| Literature DB >> 29589150 |
Jerzy Wieczorek1, Agnieszka Baran2, Krzysztof Urbański3, Ryszard Mazurek4, Agnieszka Klimowicz-Pawlas5.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to assess the content, distribution, soil binding capacity, and ecological risk of cadmium and lead in the soils of Malopolska (South Poland). The investigation of 320 soil samples from differently used land (grassland, arable land, forest, wasteland) revealed a very high variation in the metal content in the soils. The pollution of soils with cadmium and lead is moderate. Generally, a point source of lead and cadmium pollution was noted in the study area. The highest content of cadmium and lead was found in the northwestern part of the area-the industrial zones (mining and metallurgical activity). These findings are confirmed by the arrangement of semivariogram surfaces and bivariate Moran's correlation coefficients. Among the different types of land use, forest soils had by far the highest mean content of bioavailable forms of both metals. The results showed a higher soil binding capacity for lead than for cadmium. However, for both metals, extremely high (class 5) accumulation capacities were dominant. Based on the results, the investigated soils had a low (Pb) and moderate (Cd) ecological risk on living components. Soil properties, such as organic C, pH, sand, silt, and clay content, correlated with the content of total and bioavailable forms of metals in the soils. The correlations, despite being statistically significant, were characterized by very low values of correlation coefficient (r = 0.12-0.20, at p ≤ 0.05). Therefore, the obtained data do not allow to define any conclusions as to the relationships between these soil properties. However, it must be highlighted that there was a very strong positive correlation between the total content of cadmium and lead and their bioavailable forms in the soils.Entities:
Keywords: Bioavailability; Cadmium; Geostatistics; Lead; Risk assessment; Soil factors
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29589150 PMCID: PMC6280874 DOI: 10.1007/s10653-018-0100-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Geochem Health ISSN: 0269-4042 Impact factor: 4.609
Fig. 1Spatial distribution of Cd in soils
Total content of Cd and Pb in the soils (mg kg−1 d.m.)
| Parameter | Meanb | SD | Minimum | Maximum | Median | Skewness | Kurtosis | CV %a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd (0-10 cm) | 0.93a | 1.59 | 0.01 | 16.9 | 0.49 | 5.41 | 39.1 | 171 |
| Arable land | 0.97a | 1.49 | 0.07 | 7.75 | 0.49 | 3.49 |
| 154 |
| Grassland | 0.99a | 1.88 | 0.02 | 16.9 | 0.54 | 6.07 |
| 189 |
| Forest soils | 0.88a | 1.34 | 0.02 | 8.34 | 0.39 | 3.38 |
| 152 |
| Wasteland | 0.78a | 1.25 | 0.01 | 8.35 | 0.48 | 5.68 |
| 160 |
| Cd (40-50 cm) | 1.24a | 5.38 | 0 | 11.30 | 0.36 | 9.69 | – | 438 |
| Pb (0-10 cm) | 38.3a | 56.9 | 3.0 | 586 | 22.2 | 5.45 | 38.4 | 148 |
| Arable land | 50.2a | 89.6 | 11.3 | 586 | 24.0 | 5.40 |
| 178 |
| Grassland | 30.6a | 26.4 | 3.00 | 148 | 23.3 | 5.70 |
| 86 |
| Forest soils | 41.5a | 61.5 | 8.00 | 356 | 19.4 | 3.35 |
| 148 |
