Literature DB >> 25134717

Why it is scientifically respectable to believe in repression: a response to Patihis, Ho, Tingen, Lilienfeld, and Loftus (2014).

Chris R Brewin1, Bernice Andrews2.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25134717     DOI: 10.1177/0956797614541856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Norwegian judges' knowledge of factors affecting eyewitness testimony: a 12-year follow-up.

Authors:  Ludvig Daae Bjørndal; Lucy McGill; Svein Magnussen; Stéphanie Richardson; Renan Saraiva; Marie Stadel; Tim Brennen
Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law       Date:  2020-12-07

2.  False Memories and Free Speech: Is Scientific Debate Being Suppressed?

Authors:  Bernice Andrews; Chris R Brewin
Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-10-14

3.  Creating Memories for False Autobiographical Events in Childhood: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chris R Brewin; Bernice Andrews
Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-04-08

4.  Belief in Unconscious Repressed Memory Persists.

Authors:  Henry Otgaar; Mark L Howe; Olivier Dodier; Scott O Lilienfeld; Elizabeth F Loftus; Steven Jay Lynn; Harald Merckelbach; Lawrence Patihis
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-03

5.  Tilting at Windmills: Why Attacks on Repression Are Misguided.

Authors:  Chris R Brewin
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-08-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.