Literature DB >> 35570626

[Accuracy of key point matrix technology based contactless automatic measurement for joint motion of hand].

Lulu Lü1, Jiantao Yang1,2,3, Fanbin Gu1, Jingyuan Fan1, Chaoyang Wang1, Qingtang Zhu1,2,3, Xiaolin Liu1,2,3.   

Abstract

Objective: To validate the use of key point matrix technology based contactless automatic measurement for evaluation of joint motion of hand.
Methods: Thirty-three volunteers were enrolled to evaluate the extension and flexion of hand joints between May 2021 and November 2021. There were 20 males and 13 females, the age ranged from 16 to 70 years with an average of 30.2 years. The extension angles of 14 joints of 5 fingers (including hyperextension) and the flexion angles of 12 joints of 4 fingers (excluding thumb) of volunteers were measured by key point matrix technology and manual goniometer, respectively. Then 5 participants and repeated measurement experiment were employed to test the system repeatability and accuracy; 28 participants and paired measurement experiment were employed to test the system accuracy.
Results: The average repeatability of finger joint motion measured by the key point matrix technology was 1.801° (extension) and 7.823° (flexion), respectively. Compared with manual measurement, the average differences of each finger joint measured by the key point matrix technology were 3.225° in extension and 14.145° in flexion, respectively. The key point matrix technology based contactless automatic evaluation system offered excellent consistency with the manual goniometers ( ICC=0.875). While most of the consistency with manual goniometer of individual joints were at moderate levels (median of ICC, 0.440). The correlation coefficients between the measurement results of the two methods were mainly positive in the extension of the joint ( P<0.05) and negative in the flexion of the joints ( P<0.05).
Conclusion: The key point matrix technology based contactless automatic evaluation provides sufficient measurement repeatability and accuracy in evaluation for the joint motion of hand.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Finger; contactless automatic evaluation; joint motion; key point matrix technology

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35570626      PMCID: PMC9108647          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202201078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  11 in total

1.  A study to compare the reliability of composite finger flexion with goniometry for measurement of range of motion in the hand.

Authors:  Bridget Ellis; Anne Bruton
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.477

2.  Biomechanics of the hand.

Authors:  Scott F M Duncan; Caitlin E Saracevic; Ryosuke Kakinoki
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 1.907

3.  Intel® RealSense™ SR300 Coded light depth Camera.

Authors:  Aviad Zabatani; Vitaly Surazhsky; Erez Sperling; Sagi Ben Moshe; Ohad Menashe; David H Silver; Tzachi Karni; Alexander M Bronstein; Michael M Bronstein; Ron Kimmel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 6.226

4.  Modifying Kinect placement to improve upper limb joint angle measurement accuracy.

Authors:  Na Jin Seo; Mojtaba F Fathi; Pilwon Hur; Vincent Crocher
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 1.950

5.  Range of Motion Measurements of the Fingers Via Smartphone Photography.

Authors:  John Z Zhao; Philip E Blazar; Ariana N Mora; Brandon E Earp
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-01-28

Review 6.  Human hand modelling: kinematics, dynamics, applications.

Authors:  Agneta Gustus; Georg Stillfried; Judith Visser; Henrik Jörntell; Patrick van der Smagt
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  A Novel Multistandard Compliant Hand Function Assessment Method Using an Infrared Imaging Device.

Authors:  Qiang Fang; Seedahmed S Mahmoud; Xudong Gu; Jianming Fu
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 5.772

8.  The validity of an objective measurement method using the Leap Motion Controller for fingers wrist, and forearm ranges of motion.

Authors:  Nilay Arman; Ayse Betul Oktay; Devrim Tarakci; Ela Tarakci; Yusuf Sinan Akgul
Journal:  Hand Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 0.969

9.  An analysis of the precision and reliability of the leap motion sensor and its suitability for static and dynamic tracking.

Authors:  Jože Guna; Grega Jakus; Matevž Pogačnik; Sašo Tomažič; Jaka Sodnik
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  A Non-Contact Measurement System for the Range of Motion of the Hand.

Authors:  Trieu Pham; Pubudu N Pathirana; Hieu Trinh; Pearse Fay
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.