Literature DB >> 35570360

How do people get information for COVID-19 according to age groups?

Seungil Yum1.   

Abstract

This study highlights how people get important information on COVID-19 according to age groups by employing social network analysis for Twitter. First, people have different key players according to the age groups. For example, while universities and journals play a crucial role in the adults' networks, news media have a significant impact on the elderly's networks. Second, people have different characteristics of social network groups according to age. For example, people belong to small groups, and barely communicate with others across the groups in the teens' networks, whereas people in each group have strong communication networks with other groups in the elderly's networks. Third, this study shows that people utilise different domains to share COVID-19 information according to age. For example, while twitter.com ranks first in the children, teens, and elderly's networks, cnn.com places first in the adults' networks.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; age; coronavirus; social network analysis; twitter

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35570360      PMCID: PMC9348123          DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Plann Manage        ISSN: 0749-6753


Introduction

Coronavirus (COVID‐19) has been one of the most important issues across the world (see e.g., , , , , ). As of 18 June 2020, according to the Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Centre, more than 8.28 million cases have been reported across 188 countries, resulting in more than 446,000 deaths. COVID‐19 is considered as one of the worst viruses in human history since it has a dominant contagious disease and infection fatality rate. COVID‐19 also exerts a significant impact on global mental health and plays a different role in the psychological status across countries. For example, Wang et al. report that Poland and the Philippines experience the highest levels of anxiety, depression and stress, whereas Vietnam has the lowest mean scores in these areas among eight countries (China, Poland, the Philippines, Spain, the US, Iran, Pakistan, and Vietnam). Wang et al. highlight that Thailand shows all the highest scores of stress, anxiety, and depression scores, while Vietnam exhibits all the lowest scores among seven countries in Asia (China, Iran, Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam). Most countries and policy makers have developed many disease policies to control the COVID‐19 pandemic, such as lockdown, social distancing, face mask use, hand hygiene, training, and workplace safety (see e.g., , , , , , , , , , , ). For example, Le et al. report that Vietnam implements a partial lockdown on 1 April 2020 where residents are be able to go outside only for essential needs and have to stay at home. Tan et al. show that the Chinese government implements lockdown and quarantine on Chongqing to control the COVID‐19 epidemic, and all workers are forced to cease working from 31 January 2020 to 9 February 2020. Governments and organisations have discovered that COVID‐19 exerts a different impact on people according to their age (see e.g., , , , , ). For instance, the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC; 2021), as of 18 June 2020, 93% of COVID‐19 death occur are reported in the population over 55 years of age. European Commission reports that 94% of fatalities are uniformly concentrated in the population over 60 years of age, and the case fatality rate (CFR) for all countries is starting to increase after age 50. Scholars have also explored how COVID‐19 plays a significant role in people and information dissemination tools by employing Social Network Services (SNS) and Social Network Analysis (SNA; see e.g., , , , ). This is because SNS and SNA are some of the most important data sources and visualisation methodologies for information dissemination in our knowledge‐based society and are utilised in many academic fields, such as medicine, urban planning, business, engineering, and so on. For instance, Kuchler et al. exhibit that COVID‐19 is more likely to spread between regions with stronger social network connections in Westchester County, NY, in the US and Lodi province in Italy by using aggregated data from Facebook. Li et al. show that YouTube has tremendous potential to both support and hinder public health efforts for COVID‐19 from the top 75 viewed videos. Block et al. highlight that a strategic social network‐based reduction of contact significantly improves the effect of social distancing measures by adopting a social network approach. Nielsen et al. report that superspreading sharply increases mitigations that reduce the overall personal contact number and that social clustering enhances this effect using a mathematical social network model. However, prior studies have barely highlighted how people get important information for COVID‐19 according to the age. Understanding communication networks is necessary to provide valuable information on COVID‐19 for people to minimise the virus damage in a timely manner. For instance, children are highly interested in protecting themselves from coronavirus in the school environment, and the elderly care more about COVID‐19 since they are the most susceptible to the virus because of their health conditions, such as cardiovascular diseases, respiratory diseases, or diabetes. Therefore, this study aims to highlight how people communicate with others to share valuable information on COVID‐19 according to the age groups (children, teens, adults, and elderly) by employing SNA based on Twitter, which is one of the most popular SNS. To the best of my knowledge, this study is the first article exploring the social networks for COVID‐19 according to the age by employing SNA for SNS.

