Naveen Nagiah1, Raven El Khoury1, Mahmoud H Othman2, Jun Akimoto3, Yoshihiro Ito2,3, David A Roberson4, Binata Joddar1,5. 1. Inspired Materials & Stem-Cell Based Tissue Engineering Laboratory, Department of Metallurgical, Materials, and Biomedical Engineering, M201 Engineering, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79968, United States. 2. Nano Medical Engineering Laboratory, RIKEN Cluster for Pioneering Research, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan. 3. Emergent Bioengineering Materials Research Team, RIKEN Center for Emergent Matter Science, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan. 4. Polymer Extrusion Lab, Department of Metallurgical, Materials, and Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79968, United States. 5. Border Biomedical Research Center, The University of Texas at El Paso, 500 W. University Avenue, El Paso, Texas 79968, United States.
Abstract
In this study, three types of electrospun scaffolds, including furfuryl-gelatin (f-gelatin) alone, f-gelatin with polycaprolactone (PCL) in a 1:1 ratio, and coaxial scaffolds with PCL (core) and f-gelatin (sheath), were developed for tissue engineering applications. Scaffolds were developed through single nozzle electrospinning and coaxial electrospinning, respectively, to serve as scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering. Uniform fibrous structures were revealed in the scaffolds with significantly varying average fiber diameters of 760 ± 80 nm (f-gelatin), 420 ± 110 nm [f-gelatin and PCL (1:1)], and 810 ± 60 nm (coaxial f-gelatin > PCL) via scanning electron microscopy. The distinction between the core and the sheath of the fibers of the coaxial f-gelatin > PCL electrospun fibrous scaffolds was revealed by transmission electron microscopy. Thermal analysis and Fourier transformed infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy revealed no interactions between the polymers in the blended electrospun scaffolds. The varied blending methods led to significant differences in the elastic moduli of the electrospun scaffolds with the coaxial f-gelatin > PCL revealing the highest elastic modulus of all scaffolds (164 ± 3.85 kPa). All scaffolds exhibited excellent biocompatibility by supporting the adhesion and proliferation of human AC16 cardiomyocytes cells. The biocompatibility of the coaxial f-gelatin > PCL scaffolds with superior elastic modulus was assessed further through adhesion and functionality of human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes, thereby demonstrating the potential of the coaxially spun scaffolds as an ideal platform for developing cardiac tissue-on-a-chip models. Our results demonstrate a facile approach to produce visible light cross-linkable, hybrid, biodegradable nanofibrous scaffold biomaterials, which can serve as platforms for cardiac tissue engineered models.
In this study, three types of electrospun scaffolds, including furfuryl-gelatin (f-gelatin) alone, f-gelatin with polycaprolactone (PCL) in a 1:1 ratio, and coaxial scaffolds with PCL (core) and f-gelatin (sheath), were developed for tissue engineering applications. Scaffolds were developed through single nozzle electrospinning and coaxial electrospinning, respectively, to serve as scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering. Uniform fibrous structures were revealed in the scaffolds with significantly varying average fiber diameters of 760 ± 80 nm (f-gelatin), 420 ± 110 nm [f-gelatin and PCL (1:1)], and 810 ± 60 nm (coaxial f-gelatin > PCL) via scanning electron microscopy. The distinction between the core and the sheath of the fibers of the coaxial f-gelatin > PCL electrospun fibrous scaffolds was revealed by transmission electron microscopy. Thermal analysis and Fourier transformed infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy revealed no interactions between the polymers in the blended electrospun scaffolds. The varied blending methods led to significant differences in the elastic moduli of the electrospun scaffolds with the coaxial f-gelatin > PCL revealing the highest elastic modulus of all scaffolds (164 ± 3.85 kPa). All scaffolds exhibited excellent biocompatibility by supporting the adhesion and proliferation of human AC16 cardiomyocytes cells. The biocompatibility of the coaxial f-gelatin > PCL scaffolds with superior elastic modulus was assessed further through adhesion and functionality of human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes, thereby demonstrating the potential of the coaxially spun scaffolds as an ideal platform for developing cardiac tissue-on-a-chip models. Our results demonstrate a facile approach to produce visible light cross-linkable, hybrid, biodegradable nanofibrous scaffold biomaterials, which can serve as platforms for cardiac tissue engineered models.
Myocardial infarction (MI) prevails as one of the leading causes
of morbidity and mortality worldwide, caused by the irreversible death
of cardiomyocytes in the heart wall.[1] The
loss of these terminally differentiated cardiomyocytes during MI leads
to a significant reduction in contractile efficiency after damage
to the myocardium in the heart, subsequently leading to heart failure
in the long term.[2] The deficiency of reliable
human tissue-based model systems for studying cardiac diseases has
posed a severe challenge in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms
and cellular processes during the progression of heart disease.[3] Studies have attempted to model cardiac tissues
through traditional tissue engineering approaches with cells seeded
on scaffolds to understand heart diseases at their initial stage.[4−6] Tissue engineering includes the development of functional and supportive
scaffolds for the targeted regeneration of damaged tissues and organs.[7] Nanofiber-based scaffolds serve as a suitable
environment for cell attachment and proliferation because of their
resemblance to a natural extracellular matrix (ECM).[8−10] However, traditional hydrogel-based scaffolds often have inherently
low mechanical and handling properties, which poses a disadvantage.[11] Electrospinning is a simple and versatile method
for generating nanofibers from a variety of materials that include
polymers, composites, and ceramics.[12] Electrospun
fibrous scaffolds with high surface area to volume ratio and superior
mechanical properties have been applied in wound healing, tissue engineering,
and drug delivery.[13−15] Moreover, ECM-mimicking electrospun scaffolds laden
with stem cells bear promise toward in vivo transplantation
as they reduce the probability of an immune response since autologous
cells are obtained from patients.[16−18]Our goal in this
study was to develop a set of furfuryl-gelatin
(f-gelatin)-based electrospun scaffolds for the modeling of cardiac
tissues. Gelatin is most favored for the preparation of cell-based
scaffolds in tissue engineering because of its biodegradability, cell
binding ability due to the presence of an Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD)-sequence,
and its widespread availability at a low cost.[19] Moreover, its lower immunogenicity and its ability to be
mixed with other materials such as alginate in order to enhance its
mechanical properties make it an ideal polymer biomaterial for applications
in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.[20−24] Cross-linking of gelatin, enzymatically or with chemical
