Literature DB >> 3556987

Prognosis of chronic unexplained dyspepsia. A prospective study of potential predictor variables in patients with endoscopically diagnosed nonulcer dyspepsia.

N J Talley, D McNeil, A Hayden, C Colreavy, D W Piper.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine if there were predictors of the symptomatic course of patients with chronic unexplained (essential) dyspepsia. After endoscopic assessment, 111 patients with essential dyspepsia were followed up by telephone interview every second month. Data were gathered, for a mean of 17 mo per patient, on the number of days of upper abdominal pain (the response variable) each month. In the 6-mo period before entry to the study the following predetermined predictor variables were collected: demographic factors (age, sex, social grade), number of pain days in the 6 mo before diagnosis, environmental factors (analgesics, nonsalicylate nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, alcohol, smoking, coffee, tea), length of dyspepsia history, and past history of peptic ulcer. Prospectively for each month of follow-up, the following additional variables were recorded: environmental factors, treatment, and development of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. It was found that patients with more pain before diagnosis were significantly more likely to have pain over the follow-up, and the taking of medications for dyspepsia and development of gastroesophageal reflux were associated with more days of pain over the follow-up (all p less than 0.001). Demographic and environmental factors, length of dyspepsia history, and a past history of ulcer were of no significant predictive value. There was a decrease in pain over the follow-up period (p = 0.002), but this effect was limited to the first two periods after endoscopic diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3556987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  18 in total

1.  Evaluation and management of dyspepsia.

Authors:  R Christopher Harmon; David A Peura
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.409

2.  Food intolerance in duodenal ulcer patients, non ulcer dyspeptic patients and healthy subjects. A prospective study.

Authors:  H Kaess; M Kellermann; A Castro
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1988-03-01

3.  Natural course of functional dyspepsia after Helicobacter pylori eradication: a seven-year survey.

Authors:  Francesco di Mario; Nicoletta Stefani; Nadia Dal Bò; Massimo Rugge; Alberto Pilotto; Giulia Martina Cavestro; Lucas Giovanni Cavallaro; Angelo Franzé; Gioacchino Leandro
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Economic costs of functional dyspepsia.

Authors:  O Nyrén; G Lindberg; E Lindström; R Seensalu
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  An evidence-based approach to the management of uninvestigated dyspepsia in the era of Helicobacter pylori. Canadian Dyspepsia Working Group.

Authors:  S J Veldhuyzen van Zanten; N Flook; N Chiba; D Armstrong; A Barkun; M Bradette; A Thomson; F Bursey; P Blackshaw; D Frail; P Sinclair
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-06-13       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Exocrine pancreatic function and chronic unexplained dyspepsia. A case-control study.

Authors:  R C Smith; N J Talley; O F Dent; M Jones; S L Waller
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1991-04

7.  Prevalence of functional dyspepsia in an outpatient clinic with primary care physicians in Japan.

Authors:  Toshikatsu Okumura; Sachie Tanno; Masumi Ohhira; Satoshi Tanno
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 7.527

8.  Double-blind dose-response multicenter comparison of fedotozine and placebo in treatment of nonulcer dyspepsia.

Authors:  B Fraitag; M Homerin; P Hecketsweiler
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Why do functional gastrointestinal disorders come and go?

Authors:  N J Talley
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Environmental factors and chronic unexplained dyspepsia. Association with acetaminophen but not other analgesics, alcohol, coffee, tea, or smoking.

Authors:  N J Talley; D McNeil; D W Piper
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.