LITERATURE REVIEW

COVID‐19 is a new disease linked to the same type of coronaviruses, such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS). Symptoms can include cough, fever, and shortness of breath. In some cases, the infection can cause pneumonia or breathing difficulties. More rarely, the disease can be fatal. COVID‐19 can be transmitted not only through direct contact with respiratory droplets of an infected person, but also be infected from touching surfaces contaminated with the virus and touching their face. Many countries have put in place lockdowns and public health measures to promote physical distancing, good hand hygiene and isolating cases and testing, and tracing of contacts of people with COVID‐19. Countries have found that COVID‐19 differently affects people according to the age. For example, Korea Centres for Disease Control and Prevention reports that severe cases of COVID‐19 according to age groups as follows: children (0%), teens (0%), adults (25.0%), and elderly (75.0%) as of 18 June 2020. The Office for National Statistics in the UK shows the COVID‐19 deaths according to age groups as follows: 0–15 years (0.0%), 15–44 years (1.1%), 45–64 years (9.7%), and 65+ years old (89.2%). The New York City Health shows that the COVID 19 deaths of people are differentiated by the age as of 13 May 2020 as follows: 0–17 years old (0.06%), 14–44 years old (3.9%), 45–64 years old (22.4%), 65–74 years old (24.9%), and 75+ years old (48.7%). Scholars also have highlighted the relationship between COVID‐19 and age groups. Cortis show that COVID‐19 tends to have higher morbidity in younger individuals but higher mortality for the elderly, and the percentage of children and teens under 14 with confirmed COVID‐19 cases is far lower than the standard population percentage. Davies et al. highlight that susceptibility to COVID‐19 in children of age is approximately half that of adults and elderly, and that clinical symptoms manifest in 21% of infections in teens, rising to 69% of infections in elderly over 70 years based on South Korea, China, Italy, Japan, Singapore, and Canada. Verity et al. highlight that the death rate of covid‐19 has been calculated at 0.66%, rising drastically to 7.8% in people aged over 80 and declining to 0.0016% in children aged 9 and under based on the data of patients who died from COVID‐19 in Hubei, mainland China and 37 countries, as well as Hong Kong and Macau. Some scholars have focussed on how COVID‐19 plays an important role in psychological health according to age groups (see e.g., ). For instance, Tee et al. report that the young age group of 12–21.4 years has significantly high stress, anxiety, and depression based on online surveys of 1879 participants gathered from March 28‐12 April 2020. Wang et al. exhibit levels of psychological impact, anxiety, depression, and stress during the initial stage of the COVID‐19 outbreak using an online survey of 1210 respondents from 194 cities in China from January 31 to 2 February 2020. Wang et al. report mental health of the general population during the COVID‐19 pandemic for Iran and China based on 1411 respondents (550 from Iran and 861 from China). As prior studies indicate, most articles have focussed on the age distribution of COVID‐19 deaths or psychological impacts across countries. In other words, the social networks of people to cope with COVID‐19 according to age groups have not highlighted in the literature. Therefore, this study explores how people communicate with others to cope with the COVID‐19 pandemic according to age groups by employing SNA for Twitter.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This study employs SNA to show the communication networks for COVID‐19 according to the age. SNA is a methodology of representing networks of individuals as graphs to show edges among nodes (see e.g., ). Scholars employ SNA to demonstrate the relationship among individuals for their research topic (see e.g., , , , , ). This study utilises Twitter data to demonstrate social networks of people for COVID‐19 across age groups. Twitter has been widely employed for big data analyses in the academic field (see e.g., , , , , ). This study observes Twitter data stream between May 26 and 2 June 2020 based on the keywords COVID‐19 and the age group and chooses the best data set for the analyses (May 27 and May 28) based on some important criteria (e.g., the number of Twitter users, communications, and suitable contents). This study selects key players in the following categories: doctors, institutes, news media, organisations, politicians, professors, activists, journals, universities, researchers, and others. This study employs NodeXL to highlight social networks of COVID‐19 across the age groups. NodeXL is a visualisation software programme, which supports social networks and content analysis. NodeXL has been extensively employed as a social network methodology in academic fields (see e.g., ). This study utilises PageRank (PR) to highlight the magnitude of the importance of public key players. PageRank measures the importance of each vertex within the graph using a link analysis algorithm developed by Larry Page who is one of the co‐founders of Google along with Sergey Brin (see Table 1 for descriptive statistics).
TABLE 1