agents like glutaraldehyde, usually render the resultant compound
toxic.[25,26] In order to overcome this drawback, Son
et al. developed visible light cross-linkable gelatin through the
introduction of furfuryl groups.[27] We had
previously adopted this f-gelatin for the biofabrication of scaffolds
to study the interactions between STO fibroblasts and C2C12 cells
over a sustained period.[28] However, the
rheological analysis performed on the aforementioned scaffolds revealed
an elastic modulus of 1.7 kPa, which is significantly lower than that
of the native ECM present in the myocardium. Hence, a platform with
an elastic modulus closely mimicking the mechanical properties of
the native cardiac tissue needs to be developed to serve as an ideal
scaffold for modeling of cardiac tissue. Thus, we hypothesized that
blending of the hydrophilic f-gelatin with the hydrophobic polycaprolactone
(PCL) would enhance the elastic modulus of the resultant scaffolds,
as well as improve its structural stability in order to be used as
platforms for modeling of cardiac tissues.[29] PCL is an optimal hydrophobic biodegradable polymer, which has been
used as a component for making cardiac tissue scaffolds.[30,31] Although PCL is mechanically stable and rigid, it does not confer
bioreactivity as it lacks the innate sites for cell adhesion. Being
hydrophobic in nature, PCL also tends to attract platelet and plasma
protein adhesion, leading to a prolonged inflammatory response from
the host.[32] Hence, we postulated that combining
PCL with f-gelatin would ensure that the hydrophobic PCL component
would confer mechanical stability to the scaffold, while the f-gelatin
would enhance biocompatibility to mimic the ECM properties of native
biological tissue. Although others before have done this in different
ratios (70% gelatin and 30% PCL[33]), our
study reports the creation of hybrid scaffolds with f-gelatin and
PCL in a 1:1 ratio with the goal of enhancing the structural stability
of both blended and coaxially electrospun fibers for evaluation of
their microscopic structure, surface and bulk properties, and biocompatibility
of the resultant scaffolds.Thus, we developed three types of
electrospun scaffolds based on
f-gelatin, including (1) f-gelatin electrospun scaffolds, (2) f-gelatin
with PCL in a ratio of 1:1, and (3) coaxial PCL (core, inside) with
f-gelatin (sheath, outside) (coaxial f-gelatin > PCL), were developed
through single nozzle electrospinning and coaxial electrospinning,
respectively. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting
the development and establishment of f-gelatin-based scaffolds via
electrospinning. Material characterization and biocompatibility evaluation
were then performed on these hybrid electrospun scaffolds as platforms
for growing cardiac cells. The electrospinning parameters were optimized
for all three scaffolds and their structural and mechanical integrity
were characterized through electron microscopy and rheological studies.
The interaction between the blended electrospun scaffolds (f-gelatin
with PCL 1:1, coaxial f-gelatin > PCL) were assessed through thermal
analysis and attenuated total reflection–Fourier transform
infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy. The biodegradation behavior of all
scaffolds were analyzed through swelling studies accompanied by scanning
electron microcopy (SEM). The biocompatibility of all the electrospun
scaffolds was analyzed initially with human AC16 cardiomyocytes. The
biocompatibility of the coaxial f-gelatin > PCL scaffolds with
an
expected higher elastic modulus was assessed further through adhesion
and functionality of human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived
cardiomyocytes, thereby helping establish these scaffolds as an ideal
platform for developing cardiac tissue-on-a-chip models. The hiPSC
cardiomyocytes were adopted in this study due to their prior use in
the modeling and study of cardiac diseases such as cardiomyopathies
and ischemic heart disease.[34]The
results obtained from this study can support the use of these
electrospun scaffolds as in vitro preclinical platforms
for modeling of healthy and diseased cardiac tissue states beneficial
for drug screening or regenerative engineering applications. This
study collectively demonstrates a facile approach to produce visible
light cross-linkable, hybrid, biodegradable nanofibrous scaffold biomaterials,
which can be adopted as versatile cardiac tissue engineering platforms.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals
Furfuryl-gelatin
(f-gelatin)
was prepared by homogeneous addition of furfuryl amine to a porcine
gelatin solution as described in previously published works.[28] Phosphate buffered saline 10× solution
and 1,1,1,3,3,3 hexafluoroisopropanol (HFP) was purchased from Fisher
Bioreagents, USA. Polycaprolactone (PCL) of average Mn 80 000
was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA.
Cell Studies
Two different cardiac
cell types were utilized for this study. Human AC16 cardiomyocyte
cell lines and Cellartis human iPSC derivative cardiomyocytes were
utilized to determine the biocompatibility of the electrospun scaffolds.The AC16 human cardiomyocyte cell lines (SCC109, EMD Millipore,
Burlington, MA, USA) were cultured and expanded in Dulbecco’s
Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM/F12, Sigma-Aldrich) containing 2 mM l-glutamine (EMD Millipore), 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (EMD
Millipore), and 1× penicillin-streptomycin solution (EMD Millipore).
PKH26 Red Fluorescent Cell Linker Mini Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis,
MO, USA), and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Thermo Fisher
Scientific, USA) were used as cell labeling dyes. In addition, 48-
and 24-well flat-bottom plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) were
used for in vitro cultures. Trypsin-ethylene diamine
tetra acetic acid (EDTA, 0.25%, phenol red, ThermoFisher) was used
for cell detachment.Cellartis cardiomyocytes (from ChiPSC22)
are human cardiomyocytes
derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and were obtained
from Takara Bio, USA. These cells were cultured in Cellartis culture
base with 10% FBS and stabilized prior to experiment. Both AC16 human
cardiomyocytes and Cellartis cardiomyocytes were stained with PKH26
dye (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) prior to seeding on electrospun
scaffolds, as per manufacturer recommendations.
Synthesis of F-Gelatin
F-gelatin
was synthesized and characterized as previously reported.[28] Porcine gelatin (4 g, Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved
in 300 mL of milli-Q water. N-Hydroxysuccinimide
(NHS) (3.9 g, Tokyo Chemical Industry, Tokyo, Japan) and 1-ethyl-3-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)carbodiimide
(EDC) (4.8 g, Tokyo Chemical Industry), dissolved in 100 mL of milli-Q
water, and furfurylamine (1.5 g, Sigma-Aldrich) were added slowly
to the gelatin solution, and then the solution was stirred at 40 °C
for 24 h. After the reaction, the solution was filtrated and then
dialyzed using a dialysis membrane with a molecular weight cutoff
of 3500 Da (Spectrum Laboratories, Rancho Dominguez, CA) against water
for 3 days in dark conditions. The f-gelatin was recovered by lyophilization
and was used for further studies.
