Literature DB >> 35571598

Norwegian judges' knowledge of factors affecting eyewitness testimony: a 12-year follow-up.

Ludvig Daae Bjørndal1, Lucy McGill2, Svein Magnussen1, Stéphanie Richardson3, Renan Saraiva4, Marie Stadel5, Tim Brennen1.   

Abstract

Eyewitness evidence often plays a critical role in decisions made in the criminal justice system. To evaluate eyewitness testimony accurately, judges must be aware of factors that can contaminate this type of evidence. In 2008, a survey of judges in Norway revealed a lack of awareness of several factors that affect eyewitness testimony. In the current study, a survey was administered to Norwegian judges (N=98) to evaluate their knowledge of factors that affect eyewitness testimony. Results showed that judges' overall knowledge scores were similar to those reported in 2008, but substantial increases and decreases in knowledge were observed for specific factors. Additional analyses indicated that increased uncertainty regarding some eyewitness factors led to a decline in accuracy when compared to responses observed in 2008. The current study provides an updated assessment of judges' knowledge of eyewitness factors and highlights the need for more comprehensive training for judges regarding these factors.
© 2020 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law.

Entities:  

Keywords:  estimator variables; eyewitness testimony; judges; survey; system variables

Year:  2020        PMID: 35571598      PMCID: PMC9103262          DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1837028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law        ISSN: 1321-8719


  22 in total

1.  The effects of peer review and evidence quality on judge evaluations of psychological science: are judges effective gatekeepers?

Authors:  M B Kovera; B D McAuliff
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2000-08

2.  The man behind the mask: accuracy and predictors of eyewitness offender descriptions.

Authors:  Ivar A Fahsing; Karl Ask; Pär Anders Granhag
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2004-08

3.  After 30 years, what do we know about what jurors know? A meta-analytic review of lay knowledge regarding eyewitness factors.

Authors:  Sarah L Desmarais; J Don Read
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2011-06

4.  Eyewitness testimony: tracing the beliefs of Swedish legal professionals.

Authors:  Pär Anders Granhag; Leif A Strömwall; Maria Hartwig
Journal:  Behav Sci Law       Date:  2005

5.  Are the "memory wars" over? A scientist-practitioner gap in beliefs about repressed memory.

Authors:  Lawrence Patihis; Lavina Y Ho; Ian W Tingen; Scott O Lilienfeld; Elizabeth F Loftus
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-12-13

6.  Expert testimony on eyewitness evidence: in search of common sense.

Authors:  Kate A Houston; Lorraine Hope; Amina Memon; J Don Read
Journal:  Behav Sci Law       Date:  2013-09-03

7.  Why it is scientifically respectable to believe in repression: a response to Patihis, Ho, Tingen, Lilienfeld, and Loftus (2014).

Authors:  Chris R Brewin; Bernice Andrews
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-08-18

Review 8.  Rethinking the Reliability of Eyewitness Memory.

Authors:  John T Wixted; Laura Mickes; Ronald P Fisher
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-05

9.  Stress, stress-induced cortisol responses, and eyewitness identification performance.

Authors:  Melanie Sauerland; Linsey H C Raymaekers; Henry Otgaar; Amina Memon; Thijs T Waltjen; Maud Nivo; Chiel Slegers; Nick J Broers; Tom Smeets
Journal:  Behav Sci Law       Date:  2016-07-15

Review 10.  An examination of the causes and solutions to eyewitness error.

Authors:  Richard A Wise; Giuseppe Sartori; Svein Magnussen; Martin A Safer
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 4.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.