Descriptive statistics

Graph metricChildrenTeensAdultsElderly
Graph‐typeDirectedDirectedDirectedDirected
Vertices18,064149616,56317,297
Unique edges30,629208317,97725,131
Edges with duplicates418317552871992
Total edges34,812225823,26427,123
Self‐loops184029711932053
Reciprocated vertex pair ratio0.0080.0290.0100.010
Reciprocated edge ratio0.0160.0570.0200.020
Connected components175139113002189
Single‐vertex connected components652155541904
Maximum vertices in a connected component12,0407312,59210,135
Maximum edges in a connected component26,78331818,07918,372
Maximum geodesic distance (diameter)2361925
Average geodesic distance6.0401.9114.5456.831
Graph density0.0000.0010.0000.000
Modularity0.8330.8480.7840.878
Minimum PageRank0.2220.2920.2600.221
Maximum PageRank750221843335
Average PageRank1111
Median PageRank0.5490.7490.5290.573
Descriptive statistics

RESULTS

Tables 2, 3, 4, 5 demonstrate the social networks for COVID‐19 according to the age groups. In the children's networks, doctors play the most important role in social networks for COVID‐19. For instance, Amalina who is a general surgeon in London ranks first, and Zoë Hyde who is a doctor at the University of Western Medical School places second. Also, Kerryn Phelps who is one of Australia's best‐known doctors takes ninth. Next, Organisations play the second important role in the networks among top key players. For example, UNICEF, World Health Organisation, and WHO African Region place third, fourth, and fifth, respectively. Not only them, but also UN Human Rights ranks eighth, and Amer Acad Paediatrics, which is the American Academy of Paediatrics dedicated to the health of all children, takes fourteenth.
TABLE 2

Top 20 key players in children

NoPRNameDescription
1D1750.3AmalinaDoctor of Medicine in London
2D2510.8Zoë HydeDoctor at the University of Western Medical School
3O1170.2UNICEFHumanitarian Aid Organisation
4O2130.0WHOWorld Health Organisation
5O3120.0WHO African RegionWHO African
6P195.2Scott MorrisonThe Prime Minister of Australia
7T185.2Melinda GatesAmaerican Philanthropist Co‐founded the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
8O476.2UN Human RightsOrganisation for Human Right
9D375.8Kerryn PhelpsOne of Australia's Best‐Known Doctors 
10P254.0Justin TrudeauPrime Minister of Canada
11R152.8Henrietta H. ForeExecutive Director of UNICEF
12A145.9Agnes CallamardHuman Rights Activist
13P337.1Greg AbbottGovernor of Texas
14O534.4Amer Acad PaediatricsThe American Academy of Paediatrics for the Health of all Children.
15F133.5Azra GhaniProfessor of Infectious Disease Epidemiology at Imperial College London
16N129.2RTRussian International Television Network
17R227.8Tedros Adhanom GhebreyesDirector General of the World Health Organisation
18P426.9Gary GannonIrish Social Democrats Politician
19P526.1SAnna MarinPrime Minister of Finland
20P625.9Hanna KosonenMinister of Science and Culture in Finland

Abbreviations: Activists, A; D, Doctors; Professor, F; Institute, I; Journals, J; News media, N; Organisation, O; Politicians, P; PR, PageRank; R, Researcher; T, other; U, Universities.