Electrospinning
of F-Gelatin-Based Scaffolds
The apparatus used for obtaining
coaxial fibers was developed in-house.[12] F-gelatin polymer solutions of 10% w/v concentration
were prepared by dissolving 1 g of dried f-gelatin in 10 mL of HFP.
The visible light cross-linking photoinitiator, riboflavin (RF), was
procured from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA). To the f-gelatin
solution was added 100 μL of RF (5% w/v in HFP). Blended polymer
solutions of 10% w/v were obtained by individually dissolving 5% w/v
of dried f-gelatin and 5% w/v of PCL in 10 mL of HFP. The dissolved
solution was further mixed and stirred for 6–8 h to obtain
a blended solution of PCL and f-gelatin in a ratio of 1:1. The polymer
solution was then loaded in a 5 mL syringe with 24 G needle connected
to the positive terminal of a high voltage DC supply (ES30P 10 W power
supply, Gamma High Voltage Research, Ormond Beach, FL). In case of
coaxial electrospinning, the polymer solutions were loaded in different
syringes. PCL solution was passed through an inner needle of 22 G
(0.71 mm internal diameter) and the sheath f-gelatin solution was
passed through the outer needle of 16 G (1.65 mm internal diameter).[35] The RF solution was added to the f-gelatin solution
before electrospinning. The fibers were deposited onto a grounded
aluminum substrate placed at a distance of 10 cm perpendicular to
the needle. Fibers were electrospun at room temperature (26 °C)
and a relative humidity of 78%. The resulting electrospun fibers were
then cross-linked by immediately exposing them to visible light for
2 min (400 nm wavelengths at 100% intensity, Intelli-Ray 600, Uvitron
International, West Springfield, MA). After the cross-linking process,
the electrospun scaffolds were rinsed with phosphate buffered saline
(pH 7.4) and used for further studies. The obtained samples were stored
at room temperature until further use.
Characterization
of the Electrospun Fibers
The physiochemical characterization
of the scaffolds was performed
to analyze and choose an optimal scaffold as a potential platform
for cardiac tissue modeling.
Scanning Electron Microscopy
(SEM)
SEM was performed to analyze the surface morphology
of the electrospun
scaffolds. The samples were mounted on brass stubs, were sputter-coated
with gold/palladium (2–3 min) in a sputter coater (Gatan Model
682 Precision etching coating system, Pleasantown, CA, USA), and were
visualized using SEM (S-4800, Hitachi, Japan) at 7 kV voltage and
current of 5 μA at varying magnifications. The diameters of
about 50 different fiber samples were measured in each sample group
using ImageJ to obtain their average diameter.
Transmission Electron Spectroscopy (TEM)
TEM was performed
on coaxial f-gelatin > PCL electrospun scaffolds
using an H9500 TEM (Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), operating with an
accelerating potential of 100 kV, to analyze their internal structure
because it cannot be revealed using SEM. The electrospun fiber samples
for TEM observation were prepared by directly depositing the as-spun
fibers on Formvar-coated Cu TEM grids (Ted Pella Inc., Redding, CA,
USA).
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
(FTIR)
FTIR was performed on the electrospun scaffolds to
analyze the interaction between the blended polymers during the electrospinning
process. Measurements were carried out on the fibrous scaffolds using
a Thermo Mattison spectrometer (Thermo Mattison, Waltham, MA) equipped
with a ZnSe ATR crystal. Typically, 32 scans were signal-averaged
to reduce spectral noise. The spectrum of the samples was recorded
from 400 to 4000 cm–1 to assess the interaction
between the polymers.
Thermal Analysis by Thermogravimetric
(TGA)
Analysis and Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
Thermal
analysis was performed to elucidate the thermal stability of the electrospun
scaffolds and further discern the interaction or lack of interaction
between the blended polymer systems. TGA of the fibers was performed
using a universal Mettler TGA Analyzer, Model TGA/DSC 1 (Mettler-Toledo,
Columbus, OH). About 5 mg of the samples was heated at 10 °C
min–1 in a temperature range of 0–600 °C
using platinum crucibles. DSC analysis of the fibers was performed
from 0 to 300 °C at 10 °C min–1 using
the Mettler TGA Analyzer, Model TGA/DSC 1. The instrument was calibrated
using an indium standard, and the calorimeter cell was flushed with
liquid nitrogen at 20 mL min–1.
Rheological Analysis
The elastic
modulus of the electrospun scaffolds was elucidated by studying their
rheological properties. To examine the rheological properties of the
electrospun scaffold, the samples were soaked in 1× PBS for 24
h before testing. Circular samples of electrospun scaffold mats were
made with dimensions of 25 mm diameter and 1 mm thickness for these
experiments in accordance with previously published works.[36] An oscillatory shear stress rheometric study
was performed using an Anton-Paar MCR 92 rheometer (Anton-Paar, Austria)
with a PP25/S measuring system at 1% strain with a frequency range
between 0.5 and 50 Hz.[28,37] Analysis for frequency and strain
was conducted within the viscoelastic range of the samples.[28,37] The storage/loss moduli, complex viscosity, and elastic modulus
were measured at 1.99 Hz, as previously done and reported.[28,37]
Swelling and Morphological Analysis of Electrospun
Scaffolds
Swelling studies were performed on electrospun
scaffolds to assess their structural stability during long-term in vitro studies. Prior to performing these studies, the
hydrophilicity of all samples were determined using contact angle
measurement with an in-house video recorder. The cross-linked electrospun
scaffolds were cut into dimensions of 2 × 2 cm2 for in vitro swelling studies. The isolated specimens were placed
in Petri plates containing DMEM/F12 with 2 mM l-glutamine,
10% FBS, and 1× penicillin–streptomycin solution at 37
°C humidified with 5% CO2 for 14 and 21 days, respectively.
The specimens were recovered at the end of each incubation period
and were analyzed using SEM.
Biological
Assessment of the Electrospun Scaffolds
Human
AC16 Cardiomyocytes Cell Culture and
Adhesion on Electrospun Scaffolds
AC16 cardiomyocytes were
prestained using the PKH26 cytoplasmic staining dye; seeded on the
fibrous scaffolds placed in a 24 well culture plate (Corning, NY,
USA); and maintained in DMEM/F12 containing 2 mM l-glutamine,
10% FBS, and 1X Penicillin-Streptomycin Solution at 37 °C humidified
with 5% CO2. The cell seeding density was 25 000
cells/cm2 on scaffolds each approximately 1.9 cm2 in area that were designed to fit within the 24 wells. After 24
h of culture, the cell-laden constructs were fixed using 4% PFA, mounted
on glass slides, and imaged using a confocal fluorescence microscope
(Olympus IX81 inverted fluorescence motorized microscope, Japan) to
confirm the adhesion and retention of viable cells on the electrospun
scaffolds.
