| Literature DB >> 35571026 |
Jessica Buthmann1, Dennis Huang2, Patrizia Casaccia3, Sarah O'Neill2,4, Yoko Nomura3,5, Jia Liu3.
Abstract
Maternal stress during pregnancy exerts long-term effects on the mental well-being of the offspring. However, the long-term effect of prenatal exposure on the offspring's mental status is only partially understood. The placenta plays a vital role in connecting the maternal side to the fetus, thereby serving as an important interface between maternal exposure and fetal development. Here, we profiled the placental transcriptome of women who were pregnant during a hurricane (Superstorm Sandy), which struck New York City in 2012. The offspring were followed longitudinally and their temperament was assessed during the first 6-12 months of age. The data identified a significant correlation between a Superstorm Sandy stress factor score and infant temperament. Further, analysis of the placental transcriptomes identified an enrichment of functional pathways related to inflammation, extracellular matrix integrity and sensory perception in the specimen from those infants with "Slow-to-Warm-up" temperament during the first year of life. Together, these findings provide initial evidence that maternal exposure to climate-related disasters results in altered placental transcriptome, which may be related to long-term emotional and behavioral consequences in children.Entities:
Keywords: Superstorm Sandy; epigenome; inflammation; placenta; sensory perception; surgency/extraversion
Year: 2022 PMID: 35571026 PMCID: PMC9099074 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.887619
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.772
Exposure and demographic characteristics of the full sample and by temperament group.
| Full sample (N = 33) | Easy temperament (N = 11) | Intermediate temperament (N = 11) | Slow-to-Warm-up temperament (N = 11) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethnicity (% Hispanic) | 63.6% | 54.5% | 81.2% | 63.6% |
| Marital status (% married) | 69.7% | 72.3% | 72.3% | 36.4% |
| Educational attainment (% College+) | 48.5% | 45.5% | 72.3% | 27.3% |
| Financial assistance | 15.0% | 27.3% | 0.0% | 18.2% |
| Exposure timing in gestation (weeks) Mean (SD) | 10.28 (11.14) | 10.10 (11.26) | 9.97 (10.17) | 10.75 (12.90) |
| Child sex (% female) | 51.2% | 45.5% | 63.6% | 45.5% |
| Surgency/Extraversion M(SD) | 5.4 (0.65) | 5.8 (0.57) | 5.5 (0.40) | 4.8 (0.58) |
| Negative Affectivity M(SD) | 3.5 (0.76) | 3.4 (0.96) | 3.4 (0.69) | 3.8 (0.56) |
| Orienting/Regulation M(SD) | 5.2 (0.62) | 5.4 (0.78) | 5.3 (0.38) | 4.9 (0.56) |
Correlations among variables of interest.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Surgency/Extraversion | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 2. Negative Affectivity | −0.09 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 3. Orienting/Regulation | 0 0.44* | −0.51** | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 4. IBQ Factor Score | 0.62*** | −0.34† | 0.42* | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 5. Storm PTSD Symptoms | −0.22 | 0.28 | −0.39* | −0.10 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| 6. Storm32 Threat | −0.21 | 0.29† | −0.06 | −0.30† | 0.45** | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 7. Storm32 Loss | −0.35* | 0.31† | −0.09 | −0.26 | 0.63*** | 0.60*** | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 8. Storm32 Scope | −0.18 | 0.12 | −0.22 | −0.31† | 0.72*** | 0.28 | 0.68*** | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 9. Storm32 Change | 0.01 | 0.31† | −0.08 | −0.11 | 0.30† | 0.17 | 0.36* | 0.26 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 10. Storm Factor | −0.31† | 0.33† | −0.25 | −0.32† | 0.87*** | 0.65*** | 0.90*** | 0.83*** | 0.52** | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 11. Global Assessment of Functioning | −0.01 | −0.21 | −0.10 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.09 | −0.03 | 0.12 | 0.02 | −0.03 | – | – | – | – | |
| 12. Prenatal Depression | −0.01 | 0.32† | −0.05 | 0.26 | 0.06 | −0.04 | 0.04 | −0.26 | 0.17 | −0.03 | 0.36* | – | – | – | – |
| 13. State Anxiety | 0.12 | 0.15 | −0.12 | 0.34† | 0.18 | −0.05 | −0.03 | −0.15 | −0.03 | −0.01 | 0.41* | 0.50** | – | – | – |
| 14. Trait Anxiety | 0.15 | 0.28 | −0.11 | 0.29 | 0.15 | −0.11 | −0.03 | −0.15 | −0.07 | −0.04 | −0.40* | 0.59*** | 0.82*** | – | – |
| 15. Psychopathology Factor | 0.08 | 0.29 | −0.06 | 0.30† | 0.21 | −0.09 | 0.01 | −0.21 | 0.04 | 0.00 | −0.64** | 0.77*** | 0.87*** | 0.90*** | – |
† p < 0.1, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Numbers across the top row correspond to the variables in the first column. Matrix values represent Pearson’s correlation coefficients.