TABLE 3

Top 20 key players in teens

NoPRNameDescription
1O121.5American Psychological AssociationThe Largest Organisation of Psychologists in the US
2I113.0Indiana State Department of HealthThe Indiana State Department of Health
3O212.2MentalHealthFirstAidNational Programme for Mental Illness and Substance Use
4I210.8Ottawa public healthOttawa's Health Information, Programs & Services
5O38.9HealthychildrenOfficial Parenting Website of the American Academy of Paediatrics
6F16.2Miranda van TilburgProfessor of Clinical Research at Campbell Univeristy
7A16.2Mandy SangheraInternational Human Rights Activist
8O44.4Bullying UKUK Charity
9N14.0SchoolLibraryJournalAmerican Monthly Magazine for Young People
10O53.9JEDOrganisation for Teens and Young Adults
11O63.9Human Rights CampaignThe Largest LGBTQ Advocacy Group 
12O73.6Junior AchievementGlobal Non‐Profit Youth Organisation
13O83.5Minding Your MindOrganisation for Ending Stigma and Destructive Behaviours Associated With Mental Health Issues
14N23.4CNBCThe World Leader in Business NEWS
15A23.0Jamie MargolinAmerican Climate Justice Activist
16O92.9NAGCPromotes Awareness of the Needs of Children and Teens
17O102.9C. Elizabeth DoughertyOrganisation for Supporting Children, Youth and Adults Facing Complex Illness
18O112.7NCMECNational Centre for Missing and Exploited Children
19N32.6news.com.auAustralia's #1 News Site
20N42.6Local 12/WKRC‐TVCincinnati's Trusted Source for Breaking News
TABLE 4

Top 20 key players in adults

NoPRNameDescription
1I11842.8CDCThe Centres For Disease Control And Prevention
2U1162.7UC san FranciscoThe University of California, San Francisco
3D1132.8Dena GraysonAmerican Medical Doctor
4R173.5Eric Feigl‐dingAmerican Public Health Scientist
5F160.3Mehmet OzColumbia University professor
6U260.2RoyalCollegeObsGynThe Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
7O147.1WHOWorld Health Organisation
8O239.8Sport EnglandNon‐Departmental Public Body
9O338.8WHO South‐East AsiaWHO South‐East Asia
10O434.5The RCMBritish Midwives Organisation 
11J130.2Microbes & InfectionJournal for Infection & Immunity
12P129.9John CornynUnited States Senator
13I226.3Health Canada and PHACAgency of the Government of Canada for Public Health
14F224.3Zoë HydeFaculty at the University of Western Medical School
15O518.8WHO African RegionWHO African Region
16P218.7Steve HermanAmerica's White House Bureau Chief
17J216.6JAMAThe Journal of the American Medical Association 
18I315.3HHS.govUnited States Department of Health and Human Services
19U314.4HarvardPublicHealthPublic health School of Harvard University
20U414.4CCDD at Harvard ChanThe Centre for Communicable Disease Dynamics at Harvard
TABLE 5