Flow Cytometry Analysis
(FACS)
To estimate cell proliferation and overall biocompatibility
of the
electrospun scaffolds, the AC16 human cardiomyocytes were prestained
using Cell Trace Violet proliferation kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA)
using manufacturer’s protocols for this experiment. These prestained
cells were seeded on the electrospun scaffolds (25 000 cells/cm2 on a total area of 1.9 cm2) and cultured for 24
h and 7 days, respectively (37 °C, 5% CO2). After
24 h and 7 days, cells on the electrospun scaffolds were treated using
Trypsin-EDTA (0.25%, phenol red) to detach and extract the cells for
FACS analysis. Extracted cells were fixed with 4% PFA for 15 min at
room temperature, added to their designated FACS analysis falcon tubes,
and analyzed using a Beckman Coulter Gallios Flow Cytometer (Brea,
CA, USA) with excitation and emission wavelengths of 405 and 450 nm,
respectively. Positive controls included prestained cells grown on
plastic Petri dishes for 48 h. Negative controls included nonstained
cells grown on plastic Petri dishes for 48 h.
Culture of Human hiPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes
Because
of their expected superior mechanical properties, the coaxial
f-gelatin > PCL electrospun scaffolds were chosen for further studies
with hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes for developing a cardiac tissue
model. Cellartis cardiomyocytes (10 000 cells/0.95 cm2) were seeded on coaxial f-gelatin > PCL scaffolds placed in 48-well
plates and cultured in Cellartis culture base with 10% FBS at 37 °C
humidified with 5% CO2. After 48 h of culture, the cell-laden
constructs were fixed using 4% PFA, mounted on glass slides, and imaged
using a confocal fluorescence microscope (Olympus IX81 inverted fluorescence
motorized microscope, Japan) to confirm the adhesion and retention
of cells on the electrospun scaffolds.Moreover, to assess the
long-term biocompatibility of the coaxial electrospun scaffolds, a
Live/Dead assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) was used according
to the protocol provided by the manufacturer after 7 days of culture
of the hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes atop such scaffolds. Calcein AM
(green) represented live cells while ethidium homodimer (red) represented
dead cells. The viability of the cells was quantified using the eq below.
Statistical Analysis
The IBM SPSS
software package was used for all statistical analysis reported in
this study. All experiments were performed in triplicate, and numerical
data are reported as mean ± standard deviation. All data were
compared using ANOVA with p < 0.05 considered
to be statistically significant.
Results
Morphological and Structural Analysis
SEM images of
the cross-linked electrospun samples are shown in Figure A–I. Well-formed,
robust fibers were observed in all electrospun scaffolds, and their
average fiber diameters are tabulated in Table .
Figure 1
Electron microscopy images of f-gelatin, f-gelatin
blended with
PCL (1:1), and coaxial f-gelatin > PCL electrospun scaffolds. In
images
A–I, SEM images are presented, and in J, a TEM image is presented.
In A–C the cross section is presented at a lower magnification
(scale bar = 1 mm). In D–F, higher magnification cross-sectional
images are shown (scale bar = 100 μm). In G–I, high-magnification
images from the surface are presented (scale bar = 20 μm). Panel
J shows a representative TEM image of coaxial f-gelatin > PCL electrospun
scaffolds (scale bar = 100 nm).
Table 1
Optimized Parameter for Electrospinning
F-Gelatin-Based Fibers
scaffold type
f-gel
f-gelatin
and PCL (1:1)
coaxial f-gelatin > PCL
concentration of polymer(s)
10% w/v (f-gel)
5% w/v (f-gel)
5% w/v (f-gel)
5% w/v (PCL)
5% w/v (PCL)
solvent
HFP
HFP
HFP
flow rate
0.5 mL/h
1 mL/h
core-0.5 mL/h
sheath-0.5 mL/h
accelerating voltage
1.5 kV/cm
1.5 kV/cm
1.5 kV/cm
distance between tip and collector
10 cm
10 cm
10 cm
average fiber diameter (nm)
760 ± 80 nm
420 ± 110 nm
810 ± 60 nm
Electron microscopy images of f-gelatin, f-gelatin
blended with
PCL (1:1), and coaxial f-gelatin > PCL electrospun scaffolds. In
images
A–I, SEM images are presented, and in J, a TEM image is presented.
In A–C the cross section is presented at a lower magnification
(scale bar = 1 mm). In D–F, higher magnification cross-sectional
images are shown (scale bar = 100 μm). In G–I, high-magnification
images from the surface are presented (scale bar = 20 μm). Panel
J shows a representative TEM image of coaxial f-gelatin > PCL electrospun
scaffolds (scale bar = 100 nm).Figures A–F
show the cross-sectional images of the electrospun scaffolds in low
(Figure A–C)
and high magnification (Figure D–F), respectively. The thickness of the electrospun
scaffolds varied between 50 and 75 μm, and these scaffolds were
used as such for further characterization. The yellow color present
in the non-cross-linked scaffolds was due to the presence of RF, which
was used as an initiator for visible light cross-linking (Supplementary Figure S1). The fading of the yellow
color confirmed the completion of the photo-cross-linking process
(optimized in our laboratory; results not included) in all the electrospun
scaffolds. The average diameter of the blended f-gelatin and PCL (1:1)
scaffolds was found to be the lowest (420 ± 110 nm), and it was
noted to be the highest (810 ± 60 nm) for the blended coaxial
f-gelatin > PCL electrospun scaffolds. The optimized parameters
for
electrospinning, as tabulated in Table , outline that the distance between the tip and collector,
the accelerating voltage, and the total concentration of the polymer
solutions were all maintained constant. Hence, the significant change
in average fiber diameters was due to the flow rate and addition of
PCL in samples containing the polymer solution. The viscosity of the
polymer solutions influences the average fiber diameters of the electrospun
scaffolds in a proportional manner.[7,12] Hence, the
significant difference in the scaffold diameters was due to the lowering
of the viscosity (results not included). In case of the coaxially
spun f-gelatin > PCL scaffolds, the polymer solutions were not
blended
conventionally, thereby leading to a corresponding increase in average
fiber diameter.Coalescence of the fiber junctions was found
to be predominant
in coaxial f-gelatin > PCL electrospun scaffolds (Figure I). During coaxial electrospinning,
the evaporation of the core polymer solvent occurs through the sheath.
