Megan M Coffer1,2, Blake A Schaeffer3, Wilson B Salls3, Erin Urquhart4, Keith A Loftin5, Richard P Stumpf6, P Jeremy Werdell7, John A Darling3. 1. ORISE Fellow, U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, Durham, NC, USA. 2. Center for Geospatial Analytics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA. 3. U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, Durham, NC, USA. 4. Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Ocean Ecology Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA. 5. U.S. Geological Survey, Kansas Water Science Center, Lawrence, KS, USA. 6. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Silver Spring, MD, USA. 7. Ocean Ecology Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA.
Abstract
Cyanobacterial blooms can have negative effects on human health and local ecosystems. Field monitoring of cyanobacterial blooms can be costly, but satellite remote sensing has shown utility for more efficient spatial and temporal monitoring across the United States. Here, satellite imagery was used to assess the annual frequency of surface cyanobacterial blooms, defined for each satellite pixel as the percentage of images for that pixel throughout the year exhibiting detectable cyanobacteria. Cyanobacterial frequency was assessed across 2,196 large lakes in 46 states across the continental United States (CONUS) using imagery from the European Space Agency's Ocean and Land Colour Instrument for the years 2017 through 2019. In 2019, across all satellite pixels considered, annual bloom frequency had a median value of 4% and a maximum value of 100%, the latter indicating that for those satellite pixels, a cyanobacterial bloom was detected by the satellite sensor for every satellite image considered. In addition to annual pixel-scale cyanobacterial frequency, results were summarized at the lake- and state-scales by averaging annual pixel-scale results across each lake and state. For 2019, average annual lake-scale frequencies also had a maximum value of 100%, and Oregon and Ohio had the highest average annual state-scale frequencies at 65% and 52%. Pixel-scale frequency results can assist in identifying portions of a lake that are more prone to cyanobacterial blooms, while lake- and state-scale frequency results can assist in the prioritization of sampling resources and mitigation efforts. Satellite imagery is limited by the presence of snow and ice, as imagery collected in these conditions are quality flagged and discarded. Thus, annual bloom frequencies within nine climate regions were investigated to determine whether missing data biased results in climate regions more prone to snow and ice, given that their annual summaries would be weighted toward the summer months when cyanobacterial blooms tend to occur. Results were unbiased by the time period selected in most climate regions, but a large bias was observed for the Northwest Rockies and Plains climate region. Moderate biases were observed for the Ohio Valley and the Southeast climate regions. Finally, a clustering analysis was used to identify areas of high and low cyanobacterial frequency across CONUS based on average annual lake-scale cyanobacterial frequencies for 2019. Several clusters were identified that transcended state, watershed, and eco-regional boundaries. Combined with additional data, results from the clustering analysis may offer insight regarding large-scale drivers of cyanobacterial blooms.
Cyanobacterial blooms can have negative effects on human health and local ecosystems. Field monitoring of cyanobacterial blooms can be costly, but satellite remote sensing has shown utility for more efficient spatial and temporal monitoring across the United States. Here, satellite imagery was used to assess the annual frequency of surface cyanobacterial blooms, defined for each satellite pixel as the percentage of images for that pixel throughout the year exhibiting detectable cyanobacteria. Cyanobacterial frequency was assessed across 2,196 large lakes in 46 states across the continental United States (CONUS) using imagery from the European Space Agency's Ocean and Land Colour Instrument for the years 2017 through 2019. In 2019, across all satellite pixels considered, annual bloom frequency had a median value of 4% and a maximum value of 100%, the latter indicating that for those satellite pixels, a cyanobacterial bloom was detected by the satellite sensor for every satellite image considered. In addition to annual pixel-scale cyanobacterial frequency, results were summarized at the lake- and state-scales by averaging annual pixel-scale results across each lake and state. For 2019, average annual lake-scale frequencies also had a maximum value of 100%, and Oregon and Ohio had the highest average annual state-scale frequencies at 65% and 52%. Pixel-scale frequency results can assist in identifying portions of a lake that are more prone to cyanobacterial blooms, while lake- and state-scale frequency results can assist in the prioritization of sampling resources and mitigation efforts. Satellite imagery is limited by the presence of snow and ice, as imagery collected in these conditions are quality flagged and discarded. Thus, annual bloom frequencies within nine climate regions were investigated to determine whether missing data biased results in climate regions more prone to snow and ice, given that their annual summaries would be weighted toward the summer months when cyanobacterial blooms tend to occur. Results were unbiased by the time period selected in most climate regions, but a large bias was observed for the Northwest Rockies and Plains climate region. Moderate biases were observed for the Ohio Valley and the Southeast climate regions. Finally, a clustering analysis was used to identify areas of high and low cyanobacterial frequency across CONUS based on average annual lake-scale cyanobacterial frequencies for 2019. Several clusters were identified that transcended state, watershed, and eco-regional boundaries. Combined with additional data, results from the clustering analysis may offer insight regarding large-scale drivers of cyanobacterial blooms.