| Wasteland | 36.6a | 46.9 | 6.30 | 309 | 23.6 | 5.74 |
| 128 |
| Pb (40-50 cm) | 23.0b | 42.2 | 2.15 | 470 | 13.2 | 6.50 | – | 183 |
aCV %—variation coefficient
bMeans followed by the different letters in line indicate significant differences at α ≤ 0.05 according to the t Tukey test
Fig. 2Spatial distribution of Pb in soils
Global and local Moran’s autocorrelation indices and Moran’s correlation coefficients
| Dependance | Global autocorrelation index and bivariate correlation index | Local indicator of spatial autocorrelation (LISA)** [%] | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | H–H | L–L | L–H | H–L | |||
| Cd | lagCd/Cd | 0.4283* | 70.0 | 6.88 | 20.3 | 1.88 | 0.94 |
| lagCd/X | −0.3481* | 70.6 | 0.31 | 0.94 | 8.13 | 20.0 | |
| lagCd/Y | 0.3036* | 70.9 | 9.06 | 10.6 | 0.00 | 9.38 | |
| Pb | lagPb/Pb | 0.3344* | 74.4 | 5.94 | 16.9 | 1.88 | 0.94 |
| lagPb/X | −0.2902* | 75.3 | 0.00 | 2.19 | 7.50 | 15.0 | |
| lagPb/Y | 0.2299* | 75.9 | 7.19 | 4.38 | 0.00 | 12.5 | |
*Significant at pseudo p value 0.05, **LISA—local indicator of spatial autocorrelation; N without autocorrelation, H–H clusters with high values, L–L clusters with low values, L–H low values are surrounded by high values (“coldspots”), and H–L high values are surrounded by low values (“hot spots”)
Fig. 4Semivariogram maps (surface semivariograms) created on the basis of the total content of Pb and Cd in soils of the Malopolska district. Values of semivariance (γ) of total Cd and Pb are presented on the maps. Semivariogram map is a plot of experimental (directional) semivariogram and coordinates calculated on the basis of point location vertical (Northing) and horizontal (Easting) differences (Mucha and Wasilewska-Blaszczyk 2015; Bartuś 2012). Geometric anisotropy in NW–SE direction shows the highest variation within data
Fig. 3Accumulation coefficient of metals as the content ratio: Cd(0–10 cm)/Cd(40–50 cm) and Pb(0–10 cm)/Pb(40–50 cm) in soils
Content of bioavailable forms of Cd and Pb in soils (mg kg−1 d.m.) extracted with 0.01 mol CaCl2 dm−3
| Parameter | Meanb | SD | Minimum | Maximum | Median | CV %a | % Extractiond |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd (all samples) | 0.11 | 0.14 | ndc | 1.23 | 0.08 | 125 | 24 (0–98) |
| Arable land | 0.10a | 0.12 | nd | 0.58 | 0.07 | 119 | 23 (0–94) |
| Grassland | 0.10a | 0.09 | 0.005 | 0.45 | 0.07 | 90 | 21 (0–97) |
| Forest soils | 0.17b | 0.22 | nd | 1.23 | 0.10 | 131 | 34 (0–98) |
| Wasteland | 0.09a | 0.08 | nd | 0.36 | 0.07 | 86 | 18 (1–61) |
| Pb (all samples) | 0.410 | 0.52 | nd | 4.73 | 0.24 | 127 | 1.70 (0–32) |
| Arable land | 0.25a | 0.18 | 0.04 | 0.81 | 0.18 | 75 | 1.46 (0–10) |
| Grassland | 0.34a | 0.50 | nd | 4.73 | 0.21 | 148 | 1.83 (0–32) |
| Forest soils | 0.74b | 0.71 | nd | 4.08 | 0.52 | 97 | 1.68 (0–5) |
| Wasteland | 0.29a | 0.21 | 0.05 | 0.85 | 0.19 | 71 | 1.64 (0–9) |
aCV %—variation coefficient
bMeans followed by the different letters in line indicate significant differences at α ≤ 0.05 according to the t Tukey test
cnd—not detected
dPercentage of bioavailable fraction in relation to total content
