is the supersaturation
at the surface of the crystal. We distinguish Ssurf from the bulk value , where aCa and are the ion activities in bulk
solution
and Ksp is the solubility product of calcite.
In crystals that exhibit crystallographically nonequivalent step types,
such as the acute and obtuse steps of calcite, each step type will
have a distinct stability, and this stability will be reflected in
the thermodynamic driving force for growth that underpins L. In particular, eq will correspond to the critical
length of the least stable step type—the obtuse step in the
case of calcite.[16] This perspective of
nonequivalent step types conflicts with previous accounts, and we
explain it in the Supporting Information.Critical lengths are manifested at screw dislocations and
in the
two-dimensional nucleation of islands.[1,20,21] For calcite, L has been directly measured by observing the motion of nascent
step segments nucleated at screw dislocations.[1] However, we focus here on ref (2), where the critical lengths were not directly measured,
but where they can be inferred geometrically from the reported step
velocities and terrace widths (circles in Figure a). For calcite grown under surface control
(Ssurf = Sbulk), the critical lengths should follow the blue line in Figure a, which is a plot of eq with a step free energy
ϕ = 3kT.[22] However, the experimental
results are an order of magnitude too large. This discrepancy between
experiment and theory, which has been noted previously,[23] indicates that the supersaturation at the surface
must have been substantially lower than in the bulk, in agreement
with our finite element analysis.
Figure 2
AFM calcite kinetics recalibrated against
the surface supersaturation.
(a) The theoretical relationship between L and Ssurf (eq ) is shown by the blue line. AFM-derived
measurements of L (red
circles) are larger, reflecting the differences between Sbulk and Ssurf. The measurements
are consistent with a steady state correlation (red line) after substantial
surface reconstruction, achieved in this case only for large supersaturations.
(b) Obtuse step velocities from AFM (red circles) recalibrated against Ssurf (blue circles). The lines are drawn to
guide the eye. See the Supporting Information for the acute step velocities. (c) Normal growth rate (red circles)
recalibrated against Ssurf (blue circles).
The line is a theoretical fit. (a–c) All AFM measurements (circles)
have been reproduced from ref (2). The yellow arrows depict, for a single datum, the procedure
of using L to map from Sbulk to Ssurf.
AFM calcite kinetics recalibrated against
the surface supersaturation.
(a) The theoretical relationship between L and Ssurf (eq ) is shown by the blue line. AFM-derived
measurements of L (red
circles) are larger, reflecting the differences between Sbulk and Ssurf. The measurements
are consistent with a steady state correlation (red line) after substantial
surface reconstruction, achieved in this case only for large supersaturations.
(b) Obtuse step velocities from AFM (red circles) recalibrated against Ssurf (blue circles). The lines are drawn to
guide the eye. See the Supporting Information for the acute step velocities. (c) Normal growth rate (red circles)
recalibrated against Ssurf (blue circles).
The line is a theoretical fit. (a–c) All AFM measurements (circles)
have been reproduced from ref (2). The yellow arrows depict, for a single datum, the procedure
of using L to map from Sbulk to Ssurf.Once the role of mass transport is recognized,
the experimental
dependence of L on Sbulk becomes straightforward to interpret. When
a crystal is first exposed to a fresh solution, its surface will reconstruct
in response. However, it takes time for the new step trains to spread
from the dislocation sources across the surface. If sufficient time
is allowed for large-scale reconstruction, then L will converge to a steady state curve
with a dependence on (ln Sbulk)−1 that is nonlinear due to the feedback loop between surface structure
and Ssurf (red line in Figure a); if only partial reconstruction
is achieved, then L will
depend on the stochastic history of the surface (see the low supersaturation
points in Figure a);
and if negligible reconstruction occurs across a series of distinct
solution conditions, then L will display a linear dependence on (ln Sbulk)−1, but the function will be notably
offset from the origin such that L extrapolates to zero at (precisely as observed in the
direct measurements
of L(1)). See the Supporting Information for a mathematical treatment of these cases.Irrespective
of the surface structure, even far from steady state,
the critical length only depends on the prevailing surface supersaturation,
and so Ssurf can always be computed from
the measured critical length using eq . The true saturation state associated with any measurement x, such as a step velocity, may also be recovered from L as long as the locales of x and L are
similar enough to experience an identical solution environment (we
estimate that points within ∼10 μm can be assumed to
share a solution environment for AFM studies of calcite). In other
words, L allows a nominal
measurement (Sbulk, x) to be decoupled from solute transport and mapped to its surface-controlled
analogue (Ssurf, x).
