| Literature DB >> 30072917 |
Chuangye Yang1, Ruijuan Hao1, Xiaodong Du1,2, Yuewen Deng1,2, Ruijiao Sun3, Qingheng Wang1,2.
Abstract
Natural disasters and environmental pollution are the main problems in traditional offshore cultivation. While culturing pearl oysters through industrial farming can avoid these problems, food availability in this case is limited. This study compares the metabolomics responses of pearl oysters, Pinctada fucata martensii, fed a formulated diet indoors with those of oysters cultured with natural diet outdoors by using a gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-TOF/MS)-based metabolomics approach. The animals were divided into two groups as follows: the experimental group (EG) was fed a formulated diet indoors and the control group (CG) was cultured with natural diet outdoors. After 45 days of feeding, the survival rate of EG was significantly higher than that of CG. The absolute growth rate (AGR) of the total weight of EG did not significantly differ from that of CG, but the AGRs of the shell length, shell height, and shell width of CG were significantly higher than those of EG. EG showed significantly higher amylase activities than CG, and the hexokinase and glucose-6-phosphate isomerase concentrations of the former were significantly lower than those of the latter. Metabolomics revealed 125 metabolites via mass spectrum matching with a spectral similarity value > 700 in the hepatopancreas, and 48 metabolites were considered to be significantly different between groups (VIP > 1 and P < 0.05). Pathway analysis results indicated that these significantly different metabolites were involved in 34 pathways. Further integrated key metabolic pathway analysis showed that, compared with CG, EG had lower capabilities for cysteine and methionine metabolism, sulfur metabolism, and starch and sucrose metabolism. This study demonstrated that the formulated diet could be an excellent substitute for natural diet; however, its nutrients were insufficient. Effective strategies should be developed to enhance the utilization of formulated diets.Entities:
Keywords: GC–MS; Pinctada fucata martensii; formulated diet; metabolomics; nutritional requirements
Year: 2018 PMID: 30072917 PMCID: PMC6060569 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00944
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Figure 1Survival rates, activities of amylase, concentrations of HK and G6PI in the hepatopancreas of P. f. martensii fed formulated diet indoors (EG) and cultured with a natural diet outdoors (CG). Means with the same letters are not significantly different (P > 0.05). (A) survival rates; (B) activities of amylase; (C) concentrations of HK; (D) concentrations of G6PI.
Growth performance of pearl oyster (P. f. martensii) fed a formulated diet indoors (EG) and cultured with natural diet outdoors (CG).
| Shell length | 3.90 ± 0.10 | 4.42 ± 0.29 |
| Shell width | 1.22 ± 0.22 | 1.63 ± 0.39 |
| Shell height | 3.97 ± 0.46 | 4.26 ± 0.39 |
| Total weight | 4.03 ± 0.32 | 4.28 ± 0.36 |
Means with the same letters within a row are not significantly different (P >0.05).
Figure 2Typical GC–TOF/MS TICs of P. f. martensii hepatopancreas samples of EG and CG. The ordinate shows the relative mass abundance, and the abscissa shows the retention time. (A) Typical GC-TOF/MS TICs of EG; (B) Typical GC-TOF/MS TICs of CG.
Figure 3PCA score plots, OPLS-DA corresponding validation plots, and OPLS-DA score plots derived from the GC–TOF/MS metabolite profiles of the hepatopancreas of P. f. martensii. (A) PCA score plots; (B) OPLS-DA corresponding validation plots; (C) OPLS-DA score plots.
Figure 4Hierarchical clustering analysis for SDMs. The relative metabolite level is depicted according to the color scale. Red indicates upregulation, while blue indicates downregulation.
Identification of SDMs with similarity (Sim) > 700 in hepatopancreas between EG and CG groups.
| Palmitoleic acid | 948 | 1.527 | 0.000 | 3.041 | 1.605 | ↑ |
| Pyruvic acid | 948 | 1.133 | 0.027 | 0.692 | −0.531 | ↓ |
| Oleic acid | 947 | 1.559 | 0.000 | 2.804 | 1.487 | ↑ |
| Sarcosine | 945 | 1.603 | 0.000 | 0.020 | −5.660 | ↓ |
| Maltose | 932 | 1.296 | 0.009 | 4.296 | 2.103 | ↑ |
| Oleic acid | 927 | 1.605 | 0.000 | 8.696 | 3.120 | ↑ |
| Palmitic acid | 926 | 1.396 | 0.002 | 1.361 | 0.445 | ↑ |
