| Literature DB >> 35565921 |
Chang Kong1, Linsheng Yang1,2, Hongqiang Gong3, Li Wang1, Hairong Li1,2, Yonghua Li1, Binggan Wei1, Cangjue Nima3, Yangzong Deji3, Shengcheng Zhao3, Min Guo3, Lijuan Gu1, Jiangping Yu1, Zongji Gesang3, Rujun Li3.
Abstract
Dietary imbalances are an important cause of morbidity and mortality, both in China and globally. Abnormal element content in the natural environment and the unbalanced dietary structure of populations coexist in the Tibetan Plateau. This study analyzed the dietary and food consumption patterns of 617 Tibetan residents and their associated factors. Cluster analysis revealed three modes of dietary pattern; the food consumption scores (FCSs) of subjects in modes with relatively high consumption frequency of staple food and relatively singular dietary structure were the lowest. Although the FCSs of most subjects were acceptable (FCS > 35), subjects with relatively low FCSs were more dependent on locally cultivated highland barley that is probably low in selenium. Hierarchical linear models revealed both individual-family and regional factors were significantly related (p values < 0.05) with the food consumption of subjects as follows: age, travel time from township to county, and cultivation area of highland barley were negatively related; numbers of individuals aged 40-60 years and pork, beef, and mutton production were positively related. Individuals with secondary or higher education had higher FCSs. A single indicator may be incomprehensive in dietary and food consumption studies. For people with a relatively unbalanced diet, an analysis of the main foods they consume is critical. Dietary and food consumption patterns might have relatively large inter-regional and intra-regional variations; therefore, factors that influence it might be multi-level and multi-scale.Entities:
Keywords: China; Tibetan Plateau; dietary pattern; food consumption pattern; food consumption score
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35565921 PMCID: PMC9103862 DOI: 10.3390/nu14091955
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Figure 1Location of residents who participated in the investigation in Tibet, China.
Food groups and standard weights used in analyses.
| Food Items | Food Groups | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Highland barely, rice, wheat, corn, potato, and its products | Main staples | 2 |
| Bean and its products | Pulses | 3 |
| Vegetables | Vegetables | 1 |
| Fruit | Fruit | 1 |
| Meat, poultry, and eggs | Meat | 4 |
| Milk and its products | Milk | 4 |
| Oil | Oil | 0.5 |
Classification and description of potential confounding factors related to food consumption score for the study analysis.
| Independent Variable | Classification and Description |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Age | Continuous variables |
| Gender | 1 = Male; 2 = Female |
| Educational attainment | 1 = No education; 2 = Primary; 3 = Secondary or higher |
| Number of family members | Continuous variables |
| Number of family members under 18 years of age | Continuous variables |
| Number of family members aged 18–40 years | Continuous variables |
| Number of family members aged 40–60 years | Continuous variables |
| Number of family members over 60 years of age | Continuous variables |
| Family annual income (CNY 10,000) | Continuous variables |
|
| |
| Counties by type | 1 = county of agriculture; 2 = county of half agriculture and half animal husbandry; 3 = county of animal husbandry |
| The travel time from township to county (minute) | Continuous variable a |
| Population | Continuous variable |
| Administrative area (square kilometer) | Continuous variable |
| Population density (person per square kilometer) | Continuous variable b |
| Regional gross domestic product (CNY 10,000) | Continuous variable |
| Planting area of facility agriculture (hectare) | Continuous variable |
| Cultivation area of food crop (hectare) | Continuous variable |
| Cultivation area of wheat (hectare) | Continuous variable |
| Cultivation area of highland barley (hectare) | Continuous variable |
| Agricultural acreage at the end of year (hectare) | Continuous variable |
| Number of livestock stocks at the end of the year (10,000) | Continuous variable |
| Number of heavy livestock stocks (10,000) | Continuous variable |
| Pork, beef, and mutton production (ton) | Continuous variable |
| Output value of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery (CNY 10,000) | Continuous variable |
| Output value of farming (CNY 10,000) | Continuous variable |
| Output value of forestry (CNY 10,000) | Continuous variable |
| Output value of animal husbandry (CNY 10,000) | Continuous variable |
| Output value of fishery (CNY 10,000) | Continuous variable |
| Output value of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery service industry (CNY 10,000) | Continuous variable |
| Gross output value of industry (CNY 10,000) | Continuous variable |
Notes: a, the travel time from township to county was used to characterize the accessibility of residents to market food, with reference to the method used by Huang [34]; b, population density was calculated by dividing population by administrative area.