The latent evaporation of the core solvent through the sheath led
to formation of coalescent junctions in coaxial f-gelatin > PCL
electrospun
scaffolds.[12] Coalescence at the fiber junctions
in coaxial f-gelatin > PCL electrospun scaffolds is advantageous
because
the fiber junctions enhance the elastic modulus of the scaffolds.[7,12,38]Figure J represents a TEM image of the coaxial f-gelatin
> PCL electrospun scaffolds that clearly indicates the core–shell
structure of the coaxial f-gelatin > PCL fibers. The core diameter
of the coaxial f-gelatin > PCL fibers was found to be significantly
lower in comparison with the sheath diameter (p =
0.03). Since the PCL polymer solution (core) had significantly lower
viscosity than the f-gelatin (sheath) polymer solution, this resulted
in a higher diameter of the sheath.[38]
Thermal Stability and Interaction
In order
to determine the chemical modifications due to addition
of PCL to f-gelatin during electrospinning, ATR-FTIR analysis was
performed initially to confirm their blending. The pure f-gelatin
fibers with and without RF were also analyzed in this experiment. Figure shows the ATR-FTIR
spectra of all electrospun scaffolds. No apparent peaks of the solvent
were observed, which demonstrates a complete evaporation of solvent
during the electrospinning process. All the commonly associated peaks
corresponding to both PCL and f-gelatin, namely, the carbonyl, amide
I, and amide II peaks, were observed.[7,12,38] Few peaks of PCL and f-gelatin within 1160–1200
cm–1 were found to be overlapping.[7,12,38] The presence of f-gelatin in
the sample was confirmed from four different regions in the spectra
and the two regions that included the 1656–1644 cm–1 (amide I)[39] and 1560–1335 cm–1 (amide II).[40] The electrospun
spectra showed bands of increasing intensity for amides I and II in
the case of the f-gelatin alone system, while the peaks were significantly
lower in intensity for the blended systems. The absence of peaks in
the amide III region (1240–670 cm–1) is related
to the loss of the triple-helix state during denaturation of collagen
to gelatin.[7,12,38] The carbonyl C=O double bond stretching mode, with contributions
from in-phase bending of the N—H bond and stretching of the
C—N bond, occurs in the frequency region of 1660–1620
cm–1, which is often referred to as the amide I
band. The frequency range 1660–1650 cm–1 was
known as α-helical, and 1640–1620 cm–1 was known as β-sheet structures. The frequency range of 1550–1520
cm–1 is due to the amide II with an α-helical
structure between 1550 and 1540 cm–1 and β-sheets
at 1525–1520 cm–1.[7,12,38,40] The amide
II vibration is caused by deformation of the N—H bonds.[41] The characteristic absorption band at 1730 cm–1 is mainly due to an ester carbonyl group, and the
band at 1283 cm–1 corresponds to the −CH
group of PCL.[7,12,32,38] The most eminent peaks are listed in Table .
Figure 2
ATR-FTIR spectroscopy
of all electrospun scaffolds.
Table 2
Prominent Peaks of F-Gelatin-Based
Electrospun Fibers
wavelength (cm–1)
designation
1700–1750
C=O stretching
1226–1280
O—C—O stretching
1636–1640
C—O stretching of amide I in gelatin
1542–1548
N—H and C—H stretching in amide II
ATR-FTIR spectroscopy
of all electrospun scaffolds.The extent of interaction
between the polymers of the blended electrospun
systems could not be determined as all peaks corresponding to both
PCL and f-gelatin were observed. Since no interactive peaks were observed,
and because the interactive peaks may overlap with individual band
vibrations of PCL and f-gelatin, thermal analysis was performed to
further analyze the interaction/noninteraction of the polymers in
the electrospun scaffolds. Moreover, photo-cross-linking of f-gelatin
showed no new peaks.TGA thermograms of blended electrospun
scaffolds that were cross-linked
are shown in Figure A. All electrospun samples demonstrated a characteristic three-stage
weight loss pattern. The first stage corresponded to the loss of moisture
from these samples, while the second and third stages corresponded
to the thermal decomposition of gelatin and PCL, as also shown by
our prior published studies.[32,38] The loss of moisture
in gelatin occurred over a temperature range of 21–90 °C
and marked the first stage of weight loss. The first weight loss was
correspondingly higher for the f-gelatin alone electrospun scaffolds
and considerably lower in the blended electrospun scaffolds, which
was apparent from the T–5% values
as listed in Table . T–5% values represent the initial
weight loss of the material used for analysis. The higher T–5% value represents a higher thermal
stability of the material.[7,12]
Figure 3
(A) TGA and (B) DSC of
all electrospun scaffolds.
Table 3
Thermal Analysis of F-Gelatin-Based
Electrospun Fibers
f-gelatin
f-gelatin and
PCL(1:1)
coaxial f-gelatin > PCL
Tmax1 (°C)
276.5
223.03
Tmax2 (°C)
278.33
376.38
380.56
T–5% (°C)
71.67
140.28
187.07
denaturation
temperature (°C)
42.52
41.12
40.6
melting temperature (°C)
61.2
56.08
(A) TGA and (B) DSC of
all electrospun scaffolds.Tmax values
are temperatures at which
maximum mass rate change occurs, and two separate Tmax values corresponding to the degradation of f-gelatin
and PCL were observed. With a different blending of PCL with f-gelatin,
the Tmax2 values were found to differ
correspondingly. The Tmax2 values correspond
to β-sheet thermal decomposition in gelatin, which further proves
that the addition of gelatin resulted in relatively easy crystallization
and increased β-sheet content.[7,38] The Tmax1 values correspond to the degradation initiated
from chain scission of the ester linkage in PCL.[7,38] Since
the degradation steps correspond to the individual polymers, no interaction
between the polymers in the electrospun scaffolds was observed through
TGA.Figure B represents
the DSC of the electrospun scaffolds. Despite gelatin being derived
from collagen, which involves rupture of the triple-helix structure
by breaking of hydrogen bonds and a rearrangement of the triple-helix
into a random configuration, renaturation is possible under certain
conditions.[12,38] Therefore, the characteristic
endothermic peaks of gelatin have often been seen to occur at the
denaturation temperature (TD).[42] Miscible polymers have a single-phase blend
for which a single glass transition, a single crystallization, and
a single melting transition is observed.[38] However, an immiscible blend typically shows two inflections or
endotherms due to the glass transition and/or melting endotherms,
although they are expected to deviate from those of the pure components.[43] Hence, PCL and f-gelatin are thermodynamically
immiscible polymers. Furthermore, f-gelatin and PCL (1:1) electrospun
scaffolds exhibited a significantly higher Tm (melting temperature) when compared to the coaxial f-gelatin
> PCL electrospun system.An increased pressure and temperature
when heat is transferred
from the f-gelatin sheath to the PCL core led to the significant decrease
in Tm of PCL in coaxial f-gelatin >
PCL
scaffolds.[12] Since no third interactive
peak was observed from DSC, it conclusively proved the noninteraction
of the polymers after electrospinning and cross-linking. Thermal analysis
also conclusively proves that the coalescence of fibers observed in
the coaxial f-gelatin > PCL electrospun scaffolds was physical
in
nature alone with no chemical interactions.