FIGURE 1Assessment of infant temperament score at 6 months of age in children exposed to Superstorm Sandy in utero. (A) Experiment outline (B) Temperament was assessed at 6 months of age. Compared with infants with an easy temperament (ET), the Surgency/Extraversion score was significantly reduced in infants with Slow-to-Warm-up temperament (SW). Compared with infants with ET, a trend towards increased Negative Affectivity (C) and decreased Orienting/Regulation (D), was observed in the SW temperament infants, although the differences did not reach statistical significance. Data represented as mean ± SD. ∗∗∗ denotes p = 0.0008 by unpaired t-test.
Prenatal maternal stress and psychopathology predict infant temperament.
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marital status | 0.26 (−0.27, 1.28) | 0.24 (−0.30, 1.19) | 0.26 (−0.21, 1.20) |
| Race | −0.24 (−0.60, 0.14) | −0.26 (−0.60, 0.11) | −0.30 (−0.62, 0.06) |
| Socioeconomic status (SES) | −0.01 (−0.69, 0.14) | −0.13 (−0.91, 0.46) | −0.11 (−0.83, 0.46) |
| Psychopathology factor score | – | 0.34 (−0.03, 0.63) | 0.38* (0.02, 0.64) |
| Storm stress factor score | – | – | −0.35* (−0.94, −0.12) |
|
| −0.01 | 0.07 | 0.18 |
|
| 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.12∗ |
∗p < 0.05. Values represent standardized regression coefficients. Values in parentheses represent 95% confidence intervals.
FIGURE 2Robust placental transcriptome changes are associated with infant temperament. (A) Principal component analysis on the transcriptome of infants with Easy (ET) and Slow-to-Warm-up (SW) Temeprament. Small circles denote each subject, and big circiles represent the centroid of each group. (B) Heatmap of placental transcriptome from infants with Easy (ET) or Slow-to-Warm-up (SW) temperament. (C) Top differentially expressed genes (p < 0.05, fold change >1.5) were identified, with 545 genes downregulated (red) and 101 genes upregulated (blue) in placenta of infants SW temperament. (D) The gene ontology category of transcripts with higher expression in the samples from infants with SW temperament, was associated with regulation of regulatory T cell differentiation. (E) For the downregulated transcripts in the placental samples form infants with SW temperament, the most significant gene ontology categories related to extracellular matrix organization and cell-substrate interaction. (F) In particular, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) identified gene sets regulating sensory perception were enriched in the infants with SW temperament. (G) ChIP Enrichment Analysis (ChEA) revealed chromatin remodeler in the Polycomb complex 2 (e.g., SUZ12, EZH2), microRNA processing (e.g., DROSHA), and transcription factors in Estrogen Receptor family (e.g. ESR2, ESR1) share the most significant overlapping targets and binding site proximity to the differentially expresses genes in the placental samples from infants with SW temperament.