Figure 2Food consumption frequency of the subjects (n = 617).
Figure 3Dietary patterns of subjects in each investigation point. Mode 1: staple food, fruits, and vegetables; Mode 2: staple food, meat, and milk; Mode 3: staple food.
Figure 4Proportion of dietary patterns in cities.
Figure 5Mean value of food consumption score of subjects in counties.
Figure 6Mean values of food consumption scores of subjects in cities.
Figure 7Mean values of the proportion of highland barley consumption frequency of counties.
Figure 8Mean values of the proportion of staple food consumption frequency of subjects in cities in Tibet.
Figure 9Relationship of dietary patterns and food consumption scores.
Figure 10Relationship of the proportion of highland barley consumption frequency (%) and food consumption scores (FCS).
Descriptive statistics of demographic variables (n = 506).
| Demographic Variable | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | Female | |
| 230 (45.45) | 276 (54.55) | ||
| Age | <40 | 40–60 | >60 |
| 140 (27.67) | 254 (50.20) | 112 (22.13) | |
| Educational attainment | No education | Primary | Secondary or higher |
| 255 (50.40) | 189 (37.35) | 62 (12.25) | |
| Number of family members | 1–5 | 6–10 | 11–15 |
| 271 (53.56) | 202 (39.92) | 33 (6.52) | |
| Number of family members under 18 years old | 0–1 | 2–3 | 4–6 |
| 225 (44.46) | 214 (42.30) | 67 (13.24) | |
| Number of family members aged 18–40 | 0–2 | 3–5 | 6–9 |
| 317 (62.65) | 176 (34.78) | 13 (2.57) | |
| Number of family members aged 40–60 | 0–1 | 2–3 | 4–5 |
| 239 (47.23) | 244 (48.22) | 23 (4.55) | |
| Number of family members over 60 years old | 0 | 1 | 2–3 |
| 441 (87.15) | 39 (7.71) | 26 (5.14) | |
| Percentage of family members under 18 years old | 0–30 | 30.01–60 | 60.01–100 |
| 258 (50.99) | 233 (46.05) | 15 (2.96) | |
| Percentage of family members aged 18–40 | 0–30 | 30.01–60 | 60.01–100 |
| 153 (30.24) | 301 (59.48) | 52 (10.28) | |
| Percentage of family members aged 40–60 | 0–30 | 30.01–60 | 60.01–100 |
| 296 (58.50) | 165 (32.61) | 45 (8.89) | |
| Percentage of family members over 60 years old | 0–30 | 30.01–60 | 60.01–100 |
| 486 (96.05) | 7 (1.38) | 13 (2.57) | |
Hierarchical linear model of influencing factors related to food consumption score.
| Independent variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient | (95% Confidence Interval) | Coefficient | (95% Confidence Interval) | |||
| Constant term | 72.85 * | 66.29 | 79.41 | 74.61 * | 66.52 | 82.71 |
| Age | −0.10 | −0.21 | 0.00 | −0.11 * | −0.22 | −0.01 |
| No education | Ref | Ref | ||||
| Primary | 1.66 | −1.11 | 4.44 | 1.74 | −1.02 | 4.50 |
| Secondary or higher | 4.99 * | 0.80 | 9.17 | 4.69* | 0.52 | 8.86 |
| Number of family members under 18 years of age | −0.13 | −1.06 | 0.81 | −0.09 | −1.02 | 0.83 |
| Number of family members aged 18–40 years | 0.21 | −0.73 | 1.16 | 0.26 | −0.68 | 1.21 |
| Number of family members aged 40–60 years | 1.74 * | 0.54 | 2.94 | 1.83 * | 0.63 | 3.03 |
| Number of family members over 60 years of age | 0.67 | −1.72 | 3.05 | 0.81 | −1.56 | 3.17 |
| County of agriculture | Ref | |||||
| County of half agriculture and half animal husbandry | 1.90 | −3.37 | 7.18 | |||
| County of animal husbandry | −1.53 | −8.83 | 5.76 | |||
| The travel time from township to county(minute) | −0.02 * | −0.03 | 0.00 | |||
| Cultivation area of highland barley(hectare) | −1.70 × 10−3 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| Pork, beef, and mutton production(ton) | 7.17 × 10−4 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
Notes: Ref, reference category; *, significant at the 0.05 level.