Top 20 key players in elderly

NoPRNameDescription
1R1335.1BlueSkyResearcher IT Consultant/Software Engineer
2N1165.7QuickTake by bloombergGlobal News the World Needs Today
3I1161.8CDCCentres for Disease Control and Prevention
4N2111.6OffGuardianIndependent News and Opinion Website
5F1106.2Christian ChristensenProfessor of Journalism at Stockholm Univ
6P186.1Andrew CuomoGovernor of New York
7F269.6Jane PhilpottDean of the Queen's University Faculty of Health Sciences
8O161.1World Economic ForumOrganisation for Improving the State of the World
9N353.8BBC Radio 4 TodayBBC's long‐running early morning news
10P253.0Helen WhatelyBritish conservative party politician who was appointed Minister of State at the Department of Health and Social Care
11P341.8Donald J. TrumpThe US President
12T139.7FacebookSocial Media Company
13R234.9Zaeem ZiaDirector Health Information Systems GB/District Health Officer
14P331.1YediyurappaChief Minister of Karnataka
15O230.1Workers party of BritainOrganisation for workers Party of Britain
16N427.4Science NewsAmerican Bi‐Weekly Magazine
17O326.6Code of Vets™Organisation Dedicated to Assisting America's Veterans.
18P426.3David VanceAmerican Politician
19A123.4Shaun KingAmerican Writer, Civil Rights Activist
20A222.5Vanessa BeeleyBritish Activist and Blogger
Top 20 key players in children Abbreviations: Activists, A; D, Doctors; Professor, F; Institute, I; Journals, J; News media, N; Organisation, O; Politicians, P; PR, PageRank; R, Researcher; T, other; U, Universities. Top 20 key players in teens Top 20 key players in adults Top 20 key players in elderly In the teens' networks, organisations play the most significant role in social networks for COVID‐19. For example, organisations rank first, third, and fifth. To be specific, the American Psychological Association, which is the largest scientific and professional organisation of psychologists in the United States, ranks first. The MentalHealthFirstAid, which is the national programme to teach the skills to respond to the signs of mental illness and substance use, ranks third. The HealthyChildren, which is the official parenting website of the American Academy of Paediatrics, takes fifth. Not only that, but also 11 out of the top 20 key players are organisations, which are 55% of the key players. In the adults' networks, people show some unique characteristics of social networks for COVID‐19. They have two key player groups (universities and journals), which are not in the other networks. First, Universities play a crucial role in communication networks. For example, UC San Francisco, which is the University of California, San Francisco, ranks second, and RoyalCollegeObsGyn, which is the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, places sixth. HarvardPublicHealth, which is the public health school of Harvard University, and CCDD at Harvard Chan, which is the Centre for Communicable Disease Dynamics at Harvard, rank 19th and twentieth, respectively. Second, Microbes & Infection, which is the journal covering all fields of infection & immunity, places eleventh, and JAMA, which is the Journal of the American Medical Association, ranks seventeenth. Another characteristic of adults is that people rely on institutes higher than others. For example, the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention ranks first. In the elderly's networks, people tend to rely on the key players that allow people to access easily, inconsistent with adults. For example, news media play an important role in elderly, whereas they have no top 20 key players in adults. The QuickTake by Bloomberg, which is the global news the world needs today, ranks second, and the OffGuardian, which is the independent news and opinion website, places fourth. The BBC Radio 4 Today, which is the BBC's long‐running early morning news, places ninth, and the Science News, which is the American bi‐weekly magazine, ranks sixteenth. Also, Facebook, which is one of the most popular and easily accessible social media platform, ranks twelfth. Another interesting character is that Donald Trump, the US president, ranks eleventh. They are the only networks, which have Donald Trump as the top key player. Figure 1 shows the communication networks of people based on PR. In the children's networks, most key players are highly concentrated in the central part of the circle. Some key players, such as Azra Ghani (F1), Justin Trudeau (P2), Azra Ghani (P3), and Amalina (D1), relatively have some distances from other key players. In the teens' networks, people show relatively dispersed patterns. Overall, key players are located in the central part of the networks. In the adults' networks, nodes are highly concentrated in some parts, and key players show the most dispersed locations among all networks. The Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (I1), HHS.gov (I3), and JAMA (J2) are placed in the central part of the networks. In the elderly's networks, nodes show a large circle, and most key players are located in the large networks. Some key players, such as Donald Trump (P3) and Zaeem Zia (R2), play an important role in outer networks of the circle.
FIGURE 1