Fig. 5Spatial distribution of bioavailable forms of Cd and Pb in soils
Fig. 6Soil cadmium- and lead-binding ability
Statistical results of potential ecological risk index and hazard quotient of Cd and Pb
| Elements | Risk | Arable land | Grassland | Forest soils | Wasteland | All samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cadmium |
| 4.40 (0.32–35.2)a | 4.0 (0.11–76.7) | 4.0 (0.11–37.9) | 3.55 (0.05–39.1) | 4.22 (0.05–6.8) |
|
| 132 (9.55–1057) | 135 (3.27–2303) | 120 (3.36–1138) | 106 (1.56–1170) | 126 (1.56–2303) | |
| HQ | 0.32 (0.02–2.58) | 0.33 (0.01–5.63) | 0.09 (0–0.83) | 0.25 (0.05–2.86) | 0.26 (0.01–5.63) | |
| Lead |
| 1.84 (0.41–23.4) | 2.06 (0.16–32.6) | 2.85 (0.60–17.8) | 1.45 (0.30–11.87) | 2.13 (0.16–32.5) |
|
| 9.19 (2.03–117) | 10.3 (0.82 –162) | 14.3 (2.99–85.9) | 7.23 (1.52–59.3) | 10.6 (0.82–162) | |
| HQ | 0.13 (0.03–1.69) | 0.15(0.01–2.35) | 0.10 (0.02–0.62) | 0.10 (0.02–0.85) | 0.13 (0.01–2.35) | |
| PERI | 141 (12.1–1150) | 145 (5.53–2466) | 134 (12.2–1229) | 113 (4.28–129) | 137 (4.28–2466) | |
aMean value, range
Relationships between soil properties and concentration of cadmium and lead in soils
| Parameters | C—org. | Sand | Silt | Clay | Cd Total | Pb Total | Cd CaCl2 | Pb CaCl2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sand | 0.06 | |||||||
| Silt | −0.12* | −0.78* | ||||||
| Clay | 0.03 | −0.78* | 0.23* | |||||
| Cd Total | 0.17* | 0.25* | −0.21* | −0.18* | ||||
| Pb Total | 0.29* | 0.26* | −0.21* | −0.20* | 0.79* | |||
| Cd CaCl2 | 0.20* | 0.07 | −0.05 | −0.06 | 0.14* | 0.21* | ||
| Pb CaCl2 | 0.22* | 0.12* | −0.07 | −0.12* | 0.02 | 0.18* | 0.32* | |
| pH | −0.15* | 0.06 | 0.03 | −0.10 | 0.11 | 0.07 | −0.10 | −0.11* |
*Significant at p ≤ 0.05
Fig. 7Scatter plot showing dependence between Cd and Pb content in studied soils
Component matrix for variables
| Variables | All samples | Arable land | Grassland | Forest | Wasteland | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCA 1 | PCA 2 | PCA 1 | PCA 2 | PCA 1 | PCA 2 | PCA 1 | PCA 2 | PCA 1 | PCA 2 | |
| pH | −0.0943 | −0.5966 | 0.1181 | −0.3306 | 0.5083 | −0.2592 | −0.1229 | −0.5225 | 0.3077 | 0.1092 |
| C—org. | 0.3301 | 0.5715 | −0.051 | −0.4038 | 0.1118 | −0.5508 | 0.4106 | 0.5084 | 0.1249 | −0.5743 |
| Sand | 0.8313 | −0.3753 | −0.9316 | 0.3036 | 0.7882 | 0.5933 | 0.7856 | −0.5136 | 0.8313 | 0.4738 |
| Silt | −0.663 | 0.2705 | 0.743 | −0.0832 | −0.5948 | −0.3752 | −0.5984 | 0.4898 | −0.7331 | −0.1781 |
| Clay | −0.6381 | 0.3169 | 0.7134 | −0.4137 | −0.6098 | −0.524 | −0.6676 | 0.3477 | −0.5234 | −0.616 |
| CdTotal | 0.6282 | −0.0467 | −0.3722 | −0.8342 | 0.7109 | −0.5537 | 0.7303 | −0.2199 | 0.7628 | −0.55 |
| PbTotal | 0.6894 | 0.162 | −0.4345 | −0.7834 | 0.7128 | −0.5132 | 0.825 | 0.3855 | 0.7544 | −0.5431 |
| CdCaCl2 | 0.3144 | 0.5458 | 0.3981 | −0.0057 | −0.1868 | 0.1649 | 0.671 | 0.3093 | 0.1169 | −0.3531 |
| PbCaCl2 | 0.3175 | 0.613 | 0.0747 | 0.1294 | −0.1305 | 0.2048 | 0.4822 | 0.6031 | 0.1579 | 0.3914 |
| % of the total variance | 30.28 | 18.88 | 27.08 | 20.77 | 29.81 | 19.75 | 38.90 | 20.14 | 31.14 | 20.59 |
Fig. 8Results of PCA relationships between cadmium and lead and soil factors