| Literature DB >> 35563921 |
Wan Si1, Jie Xiong1, Yuping Huang1, Xuesong Jiang1, Dong Hu2.
Abstract
Damage occurs easily and is difficult to find inside fruits and vegetables during transportation or storage, which not only brings losses to fruit and vegetable distributors, but also reduces the satisfaction of consumers. Spatially resolved spectroscopy (SRS) is able to detect the quality attributes of fruits and vegetables at different depths, which is of great significance to the quality classification and defect detection of horticultural products. This paper is aimed at reviewing the applications of spatially resolved spectroscopy for measuring the quality attributes of fruits and vegetables in detail. The principle of light transfer in biological tissues, diffusion approximation theory and methodologies are introduced, and different configuration designs for spatially resolved spectroscopy are compared and analyzed. Besides, spatially resolved spectroscopy applications based on two aspects for assessing the quality of fruits and vegetables are summarized. Finally, the problems encountered in previous studies are discussed, and future development trends are presented. It can be concluded that spatially resolved spectroscopy demonstrates great application potential in the field of fruit and vegetable quality attribute evaluation. However, due to the limitation of equipment configurations and data processing speed, the application of spatially resolved spectroscopy in real-time online detection is still a challenge.Entities:
Keywords: fruits and vegetables; optical properties; quality assessment; spatially resolved spectroscopy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35563921 PMCID: PMC9104625 DOI: 10.3390/foods11091198
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1The configuration of single-fiber scanning and the “banana-shape” path of light propagation in the sample.
Figure 2Flowchart of complete experimental procedures based on the spatially resolved spectroscopy measurement system. (SRS = spatially resolved spectroscopy; SR = spatially resolved).
Figure 3The configuration of the multi-fiber array based on a multiplexer.
Figure 4The configuration of the ring arrays based on an imaging spectrograph. (CCD = charge-coupled device).
Figure 5The configuration of the multi-channel curved array of SRS.
Figure 6The configuration of hyperspectral line-scan imaging.
SRS configurations of optical fiber arrays and hyperspectral line-scan imaging with different wavelength regions.
| Configurations | Products | Wavelength (nm) | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| OFA 1 | Apple | 400–1000 | [ |
| 750 | [ | ||
| 550–1650 | [ | ||
| 600–1100 | [ | ||
| 500–1000 | [ | ||
| Tomato | 550–1650 | [ | |
| Pear | 500–1000 | [ | |
| HLI 2 | Apple | 500–1000 | [ |
| 450–1000 | [ | ||
| 600–1000 | [ | ||
| 450–1050 | [ | ||
| 650, 980 | [ | ||
| Tomato | 500–1000 | [ | |
| 500–950 | [ | ||
| Peach | 500–1000 | [ | |
| 515–1000 | [ | ||
| 550–1000 | [ | ||
| Cucumber | 700–1000 | [ | |
| 500–1000 | [ | ||
| Pear | 500–1000 | [ | |
| Plum | |||
| Kiwifruit | |||
| Zucchini squash | |||
| Juice | 500–1000 | [ |
1 OFA = optical fiber arrays. 2 HLI = hyperspectral line-scan imaging.
Post-harvest quality assessment by optical properties of fruits and vegetables.
| Products | Quality Attributes | Main Studies | Models | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apple | Firmness, SSC | Prediction for apple firmness and SSC. | PLS 1 | [ |
| MLR 2 | [ | |||
| PLS | [ | |||
| Mealiness | Investigate the possibility of non-destructive apple mealiness classification. | PCR 3, PLS, ANN 4 | [ | |
| Bruising | Knowledge of the spectral absorption and scattering properties of normal and bruised apple tissue. | — | [ | |
| Tissue structure | Research on light penetration properties of ‘Jonagold’ apple tissue. | — | [ | |
| Investigation on light propagation through apple tissue structures. | — | [ | ||
| Optical properties–microstructure–texture relationships of dried apple slices. | — | [ | ||
| Quantify the relationship of optical properties with structural and mechanical properties in apple tissues. | LRA 5 | [ | ||
| Peach | Firmness, SSC | Prediction of firmness and SSC for ‘Red Star’ peaches. | PLS | [ |
| Fungal infection | Determine the relationships of the optical parameters with structural and biochemical parameters during quality deterioration. | PCCA 7 | [ | |
| Bruising | Measure the optical coefficients of peaches after bruising at different maturity levels and detect bruises. | SVM 8 | [ | |
| Tomato | Maturity | Measure the absorption and scattering coefficients of tomato fruit at four maturity stages. | — | [ |
| Ripeness evaluation and classification of ‘Sun Bright’ tomato. | PLS-DA 9 | [ | ||
| Firmness, SSC | Prediction for tomato firmness and SSC by optical property parameters. | PLS | [ | |
| Cucumber | Defect | Measure the optical absorption and scattering properties of normal and internally defective pickling cucumbers. | — | [ |
| Pear | Optical property | Optical property measurement of pear samples with a double-fiber-optical-probe system. | — | [ |
| Juice | Optical property | Measure the absorption and scattering properties of turbid food materials. | LRA | [ |
| Various products | Optical property | Optical property measurement for the samples of apple, peach, pear, kiwifruit, plum, cucumber, zucchini squash, and tomato. Classification of tomato at three ripeness stages. | — | [ |
1 PLS = Partial least square. 2 MLR = Multiple linear regression. 3 PCR = Principal component regression. 4 ANN = Artificial neural network. 5 LRA = Linear regression analysis. 6 LS-SVM = Least square support vector machine. 7 PCCA = Pearson correlation coefficient analysis. 8 SVM = support vector machine. 9 PLS-DA = Partial least square discriminant analysis.
Post-harvest quality assessment by spatially resolved spectra of fruits and vegetables.
| Products | Quality Attributes | Main Studies | Models | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apple | Firmness, SSC | Simultaneous evaluation of SSC and firmness in apple with a multifiber-based SRS measurement system. | PLS | [ |
| Evaluate and compare different mathematical models for describing the hyperspectral scattering profiles in order to select an optimal model for predicting firmness and SSC of apples. | MLR | [ | ||
| Mealiness | Detection and classification of mealy apples for investigating the potential of hyperspectral scattering technique. | PLS | [ | |
| Bruising | Evaluate the changes of optical properties in tomatoes during ripening and develop classification models for grading the ripeness of tomatoes. | PLS-DA | [ | |
| Variety classification | Classification of apple varieties based on individual spectra and spectral combination. | PLS-DA | [ | |
| Sort three varieties of apple into two quality grades based on firmness, SSC, or both firmness and SSC. | LDA 1 | [ | ||
| Tomato | Maturity | Recognition for tomato surface color and internal color by SRS and conventional single point VIS/NIR spectroscopy. | PLS-DA | [ |
| Evaluate tomato maturity in different layers by using a newly developed spatially resolved spectroscopic system. | SVM-DA 2 | [ | ||
| Tomato maturity classification based on different models and source-detector distance. | PLS-DA | [ | ||
| Firmness, SSC/pH | Quality assessment (SSC and pH) of tomatoes with single-point spectra and SR spectra using a newly developed SRS system. | PLS | [ | |
| Quality evaluation of tomato fruit based on individual spectra and spectral combination with different source-detector distance. | PLS | [ | ||
| Determine optimal prediction models for the firmness parameters with individual SR spectra and their combinations. | PLS | [ |
1 LDA = Linear discriminant analysis. 2 SVMDA = Support vector machine discriminant analysis.