PageRank

PageRank Next, this study employs cluster analysis by utilising the Clauset–Newman–Moore cluster algorithm. Cluster analysis is a methodology for the task of assigning a set of objects into groups so that the objects in the same cluster are more similar to each other than those in other clusters. The Clauset‐Newman‐Moore cluster algorithm is one of the best methods for big data analysis. Figures 2 and 3 show the social networks according to age groups based on the Clauset–Newman–Moore cluster algorithm. In the children's networks, Amalina (D1) and Zoë Hyde (D2) are located in the centre of group 1 and group 3, respectively (see Figure 5). UNICEF (O1), World Health Organisation (O2), and Henrietta H. Fore (R1) play an essential role in group 2. While group 1 tends to communicate with others within the group, group 2 and group 3 actively communicate with other groups.
FIGURE 2

Social networks for the typical case

FIGURE 3

Social networks for groups

Social networks for the typical case Social networks for groups In the teens' networks, Mandy Sanghera (A1), the American Psychological Association (O1), and the Ottawa Public Health (I2) play the central role in group 1, group 2, and group 4, respectively. People belong to small groups, and rarely communicate with others across the groups. All key players have an independent group except for the Junior Achievement (O7) and CNBC (N2; group 12) and NAGC (O9) and C. Elizabeth Dougherty (O10; group 17). In the adults' networks, people are heavily concentrated in group 1 and group 2, and they actively communicate with other groups. While I1 plays the crucial role in group 1, there is no key player in group 2. Many key players (13 out of 20) have their independent group, whereas the rest key players play an important role in small groups. In the elderly's networks, people are relatively distributed in each group. Each group has strong communication networks with other groups. They show the most open communication systems across the groups. QuickTake by Bloomberg (N1) and the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (I1) are located in the central hubs of group 1. The Code of Vets (O3) and Andrew Cuomo (P1) play an important role in group 2. The BlueSky (R1) and Donald Trump (P3) exert an important impact on group 3 and group 4, respectively. Table 6 show that people utilise different domains to share COVID‐19 information according to the age. In the children's networks, twitter.com ranks first. Gofundme.com, which is the American crowdfunding platform that allows people to raise money for events ranging from life events, such as celebrations and graduations to challenging circumstances like accidents and illnesses, ranks second. Techfordaddy.com places third since many parents are in sympathy with the article in the parenting category, that is, toddlers cannot understand why they must do social distancing, but they would understand their parents' efforts 1 day. Co.uk, which is the Internet country code top‐level domain for the United Kingdom, ranks fourth, and com.au, which is the Internet country code top‐level domain for Australia places fifth. In the teen's networks, twitter.com places first. Slj.com, which is the School Library Journal of the American monthly magazine for young people, ranks second. Youtube.com takes third, and co.uk places fourth. Npr.org, which is the National Public Radio, takes fifth.
TABLE 6

Top five domains in the networks

ChildrenTeensAdultsElderly
DomainsCountDomainsCountDomainsCountDomainsCount
1twitter.com362twitter.com45cnn.com235twitter.com393
2gofundme.com105slj.com20twitter.com227weforum.org173
3techfordaddy.com80youtube.com15cdc.gov39cbc.ca82
4co.uk74co.uk11co.uk34co.uk59
5com.au57npr.org11org.uk27youtube.com54
Top five domains in the networks In the adults' networks, cnn.com places first, inconsistent with other groups' networks. Twitter ranks second, and official domains take from third to fifth. For example, cdc.gov, which is the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention of the United States, ranks third. co.uk and org.uk place fourth and fifth, respectively. In the elderly's networks, twitter.com places first, followed by weforum.org, cbc.ca, co.uk, and youtube.com. weforum.org is the world economic forum that engages the foremost political, business, cultural and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas. Cbc.ca is the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation that serves as the national public broadcaster for both radio and television.

