| Literature DB >> 35564015 |
Umezuruike Linus Opara1,2, Tobi Fadiji1, Oluwafemi James Caleb1,3, Adebanji Olasupo Oluwole1.
Abstract
Fresh ready-to-cook fish fillets are susceptible to loss of freshness and accumulation of off-odour due to accelerated microbial spoilage. Suboptimal storage temperature and packaging conditions accelerate this process, limiting the economic potential. This study investigated the effects of modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) and storage temperature (0 °C and 4 °C) on the volatile compounds (VOCs) of Cape hake (Merluccius capensis) fish fillets as a predictor of shelf life and quality. Fresh Cape hake fillets were packaged under active modified atmosphere (40% CO2 + 30% O2 + 30% N2) and passive modified atmosphere (0.039% CO2 + 20.95% O2 + 78% N2) with or without an absorbent pad and stored at 0 °C and 4 °C for 12 d. The results obtained demonstrated that changes in VOCs and concentration were significantly (p < 0.05) influenced by MAP conditions, storage temperature and duration. A total of 16 volatiles were identified in the packaged Cape hake fillets: 4 primary VOCs and 12 secondary VOCs. The spoilage VOCs identified include tri-methylamine (TMA) (ammonia-like), esters (sickeningly sweet) and sulphur group (putrid). The concentration of secondary VOCs increased continuously during storage. Active-MA-packaged fillets performed better and had lower TMA values of 0.31% at 0 °C on day 12 in comparison to 7.22% at 0 °C under passive on day 6. Ethyl acetate was detected in passive-MA-packaged fillets stored at 0 °C on day 3, and the levels increased to 3.26% on day 6, while active-MA-packaged fillets maintained freshness. This study showed that in conjunction with TMA, VOCs such as esters and sulphur-related compounds could be used as spoilage markers for Cape hake fish fillets.Entities:
Keywords: cape hake; fish fillets; modified-atmosphere packaging; storage temperature; volatile composition
Year: 2022 PMID: 35564015 PMCID: PMC9103146 DOI: 10.3390/foods11091292
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1An illustration of the fish fillet packaging approach.
Effects of packaging with/without absorbent pad, temperature (0 °C and 4 °C) and storage time (d) on bacterial growth of Cape hake fillet.
| STORAGE DAYS | TEMP. (°C) | MAP − PAD | MAP + PAD | PMAP − PAD | PMAP + PAD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1.2 ± 0.13 j | 1.2 ± 0.13 j | 1.2 ± 0.13 j | 1.2 ± 0.13 j | |
| 3 | 0 | 3.6 ± 0.07 i | 3.5 ± 0.05 i | 3.9 ± 0.05 g | 3.7 ± 0.09 h |
| 4 | 3.8 ± 0.04 h | 3.6 ± 0.01 h | 6.2 ± 0.09 c | 6.2 ± 0.03 c | |
| 6 | 0 | 4.5 ± 0.04 f | 4.5 ± 0.04 f | 7.1 ± 0.1 a | 6.9 ± 0.03 a |
| 4 | 4.8 ± 0.03 e | 4.8 ± 0.03 e | nd | nd | |
| 9 | 0 | 5.0 ± 0.03 e | 4.9 ± 0.03 e | nd | nd |
| 4 | 6.0 ± 0.03 d | 5.9 ± 0.03 d | nd | nd | |
| 12 | 0 | 5.2 ± 0.03 e | 5.1 ± 0.03 e | nd | nd |
| 4 | 7.2 ± 0.03 a | 7.2 ± 0.03 a | nd | nd |
nd = Not determined due to sensory rejection. Different letters indicate significant differences in pH values (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s Multiple Range tests; MAP − PAD: active-MA without absorbent pad; MAP + PAD: active-MA with absorbent pad, PMAP − PAD: passive-MA without absorbent pad and PMAP + PAD: passive-MA with absorbent pad. Sampling was stopped on days when bacterial growth exceeded the microbial limit of <5.5 log cfu/g by day 6 [38,39]. Thus, sampling for fillets stored under PMAP at 4 °C was stopped on day 3; furthermore, sampling under PMAP at 0 °C was stopped on day 6. Research findings have indicated that CO2 retards the growth of psychotropic, aerobic and Gram-negative microbes and slows down the deterioration of fresh RTC fish fillets [40]. Delayed deterioration in active-MAP stored fillets because dissolved CO2 leads to the formation of carbonic acid. The un-dissociated form of carbonic acid (bicarbonate ion) changes cell permeability and hinders microbes’ metabolic processes [41]. Therefore, active-MAP combined with an absorbent pad at optimum cold storage (0 °C) can assist in extending the shelf life and maintaining microbial safety of RTC hake fillets.
