| Literature DB >> 35566473 |
Syota Saito1, Yuta Nakao1, Yoko Hasegawa2,3, Koutatsu Nagai4, Kyoko Sano4, Yuki Uchiyama5, Hiromitsu Kishimoto3, Ken Shinmura6, Kazuhisa Domen5.
Abstract
In the assessment of skeletal muscle strength, rate of force development (RFD) is clinically identified as a functional index that reflects the effects of aging, but there are few reports on RFD of the tongue. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between RFD of tongue pressure (RFD-TP) and oral and whole-body physical performance in older adults, and to clarify its characteristics. We enrolled adults aged ≥65 years with pathological occlusal contact in premolar and molar regions of teeth in the Tamba-Sasayama area, Japan, from 2017 to 2018. Maximum tongue pressure (MTP) and the speed to reach the maximum tongue pressure (RFD-TP) were evaluated as measures of tongue function. Oral functions related to objective measures of tongue function, such as repetitive saliva swallowing test, oral diadochokinesis, and physical status or performance, such as mini mental state examination, body mass index, skeletal mass index, knee extension force, one-leg standing time, grip strength, walking speed, timed up-and-go test, and five-time chair stand speed was evaluated. No significant correlation was found between MTP and age, but RFD-TP had a significant negative correlation with age. Neither RFD-TP nor MTP showed a significant correlation with oral function. RFD-TP was associated with physical performance, such as knee extension force and one-leg standing time. RFD-TP is more sensitive to aging than MTP. In addition, RFD-TP is related to physical performance and may be useful for the early detection of frailty.Entities:
Keywords: aging; frailty; maximum tongue pressure; physical performance; rate of force development; tongue pressure
Year: 2022 PMID: 35566473 PMCID: PMC9101244 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092347
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.964
Figure 1Tongue pressure measurement and assessment. (a) Tongue pressure measuring instrument. Tongue pressure was measured using the JMS tongue pressure measuring instrument (TPM-01, JMS, Hiroshima, Japan). The instrument has a power button and a measurement start button, and the LCD monitor displays the maximum tongue pressure and the current pressure value. (b) Rate of force development of tongue pressure (RFD-TP). Tongue pressure values were recorded at a sampling frequency of 20 Hz using dedicated software provided by JMS. Instructed the subject to “compress the probe with maximum force as soon as possible”. RFD-TP was defined as maximum tongue pressure (MTP) (kPa) divided by the time (second) it took to reach MTP.
Summary of participant characteristics and relationship with aging.
| Measurement Variables | Overall (n = 87) | Male (n = 29) | Female (n = 58) | Rage | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical/Cognitive condition | ||||||
| Age (years) | 74.3 (69.0, 80.0) | 75.2 (69.0, 81.0) | 73.8 (69.0, 78.0) | 0.358 | - | - |
| BMI (kg/m2) * | 22.6 (20.5, 24.4) | 23.8 (22.1, 25.5) | 22.0 (20.2, 24.2) | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.977 |
| SMI (kg/m2) * | 6.4 (5.7, 7.2) | 7.5 (7.1, 7.9) | 5.9 (5.5, 6.2) | <0.001 | −0.113 | 0.299 |
| MMSE (score) # | 28.1 (27.0, 30.0) | 27.7 (26.0, 30.0) | 28.2 (27.0, 30.0) | 0.298 | −0.295 | 0.006 |
