| Literature DB >> 35565573 |
Hao Chen1, Chunjie Wang2, Simujide Huasai1, Aorigele Chen1.
Abstract
The diet energy level plays a vital role in the energy balance of transition cows. We investigated the effects of high dietary energy density on body metabolism. Twenty multiparous Angus cows were randomly assigned to two treatment groups (10 cows/treatment), one receiving a high-energy (HE) diet (NEm = 1.67 Mcal/kg of DM) and the other administered a control (CON) diet (NEm = 1.53 Mcal/kg of DM). The results indicated that feeding a high-energy diet resulted in higher plasma glucose concentration and lower concentrations of plasma NEFA and BHBA on d 14 relative to calving in the HE-fed cows compared to the CON-fed ones. The postpartum plasma levels of T-AOC were lower in cows that received the CON diet than in cows in the HE group, while the concentration of malondialdehyde (MDA) showed an opposite trend. Among the 51 significantly different metabolites, the concentrations of most identified fatty acids decreased in HE cows. The concentrations of inosine, glutamine, and citric acid were higher in HE-fed cows than in CON-fed cows. Enrichment analysis revealed that linoleic acid metabolism, valine, leucine as well as isoleucine biosynthesis, and glycerophospholipid metabolism were significantly enriched in the two groups.Entities:
Keywords: cow; dietary energy density; metabolic profiles; negative energy balance; plasma
Year: 2022 PMID: 35565573 PMCID: PMC9105006 DOI: 10.3390/ani12091147
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Chemical composition of the mixed diets (HE and CON) offered to the cows during the trial.
| Group 1 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Item | HE | CON |
| Ingredient, % of DM | ||
| Corn silage | 42.0 | 33.0 |
| Dry rice straw | 18.0 | 27.0 |
| Corn | 22.8 | 15.6 |
| Wheat bran | 5.2 | 12.1 |
| Soybean meal | 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Cottonseed meal | 3.6 | 5.1 |
| CaHPO4 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| NaHCO3 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| NaCl | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Unifat 2 | 2.5 | 1.3 |
| Premix 3 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Total | 100 | 100 |
| Nutrient composition | ||
| CP, % of DM | 11.55 | 11.78 |
| ADF, % of DM | 23.52 | 26.88 |
| NDF, % of DM | 37.51 | 41.62 |
| TDN, % of DM | 71.19 | 68.31 |
| NEm 4, Mcal/kg DM | 1.67 | 1.53 |
| Calcium, % of DM | 0.72 | 0.79 |
| Phosphorus, % of DM | 0.36 | 0.34 |
1 HE = high energy (NEm = 1.67 Mcal/kg of DM); CON = medium energy; (NEm = 1.53 Mcal/kg of DM); 2 Fractionated palm fatty acids (China Benefit Agriculture, Beijing, China). 3 Premix contained (per kg of premix): 480,000 IU of vitamin A, 90,000 IU of vitamin D3, 3500 IU of vitamin E, 2400 mg of Fe, 168 g of Ca, 38 g of P, 950 mg of Cu, 1500 mg of Mn, 3150 mg of Zn, 28 mg of I, 33 mg of Se, and 26 mg of Co. 4 NEm was calculated based on NRC (2001).
Effect of dietary energy level during the transition period on the concentration of serum metabolites and the oxidative status in postpartum Angus cows.
| Treatments 1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Items 2 | CON | HE | SEM | |
| Glucose mmol/L | 5.73 b | 6.21 a | 0.055 | 0.031 |
| Insulin mIU/L | 19.02 b | 28.47 a | 0.398 | 0.002 |
| NEFA μmol/L | 612.56 a | 529.77 b | 30.50 | 0.017 |
| BHBA μmol/L | 509.62 a | 398.31 b | 18.69 | 0.026 |
| T-AOC U/mL | 2.25 b | 3.63 a | 0.375 | <0.001 |
| GSH-Px U/mL | 136.05 | 102.03 | 16.53 | 0.011 |
| SOD U/mL | 15.66 | 17.91 | 0.021 | 0.127 |
| MDA mmol/mL | 2.33 a | 1.56 b | 0.76 | 0.018 |
1 HE = high energy (NEm = 1.67 Mcal/kg of DM); 2 CON = medium energy; (NEm = 1.53 Mcal/kg of DM); a,b Means bearing different superscripts in the same row differ significantly (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Overlap of the total ion chromatograms of the QC sample in the positive (A) and negative (B) ion modes.
Figure 2The OPLS-DA model (A,C) and permutation test of the OPLS-DA model (B,D) were derived from the LC–MS metabolomics profiles of the plasma of Angus cows fed the high-energy diet (HE) and the control diet (CON). (A–D) plasma samples analyzed in POS and NEG ion modes; the green and blue colors indicate, respectively, CON and HE diets administered to beef steers (A,C). Blue triangles represent the Q2 value, and red dots represent the R2 value from the permutation test (B,D).
Figure 3Volcano plots for the HE and. CON groups. (A,B) plasma samples analyzed in POS and NEG ion modes, respectively. Red and blue indicate, respectively, significantly upregulated and downregulated metabolites in the HE group compared with the CON group, and gray denotes no significant difference.
