| Literature DB >> 35565489 |
Jessica Maria Abbate1, Gabriele Grifò2, Fabiano Capparucci3, Francesca Arfuso1, Serena Savoca4,5, Luca Cicero3,6, Giancarlo Consolo2, Giovanni Lanteri3.
Abstract
Electric impedance spectroscopy techniques have been widely employed to study basic biological processes, and recently explored to estimate postmortem interval (PMI). However, the most-relevant parameter to approximate PMI has not been recognized so far. This study investigated electrical conductivity changes in muscle of 18 sea bass specimens, maintained at different room temperatures (15.0 °C; 20.0 °C; 25.0 °C), during a 24 h postmortem period using an oscilloscope coupled with a signal generator, as innovative technology. The root mean square (RMS) was selected among all measured parameters, and recorded every 15 min for 24 h after death. The RMS(t) time series for each animal were collected and statistically analyzed using MATLAB®. A similar trend in RMS values was observed in all animals over the 24 h study period. After a short period, during which the RMS signal decreased, an increasing trend of the signal was recorded for all fish until it reached a peak. Subsequently, the RMS value gradually decreased over time. A strong linear correlation was observed among the time series, confirming that the above time-behaviour holds for all animals. The time at which maximum value is reached strongly depended on the room temperature during the experiments, ranging from 6 h in fish kept at 25.0 °C to 14 h in animals kept at 15.0 °C. The use of the oscilloscope has proven to be a promising technology in the study of electrical muscle properties during the early postmortem interval, with the advantage of being a fast, non-destructive, and inexpensive method, although more studies will be needed to validate this technology before moving to real-time field investigations.Entities:
Keywords: Dicentrarchus labrax; PMI; RMS; electrical conductivity; postmortem interval; skeletal muscle; teleost
Year: 2022 PMID: 35565489 PMCID: PMC9105913 DOI: 10.3390/ani12091062
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Figure 1Schematic of the electric system.
Mean and standard deviation of hematological parameters and electrolytes measured in fish included in three experimental groups.
| WBC | Rbc | Hgb | Hct | MCV | MCH | MCHC | TC | Calcium | Sodium | Potassium | Chloride | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 14.57 ± 1.88 | 2.61 ± 0.53 | 7.18 ± 1.31 | 30.22 ± 6.87 | 116.70 ± 16.99 | 27.90 ± 3.48 | 24.04 ± 2.1 | 56.23 ± 13.54 | 13.12 ± 1.87 | 187.67 ± 14.02 | 4.83 ± 1.97 | 156.18 ± 11.79 |
|
| 14.83 ± 0.75 | 2.92 ± 0.26 | 6.77 ± 0.95 | 28.58 ± 1.49 | 115.51 ± 10.62 | 27.60 ± 2.16 | 24.52 ± 1.50 | 54.60 ± 9.03 | 12.17 ± 1.94 | 191.5 ± 14.36 | 5.3 ± 1.35 | 162.35 ± 6.19 |
|
| 15.41 ± 0.70 | 2.68 ± 0.40 | 6.86 ± 0.46 | 29.24 ± 2.93 | 118.91 ± 9.48 | 27.74 ± 1.02 | 23.93 ± 1.16 | 55.69 ± 8.87 | 12.65 ± 3.01 | 186.7 ± 9.40 | 3.67 ± 1.54 | 158.33 ± 10.31 |
Figure 2Time evolution of RMS value of the output voltage evaluated over a 24 h period for all 18 sea bass specimens.
Figure 3Density plot of the one-to-one linear correlation coefficient r.
Figure 4Experimental RMS data (black lines) and best fits obtained using Equation (2) (red lines).
Figure 5The adjusted R-squared (adj.R2) values (7) arising from the analysis carried out in Figure 4, evaluated for each specimen.
Figure 6(a) Time at which the maximum RMS value is reached (t); (b) the maximum excursion of the RMS value from its initial value (Equation (5)), and (c) the area beneath the best fit curve (Equation (6)).
Results of ANOVA performed on RMS peaks value (t) reached by the three experimental groups.
| Tukey’s Multiple Comparisons Test | Mean Diff. | 95.00% CI of Diff. | Significant? | Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −3.233 | −4.710 to −1.757 | Yes | 0.002 | |
| −6.995 | −8.153 to −5.837 | Yes | <0.0001 | |
| −3.762 | −5.306 to −2.217 | Yes | 0.0012 |
Features used in the cluster analysis.
|
|
| Δ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | 25 | 6.84 | 0.23 | 2.43 |
| 2 | F | 25 | 5.80 | 0.20 | 2.68 |
| 3 | M | 25 | 5.67 | 0.15 | 1.83 |
| 4 | M | 25 | 7.49 | 0.22 | 2.38 |
| 5 | M | 25 | 6.03 | 0.16 | 2.20 |
| 6 | M | 25 | 6.52 | 0.22 | 2.26 |
| 7 | M | 20 | 9.27 | 0.23 | 2.59 |
| 8 | M | 20 | 9.28 | 0.24 | 3.06 |
| 9 | M | 20 | 10.80 | 0.39 | 6.05 |
| 10 | F | 20 | 10.82 | 0.38 | 5.90 |
| 11 | M | 20 | 9.19 | 0.22 | 2.44 |
| 12 | M | 20 | 8.39 | 0.18 | 2.91 |
| 13 | M | 15 | 12.80 | 0.28 | 4.93 |
| 14 | M | 15 | 13.30 | 0.19 | 3.37 |
| 15 | F | 15 | 13.50 | 0.28 | 4.88 |
| 16 | M | 15 | 13.32 | 0.27 | 4.79 |
| 17 | M | 15 | 13.30 | 0.18 | 3.18 |
| 18 | F | 15 | 14.10 | 0.50 | 9.05 |
Figure 7Dendrogram resulting from the agglomerative clustering method.