| Oral function | ||||||
| RFD-TP (kPa/s) # | 98.6 (73.5, 110.6) | 109.0(71.6, 151.4) | 93.4 (73.9, 102.3) | 0.331 | −0.233 | 0.03 |
| MTP (kPa) | 34.3 (30.0, 38.2) | 33.9 (27.6, 39.4) | 34.5 (30.2, 37.8) | 0.709 | −0.113 | 0.299 |
| ODK /ta/ (times/5 s) # | 31.1 (29.0, 34.0) | 30.1 (27.5, 34.5) | 31.5 (29.0, 34.0) | 0.307 | −0.219 | 0.041 |
| RSST (times/30 s) * | 5.1 (3.0, 7.0) | 6.0 (4.0, 7.5) | 4.7 (3.0, 6.0) | 0.012 | −0.133 | 0.221 |
| EAT-10 (score) | 0.2 (0, 0) | 0.2 (0, 0) | 0.2 (0, 0) | 0.363 | 0.126 | 0.245 |
| Physical performance | ||||||
| Walking speed (m/s) | 1.5 (1.3, 1.7) | 1.4 (1.2, 1.5) | 1.5 (1.3, 1.7) | 0.11 | −0.085 | 0.435 |
| TUG (s) # | 6.0 (5.1, 6.5) | 5.9 (5.0, 6.3) | 6.1 (5.3, 6.5) | 0.163 | 0.581 | <0.001 |
| One-leg standing (s) # | 32.7 (11.8, 60.0) | 34.5 (12.6, 60.0) | 31.8 (11.4, 60.0) | 0.559 | −0.575 | <0.001 |
| 5CS (s) # | 6.87 (5.36, 7.40) | 7.61 (5.57, 8.34) | 6.49 (5.28, 7.12) | 0.192 | 0.345 | 0.001 |
| Grip strength (kg) *# | 27.6 (22.0, 32.0) | 36.4 (30.3, 41.3) | 23.2 (20.4, 26.5) | <0.001 | −0.295 | 0.006 |
| Knee extension force (N) *# | 358.6 (276.0, 418.0) | 467.1 (350.0, 540.5) | 304.3 (255.8, 343.0) | <0.001 | −0.368 | <0.001 |
Data are shown as median (Q1, first quartile; Q3, third quartile). BMI: body mass index. SMI: skeletal muscle mass index. MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination. RFD-TP: rate of force development of tongue pressure. MTP: maximum tongue pressure. ODK: oral diadochokinesis. RSST: repetitive saliva swallowing test. TUG: timed up and go test. 5CS: 5-time chair stand test. p-value: Comparison between men and women Mann–Whitney U-test *: p < 0.05. Rage: Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient with age, #: p < 0.05.
Figure 2Scatter plots depicting (a) the relationship between the rate of force development of tongue pressure (RFD-TP) and age and (b) the relationship between the maxi-mum tongue pressure (MTP) and age. The RFD-TP showed a significant negative correlation with age (r = −0.233, p = 0.03), but MTP had no significant correlation (r = −0.113, p = 0.299).
Correlations between RFD or MTP and evaluated factors.
| RFD-TP | MTP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | R | |||
| Physical/Cognitive condition | ||||
| Age | −0.233 | 0.03 * | −0.113 | 0.299 |
| BMI | 0.079 | 0.472 | 0.184 | 0.09 |
| SMI | 0.173 | 0.112 | 0.092 | 0.401 |
| MMSE | 0.21 | 0.053 | 0.009 | 0.937 |
| Oral function | ||||
| ODK/ta/ | −0.022 | 0.839 | −0.054 | 0.619 |
| RSST | 0.048 | 0.66 | −0.083 | 0.445 |
| EAT-10 | 0.021 | 0.847 | −0.035 | 0.744 |
| Physical performance | ||||
| Walking speed | −0.187 | 0.083 | −0.215 | 0.046 * |
| TUG | −0.172 | 0.111 | −0.104 | 0.338 |
| One-leg standing | 0.284 | 0.008 * | 0.099 | 0.361 |
| 5CS | −0.177 | 0.101 | −0.175 | 0.106 |
| Grip strength | 0.12 | 0.268 | −0.118 | 0.277 |
| Knee extension force | 0.316 | 0.003 * | 0.029 | 0.793 |
RFD-TP: rate of force development of tongue pressure. MTP: maximum tongue pressure. BMI: body mass index. SMI: skeletal muscle mass index. MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination. ODK: oral diadochokinesis. RSST: repetitive saliva swallowing test. TUG: timed up and go test, 5CS: 5-time chair stand test. R: Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient; *: p < 0.05.