Mechanical
Parameters
Rheometric
analysis was performed on the cross-linked electrospun scaffolds after
12 h of preswelling in 1× PBS (pH 7.4) and is presented in Figure . At 1% constant
strain, the average elastic modulus was 3.46 ± 0.05 kPa for the
f-gelatin electrospun scaffolds and 28.49 ± 0.26 kPa for the
f-gelatin and PCL (1:1) scaffolds. The average elastic modulus of
the coaxial f-gelatin > PCL scaffolds was 164 ± 3.85 kPa.
The
addition of PCL to the blended scaffolds was found to significantly
improve the elastic modulus of the scaffolds (p =
0.02). In case of f-gelatin and PCL (1:1) electrospun scaffolds, the
topical addition of PCL to f-gelatin polymer solution merely contributed
to the enhancement of the elastic modulus of the resultant scaffold.
However, for the coaxial f-gelatin > PCL scaffolds, a significantly
higher elastic modulus was recorded. Hence, the coaxial f-gelatin
> PCL electrospinning process significantly improved the mechanical
stability of the fibrous scaffolds. Moreover, the physical coalescence
of fibers at the junctions in coaxial f-gelatin > PCL electrospun
scaffolds also led to their enhanced elastic modulus.[7,12] The elastic modulus of the blended scaffolds fell within the range
of the native ECM present in the human myocardium and can be potentially
utilized as platforms or scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering.[37]
Figure 4
Elastic modulus of all electrospun scaffolds obtained
through rheological
analysis. F-Gelatin is labeled as F-GEL; blended f-gelatin and PCL
(1:1) is labeled as 1:1, and coaxial f-gelatin > PCL electrospun
scaffolds
is labeled as COAX in the figure.
Elastic modulus of all electrospun scaffolds obtained
through rheological
analysis. F-Gelatin is labeled as F-GEL; blended f-gelatin and PCL
(1:1) is labeled as 1:1, and coaxial f-gelatin > PCL electrospun
scaffolds
is labeled as COAX in the figure.
In Vitro Swelling and Dissolution
Studies
Figure shows the SEM images of in vitro swelling of blended
cross-linked fibers of f-gelatin, f-gelatin and PCL (1:1), and coaxial
f-gelatin > PCL systems after 2 (Figure A–C) and 3 weeks (Figure D–F). Swelling of the
fibers was detected in all electrospun scaffolds. The swelling pattern
was significantly pronounced in pure f-gelatin electrospun scaffolds
and least pronounced in the blended f-gelatin and PCL (1:1) system.
The degree of swelling was proportional to the composition of f-gelatin
present in the sample (Figure G). Correspondingly, changes in morphology of the fibers were
increasingly pronounced with the presence and composition of f-gelatin.
PCL being a hydrophobic polymer was found to undergo surface erosion
dissolution, while gelatin present in the fibers corresponded to bulk
dissolution of the fibers.[7,12] The porosity and pore
structure of the electrospun scaffolds are significantly affected
by the swelling of f-gelatin after 2 weeks. The higher degree of swelling
in f-gelatin electrospun scaffolds and coaxial f-gelatin > PCL
scaffolds
led to the complete occlusion of pores within 2 weeks. After 3 weeks,
the high degree of swelling in f-gelatin electrospun scaffolds led
to the disruption of its fibrous nature while in coaxial f-gelatin
> PCL scaffolds the partial dissolution of the f-gelatin sheath
exposed
the internal PCL fibers in the scaffold. The blended f-gelatin and
PCL (1:1) electrospun scaffolds clearly showed the chemical noninteraction
of gelatin and PCL fibers during the study. The swelling of f-gelatin
is clearly visible after 2 weeks and was found to be more pronounced
after 3 weeks. The occlusion of pores was minimal in the blended f-gelatin
and PCL (1:1) electrospun scaffolds and was highest in f-gelatin electrospun
scaffolds. The hydrophilicity of the gelatin structure leads to bulk
dissolution of the shell structure.[12] The
obtained results conclusively indicate that the increase in f-gelatin
composition increased the biodegradability of the scaffold.
Figure 5
(A–C)
SEM images of in vitro dissolution
of f-gelatin, f-gelatin and PCL (1:1), and coaxial f-gelatin >
PCL
electrospun scaffolds after 2 weeks (scale bar = 50 μm). (D–F)
Scaffolds imaged using SEM after 3 weeks (scale bar = 50 μm).
(G) Schematic representation of the proposed dissolution mechanism
in blended electrospun scaffolds.
(A–C)
SEM images of in vitro dissolution
of f-gelatin, f-gelatin and PCL (1:1), and coaxial f-gelatin >
PCL
electrospun scaffolds after 2 weeks (scale bar = 50 μm). (D–F)
Scaffolds imaged using SEM after 3 weeks (scale bar = 50 μm).
(G) Schematic representation of the proposed dissolution mechanism
in blended electrospun scaffolds.
Biocompatibility
Figure A–C represents the adhesion
of AC16 cardiomyocytes on all the electrospun scaffolds. All three
sets of electrospun scaffold groups were found to support the adhesion
of AC16 cardiomyocytes after only 24 h of culture. The percentage
of adhered cells (Figure D) studied through PK26 cell-labeling using ImageJ software
showed significantly better adhesion of cells on blended electrospun
f-gelatin and PCL (1:1) (∼64%) and coaxial f-gelatin > PCL
scaffolds (∼68%) than on f-gelatin electrospun scaffolds (∼39%).
Although we did not report the biomarker characterization for gap
junction analysis for the AC16 cardiomyocyte cells adhered onto the
scaffolds, our previously published works have extensively highlighted
the presence of Connexin 43 as a cardiac gap junction expressed by
such cells atop f-gelatin-based scaffolds.[36]
Figure 6
(A–C)
Confocal microscopy images of AC16 cardiomyocytes
stained with DAPI (blue) and PKH26 (red) on f-gelatin, f-gelatin and
PCL (1:1), and coaxial f-gelatin > PCL electrospun scaffolds after
24 h (scale bar = 100 μm). (D) A quantitative estimate of the
PKH26-stained cell area for all samples is shown. A significantly
higher number of cells were present on the coaxial scaffolds (p < 0.05) in comparison with the other scaffolds.
