| Literature DB >> 35561554 |
Manuela Vaneckova1, Gian Franco Piredda2, Michaela Andelova3, Jan Krasensky4, Tomas Uher3, Barbora Srpova3, Eva Kubala Havrdova3, Karolina Vodehnalova3, Dana Horakova3, Tom Hilbert2, Bénédicte Maréchal2, Mário João Fartaria2, Veronica Ravano2, Tobias Kober2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Pathology in multiple sclerosis is not homogenously distributed. Recently, it has been shown that structures adjacent to CSF are more severely affected. A gradient of brain tissue involvement was shown with more severe pathology in periventricular areas and in proximity to brain surfaces such as the subarachnoid spaces and ependyma, and hence termed the "surface-in" gradient. Here, we study whether (i) the surface-in gradient of periventricular tissue alteration measured by T1 relaxometry is already present in early multiple sclerosis patients, (ii) how it differs between early and progressive multiple sclerosis patients, and (iii) whether the gradient-derived metrics in normal-appearing white matter and lesions correlate better with physical disability than conventional MRI-based metrics.Entities:
Keywords: Atlas-based assessment; Gradient of tissue damage; MP2RAGE; Multiple sclerosis; T(1)-relaxometry
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35561554 PMCID: PMC9112026 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.891
Demographic and MRI characteristics of the 3 groups.
| Healthy volunteers | Early multiple sclerosis | Progressive multiple sclerosis | Healthy vs. Early MS | Healthy vs. progressive MS | Early MS vs. progressive MS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | 92 | 47 | 52 | |||
| % Female | 63 | 75 | 65 | |||
| Age (years) | 37.3 ± 10.6 | 31.8 ± 8.0 | 49.9 ± 7.2 | p = 0.24 KW | p < 0.001 KW | p < 0.001 KW |
| Disease duration* | – | 4.7 ± 5.4 | 19.48 ± 7.8 | – | – | p < 0.001 MW |
| EDSS | – | 2.0 (1.0 – 3.5) | 5.5 (3.5 – 6.5) | – | – | p < 0.001 MW |
| T2 lesion volume (ml) | – | 6.7 ± 8.7 | 14.1 ± 15.2 | – | – | p < 0.001 MW |
| T2 lesion count | – | 22 (1–128) | 28 (3–68) | – | – | p < 0.001 MW |
| Brain volume (%) | 80.0 ± 2.2 | 79.4 ± 2.9 | 74.9 ± 3.8 | p = 1.0 KW | p < 0.001 KW | p < 0.001 KW |
| Lateral ventricles (%) | 1.3 ± 0.4 | 1.5 ± 0.6 | 2.2 ± 1.2 | p = 0.001 KW | p < 0.001 KW | p = 0.025 KW |
| White matter (%) | 31.7 ± 1.6 | 31.0 ± 2.4 | 29.9 ± 2.7 | p = 0.308 | p < 0.001 | p = 0.049 |
| Gray matter (%) | 48.3 ± 2.3 | 48.4 ± 2.2 | 45.0 ± 2.0 | p = 0.9 | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 |
Legend: All volumes are shown as % of total intracranial volume, except for lesion volumes which are in millilitres, and lesion count. All measures are mean ± SD except lesion count (median, range). EDSS = Expanded Disability Status Scale.
*Disease duration is shown in years for patients with progressive multiple sclerosis and in months for patients with early multiple sclerosis.
= ANOVA; KW = Kruskal-Wallis test; MW = Mann Whitney U test.
Fig. 1Computation of T1 z-score maps and periventricular gradient extraction. Representative slices of (A) the anatomical study-specific template, (B) the normative T1 atlas, and (C) the distance to ventricles of the supratentorial WM voxels. The intercept, sex, age, and age2 maps in (B) are intended as the β0, βsex, βage and βage2 coefficients of the following equation describing the expected reference T1 value in a given brain voxel: , with sex being a categorical variable and the age expressed in years and centred at the mean age of the healthy control cohort (37 y). The first band was excluded to minimise the partial volume effect.
