| Literature DB >> 35565570 |
Xianghui Zhang1,2, Xiancai Hao2, Wenxiu Ma2, Tengfei Zhu2, Zhihua Zhang2, Qian Wang2,3, Kaiqiang Liu2,3, Changwei Shao2,3, Hong-Yan Wang2,3.
Abstract
Pathogenic infection of fishes is an important constraining factor affecting marine aquaculture. Insufficient understanding of the molecular mechanisms has affected the diagnosis and corresponding treatment. Here, we reported the dynamic changes of gene expression patterns in the Chinese tongue sole kidney at 16 h, 48 h, 72 h and 96 h after Vibrio harveyi infection. In total, 366, 214, 115 and 238 differentially expressed genes were obtained from the 16 h-vs. -C, 48 h-vs. -C, 72 h-vs. -C and 96 h-vs. -C group comparisons, respectively. KEGG enrichment analysis revealed rapid up-regulation of several immune-related pathways, including IL-17, TNF and TLR signaling pathway. More importantly, time-series analyses of transcriptome showed that immune genes were specifically up-regulated in a short period of time and then decreased. The expression levels of chemokines increased after infection and reached a peak at 16 h. Specifically, Jak-STAT signaling pathway played a crucial role in the regulation during Vibrio harveyi infection. In the later stages of infection, genes in the neuroendocrine pathway, such as glucocorticoid-related genes, were activated in the kidney, indicating a close connection between the immune system and neuroendocrine system. Our dynamic transcriptome analyses provided profound insight into the gene expression profile and investigation of immunogenetic mechanisms of Chinese tongue sole.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese tongue sole; Vibrio harveyi; immune response; transcriptome
Year: 2022 PMID: 35565570 PMCID: PMC9104532 DOI: 10.3390/ani12091144
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Specific primers used for qRT-PCR.
| Prime | 5′–3′ |
|---|---|
| CTTGTCAGGTCTTGACCCTG | |
| GTAACAGCAGGTTTTGGATGG | |
| CAGCAAAGTGACAGTGAT | |
| AGGCACACTTTCACATCA | |
| CAAGTCAGAAGGTGTCAG | |
| GGAAGTGACTGGAGTTGG | |
| TGAAGAACTGAAACTGCAACACT | |
| TGCTGATCGGTACTATTCCATTG | |
| CCAGAGTCACCACTTGGAAA | |
| GCTGAGGTTCCTGAGTTTGTT | |
| GTTTCAGGTGATCAAGGGCT | |
| TCGTCCCTCTTAGTCACACA | |
| ACCGATCAGCAGGGACTTTA | |
| CTTCTTCCCGTTCACCAGAC | |
| TTTCTCCCAGCACGAAAACA | |
| GGGATGTAAGGATGTCGCTC | |
| GGACATCATCTGCACAACCA | |
| TAGAGGCATACGACACCAGT | |
| TCACTAAACGGGGCCTAAAC | |
| CTTTCTCGTTAGCACTCTGCTT | |
| GCTGTGCTGTCCCTGTA | |
| GAGTAGCCACGCTCTGTC |
Figure 1Differential expression analysis of genes between different stages. (A–D) The volcano plot shows the differential expression genes, including 16 h−vs. −C (A), 48 h−vs. −C (B), 72 h−vs. −C (C) and 96 h−vs. −C (D). The red and dark purple colors indicate up- and down-regulated DEGs in the different group comparisons, respectively.
Figure 2Venn diagram showing the DEGs in the four groups and the shared DEGs among the comparisons.
Figure 3Top 20 terms in the GO functional classification of DEGs identified from the different group comparisons (p-value < 0.05).
Figure 4Top 20 pathways in the KEGG functional classification of DEGs identified from the different group comparisons (p-value < 0.05), 16 h−vs. −C (A), 48 h−vs. −C (B), 72 h−vs. −C (C) and 96 h−vs. −C (D).
Figure 5Transcriptome-wide time-series cluster of DEGs. (A) Cluster analysis of DEGs based on Mfuzz. (B,C) Functional categorization of DEGs in Cluster 2 ((B), n = 270) or Cluster 3 ((C), n = 117) by KEGG analysis.
Figure 6Expression patterns and protein-protein interaction networks of DEGs. (A) Expression patterns of DEGs in immune-related pathways. (B) Protein-protein interaction networks of the immune-related proteins. (C) Relationships between Stat1 and other selected immune-related proteins.
Figure 7Expression levels of immune genes verified by both qRT-PCR and RNA-seq.