Volatile compounds identified from MA-packaged Cape hake fillets.
| Compound | RT (min) | Similarity (%) | Aroma Descriptor *** |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| ** Ethyl alcohol | 4.73 | 91 | Sweet |
| ** 3-methyl-1-butanol | 10.4 | 86 | Malt |
| ** 2-ethyl-1-hexanol | 20.9 | 83 | Sweet |
| 1,2-butanediol | 7.74 | 83 | Unknown |
| Phenyl ethyl alcohol | 35.1383 | 97 | Spicy |
| Butylated hydroxy toluene | 34.8562 | 95 | Spicy, phenolic |
|
| |||
| ** 3-octanone | 12.3639 | 83 | Earthy, mushroom |
| 2,3-butanedione | 5.3933 | 53 | Butter, cheese |
| 4-hydroxy-4 methyl-2 pentanone | 16.5687 | 78 | Unknown |
|
| |||
| Acetic acid | 19.92 | 58 | Sour |
|
| |||
| Tri-methylamine | 3.7916 | 72 | Fish-like |
|
| |||
| Ethyl acetate | 4.349 | 72 | Pineapple |
| Butanoic acid, ethyl ester | 6.3173 | 91 | Fruity, banana |
|
| |||
| 1-Propanol, 3-(methyl thio)- | 29.7057 | 99 | Unknown |
| Dimethyl sulphide | 3.566 | 94 | Cabbage |
| Dimethyl disulphide | 7.3122 | 94 | Onion, putrid |
RT = retention time; (MS software, NIST version 2.0); ** = primary volatile compounds; *** [32,33,34].
Common volatiles identified from MA-packaged Cape hake fillets using gas chromatography–mass spectra analysis showing freshness and spoilage indicator markers expressed as % peak areas indicating sampling days 0, 6 and 12.
| Common Volatiles | RT | Day 0 | Day 6 | Day 12 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Min) | ||||||||||||
| 0 °C MAP − | 0 °CMAP + | 0 °C PMAP | 0 °C PMAP + | 4 °CMAP − | 4 °C MAP+ | 0 °C MAP − | 0 °C MAP + | 4 °C MAP − | 4 °C MAP + | |||
| PAD | PAD | PAD | PAD | PAD | PAD | PAD | PAD | PAD | PAD | |||
| Ethyl alcohol | 4.73 | 0.6 ± 0.10 t | 2.3 ± 0.12 me | 2.2 ± 0.12 n | 3.6 ± 0.12 c | 3.2 ± 0.12 f | 3.0 ± 0.12 j | 2.9 ± 0.12 k | 1.1 ± 0.12 r | 0.7 ± 0.12 s | 2.2 ± 0.12 n | 2.1 ± 0.12 o |
| 3-methyl butanol | 10.4 | 0.1 ± 0.03 q | 0.3 ± 0.04 l | 0.2 ± 0.01 n | 1.0 ± 0.03 c | 0.9 ± 0.02 d | 0.5 ± 0.01 h | 0.5 ± 0.01 h | 0.7 ± 0.01 f | 0.5 ± 0.01 h | 1.3 ± 0.03 a | 1.1 ± 0.01 b |
| 2-ethyl hexanol | 20.9 | 0.3 ± 0.06 a | nd | Nd | 0.2 ± 0.02 b | 0.2 ± 0.02 c | nd | Nd | nd | nd | nd | nd |
| 3-octanone | 12.36 | 0.2 ± 0.01 s | 0.4 ± 0.01 n | 0.3 ± 0.02 p | 1.0 ± 0.02 a | 0.9 ± 0.02 b | 0.5 ± 0.02 l | 0.4 ± 0.01 h | 0.8 ± 0.01 d | 0.55 ± 0.02 i | 0.88 ± 0.01 c | 0.8 ± 0.02 d |
| Tri-methylamine | 3.79 | nd | nd | Nd | 7.2 ± 0.07 a | 5.4 ± 0.05 b | nd | Nd | 0.3 ± 0.03 k | 0.1 ± 0.03 l | 2.4 ± 0.14 g | 1.8 ± 0.13 h |
| Ethyl Acetate | 4.35 | nd | nd | Nd | 3.3 ± 0.01 a | 3.1 ± 0.01 b | nd | Nd | nd | nd | 1.2 ± 0.01 c | 1.2 ± 0.01 d |
| Butanoic acid Ester | 6.32 | nd | nd | Nd | 0.8 ± 0.002 a | 0.6 ± 0.001 b | nd | Nd | nd | nd | 0.3 ± 0.001 c | 0.2 ± 0.001 d |
