Literature DB >> 35562604

Uncertainty analysis and sensitivity of scapulothoracic joint angles to kinematic model parameters.

Y Blache1, I Rogowski2, M Degot2, R Trama2, R Dumas3.   

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to determine the influence of kinematic model parameter variability on scapulothoracic angle estimates, and to define which parameters of the kinematic model have the largest effect on scapulothoracic angle estimates. Nominal subject-specific kinematic models of nine participants were implemented. Fifteen parameters of the nominal models relative to the clavicle length, ellipsoid, sternoclavicular and acromioclavicular joint centers, and contact point location were altered from - 1 to 1 cm. Then, scapulothoracic angles were computed during four movements using multibody kinematic optimizations for nominal and altered models. The percentage of scapulothoracic angle variance explained by each parameter of the kinematic model was computed using Effective Algorithm for Computing Global Sensitivity Indices. When altering simultaneously the 15 parameters of the kinematic model, scapulothoracic angles varied up to 50°. For all movements and degrees of freedom, the clavicle length significantly explained the largest part of scapulothoracic angle variance (up to 25%, p < 0.01). In conclusion, kinematic model parameters need to be estimated accurately to avoid any bias in scapulothoracic angle estimates especially in a clinical context. The present sensitivity analysis may also be used as a benchmark for future works focusing on improving shoulder kinematic models. The curves represent mean scapulothoracic angles computed with the nominal model and their variability when kinematic model parameters are altered. The colormap graphs represent the percentage of scapulothoracic angle variance explained by each parameter of the kinematic model.
© 2022. International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clavicle; Ellipsoid; Joint center location; Scapula; Shoulder

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35562604     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-022-02593-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  21 in total

Review 1.  Scapular dyskinesis and its relation to shoulder injury.

Authors:  W Benjamin Kibler; Aaron Sciascia; Trevor Wilkes
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Global sensitivity analysis of the kinematics obtained with a multi-body optimisation using a parallel mechanism of the shoulder.

Authors:  A El Habachi; S Duprey; L Chèze; R Dumas
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.763

Review 3.  Kinematic models of the upper limb joints for multibody kinematics optimisation: An overview.

Authors:  Sonia Duprey; Alexandre Naaim; Florent Moissenet; Mickaël Begon; Laurence Chèze
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Clinical implications of scapular dyskinesis in shoulder injury: the 2013 consensus statement from the 'Scapular Summit'.

Authors:  W Ben Kibler; Paula M Ludewig; Phil W McClure; Lori A Michener; Klaus Bak; Aaron D Sciascia
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  A patient-specific measurement technique to model shoulder joint kinematics.

Authors:  C Charbonnier; S Chagué; F C Kolo; J C K Chow; A Lädermann
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 2.256

6.  Effects of ellipsoid parameters on scapula motion during manual wheelchair propulsion based on multibody kinematics optimization. A preliminary study.

Authors:  S Hybois; A Lombart; P Puchaud; J Bascou; F Lavaste; H Pillet; C Sauret
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.763

7.  Determining in vivo sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular and glenohumeral joint centre locations from skin markers, CT-scans and intracortical pins: A comparison study.

Authors:  B Michaud; M Jackson; A Arndt; A Lundberg; M Begon
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.242

8.  Scapular dyskinesis after Latarjet procedure.

Authors:  Stefano Carbone; Philipp Moroder; Armin Runer; Herbert Resch; Stefano Gumina; Ralph Hertel
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Scaling and kinematics optimisation of the scapula and thorax in upper limb musculoskeletal models.

Authors:  Joe A I Prinold; Anthony M J Bull
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  A Biomechanical Model of the Scapulothoracic Joint to Accurately Capture Scapular Kinematics during Shoulder Movements.

Authors:  Ajay Seth; Ricardo Matias; António P Veloso; Scott L Delp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.