| Literature DB >> 35567187 |
Irene Chamba-Eras1, Daniel M Griffith2, Carolina Kalinhoff2, Jorge Ramírez1, Manuel Jesús Gázquez3.
Abstract
In tropical forests of southern Ecuador, artisanal gold mining releases heavy metals that become xenobiotic with indefinite circulation and eventual bioaccumulation. Restoration and rehabilitation of degraded mining sites represent a major ecological, technological and economic issue. In this study, we estimate the capacity of two native woody plants to accumulate cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), zinc (Zn) and mercury (Hg), with the goal of developing effective strategies for phytoremediation of mining sites. Individuals of Erato polymnioides and Miconia sp., as well as their rhizospheric soils, were sampled from a natural zone (NZ) of montane cloud forest, used as a control, and a polluted zone (PZ) subjected to active gold mining. Concentrations of the four heavy metals were analyzed using atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Cd, Zn and Hg concentrations were higher in soils of PZ than NZ. Bioaccumulation (BCF) and translocation factors (TF) showed that Miconia sp. has potential for Cd and Zn phytostabilization, E. polymnioides has potential for Cd and Zn phytoextraction, and both species have potential for Hg phytoextraction. Despite the low productivity of these species, their adaptability to the edaphoclimatic conditions of the region and the possibility of using amendments to increase their biomass could compensate for the effectiveness of these species in reclaiming soils contaminated by mining.Entities:
Keywords: Erato polymnioides; Miconia sp.; bioaccumulation and translocation factors; heavy metals; phytoremediation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35567187 PMCID: PMC9099852 DOI: 10.3390/plants11091186
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Mean concentration of cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), zinc (Zn) and mercury (Hg) (mg kg−1) in soils of the two study species in a natural zone (NZ) and polluted zone (PZ) of an active mining area in southern Ecuador. Standard deviations and relative errors (%) are shown. NZ was a tropical montane forest located upslope from the mining area and free from contamination, whereas PZ was subjected to continuous artisanal mining of gold and other precious metals from stream sediments and the adjacent soils.
| Cd | Pb | Zn | Hg | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NZ | 1.62 ± 0.59 | 510 ± 150 | 85 ± 16 | 1.62 ± 0.54 | |
| PZ | 4.44 ± 1.68 | 523 ± 63 | 390 ± 140 | 6.1 ± 3.6 | |
|
| NZ | 0.42 ± 0.24 | 326 ± 75 | 169 ± 93 | 1.20 ± 0.22 |
| PZ | 5.15 ± 2.23 | 430 ± 250 | 589 ± 305 | 10.2 ± 6.0 |
Figure 1Concentration of heavy metals (mg kg−1) in leaves, stems and roots of Miconia sp. and E. polymnioides in a natural zone and polluted zone of southern Ecuador.
Total weight of the study plants with their respective percentage by weight of each part (leaves, stems and roots).
| Total Plant Weight (g) | Plant Part Weight as Percentage of Total (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaves | Stems | Roots | |||
| NZ | 10.7 ± 3.6 | 39.96 ± 0.92 | 39.7 ± 4.7 | 20.3 ± 5.6 | |
| PZ | 1.96 ± 0.27 | 60.0 ± 1.3 | 23.5 ± 1.9 | 16.5 ± 2.1 | |
|
| NZ | 52 ± 11 | 17.1 ± 2.3 | 75.7 ± 1.8 | 7.23 ± 0.74 |
| PZ | 18.6 ± 2.9 | 25.5 ± 5.6 | 56 ± 12 | 18.4 ± 7.1 | |
Bioaccumulation and translocation factors for the two study species in a natural zone (NZ) and polluted zone (PZ) subjected to artisanal mining in southern Ecuador.
| Cd | Pb | Zn | Hg | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NZ | PZ | NZ | PZ | NZ | PZ | NZ | PZ | ||
| Bioaccumulation factor (BCF) | |||||||||
| Leaves | 3.47 | 3.82 | 0.14 | 0.23 | 1.11 | 0.99 | 2.05 | 1.66 | |
| Stems | 3.08 | 2.91 | 0.12 | 0.20 | 0.87 | 0.78 | 1.03 | 0.57 | |
| Roots | 3.09 | 6.50 | 0.20 | 0.49 | 1.48 | 2.34 | 1.10 | 1.05 | |
|
| Leaves | 2.88 | 6.19 | 0.25 | 0.53 | 4.48 | 3.28 | 0.73 | 1.19 |
| Stems | 2.85 | 4.62 | 0.12 | 0.38 | 4.53 | 2.08 | 0.17 | 0.31 | |
| Roots | 2.42 | 5.64 | 0.55 | 0.80 | 1.71 | 1.52 | 0.76 | 1.12 | |
| Translocation factor (TF) | |||||||||
| Leaves/roots | 1.14 | 0.84 | 0.75 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 2.53 | 1.72 | |
| Stems/roots | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.44 | 0.87 | 0.36 | |
|
| Leaves/roots | 1.27 | 1.55 | 0.46 | 0.53 | 2.40 | 2.21 | 1.04 | 1.27 |
| Stems/roots | 1.08 | 1.07 | 0.23 | 0.43 | 2.79 | 1.45 | 0.25 | 0.41 | |
Figure 2Location of the study area and pictures of the two studied zones and two native species selected for study.