(A–C)
Confocal microscopy images of AC16 cardiomyocytes
stained with DAPI (blue) and PKH26 (red) on f-gelatin, f-gelatin and
PCL (1:1), and coaxial f-gelatin > PCL electrospun scaffolds after
24 h (scale bar = 100 μm). (D) A quantitative estimate of the
PKH26-stained cell area for all samples is shown. A significantly
higher number of cells were present on the coaxial scaffolds (p < 0.05) in comparison with the other scaffolds.The significant difference in elastic modulus was
sensed by the
cells and led to a higher adhesion of cells on the blended scaffolds
with a higher elastic modulus.[44] The exposure
of RGD cell-binding sequence in f-gelatin enables the adhesion of
the cardiomyocytes to the scaffolds.[19] Moreover,
the high surface to volume ratio created by the surface roughness
of the electrospun fibrous scaffolds also provides an optimal substrate
for the cells to adhere within 24 h.[12]Figures A–F
represents the FACS analysis of cardiomyocytes extracted from all
the electrospun scaffolds. The cardiomyocytes were stained using CellTrace
Violet (CTV) dye to track cell growth and proliferation using the
concept of dye dilution after 1 and 7 days of culture. Since cell-doubling
time for AC16 cardiomyocytes is ∼25 h, cell proliferation caused
a reduction in intensity of the dye over successive generations, thereby
permitting the analysis of several generations of proliferating cells
within 7 days.[45,46] In this experiment, positive
controls included cells prestained with CTV (Supplementary Figure S2) and cultured for 48 h after which they were extracted.
Negative controls (Supplementary Figure S2) included samples cultured using the exact conditions as the positive
controls, without the addition of the CTV dye. The characteristic
peaks from the negative controls were observed in the low intensity
region, and peaks for the stained cells of the positive controls were
observed in the high intensity region.
Figure 7
FACS analysis of CTV
cardiomyocytes extracted from cell culture
plates after 1 day (A–C) and after 7-days (D–F). Unstained
negative and stained positive controls are shown in Supplementary Figure S2 and were used to define and set the
gate limits for the data shown in this figure.
FACS analysis of CTV
cardiomyocytes extracted from cell culture
plates after 1 day (A–C) and after 7-days (D–F). Unstained
negative and stained positive controls are shown in Supplementary Figure S2 and were used to define and set the
gate limits for the data shown in this figure.Figure panels
A, B, and C represent the CTV prestained cells extracted from f-gelatin,
blended f-gelatin and PCL (1:1), and coaxial f-gelatin > PCL electrospun
scaffolds, respectively, on day 1. All sample runs shown in Figure panels A, B, and
C showed peaks (97.43–99.05%) in the positive control region
(99.81%) (Supplementary Figure S2) signifying
the adhesion of cells on the scaffolds. Since the time for proliferation
was low within seeding until 24 h later, most of the cells exhibited
a higher concentration of the dye in comparison with positive controls. Figure panels D, E, and
F represent the CTV prestained cells extracted from f-gelatin, blended
f-gelatin and PCL (1:1), and coaxial f-gelatin > PCL electrospun
scaffolds,
respectively, on day 7. The intensity of the CTV dye significantly
decreased by day 7 (23.89–49.62%), which clearly signified
the dilution of dye with time, indicating proliferation of the prestained
cardiomyocytes on the electrospun scaffolds. Among the three samples,
dye dilution was maximized (24%) in the cells that proliferated atop
the blended f-gelatin and PCL (1:1), followed by 42% on cells atop
the coaxial f-gelatin > PCL electrospun scaffolds and 51% atop
the
cells on the f-gelatin scaffolds. This implies that the cells adhered
and proliferated atop the f-gelatin blended scaffolds but also preferred
an enhanced mechano-conductive scaffold such as the blended f-gelatin-PCL
scaffolds in comparison with the pure f-gelatin scaffolds.
Cardiac Tissue Modeling
Since coaxial
f-gelatin > PCL electrospun scaffolds exhibited significantly higher
elastic modulus when compared with other scaffolds, Cellartis hiPSC-derived
cardiomyocytes were seeded on them to study their biocompatibility. Figure A–C represents
the adhesion of cells on the coaxial f-gelatin > PCL electrospun
scaffolds
after 3 days, thereby providing appropriate time for the cells to
attach and adapt to the scaffold. The contractile function of the
hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes on the electrospun scaffolds was intact.
Figure 8
(A–C)
Confocal microscopy images of hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes
stained with DAPI and PKH26 on all the coaxially spun scaffolds after
72 h (scale bar = 200 μm). (D,E) Live/Dead assay results from
hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes grown on the coaxially spun scaffolds
after 7 days.
(A–C)
Confocal microscopy images of hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes
stained with DAPI and PKH26 on all the coaxially spun scaffolds after
72 h (scale bar = 200 μm). (D,E) Live/Dead assay results from
hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes grown on the coaxially spun scaffolds
after 7 days.More than 90% of cell viability
was detected after 7 days of culture
through the Live/Dead assay, as shown in Figure D,E.