Cyanobacterial blooms can have negative effects on human health and local
ecosystems. Human exposure to cyanobacteria can occur through either recreational
exposure or the consumption of contaminated drinking water, and can cause skin and
eye irritation, damage to liver and kidney function, and flu-like symptoms (World Health Organization, 2003). Effects of
cyanobacteria and their toxins on ecosystems have been documented for bacteria,
algae, plants, fish, and aquatic invertebrates (Zanchett and Oliveira-Filho, 2013). In the United States, reports of
human or animal illness associated with cyanobacterial blooms have occurred in 43 of
50 states (Dubrovsky et al., 2016).Economic impacts of cyanobacteria result in part from water treatment costs,
medical treatment costs, and surveillance and monitoring costs. As an example,
treatment costs for toxin removal vary, but totals of $6,000 to $7,000 per day to
treat drinking water supplying a city the size of Toledo, Ohio (population of
approximately 280,000), were reported in 2013 (Great
Lakes Coastal Resilience, 2013). Additional costs can be incurred through
the treatment of taste-and-odor compounds and disinfection byproducts. Costs
associated with field monitoring are more difficult to quantify, but one estimate
from the Washington State Department of Ecology, which manages and budgets a state
program for harmful algal bloom monitoring, estimated laboratory costs of event
response samples at $60,000 per year and the staff time to facilitate and coordinate
the program at $150,000 per year (Anderson-Abbs et
al., 2016).Satellite remote sensing imagery has shown utility as a spatially and
temporally efficient monitoring technique for inland cyanobacterial blooms in the
United States, at both the regional scale (Clark et
al., 2017; Urquhart et al., 2017)
and the national scale (Coffer et al., 2020).
Satellite imagery cannot be used to detect toxins (Stumpf et al., 2016) nor can it be used to characterize water quality at
depth, as the algorithms typically used for cyanobacteria can detect blooms up to a
depth of 2 m in clear water (Mishra et al.,
2005) and much less than 2 m in more turbid waters (Wynne et al., 2010). However, satellites can be used to
effectively evaluate surface cyanobacterial presence above the satellite’s
minimum reporting level (Kutser, 2009).
Satellite imagery can provide consistent, near real-time assessments of water
quality specific to cyanobacterial blooms, which can alert water quality managers to
potential concerns and emerging risks (Schaeffer et
al., 2018). Moreover, satellite imagery can characterize the full
population of phytoplankton present in a waterbody compared to traditional
phytoplankton microscopic examination, which does not routinely include picoplankton
because of their small size (Śliwińska-Wilczewska et al., 2018 ). As a result of
expanded coverage, the availability of satellite imagery has been associated with
cost savings specific to cyanobacterial monitoring (Papenfus et al., 2020). Using a 2017 cyanobacterial bloom in Utah Lake,
Utah, as a case study, Stroming et al. (2020)
estimated that the use of satellite data for harmful algal bloom monitoring resulted
in approximately $370,000 in cost savings related to human health outcomes in that
single event.This study uses satellite imagery to build on regional results presented in
Clark et al. (2017) by assessing annual
cyanobacterial frequency at multiple spatial scales. At the smallest spatial scale
considered, annual pixel-scale cyanobacterial frequency can be computed as the
percentage of satellite observations throughout the year that indicate a
cyanobacterial bloom is present. At broader spatial scales, these pixel-scale
results can be summarized into average annual lake-scale and state-scale
cyanobacterial frequencies by averaging annual results for all pixels contained in
each lake and state. Previous studies have used satellite imagery to present annual
cyanobacterial bloom frequencies at various regional scales: Clark et al. (2017) analyzed bloom frequency for lakes in
the states of Ohio and Florida; Kahru et al.