| Glucose 2 | 923 | 1.306 | 0.001 | 1.501 | 0.586 | ↑ |
| Valine | 921 | 1.129 | 0.021 | 1.390 | 0.475 | ↑ |
| O-Phosphorylethanolamine | 921 | 1.561 | 0.000 | 0.640 | −0.645 | ↓ |
| Picolinic acid | 918 | 1.593 | 0.000 | 0.201 | −2.314 | ↓ |
| Alanine 1 | 916 | 1.229 | 0.004 | 0.717 | −0.481 | ↓ |
| Phosphate | 909 | 1.373 | 0.000 | 0.598 | −0.742 | ↓ |
| Glutamic acid | 908 | 1.507 | 0.000 | 0.618 | −0.693 | ↓ |
| Cholesterol | 908 | 1.162 | 0.026 | 0.000 | −17.419 | ↓ |
| Lysine | 905 | 1.495 | 0.000 | 0.259 | −1.950 | ↓ |
| Xanthurenic acid | 904 | 1.444 | 0.000 | 0.496 | −1.012 | ↓ |
| Beta-Mannosylglycerate 2 | 902 | 1.613 | 0.012 | 0.000 | −21.091 | ↓ |
| Glutamine 1 | 894 | 1.525 | 0.000 | 2.037 | 1.027 | ↑ |
| Itaconic acid | 888 | 1.302 | 0.002 | 1.635 | 0.709 | ↑ |
| Mannose 2 | 882 | 1.376 | 0.001 | 0.581 | −0.784 | ↓ |
| Succinic acid | 881 | 1.488 | 0.000 | 0.372 | −1.425 | ↓ |
| Isomaltose 1 | 880 | 1.113 | 0.049 | 344489.857 | 18.394 | ↑ |
| Squalene | 875 | 1.615 | 0.000 | 4231511.014 | 22.013 | ↑ |
| Mannose 1 | 872 | 1.165 | 0.031 | 0.000 | −18.522 | ↓ |
| L-cysteine | 871 | 1.503 | 0.000 | 0.317 | −1.659 | ↓ |
| Alpha-ketoisocaproic acid 1 | 863 | 1.535 | 0.000 | 11.302 | 3.499 | ↑ |
| 5-aminovaleric acid lactam | 860 | 1.478 | 0.000 | 4.655 | 2.219 | ↑ |
| citrulline 1 | 860 | 1.464 | 0.000 | 0.504 | −0.989 | ↓ |
| Ornithine 1 | 860 | 1.159 | 0.027 | 0.000 | −25.208 | ↓ |
| Methyl Phosphate | 853 | 1.424 | 0.000 | 0.572 | −0.807 | ↓ |
| 3-Hydroxypyridine | 853 | 1.543 | 0.000 | 0.540 | −0.890 | ↓ |
| 2-Monopalmitin | 841 | 1.538 | 0.001 | 8.212 | 3.038 | ↑ |
| Benzoic acid | 818 | 1.596 | 0.000 | 2.423 | 1.277 | ↑ |
| Putrescine 2 | 805 | 1.467 | 0.000 | 0.004 | −7.796 | ↓ |
| Uridine 2 | 804 | 1.162 | 0.025 | 0.000 | −16.290 | ↓ |
| Arachidonic acid | 802 | 1.507 | 0.000 | 2.524 | 1.336 | ↑ |
| 2-Monopalmitin | 801 | 1.616 | 0.000 | 4539096.110 | 22.114 | ↑ |
| Sophorose 2 | 801 | 1.614 | 0.003 | 470699.180 | 18.844 | ↑ |
| Ribose | 800 | 1.501 | 0.000 | 2.332 | 1.221 | ↑ |
| Pipecolinic acid | 800 | 1.060 | 0.046 | 0.431 | −1.213 | ↓ |
| Galactinol 3 | 778 | 1.377 | 0.012 | 0.000 | −18.881 | ↓ |
| Conduritol b epoxide 2 | 758 | 1.615 | 0.000 | 0.000 | −22.243 | ↓ |
| Glucoheptonic acid 2 | 754 | 1.382 | 0.000 | 0.285 | −1.810 | ↓ |
| 4-Hydroxymandelic acid | 738 | 1.616 | 0.000 | 1213342.746 | 20.211 | ↑ |
| histidine 2 | 718 | 1.385 | 0.000 | 0.354 | −1.498 | ↓ |
| 2-Monoolein | 703 | 1.176 | 0.012 | 66.257 | 6.050 | ↑ |
| Leucine | 703 | 1.236 | 0.004 | 1.756 | 0.812 | ↑ |
FC represent Fold change; CT represent Change trend; ↑ and ↓ indicate that the metabolites were upregulated and downregulated in EG than CG, respectively.
Figure 5Metabolomic view map of significant metabolic pathways characterized in the hepatopancreas of P. f. martensii in EG and CG. This figure illustrates significantly changed pathways based on enrichment and topology analysis. The x-axis represents pathway enrichment, and the y-axis represents pathway impact. Large sizes and dark colors represent great pathway enrichment and high pathway impact values, respectively.
Metabolic pathways identified on the SDMs from the hepatopancreas between EG and CG groups.
| Cysteine and methionine metabolism | (0.692) Pyruvic acid |
| (0.317) L-Cysteine ↓ | |
| (347353.442) L-Homoserine ↑ | |
| (0.753) L-Cysteate ↓ | |
| (0.710) O-Acetyl-L-serine ↓ | |
| Starch and sucrose metabolism | (1.501) D-Glucose ↑ |
| (0.509) D-Fructose 6-phosphate ↓ | |
| (0.026) Sucrose ↓ | |
| (4.296) Maltose ↑ | |
| (344489.857) Isomaltose ↑, | |
| (0.692) Pyruvic acid ↓ | |
| Sulfur metabolism | (0.372) Succinate ↓ |
| (0.317) L-Cysteine ↓ | |
| (347353.442) L-Homoserine ↑ | |
| (0.710) O-Acetyl-L-serine ↓ | |
| Phenylalanine metabolism | (0.692) Pyruvic acid ↓ |
| (0.372) Succinate ↓ | |
| (477736.542) Phenylpyruvate ↑ | |
| (2.423) Benzoate ↑ | |
| Pyruvate metabolism | (0.692) Pyruvic acid ↓ |
| (0.372) Succinate ↓ |
The number in the parentheses represents the value of Fold change (EG/CG); ↑ and ↓ indicate that the metabolites were upregulated and downregulated in EG than CG, respectively.
Figure 6Hypothesized scheme of the metabolomics responses of pearl oysters P. f. martensii fed a formulated diet indoors or cultured with natural diet outdoors.