Discussion
Electrospinning has witnessed a profound advancement in the field
of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.[7] The versatility of the electrospinning process combined
with the emergence of new biopolymers has been a major accelerator
of this growth. The present study demonstrates the applicability of
using an f-gelatin and PCL-based electrospun fibrous scaffolds geared
toward cardiac tissue engineering applications. The f-gelatin consisted
mainly of porcine gelatin, modified by the incorporation of a furfural
group.[28,37] Earlier studies by our group on this f-gelatin
led to the development of a scaffold that can be rapidly cross-linked
in the presence of visible light to maintain structural fidelity.[28,37] However, the structural integrity and stiffness of the printed cross-linked
structure improved only when blended with hyaluronic acid.[37] Our long-term goal is to biofabricate multilayered,
multicellular models, which can be used for mimicking in vivo cardiac tissue. Since the topographies of scaffolds have been shown
to dictate cellular attachment, migration, proliferation, and differentiation,
which are critical in engineering complex functional tissues with
improved biocompatibility and functional performance, electrospinning
of f-gelatin with PCL was chosen as the method to develop the needed
platforms for cardiac tissue modeling.[47]As a first step, we developed a novel visible light cross-linked
electrospun scaffold based on f-gelatin and PCL, which would aid in
providing ideal platforms for cardiac modeling applications. In comparison
with f-gelatin 3D bioprinted gels reported by our group in prior studies,
the f-gelatin electrospun scaffolds possessed improved mechanical
properties as well as optimal swelling behavior.[28,37] Electrospinning of polymer solutions requires the optimization of
various parameters, i.e., concentration, viscosity,
molecular weight, degree of entanglement, electrical conductivity,
and surface tension.[7,12,32,38] The hydrophobic synthetic polymer PCL has
been electrospun using solvents such as dichloromethane and chloroform.[48] Because of higher conductivity and solubility
factors, HFP has been widely used to electrospin natural polymers.[38] Moreover, HFP also reduces surface tension of
the polymer solution, thereby enabling blending of natural polymers
with synthetic polymers.[38] Hence, HFP was
chosen as the optimal solvent for electrospinning f-gelatin and blended
f-gelatin and PCL fibers. The increase in diameter of coaxial f-gelatin
> PCL fibers over f-gelatin and f-gelatin and PCL (1:1) blended
fibers
has been attributed to the presence of PCL core solution that caused
a difference in charge relaxation time and viscosity of the coaxial
f-gelatin > PCL spinning solution.[49] The
increase in fiber diameter corresponds to a decrease in surface area
of the electrospun fibers, which might influence a decrease in adhesion
of cells on the coaxial f-gelatin > PCL scaffolds.[38] Thermal properties of the electrospun fibers were used
to assess the miscibility and interaction of the polymers after electrospinning.
However, no interactive peaks were exhibited by the scaffolds, leading
to the conclusion that no interaction occurred between the polymers
after electrospinning and cross-linking.In comparison with
other types of hybrid blended gelatin scaffolds,
these scaffolds produced via a simple visible light cross-linking
mechanism can maintain noninteraction between polymers, which will
aid in maintaining the structural and functional properties of growth
factors or other chemokines for releasing into a culture or in vivo, as desired because visible light cross-linking
does not seem to alter the chemical functionality of the polymers.[12,38] However, in vitro swelling studies performed on
all the systems exhibited stark differences in the structural stability
of the scaffolds over a 3 week period. Blended electrospun scaffolds
were more structurally stable than f-gelatin electrospun scaffolds.
The addition of hydrophobic PCL significantly improved the structural
stability of the scaffolds. Moreover, the swelling and dissolution
of gelatin in the blended scaffolds increased the pore diameter of
the scaffolds, which thereby enabled the penetration of cells through
the scaffolds. All electrospun scaffolds exhibited excellent biocompatibility
by supporting the adhesion and proliferation of human AC16 cardiomyocytes
over a period of 7 days. Cardiomyocytes prefer a hydrophobic surface
for adhesion and proliferation.[50] Moreover,
an increased water uptake usually decreases resultant cell adhesion.[12] However, the cell binding sequences in f-gelatin
balanced the swelling and the hydrophilic surface properties of f-gelatin.[12,38]We aim to fabricate cardiac wall tissue in vitro utilizing electrospinning, which can then be exploited in
vitro for drug studies or probing into the underlying mechanisms
involved in cardiac development and disease. The cross-linked electrospun
scaffolds had elastic moduli ranging from 3 to 160 kPa, which were
stable when exposed to long-term culture, implying they can be extremely
effective for in vivo studies, as well. The human
myocardium ranges in stiffness from 20 kPa (end of diastole) to 500
kPa (end of systole).[51] Hence, the coaxial
f-gelatin > PCL electrospun scaffold system, which possessed the
highest
elastic modulus (>150 kPa) among the three electrospun systems,
was
chosen as the potentially suitable candidate for cardiac platforms
that could withstand the contractile forces of the native myocardium.
Additionally in this study, we cultured human induced pluripotent
stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes on the chosen coaxial f-gelatin >
PCL electrospun scaffolds. The viability and contractile function
of the hiPSC-cardiomyocytes were not affected by the coaxial f-gelatin
> PCL electrospun platform, thereby confirming its potential as
an
ideal platform for cardiac tissue engineering applications.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we showed the applicability
of f-gelatin as a novel
biomaterial for electrospinning of scaffolds or platforms with cardiac
tissue ECM-like mechanical properties. Although both synthetic and
natural materials have been proposed to generate suitable tissue engineering
grafts, the ideal material or scaffold for repair and regeneration
of cardiac tissue has not yet been proposed.[28] Coaxial f-gelatin > PCL electrospun scaffolds of PCL (core) and
f-gelatin (sheath) exhibited improved structural and mechanical stability
in comparison with electrospun scaffolds developed from f-gelatin
alone and conventionally blended f-gelatin and PCL (1:1) scaffolds.
The blending of f-gelatin with PCL significantly improved its mechanical
and chemical structural stability. All electrospun scaffolds exhibited
excellent biocompatibility by supporting the adhesion and growth of
human AC16 cardiomyocytes and hiPSC cardiomyocytes, confirming the
presence of the cell binding sequences in f-gelatin that were exposed
in all scaffolds postelectrospinning and cross-linking.The
noninteraction of PCL with f-gelatin in the blended scaffolds
will aid in the addition of drug molecules like growth factors and
chemokines without any change in its structural and functional ability.[52] Further studies may be aimed at testing the in vitro efficacy of the coaxial f-gelatin > PCL electrospun
scaffolds with appropriately bound drug molecules and at developing
a robust cardiac organoid platform for drug screening applications.
In addition, since engineering of the heart muscle requires alignment
because it is an anisotropic tissue, we will devise methods for electrospinning
the fiber-based scaffolds in an aligned pattern.We will also
attempt to develop hierarchically structured scaffolds
with piezoelectric or electro-conductive properties to mimic the native
myocardium. This will enable us to generate a functional cardiac patch
that can be used for drug cytotoxicity screening or exploring triggers
for heart diseases in vitro.
Authors: Thomas Boudou; Wesley R Legant; Anbin Mu; Michael A Borochin; Nimalan Thavandiran; Milica Radisic; Peter W Zandstra; Jonathan A Epstein; Kenneth B Margulies; Christopher S Chen Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: A Sensini; L Cristofolini; A Zucchelli; M L Focarete; C Gualandi; A DE Mori; A P Kao; M Roldo; G Blunn; G Tozzi Journal: J Microsc Date: 2019-08-02 Impact factor: 1.758
Authors: Perviz Asaria; Paul Elliott; Margaret Douglass; Ziad Obermeyer; Michael Soljak; Azeem Majeed; Majid Ezzati Journal: Lancet Public Health Date: 2017-03-01