Identification of different serum metabolites in cows fed the HE diet compared to cows in the control group.
| Metabolite Name | VIP | RT (min) | Ion (m/z) | Fold Change | Positive/Negative | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cibaric acid | 1.2626 | 6.67 | 325.20 | 0.84 | 0.0378 | pos |
| Linoleic acid | 2.2307 | 7.78 | 485.32 | 0.78 | <0.00001 | pos |
| Pelargonic acid | 1.6576 | 6.51 | 200.16 | 0.72 | 0.045 | pos |
| 2-Hydroxymyristic acid | 1.0692 | 8.41 | 243.19 | 1.1034 | 0.0061 | neg |
| Citric acid | 1.235 | 0.727 | 191.02 | 1.06 | 0.0005 | neg |
| Hexadecanedioic acid | 1.0971 | 7.63 | 285.21 | 0.93 | <0.00001 | neg |
| heptadecanoic acid | 1.1185 | 6.13 | 263.24 | 0.61 | 0.0015 | neg |
| 7-Ketodeoxycholic acid | 1.9979 | 6.97 | 451.36 | 1.57 | 0.00018 | neg |
| 11Z-Eicosenoic acid | 1.0659 | 9.16 | 355.28 | 1.065 | 0.0014 | neg |
| Butyl salicylate | 1.033 | 6.66 | 195.10 | 0.9458 | 0.02184 | pos |
| LysoPE(0:0/22:0) | 1.1191 | 9.34 | 582.37 | 0.94 | 0.0005 | neg |
| LysoPC(20:4(5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z)) | 1.2623 | 7.96 | 544.33 | 0.95 | 0.01638 | pos |
| LysoPE (0:0/18:0) | 1.1836 | 7.98 | 550.31 | 0.91 | 0.0006 | neg |
| LysoPE(0:0/22:4(7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z)) | 1.3637 | 7.85 | 574.31 | 0.79 | 0.0033 | neg |
| LysoPC(20:0) | 1.3302 | 9.20 | 552.40 | 0.94 | 0.00001 | pos |
| LysoPC(22:2(13Z,16Z)) | 1.4444 | 9.27 | 620.39 | 0.83 | 0.0002 | neg |
| LysoPC(O-18:0) | 1.8298 | 9.35 | 544.36 | 0.67 | 0.0004 | neg |
| PS(14:0/18:1(9Z)) | 2.41 | 9.16 | 778.48 | 0.46 | 0.0002 | neg |
| 2.3631 | 3.53 | 237.07 | 0.48 | 0.02184 | pos | |
| Alpha-methylphenylalanine | 1.8553 | 2.15 | 180.10 | 1.74 | 0.022 | pos |
| Xanthosine | 1.6569 | 5.02 | 319.04 | 0.6661 | 0.03052 | neg |
| Pilosine | 1.5464 | 5.32 | 287.15 | 0.7331 | 0.024 | pos |
| 1.85 | 2.74 | 237.12 | 1.91 | 0.011 | pos | |
| Avenanthramide L | 1.9264 | 3.35 | 348.08 | 0.6458 | 0.0375 | pos |
| Shinflavanone | 1.6465 | 7.01 | 411.15 | 1.3989 | 0.00027 | neg |
| Mytilin B | 1.6406 | 4.11 | 391.10 | 0.7846 | 0.0403 | pos |
| 3-phenyllactic acid | 1.540 | 4.14 | 131.05 | 0.8978 | 0.0001 | pos |
| Threonine | 1.667 | 5.36 | 310.12 | 1.274 | 0.01084 | neg |
| 6-Hydroxymelatonin | 1.5301 | 5.42 | 293.11 | 1.4486 | 0.0009 | neg |
| Inosine | 1.5043 | 2.33 | 305.02 | 1.3865 | 0.02384 | neg |
| Glutamine | 1.8506 | 3.09 | 292.13 | 1.67 | 0.00157 | pos |
| Galactose | 1.1852 | 11.3 | 191.02 | 1.17 | 0.0011 | neg |
| Butyramide | 1.1267 | 1.56 | 88.07 | 0.8722 | 0.03654 | pos |
| Physapubenolide | 1.101 | 6.13 | 563.24 | 0.91 | 0.0015 | neg |
| 1.088 | 5.13 | 132.10 | 1.053 | 0.0375 | pos | |
| 1.072 | 6.641 | 173.09 | 1.089 | 0.0004 | neg | |
| 1.176 | 5.82 | 165.55 | 0.741 | 0.001 | neg | |
| 1.2108 | 2.71 | 277.12 | 0.847 | 0.0149 | neg | |
| Isopentenyladenine-9- | 1.0246 | 7.83 | 405.22 | 1.0745 | 0.0078 | pos |
| Gamma-Glutamylvaline | 1.7916 | 1.78 | 245.11 | 1.68 | <0.00001 | neg |
| Deoxycholic acid | 1.74 | 7.79 | 437.28 | 1.12 | <0.00001 | neg |
| 5′-Deoxy-5-fluorocytidine | 1.60 | 5.07 | 268.0 | 0.72 | 0.008 | pos |
| Acetoxy-8-gingerol | 1.53 | 6.79 | 363.21 | 1.23 | 0.0003 | neg |
| Gamma-Glu-Leu | 1.512 | 2.86 | 259.12 | 1.32 | 0.01 | neg |
| Oleyl alcohol | 1.135 | 7.58 | 286.30 | 0.81 | 0.048 | pos |
| 4-Methoxybenzyl propanoate | 1.1245 | 5.26 | 195.10 | 1.21 | 0.017 | pos |
| Sphinganine | 1.062 | 6.08 | 274.27 | 0.91 | 0.034 | pos |
| Lucidenic acid E2 | 1.042 | 5.77 | 551.24 | 1.14 | 0.0039 | neg |
| Monomenthyl succinate | 1.26 | 4.60 | 301.16 | 1.25 | 0.001 | neg |
| Cinncassiol D1 glucoside | 1.23 | 5.74 | 535.25 | 1.22 | 0.006 | neg |
| 1.16 | 6.65 | 228.16 | 1.35 | 0.04 | neg |
VIP: variable importance in projection; RT: retention time; fold change: HE group vs. CON group.
Figure 4Metabolome map of common metabolites identified in plasma. The x-axis represents the pathway impact, and the y-axis represents the pathway enrichment.