(2007) assessed bloom frequency in the Baltic Sea; both Hu et al. (2010) and Yang
et al. (2016) quantified the temporal frequency of cyanobacterial blooms
for Taihu Lake in China. Despite the use of a cyanobacterial frequency metric in
past studies, the effect of missing observations on annual summaries has not been
documented. While satellite imagery has the potential to provide frequent,
year-round observations, cold-season data can be limited as observations are often
quality flagged and discarded due to snow and ice cover (Coffer et al., 2020). Quantifying this effect can
demonstrate if annual frequency metrics are appropriate at all lakes and if
comparisons across lakes or states in differing regions are valid.Here, surface cyanobacterial bloom frequency is presented at the pixel-,
lake-, and state-scales using satellite observations from over 2,000 lakes across
the contiguous United States (CONUS). State boundaries were selected as opposed to
watershed boundaries to align with typical state management approaches. Average
annual lake-scale results were used to explore two additional components of the
dataset. First, potential biases caused by the inclusion of cold-season data in
annual summaries were explored. This was done by testing the hypothesis that summary
metrics would be biased toward summertime data, when cyanobacterial blooms tend to
occur, resulting in an artificially higher annual cyanobacterial bloom frequency
metric in areas affected by snow and ice. Second, spatial patterns were explored to
identify spatial clusters of high and low bloom frequency lakes. This information
may be useful for prioritizing management efforts as well as for understanding
large-scale drivers of cyanobacterial blooms. The analysis of drivers was beyond the
scope of this effort but has been reported through other analyses at the regional
level (Myer et al., 2020). This study
addresses the following research objectives:Characterize the temporal frequency of surface cyanobacterial blooms
across CONUS at the satellite pixel-, lake-, and state-scales for the years
2017 through 2019.Explore potential biases caused by the inclusion of cold-season
data. This was done by comparing average annual lake-scale results to
lake-scale results computed using a temporal subset to represent the
snow-free period.Identify spatial clusters of lakes with high cyanobacterial
frequency and lakes with low cyanobacterial frequency using average annual
lake-scale results.
Data and methods
Satellite observations
Satellite observations were obtained from the European Space
Agency’s (ESA’s) Ocean and Land Colour Instrument (OLCI) onboard
the Sentinel-3A satellite. Sentinel-3A was launched in February 2016. Continuous
observations spanning the full year over CONUS became available beginning in
2017 and are expected to be available for similar analyses in future years. OLCI
offers a 2 to 3 day revisit period, 12-bit radiometric resolution, and 300-m
spatial resolution at nadir, where nadir is defined as the point on
Earth’s surface directly below the satellite. Imagery is collected in 21
spectral bands spanning 400 nm to 1020 nm.OLCI spectral surface reflectance imagery was obtained from the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Ocean Biology Processing Group
(OBPG; https://oceandata.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov) and was further processed
and quality assured as described in Urquhart and
Schaeffer (2020). The OBPG redistributes this data record through a
data sharing agreement between NASA and ESA. Briefly, the OBPG acquired Level-1B
(calibrated, top-of-atmosphere) data directly from ESA and processed them to
Level-2 imagery through removal of the contribution of spectral Rayleigh
scattering from the top-of-atmosphere signal using NASA’s standard data
processing software packaged as part of the SeaWIFS Data Analysis System
(SeaDAS; https://seadas.gsfc.nasa.gov). A high resolution (approximately
60-m) land mask based on the NASA Shuttle Radar Topography Mission Water Body
Data Shapefiles (NASA JPL, 2013) was
used, with modifications by Urquhart and
Schaeffer (2020) to correct for embedded inaccuracies in the dataset,
such as missing lakes and reservoirs in Rhode Island and Massachusetts. Several
processing masks were applied to exclude questionable Level-2 data. A cloud flag
was adopted following Wynne et al. (2018)
and a flag for mixed land and water pixels was developed to identify cases where
the land mask reported a water pixel, but that pixel did not contain water at
the time of satellite observation. Flags to indicate potential contamination due
to adjacency effects and to identify snow- or ice-covered waterbodies were also
applied (Wynne et al., 2018). In summary,
satellite pixels containing mixed land and water, Sun glint, cloud cover, or
those adjacent to a bright target, such as land, snow, or ice, were discarded.