DISCUSSION

COVID‐19 has been one of the most important issues across the world. Understanding COVID‐19 has become one of the most essential tasks for governments, scholars, urban planners, health planners, policymakers, and so on. This study highlights how people get important information for COVID‐19 according to age groups. This study finds some significant results, consistent (or inconsistent) with prior studies. First, this study finds that peopele show significant differences among age groups for COVID‐19, consistent with the finding of the prior study (see e.g., , , , ; Tee et al., 2020). The results may be because younger people are more familiar with SNS to express their opinions for COVID‐19. For example, Klaiber et al. reveal that younger people show more concerns about the threat of COVID‐19 across multiple domains, such as popular print, television, and radio news outlets in North America. Second, this study finds that people develop different social networks according to their groups, consistent with prior studies (see e.g., , , ). For example, Gauthier et al. highlight that older minority people may experience the most severe effects of COVID‐19 since they are more apt to be isolated and have smaller networks. Third, this study suggests that SNS play an important role in sharing and providing useful information for COVID‐19 to people, consistent with prior literature (see e.g., , , ). For instance, Li et al. show that Chinese people express higher negative emotions, such as anxiety, depression, and indignation, and sensitivity to social risks on Weibo in the same group before and after the declaration of COVID‐19 on 20 January, 2020. This study has some limitations as follows: first, this study explores the social networks of COVID‐19 according to the age groups based on cross‐sectional data. The findings may be different in a longitudinal study. The longitudinal change of people for COVID‐19 would play an important role in understanding the pandemic. Future research should highlight the changes of social networks for COVID‐19 by employing the longitudinal methodology. Second, while there was no vaccine for COVID‐19 at the study period, new COVID‐19 vaccines have been developed across the world. More than 50 vaccines for COVID‐19 are either undergoing clinical trials or already approved in many countries. Therefore, vaccines would exert a significant impact on social networks. Future articles should highlight the effects of vaccines on social networks for COVID‐19 according to age groups. Third, this study highlights how people build their social networks for COVID‐19 by exploring only Twitter. Therefore, Other SNS, such as Facebook or YouTube, may show different results for the age groups. Future studies should investigate the social networks of age groups according to a multitude of social media.

CONCLUSIONS

The COVID‐19 situation has been worse as time passes. Understanding social networks of people to spread valuable information on COVID‐19 would be one of the best ways to control the COVID‐19 pandemic. This study highlights how people interact with each other for the COVID‐19 to allows governments and scholars to provide useful information to the public according to age groups since the virus exerts a different impact on people by age. This study finds some outstanding results as follows: first, people have different key players according to the age groups. For example, doctors play the most important role in children's networks for COVID‐19. Organisations play the most significant role in teens' networks. Universities and journals play a crucial role in adults' networks. News media have a significant impact on elderly's networks. Second, people have different characteristics of social network groups according to the age. For example, In the children's networks, while group 1 tends to communicate with others within the group, group 2 and group 3 actively communicate with other groups. In the teens' networks, people belong to small groups, and barely communicate with others across the groups. In the adults' networks, group 1 and group 2 actively communicate with other groups. In the elderly's networks, people are relatively distributed in each group, and each group has strong communication networks with other groups. Third, this study shows that people utilise different domains to share COVID‐19 information according to the age. For example, while twitter.com ranks first in the children, teens, and elderly's networks, cnn.com places first in the adults' networks. In contrast, co.uk takes fourth in all groups' networks. On the other hand, some domains for specific age groups rank high in the group networks. For instance, Techfordaddy.com, which provides useful parenting information for fathers, ranks third in the children's networks, and slj.com, which covers a wide variety of topics with a focus on technology, multimedia, and other information resources that arouse the interest of young learners in school, places second in the teens' networks. This study suggests some important implications as follows: first, governments and policymakers should understand the characteristics of key players according to the age. For example, in the adults' networks, people are highly interested in information on COVID‐19 from universities and journals, whereas they barely care about news media. In contrast, in the elderly's networks, they show the opposite characteristics of adults. Therefore, governments and policymakers should provide important information and useful data sources according to their characteristics. Second, governments and centres for disease control and prevention should investigate the group networks of communications for COVID‐19 according to age groups since people show different patterns for social networks based on their age. For instance, teens show relatively closed network systems, whereas the elderly exhibit relatively open network systems. Third, governments and policy practitioners should explore how people utilise Internet websites to get access to COVID‐19 information according to age groups. Not only young people, but also old people actively use social network systems, such as Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram, in our knowledge‐based societies. This study finds people use different websites to get COVID‐19 news based on their age, and it would be an excellent way to release relevant information on COVID‐19 via important websites of the age groups. Lastly, this study contributes to the theory as follows: to the best of my knowledge, there is no known information about social networks for COVID‐19 according to a multitude of age groups by employing SNA for SNS. Methodological analyses of this study would contribute to develop theoretical models based on SNS (see e.g., , ). This study would shed new light on how people communicate with each other for the COVID‐19 pandemic according to age groups, which contributes to theory and literature in health communication and social network research. For example, the findings of this article could contribute to information and health literature, such as improving theoretical coverage, reducing methodological biases, strengthening causality linkages, reducing interference of noise, improving validity and reliability of models, and developing theory that works well within limitations (see e.g., , ).

