| Literature DB >> 35566981 |
Wei-Cheng Hsiao1, Yong-Han Hong2, Yung-Hsiang Tsai3, Yi-Chen Lee3, Anil Kumar Patel4, Hui-Ru Guo3, Chia-Hung Kuo3, Chun-Yung Huang3.
Abstract
In the current investigation, a native crude fucoidan (Ex) was extracted from Sargassum crispifolium, pretreated by single-screw extrusion, and two degraded fucoidans, i.e., ExAh (degradation of Ex by ascorbic acid) and ExHp (degradation of Ex by hydrogen peroxide), were obtained. The extrusion pretreatment increased the extraction yield of fucoidan by approximately 1.73-fold as compared to the non-extruded sample. Among Ex, ExAh, and ExHp, their molecular weight and chemical compositions varied, but the structural features were similar. ExHp possessed the greatest antioxidant activities among the extracted fucoidans. According to the outcome, ExAh exhibited the maximum immune promoting effects via enhanced NO, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-10 secretion. Thus, both ExHp and ExAh may potentially be used as an effective antioxidant and as immunostimulant agents, which could be of great value in the development of food and nutraceutical products.Entities:
Keywords: Fourier transform infrared; Sargassum crispifolium; antioxidant; cytokine; fucoidan; immunostimulant
Year: 2022 PMID: 35566981 PMCID: PMC9103907 DOI: 10.3390/polym14091812
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Proximate composition of Sargassum crispifolium.
| Proximate Analysis (%) |
|
|---|---|
| Crude protein | 8.21 ± 0.24 1 |
| Crude lipid | 1.17 ± 0.03 |
| Ash | 10.3 ± 0.2 |
| Carbohydrate | 80.3 ± 0.3 |
1 Values are mean ± SD (n = 3).
Extrusion variables, extraction variables, and extraction yields of crude extracts of fucoidan for NEx and Ex.
| Variables of Extrusion | NEx | Ex |
|---|---|---|
| Preconditioning solvent | - | ddH2O |
| The moisture content of algal powder (%) | 10 | 35 |
| Feed supply (kg/h) | - | 10.4 |
| Die diameter (mm) | - | 5 |
| Screw speed (rpm) | - | 360 |
| Barrel temperature (°C) | - | 115 |
|
|
|
|
| Extraction temperature (°C) | 85 | 85 |
| Extraction time (h) | 1 | 1 |
|
|
|
|
| Extraction yield (%, dry basis) | 1.50 ± 0.19 1 | 2.59 ± 0.32 ** |
-, not adopted. 1 Values are mean ± SD (n = 3); **, p < 0.01.
Molecular weight analysis for Ex, ExAh, and ExHp.
| Fucoidans | Peak 1 (MW (kDa)/Peak Area (%)) | Peak 2 (MW (kDa)/Peak Area (%)) | Peak 3 (MW (kDa)/Peak Area (%)) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ex 1 | 50.8/70.3 | 2.34/28.6 | 0.90/1.13 |
| ExAh 1 | 50.7/64.7 | 2.36/33.7 | 0.90/1.58 |
| ExHp 1 | ND 2 | 2.28/45.1 | 0.88/54.9 |
1 Ex (fucoidan from extrusion-pretreated Sargassum crispifolium); ExAh (Ex degraded by ascorbic acid); ExHp (Ex degraded by hydrogen peroxide). 2 ND: not detected.
Composition analyses for Ex, ExAh, and ExHp.
| Chemical Composition | Ex 1 | ExAh 1 | ExHp 1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total sugar (%) 2 | 57.5 ± 2.3 b | 53.8 ± 2.6 b | 39.1 ± 1.4 a |
| Fucose (%) 2 | 48.8 ± 2.1 b | 45.8 ± 1.2 b | 40.1 ± 2.0 a |
| Sulfate (%) 2 | 32.9 ± 0.4 c | 22.4 ± 0.8 a | 26.9 ± 0.5 b |
| Uronic acid (%) 2 | 16.7 ± 0.7 b | 17.9 ± 0.1 c | 13.6 ± 0.4 a |
| Protein (%) 2 | 0.58 ± 0.02 b | 0.69 ± 0.06 c | 0.42 ± 0.02 a |
| Polyphenols (%) 2 | 0.20 ± 0.00 a | 0.43 ± 0.01 b | 0.78 ± 0.01 c |
|
|
|
|
|
| Fucose | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Galactose | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.42 |
| Mannose | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1.17 |
| Glucuronic acid | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.21 |
| Glucose | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.13 |
| Rhamnose | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Xylose | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.16 |
1 Ex (fucoidan from extrusion-pretreated Sargassum crispifolium); ExAh (Ex degraded by ascorbic acid); ExHp (Ex degraded by hydrogen peroxide). 2 Total sugars (%), fucose (%), sulfate (%), uronic acid (%), protein (%), and polyphenols (%) = (g/gsample, dry basis) × 100; Values are mean ± SD (n = 3); values in the same row with different letters (in a, b, and c) are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 1FTIR spectra for Ex, ExAh, and ExHp. Absorption bands at 3401, 2941, 1621, 1421, 1230, 1055, 837, 620, and 580 cm−1 are indicated.
Figure 2NMR spectra for Ex, ExAh, and ExHp. (A) 1H-NMR of Ex, ExAh, and ExHp and (B) 13C-NMR of Ex, ExAh, and ExHp. The characteristic peaks are indicated in each graph.
Antioxidant activities of Ex, ExAh, and ExHp.
| Treatments | DPPH/IC50 (mg/mL) 1 | ABTS/IC50 (mg/mL) 1 | FRAP/Vitamin C Equivalent (μmol Vitamin c/g Extract, Dry Basis) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ex | 5.67 ± 0.05 2,c | 0.97 ± 0.01 c | 2.33 ± 0.04 a |
| ExAh | 5.34 ± 0.27 b | 0.93 ± 0.02 b | 3.52 ± 0.12 b |
| ExHp | 3.67 ± 0.15 a | 0.32 ± 0.01 a | 6.15 ± 0.09 c |
| Vitamin C | 0.010 ± 0.000 | 0.003 ± 0.000 | - |
1 IC50 value: concentration of fucoidan sample capable of scavenging 50% of DPPH or ABTS free radicals; 2 Values are mean ± SD (n = 3); values in the same column with different letters (in a, b, and c) are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Effects of various concentrations of Ex, ExAh, and ExHp on cell viability, NO production, TNF-α production, IL-1β production, IL-6 production, and IL-10 production in RAW 264.7 macrophages. (A) cell viability, (B) NO production, (C) TNF-α production, (D) IL-1β production, (E) IL-6 production, and (F) IL-10 production. Values are mean ± SD (n = 3); values in the same graph with different letters (in a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, and i) are significantly different (p < 0.05).