Satellite observations were aggregated to weekly composites that preserved the
maximum data value for each pixel. Hereafter, a valid satellite pixel refers to
a satellite pixel in a weekly composite that was not discarded due to any of
these exclusion criteria.Cyanobacterial abundance was characterized for each valid satellite
pixel using the CI-cyano algorithm (Lunetta et
al., 2015; Wynne et al., 2010,
2008). Spectral bands centered at 665
nm, 681 nm, and 709 nm are used to assess bloom biomass and those centered at
620 nm, 665 nm, and 681 nm are used as exclusion criteria to prevent the
quantification of non-cyanobacterial blooms. The progression of the CI-cyano
algorithm is detailed in Coffer et al.
(2020). Throughout this study, a pixel is classified as a
cyanobacterial detection if the CI-cyano algorithm returns any detectable value,
indicating cyanobacteria in concentrations above the detection limit of the
sensor. As a final step, all satellite retrievals were remapped onto a
consistent Albers conic projection with a 300-m bin size to ensure spatial
consistencies across all analyses.CI-cyano has demonstrated success at the national (Coffer et al., 2020) and state (Clark et al., 2017; Mishra et al., 2019; Urquhart et
al., 2017) scales for detecting cyanobacteria. Quantitative
validation of CI- cyano has been assessed against cyanobacterial cell counts and
concentrations of chlorophyll-a across 38 CONUS states (Clark et al., 2017; Lunetta et al., 2015). Additionally, qualitative validation of
CI-cyano has been assessed against cyanobacteria presence and absence (Mishra et al., 2021; Schaeffer et al., 2018). Using CI-cyano, Coffer et al. (2020) demonstrated expected
seasonality across 46 CONUS states.Given the spatial resolution of OLCI, a total of 2,196 lakes and
reservoirs across 46 states can be resolved (Urquhart and Schaeffer, 2020). Hereafter, these are collectively
referred to as lakes. For a lake to be considered resolvable, it must be of
sufficient size and shape to accommodate at least one 300-m water-only satellite
pixel after applying the exclusion criteria described above. These lakes range
in surface area from 1.3 square kilometers (km2) to over 4,000
km2, limiting this analysis to relatively large lakes. West
Virginia and Delaware are the only states in CONUS that do not contain any
resolvable lakes. The number of valid satellite pixels in these resolvable lakes
had a median value of 19 and ranged from 1 satellite pixel to nearly 40,000
satellite pixels (Figure
S1).
Computing cyanobacterial frequency
The proportion of valid pixels that returned detectable cyanobacteria
was used to determine annual cyanobacterial frequencies at different scales
(Fig. 1). Cyanobacterial bloom
frequency was computed following Clark et al.
(2017) for each satellite pixel as the percentage of weekly satellite
composites exhibiting cyanobacterial presence above the minimum detection limit
of the satellite sensor relative to the total number of weekly satellite
composites that contained a valid measurement (i.e., measurements that were not
quality flagged and discarded) for the given pixel (Fig. 1A; Eq.
(1)):
Fig. 1.
Conceptual diagrams illustrating the computation of (A) annual
pixel-scale frequency, (B) average annual lake-scale frequency, and (C) average
annual state-scale frequency. Example pixel-scale frequency values and the
resulting average annual lake- and state-scale frequencies are shown for (B) and
(C), respectively.
In addition to pixel-scale bloom frequencies, average annual lake-scale
bloom frequencies and average annual state-scale bloom frequencies were
computed. For each year of observations, average annual lake-scale bloom
frequencies were computed by averaging annual pixel- scale bloom frequencies for
all pixels contained within a lake (Fig.
1B; Eq. (2)). Pixels
within a smaller surface area lake carry a larger weight than pixels within a
larger surface area lake when computing lake-scale averages. Average annual
state-scale bloom frequencies were computed by averaging annual pixel-scale
bloom frequencies for all pixels contained within a state (Fig. 1C; Eq.
(3)). Lakes with a larger surface area carry a larger weight than
lakes with a smaller surface area when computing state-scale averages.Annual pixel-scale cyanobacterial frequencies were computed using a
range of denominators because each denominator reflected the number of weekly
composites that contained a valid observation for the given satellite pixel.
Denominators ranged from 1 to 52 representing the 52 weeks in a calendar year
(Figure S2).
