BACKGROUND: Number of baseline lesions has been shown to predict future attacks and disability in clinically isolated syndromes (CIS). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of baseline infratentorial lesions in long-term prognosis. METHODS: Subjects were included in a prospective cohort of patients with CIS. Patients underwent brain MRI within 3 months after CIS onset. Number and location of lesions at baseline were prospectively studied. Retrospective scan analysis was conducted to specifically look at number and location of infratentorial lesions. We analyzed the time to a second attack and to reach EDSS 3.0. RESULTS: We included 246 patients with CIS followed for a median of 7.7 years. Patients with infratentorial lesions had both a higher risk of conversion (71.4% vs 29.6%; hazard ratio [HR] 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-4.8; p < 0.001) and of developing disability (32.5% vs 12.4%; HR 2.4; 95% CI 1.3-4.3; p = 0.003). Presence of at least one cerebellar lesion was associated with an increased risk of conversion (HR 2.4; 95% CI 1.3-4.5; p = 0.007). Presence of at least one brainstem lesion increased both the risk of conversion (HR 2.9; 95% CI 1.7-5.0; p < 0.001) and disability (HR 2.5; 95% CI 1.1-5.4; p = 0.026). Broken down into number of lesions, the presence of infratentorial lesions increased both the risk of conversion (83% vs 61%) (HR 22.3; 95% CI 9.7-51.1; p < 0.001) and of reaching EDSS 3.0 (40% vs 19%) (HR 3.2; 95% CI 1.3-7.4; p = 0.008) only in patients with 9 or more lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of infratentorial lesions increases the risk for disability. Brainstem rather than cerebellar lesions may be responsible for poor prognosis.
BACKGROUND: Number of baseline lesions has been shown to predict future attacks and disability in clinically isolated syndromes (CIS). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of baseline infratentorial lesions in long-term prognosis. METHODS: Subjects were included in a prospective cohort of patients with CIS. Patients underwent brain MRI within 3 months after CIS onset. Number and location of lesions at baseline were prospectively studied. Retrospective scan analysis was conducted to specifically look at number and location of infratentorial lesions. We analyzed the time to a second attack and to reach EDSS 3.0. RESULTS: We included 246 patients with CIS followed for a median of 7.7 years. Patients with infratentorial lesions had both a higher risk of conversion (71.4% vs 29.6%; hazard ratio [HR] 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-4.8; p < 0.001) and of developing disability (32.5% vs 12.4%; HR 2.4; 95% CI 1.3-4.3; p = 0.003). Presence of at least one cerebellar lesion was associated with an increased risk of conversion (HR 2.4; 95% CI 1.3-4.5; p = 0.007). Presence of at least one brainstem lesion increased both the risk of conversion (HR 2.9; 95% CI 1.7-5.0; p < 0.001) and disability (HR 2.5; 95% CI 1.1-5.4; p = 0.026). Broken down into number of lesions, the presence of infratentorial lesions increased both the risk of conversion (83% vs 61%) (HR 22.3; 95% CI 9.7-51.1; p < 0.001) and of reaching EDSS 3.0 (40% vs 19%) (HR 3.2; 95% CI 1.3-7.4; p = 0.008) only in patients with 9 or more lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of infratentorial lesions increases the risk for disability. Brainstem rather than cerebellar lesions may be responsible for poor prognosis.
Authors: Mike P Wattjes; Àlex Rovira; David Miller; Tarek A Yousry; Maria P Sormani; Maria P de Stefano; Mar Tintoré; Cristina Auger; Carmen Tur; Massimo Filippi; Maria A Rocca; Franz Fazekas; Ludwig Kappos; Chris Polman Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: M J Hoch; M T Bruno; A Faustin; N Cruz; L Crandall; T Wisniewski; O Devinsky; T M Shepherd Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Claudio Gasperini; Luca Prosperini; Mar Tintoré; Maria Pia Sormani; Massimo Filippi; Jordi Rio; Jacqueline Palace; Maria A Rocca; Olga Ciccarelli; Frederik Barkhof; Jaume Sastre-Garriga; Hugo Vrenken; Jette L Frederiksen; Tarek A Yousry; Christian Enzinger; Alex Rovira; Ludwig Kappos; Carlo Pozzilli; Xavier Montalban; Nicola De Stefano Journal: Neurology Date: 2018-12-26 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Manojkumar Saranathan; Thomas Tourdias; Adam B Kerr; Jeff D Bernstein; Geoffrey A Kerchner; May H Han; Brian K Rutt Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: A J Ligocki; W H Rounds; E M Cameron; C T Harp; E M Frohman; A M Courtney; S Vernino; L G Cowell; B Greenberg; N L Monson Journal: Genes Immun Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 2.676