ETHICS STATEMENT

Not applicable.
  42 in total

1.  The Ups and Downs of Daily Life During COVID-19: Age Differences in Affect, Stress, and Positive Events.

Authors:  Patrick Klaiber; Jin H Wen; Anita DeLongis; Nancy L Sin
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Critical Supply Shortages - The Need for Ventilators and Personal Protective Equipment during the Covid-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Megan L Ranney; Valerie Griffeth; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  On Determining the Age Distribution of COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Dominic Cortis
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-05-15

4.  The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on physical and mental health of Asians: A study of seven middle-income countries in Asia.

Authors:  Cuiyan Wang; Michael Tee; Ashley Edward Roy; Mohammad A Fardin; Wandee Srichokchatchawan; Hina A Habib; Bach X Tran; Shahzad Hussain; Men T Hoang; Xuan T Le; Wenfang Ma; Hai Q Pham; Mahmoud Shirazi; Nutta Taneepanichskul; Yilin Tan; Cherica Tee; Linkang Xu; Ziqi Xu; Giang T Vu; Danqing Zhou; Bernard J Koh; Roger S McIntyre; Cyrus Ho; Roger C Ho; Vipat Kuruchittham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Rational use of face masks in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Shuo Feng; Chen Shen; Nan Xia; Wei Song; Mengzhen Fan; Benjamin J Cowling
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 30.700

6.  An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time.

Authors:  Ensheng Dong; Hongru Du; Lauren Gardner
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 25.071

7.  Is returning to work during the COVID-19 pandemic stressful? A study on immediate mental health status and psychoneuroimmunity prevention measures of Chinese workforce.

Authors:  Wanqiu Tan; Fengyi Hao; Roger S McIntyre; Li Jiang; Xiaojiang Jiang; Ling Zhang; Xinling Zhao; Yiran Zou; Yirong Hu; Xi Luo; Zhisong Zhang; Andre Lai; Roger Ho; Bach Tran; Cyrus Ho; Wilson Tam
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 7.217

8.  The Impact of COVID-19 Epidemic Declaration on Psychological Consequences: A Study on Active Weibo Users.

Authors:  Sijia Li; Yilin Wang; Jia Xue; Nan Zhao; Tingshao Zhu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Anxiety and Depression Among People Under the Nationwide Partial Lockdown in Vietnam.

Authors:  Huong Thi Le; Andre Jun Xian Lai; Jiaqian Sun; Men Thi Hoang; Linh Gia Vu; Hai Quang Pham; Trang Ha Nguyen; Bach Xuan Tran; Carl A Latkin; Xuan Thi Thanh Le; Thao Thanh Nguyen; Quan Thi Pham; Nhung Thi Kim Ta; Quynh Thi Nguyen; Roger C M Ho; Cyrus S H Ho
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-10-29

10.  Exacerbating Inequalities: Social Networks, Racial/Ethnic Disparities, and the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States.

Authors:  Gertrude R Gauthier; Jeffrey A Smith; Catherine García; Marc A Garcia; Patricia A Thomas
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.077

View more
  1 in total

1.  How do people get information for COVID-19 according to age groups?

Authors:  Seungil Yum
Journal:  Int J Health Plann Manage       Date:  2022-05-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.