Literature DB >> 26774672

Determining in vivo sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular and glenohumeral joint centre locations from skin markers, CT-scans and intracortical pins: A comparison study.

B Michaud1, M Jackson2, A Arndt3, A Lundberg4, M Begon5.   

Abstract

To describe shoulder motion the sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular and glenohumeral joint centres must be accurately located. Within the literature various methods to estimate joint centres of rotation location are proposed, with no agreement of the method best suited to the shoulder. The objective of this study was to determine the most reliable non-invasive method for locating joint centre locations of the shoulder complex. Functional methods using pin mounted markers were compared to anatomical methods, functional methods using skin mounted markers, imaging-based methods using CT-scan data, and regression equations. Three participants took part in the study, that involved insertion of intracortical pins into the clavicle, scapula and humerus, a CT-scan of the shoulder, and finally data collection using a motion analysis system. The various methods to estimate joint centre location did not all agree, however suggestions about the most reliable non-invasive methods could be made. For the sternoclavicular joint, the authors suggest the anatomical method using the most ventral landmark on the sternoclavicular joint, as recommended by the International Society of Biomechanics. For the acromioclavicular joint, the authors suggest the anatomical method using the landmark defined as the most dorsal point on the acromioclavicular joint, as proposed by van der Helm. For the glenohumeral joint, the simple regression equation of Rab is recommended.
Copyright © 2015 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT-scan; Centre of rotation; Intracortical pins; Shoulder

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26774672     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  2 in total

1.  Uncertainty analysis and sensitivity of scapulothoracic joint angles to kinematic model parameters.

Authors:  Y Blache; I Rogowski; M Degot; R Trama; R Dumas
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Relationship between scapular control during isometric shoulder flexion and scapular motion during baseball pitching: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yuki Nomura; Hajime Toda; Masaki Katayose; Shun Watanabe; Masahiro Yoshida; Makoto Yoshida; Keizo Yamamoto
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-04-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.