| Literature DB >> 35564771 |
Abu Elnasr E Sobaih1,2, Ishfaq Ahmad Palla3, Abdul Baquee3.
Abstract
As a result of the COVID-19 epidemic, most educational institutions shifted to online education. Students and faculty members in many public institutions, particularly those in developing countries, are hampered by the absence of formal online learning management systems. Responding to COVID-19, many institutions in developing countries adopted social media sites to maintain e-learning and sustain education process. The distinction between online and real-world communities is becoming increasingly narrow, especially among the younger generations who have grown up with social media at their fingertips. This research explores perspectives of higher education students in India regarding the use of social media for e-learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic. For this purpose, an online questionnaire was directed to a sample of higher education students in India via a personal network. The results showed that students were more satisfied with their use of social media because of their perceptions of its ease of use and usefulness. The majority of the students are active on social media for 1-2 h daily (p < 0.01). YouTube was the platform of choice among all the respondents (n = 154; 36%). The results confirmed that students feel that social media websites have a significant positive impact on their overall academic performance (p < 0.01). Novel methods of teaching and learning are constantly being sought out by educators. The present moment is an opportunity to examine and analyze the theoretical benefits of social media technologies and consider their relative advantages for education through the use of technology's ability to enhance student learning.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; India; e-learning; higher education institutions; social media; student engagement; student performance
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35564771 PMCID: PMC9103976 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19095380
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
The profile of respondents and time spent on social media daily.
| Profile | Frequency | % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Male | 313 | 73 | ||
| Female | 118 | 27 | ||
|
| ||||
| Undergraduate | 153 | 35 | ||
| Post Graduate | 278 | 65 | ||
|
| ||||
| Science/Engineering | 154 | 36 | ||
| Arts/Social Science | 179 | 41 | ||
| Commerce/management | 98 | 23 | ||
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| <1 h | 42 | 10 | 25.189 (3) | 0.000 |
| 1–2 h | 215 | 50 | ||
| 3–4 h | 130 | 30 | ||
| >5 h | 44 | 10 | ||
Social media platforms of choice.
| Gender | YouTube | % | % | Research Gate | % | % | Others | % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 107 | 34 | 89 | 28 | 34 | 10 | 51 | 16 | 32 | 10 |
| Female | 47 | 39 | 34 | 28 | 22 | 18 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
Motivations for using social media.
| Purpose | Entertainment | Personal Use | Altruism | Information Seeking | Value (df) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Male | 90 | 146 | 14 | 63 | 12.070 (3) | 0.007 |
| Female | 44 | 38 | 13 | 23 | |||
Impact on students’ grades.
| Gender | Helped My Grade | Did Not Help My Grade |
|---|---|---|
| Male | 240 (77%) | 73 (23%) |
| Female | 71 (60%) | 47 (40%) |
Impact on overall academic performance.
| Gender | Impact on Overall Academic Performance | Value (df) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Highly Impact (Positive) | Moderate Impact | Highly Impact (Negative) | |||
| Male | 197 (63%) | 79 (25%) | 37 (11%) | 27.064 (2) | 0.000 |
| Female | 53 (45%) | 26 (22%) | 39 (33%) | ||
Attitudes toward and beliefs about social media use in education.
| Factors | Strongly | Disagree | Neither Agree Nor Disagree | Agree | Strongly |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enjoy using social networking sites | 15 (3.48) | 18 (4.18) | 31 (7.19) | 153 (35.5) | 214 (49.65) |
| Ease of use | 11 (2.55) | 13 (3.02) | 47 (10.9) | 159 (36.89) | 201(46.64) |
| Better learning opportunities with social networking | 7 (1.62) | 4 (0.93) | 22 (5.1) | 195 (45.24) | 203 (47.1) |
| Enjoy using social networking for assignments | 84 (19.49) | 69 (16.01) | 78 (18.1) | 98 (22.74) | 102 (23.67) |
| Social networking is good for socializing not for learning | 178 (41.3) | 104 (24.13) | 67 (15.55) | 34 (7.89) | 48 (11.14) |
| Social networking makes learning interactive/interaction with peers | 22 (5.1) | 16 (3.71) | 38(8.82) | 160 (37.12) | 195 (45.24) |
| Social networking improving student outcomes | 11 (2.55) | 7 (1.62) | 25 (5.8) | 141 (32.71) | 247 (57.31) |
| Social networking encourages sharing | 76 (17.63) | 49 (11.37) | 118 (27.38) | 91 (21.11) | 97 (22.51) |
| Satisfied with social networking in collaborative learning environments | 45 (10.44) | 17 (3.94) | 19 (4.41) | 154 (35.73) | 196 (45.48) |
| Using social networking is distracting in education | 194 (45.01) | 112 (25.99) | 58 (13.46) | 43 (9.98) | 24 (5.57) |