| Acetic acid | 19.92 | nd | nd | Nd | 0.4 ± 0.002 a | 0.4 ± 0.002 b | nd | Nd | nd | nd | 0.2 ± 0.007 c | 0.1 ± 0.002 d |
| 3-methyl thio-1-propanol | 29.71 | nd | nd | Nd | 0.5 ± 0.04 a | 0.4 ± 0.03 b | nd | Nd | nd | nd | 0.02 ± <0.0001 c | 0.01 ± <0.0001 b |
| Dimethyl sulphide | 3.57 | nd | nd | Nd | 2.9 ± 0.04 a | 2.2 ± 0.03 b | nd | Nd | nd | nd | 0.7 ± 0.013 a | 0.6 ± 0.002 b |
| Dimethyl disulphide | 7.31 | nd | nd | Nd | 0.2 ± 0.004 a | 0.1 ± 0.004 b | nd | Nd | nd | nd | 0.03 ± <0.0001 a | 0.01 ± <0.0001 b |
| 1,2-butane-diol | 7.74 | nd | nd | Nd | 0.1 ± 0.002 a | 0.06 ± 0.002 b | nd | Nd | nd | nd | 0.04 ± 0.002 c | 0.01 ± 0.002 d |
| Phenyl ethyl alcohol | 35.14 | nd | nd | Nd | 0.6 ± 0.04 a | 0.5 ± 0.03 b | nd | Nd | 0.02 ± <0.0001 f | 0.01 ± 0.003 g | 0.10 ± <0.0001 d | 0.06 ± <0.0001 e |
| Butylated hydroxy toluene | 34.86 | nd | nd | Nd | 0.3 ± 0.04 a | 0.2 ± 0.03 b | 0.1 ± 0.03 c | 0.07 ± 0.01 d | nd | nd | 0.2 ± 0.003 c | 0.09 ± 0.002 d |
| 2,3-butanedione | 5.39 | nd | nd | Nd | 0.4 ± 0.004 a | 0.3 ± 0.004 b | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd |
| 4-hydroxy-4methl-2-pentanone | 16.57 | nd | nd | Nd | 0.02 ± 0.0024 a | 0.02 ± 0.0022 b | nd | nd | nd | nd | 0.001 ± <0.0001 c | 0.0009 ± <0.0001 d |
Peak areas are means of two GC–MS runs and approximated to one decimal place except when values are very low; nd = not detected. Different letters are significant differences between each packaged fillet; MAP − PAD: active-MA without absorbent pad; MAP + PAD: active-MA with absorbent pad, PMAP − PAD: passive-MA without absorbent pad, PMAP + PAD: passive-MA with absorbent pad and RT = retention time. Sampling was stopped on days when bacterial growth exceeded microbial limits < 5.5 log cfu/g by day 6 [38,39]; thus, sampling for fillets stored under PMAP at 4 °C was stopped on day 3. Furthermore, sampling for fillets stored under PMAP at 0 °C was stopped on day 6. Table S1 shows data for days 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12.
Pearson’s correlation coefficient matrix between aerobic mesophilic counts selected spoilage quality indicators measured in Cape hake fillets during storage.
| Variables | AMC | EA | BE | DMS | DMDS | TMA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMC |
| |||||
| EA |
|
| ||||
| BE |
|
|
| |||
| DMS |
|
|
|
| ||
| DMDS |
|
|
|
|
| |
| TMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Correlation values in bold are significant at p < 0.05. AMC = aerobic mesophillic count, EA = ethyl acetate, BE = butanoic acid ester, DMS= dimethyl sulphide, DMDS = dimethyl disulphide, TMA = tri-methyl amine.