Applying this technique to the kinetic data from ref (2) immediately solves two
fundamental problems in calcite kinetics.First, basic growth
theory contends that the step velocities of
a Kossel crystal should scale as ∼(Ssurf – 1) at low supersaturation, owing to the statistical independence
of attachment and detachment events. This contrasts with the observations
of ref (2), which exhibit
a nonlinear dependence on Sbulk, with
a linear segment that is offset from the saturation point (red circles
in Figure b). These
nonlinearities, discussed further in ref (3), have motivated investigations into non-Kossel
kinetic models.[24] However, recognizing
that Ssurf and Sbulk are different due to mixed surface/transport control,
the step velocities can be recalibrated as a function of Ssurf, revealing a linear dependence consistent with the
Kossel–Stranski model (blue circles in Figure b).Second, a recent microfluidic study[25] measured the normal growth rate of calcite to
be 2 orders of magnitude
faster than AFM[2] under nominally similar
conditions. The authors speculated that mass transport may have limited
growth in the AFM experiments. Indeed, using the critical length to
recalibrate the growth rates against Ssurf yields surface-controlled rates that are 2 orders of magnitude faster
(Figure c), bringing
the AFM and microfluidic measurements to within a factor of ∼4.Mixed surface/transport control can also have subtle kinetic consequences.
The dependence of step velocity v(L) on the step segment length L remains an outstanding
problem in basic growth theory.[26] In extreme
cases of mass transport control, as well as for high kink density
crystals, the step velocity satisfies the length dependence , which we
shall refer to as the Gibbs–Thomson
rule.[20] This rule is widely applied, often
beyond the conditions for which it was derived. However, highly polygonal
crystals with an interkink spacing comparable to the thermodynamic
critical length may fail to satisfy the fluctuation–dissipation
theorem, resulting in a critical length much larger than the thermodynamic
prediction and, significantly, a step velocity that rises abruptly
beyond this kinetically determined critical length.[27] Calcite has been likened to these extremely low kink density
crystals, with the suggestion that it too fails to implement the fluctuation–dissipation
theorem.[26,28] However, we have already shown that the
unexpectedly large critical lengths of calcite can be attributed to
mixed surface/transport control, and we argue that its abrupt step
velocity profile v(L) can be similarly
ascribed. Using kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) simulation, we have computed v(L) for a calcite-like Kossel crystal
for cases representative of surface control (Ssurf = Sbulk) and mixed surface/transport
control (Ssurf ≪ Sbulk). The case of surface control was consistent with
the Gibbs–Thomson rule, while mixed control was consistent
with AFM to within a trivial normalization error (Figure ). For calcite, the rapid rise
in velocity with step length is therefore a consequence of the low
surface supersaturation (large critical length) that characterizes
mixed control.
Figure 3
Step velocity dependence on step length. The AFM measurements
were
taken from ref (1) and
span 1.19 ≤ Sbulk ≤ 1.51.
KMC simulations that are representative of surface-controlled growth
(Ssurf = Sbulk = 1.51) are consistent with the Gibbs–Thomson rule, which
deviates significantly from AFM. By contrast, KMC simulations that
are representative of mixed kinetic control (Ssurf = 1.043, derived from the critical length corresponding
to the Sbulk = 1.51 AFM measurement) are
more consistent with the AFM velocity profile.
Step velocity dependence on step length. The AFM measurements
were
taken from ref (1) and
span 1.19 ≤ Sbulk ≤ 1.51.
KMC simulations that are representative of surface-controlled growth
(Ssurf = Sbulk = 1.51) are consistent with the Gibbs–Thomson rule, which
deviates significantly from AFM. By contrast, KMC simulations that
are representative of mixed kinetic control (Ssurf = 1.043, derived from the critical length corresponding
to the Sbulk = 1.51 AFM measurement) are
more consistent with the AFM velocity profile.In conclusion, if the conditions at a crystal/solution interface
are unknown, then the information provided by in situ microscopy is, at best, underutilized. At worst, the observations
can be misinterpreted if surface control is wrongly assumed, e.g.
based on the weak dependence of mass transport on flow rate, as we
have demonstrated for AFM studies of calcite. In particular, the effects
of mass transport can be mistaken for non-Kossel kinetics or a failure
of thermodynamics. However, when the critical step length can be established,
the transport effects—including the complexities of surface
history—can be straightforwardly accommodated. For this reason,
we advocate that future in situ studies of crystal
growth under mixed surface/transport control be accompanied by sufficient
data to recover the corresponding critical lengths. In some crystal
systems, the critical length would first need to be characterized
before our technique could be applied. It is encouraging that many
further problems in the field of crystal growth theory may be readily
solved upon correcting for mass transport in this way. For example,
the dependence of calcite kinetics on solution stoichiometry has proven
difficult to reconcile with theory.[29,30] Significantly,
the existing analysis has neglected mass transport, and so this problem
is a candidate for a similar treatment.
Authors: M P Andersson; S Dobberschütz; K K Sand; D J Tobler; J J De Yoreo; S L S Stipp Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2016-08-17 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Robert Darkins; Yi-Yeoun Kim; David C Green; Alexander Broad; Dorothy M Duffy; Fiona C Meldrum; Ian J Ford Journal: Cryst Growth Des Date: 2022-05-30 Impact factor: 4.010
Authors: Alexander Broad; Robert Darkins; Dorothy M Duffy; Ian J Ford Journal: J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces Date: 2022-09-13 Impact factor: 4.177