Fig. 2Periventricular gradients in NAWM for mean absolute z-score (exceeding the prediction interval of the T1 normative linear model at a 95% level of confidence) and for volume with absolute (z-score) > 2. (A) mean absolute z-scores, (B) volume with absolute (|z-score|) > 2. Error bars indicate two standard errors.
Correlation between gradient of z-scores in NAWM (difference of mean z-scores between the bands divided by distance between bands) and EDSS in patients with progressive multiple sclerosis (* indicates statistically significant values).
| Correlation coefficient for the z-score thresholds | p-values | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gradient between bands | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 1–2 | 0.325 | 0.331 | 0.374 | 0.390 | 0.019* | 0.016* | 0.006* | 0.004* |
| 1–5 | 0.287 | 0.315 | 0.341 | 0.379 | 0.039* | 0.023* | 0.014* | 0.006* |
| 1–10 | 0.229 | 0.301 | 0.326 | 0.378 | 0.103 | 0.030* | 0.018* | 0.006* |
| 1–20 | 0.148 | 0.267 | 0.319 | 0.348 | 0.294 | 0.056 | 0.021* | 0.011* |
| 1–30 | 0.117 | 0.267 | 0.306 | 0.314 | 0.409 | 0.056 | 0.027* | 0.023* |
EDSS = expanded disability status scale, NAWM = normal appearing white matter.
Fig. 3Correlation between gradient of z-scores in NAWM and EDSS (change between bands for z-score thresholds of 0, 1, 2 and 3) in patients with progressive multiple sclerosis: (A) band 1:5; (B) band 1:10 (C) band 1:20. (* indicates statistically significant values).
Correlation between gradient of z-scores in lesions (difference of mean z-scores between the bands divided by distance between bands) and EDSS in patients with progressive multiple sclerosis (* indicates statistically significant values).
| Correlation coefficient for the z-score thresholds | p-values | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gradient between bands | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 1–2 | 0.265 | 0.210 | 0.194 | 0.182 | 0.057 | 0.135 | 0.168 | 0.196 |
| 1–5 | 0.257 | 0.220 | 0.201 | 0.200 | 0.065 | 0.117 | 0.152 | 0.156 |
| 1–10 | 0.307 | 0.305 | 0.310 | 0.321 | 0.027* | 0.028* | 0.025* | 0.020* |
| 1–20 | 0.294 | 0.310 | 0.325 | 0.328 | 0.034* | 0.026* | 0.019* | 0.018* |
| 1–30 | 0.303 | 0.307 | 0.328 | 0.315 | 0.029* | 0.027* | 0.018* | 0.023* |
EDSS = expanded disability status scale.
Fig. 4Correlation between gradient of lesion volume exceeding a given z-score threshold at baseline and EDSS assessed 2 years after baseline (change between bands for z-score thresholds of 0, 1, 2 and 3) in patients with early multiple sclerosis: (A) band 1:5; (B) band 1:10; (C) band 1:20. (* indicates statistically significant values, * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01).
A, B Correlation between gradient of lesion volume exceeding a given z-score threshold and EDSS at baseline (A) and correlation between gradient of volume exceeding a given z-score threshold in NAWM at baseline (B) and EDSS assessed 2 years after baseline in patients with early multiple sclerosis (* indicates statistically significant values).
| A | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correlation coefficient for the z-score thresholds | p-values | |||||||
| Gradient between bands | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 1–2 | 0.292 | 0.279 | 0.282 | 0.290 | 0.047* | 0.058 | 0.055 | 0.048* |
| 1–5 | 0.392 | 0.368 | 0.374 | 0.377 | 0.006* | 0.011* | 0.010* | 0.009* |
| 1–10 | 0.402 | 0.396 | 0.377 | 0.386 | 0.005* | 0.006* | 0.009* | 0.007* |
| 1–20 | 0.389 | 0.379 | 0.378 | 0.375 | 0.007* | 0.009* | 0.009* | 0.009* |
| 1–30 | 0.375 | 0.360 | 0.365 | 0.371 | 0.009* | 0.013* | 0.012* | 0.010* |
EDSS = expanded disability status scale, NAWM = normal appearing white matter.