Association of RFD or MTP with oral/physical performance.
| RFD-TP | B | β | βAge | βSex | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical/Cognitive condition | |||||||
| BMI | 0.025 | 0.032 | 0.782 | −0.154 | 0.187 | ||
| SMI | 2.84 | 0.266 | 0.772 | 0.224 | 0.772 | ||
| MMSE | 0.171 | 0.168 | 0.127 | −0.228 | 0.04 | ||
| Oral function | |||||||
| ODK | 0.106 | 0.011 | 0.917 | −0.271 | 0.013 | ||
| RSST | 0.098 | 0.025 | 0.823 | −0.164 | 0.145 | ||
| Physical performance | |||||||
| TUG | 0.34 | 0.054 | 0.662 | −0.298 | 0.018 | ||
| One-leg standing * | 0.249 | 0.273 | 0.034 | −0.108 | 0.397 | ||
| 5CS | −0.047 | −0.003 | 0.956 | −0.258 | 0.023 | ||
| Grip strength | 0.062 | 0.012 | 0.95 | −0.275 | 0.029 | −0.19 | 0.302 |
| Knee extension force * | 0.19 | 0.308 | 0.048 | −0.153 | 0.214 | 0.017 | 0.907 |
| MTP | B | β | βAge | βsex | |||
| Physical/Cognitive condition | |||||||
| BMI | 0.037 | 0.156 | 0.181 | 0.079 | 0.498 | ||
| SMI | 1.014 | 0.315 | 0.105 | 0.284 | 0.143 | ||
| MMSE | −0.01 | −0.034 | 0.764 | −0.201 | 0.079 | ||
| Oral function | |||||||
| ODK | 0.381 | 0.128 | 0.24 | −0.153 | 0.162 | ||
| RSST | 1.317 | 0.093 | 0.408 | 0.017 | 0.877 | ||
| Physical performance | |||||||
| TUG | 0.271 | 0.14 | 0.273 | −0.21 | 0.101 | ||
| One-leg standing | 0.015 | 0.051 | 0.702 | −0.106 | 0.432 | ||
| 5CS | −0.135 | −0.103 | 0.378 | −0.097 | 0.404 | ||
| Grip strength | −0.161 | −0.215 | 0.274 | −0.221 | 0.09 | −0.142 | 0.453 |
| Knee extension force | 0.013 | 0.068 | 0.683 | −0.104 | 0.431 | 0.073 | 0.637 |
RFD-TP: rate of force development of tongue pressure; MTP: maximum tongue pressure. RFD-TP and MTP were the objective variables (forced imputation method) in simple or multiple regression analysis, and the explanatory variables were the respective oral/physical performance. Age and sex were entered into the equation as an adjustment variable for sex and/or age when a significant correlation was found (Table 1). B: unstandardized coefficient, β: standardized coefficient for each evaluation item. βAge: standardized coefficient of age, βSex: standardized coefficient of sex. *: p < 0.05.
Factors associated with RFD-TP.
| Confidence Interval | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | B | S.E. | β | t-Value | Lower | Upper | |
| One-leg standing | 0.100 | 0.037 | 0.283 | 2.714 | 0.008 | 0.027 | 0.173 |
| Knee extension force | 0.508 | 0.206 | 0.257 | 2.470 | 0.016 | 0.099 | 0.917 |
| intercept | 46.944 | 13.431 | 3.495 | 0.001 | 20.226 | 73.662 | |
The multiple regression analysis was performed as follows: Dependent variable: rate of force development of tongue pressure (RFD-TP). Explanatory variables: items significantly associated with RFD-TP in Table 2 and Table 3 (Age, One-leg standing, Knee extension force, 5CS, Grip strength, MMSE and ODK), stepwise selection method (input 0.05, removal 0.10). Statistically significant explanatory variables were shown. B: Unstandardized coefficient, S.E.: Standard error of B, β: Standardized coefficient, Confidence interval: 95% confidence interval for B. Coefficient of determination of the model: 0.190.