Pixel-scale cyanobacterial frequencies computed with a small sample size (i.e.,
a small denominator) may not necessarily be representative of conditions across
the entire year. Moreover, if pixel-scale frequencies across a lake or state
were computed using different sample sizes, average lake- and state- scale
cyanobacterial frequencies could be aggregating different time periods in their
annual summaries.The focus of this paper is cyanobacterial frequency computed by
considering cyanobacterial presence and absence, but supplemental information
also includes cyanobacterial frequency within each of the risk levels defined by
the World Health Organization (WHO). The WHO states that cyanobacteria
concentrations of up to 20,000 cells/mL correspond to a relatively low
probability of adverse health effects in recreational waters, those of up to
100,000 cells/mL correspond to a moderate probability, and those above 100,000
cells/mL correspond to a high probability (World
Health Organization, 2003).It should be noted that pixel-scale estimates primarily characterize the
center of the lake, and narrow reaches are unobservable using 300-m satellite
imagery. The relatively coarse spatial resolution of OLCI results in the loss of
smaller lakes as well as more narrow portions of resolvable lakes. Lake-scale
summaries exclude satellite pixels along the land-water interface and exclude a
one-pixel buffer from the shoreline, an area where blooms tend to accumulate,
particularly in windy conditions (Gons et al.,
2005). State-scale summaries consider only lakes of sufficient size
and shape to accommodate the spatial resolution of OLCI. Thus, average
state-scale bloom frequencies presented here could be biased compared to
state-scale analyses that include a more complete representation of lakes
throughout the state.
Analyzing seasonal effects on cyanobacterial frequency
Missing data occurs primarily due to cloud cover, Sun glint, or snow and
ice. Across CONUS, northern latitude states are more affected by snow and ice
cover, particularly in the winter months. Eliminating weekly composites
containing snow and ice decreases the number of weekly composites considered in
the annual bloom frequency calculation, thus potentially artificially inflating
the resulting frequency value by weighting results more toward summer
observations, a time when cyanobacterial blooms tend to occur. Thus, annual
bloom frequency computed using weekly composites for each week in the year was
compared to bloom frequency computed using a temporal subset of weekly
composites representing only periods with no more than 10% snow and ice cover
across CONUS. This analysis indicates whether annual bloom frequency was
artificially inflated by the inclusion of the cold-season period due to a bias
toward summer observations.Relatively snow-free weekly composites were defined as those in which no
more than 10% of the area of CONUS was covered in snow or ice. Shapefiles
indicating daily snow and ice cover at a 4-km resolution were obtained from the
National Snow and Ice Data Center (National Ice
Center, 2008). This dataset provides maps of snow cover and sea ice
for the Northern Hemisphere from February 1997 to the present and are derived
from a variety of data products, including satellite imagery and in
situ data. These shapefiles were formatted according to Urquhart and Schaeffer (2020): holes in the
original shapefiles were filled before creating weekly composites preserving the
maximum snow and ice extent for each week and rasterizing the shapefiles to
match the spatial characteristics of OLCI imagery. Bloom frequency across CONUS
was then computed as described in Section
2.2 for the subset of weekly composites. While these weekly
composites do not represent a fully snow-free period, they will hereafter be
referred to as the snow-free period.Cyanobacterial frequency computed using the snow-free period could have
a different result than cyanobacterial frequency computed using the entire
annual time period. Therefore, the two populations were compared by looking at
the differences between each pair of annual and snow-free results. The Wilcoxon
signed-rank test is a nonparametric approach to test whether the corresponding
data population distributions are identical, using each pair of observations and
without assuming they follow a normal distribution (Wilcoxon, 1945). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was
applied to lake-scale results within each of the nine climate regions defined by
the National Center for Environmental Information (Figure S3; Karl and Koss, 1984) using cyanobacterial frequency
results from 2019 and the rstatix package in R Version 4.0.0
(Kassambara, 2020; R Core Team, 2020). These nine climate regions group
climatically consistent states within CONUS and were used here to group together
states more prone to missing data due to snow and ice cover in the winter
months. Lake centroids were used to assign each lake to a climate region.Cohen’s d was used to quantify the difference between the two
datasets in terms of effect size (Cohen,
1992). Cohen’s d was computed as the z-score divided by the
square root of the sample size, where the z-score is the measure of how many
standard deviations a raw score is below or above the population mean.
Generally, an absolute value of Cohen’s d between 0.1 and 0.3 indicates a
small effect, an absolute value between 0.3 and 0.5 indicates a moderate effect,
and an absolute value above 0.5 indicates a large effect.
Assessing spatial patterns in cyanobacterial frequency
Spatial clusters of lakes with high cyanobacterial bloom frequencies and
spatial clusters of lakes with low cyanobacterial bloom frequencies were
identified across CONUS. This analysis may offer important information for
management prioritization and can assist in understanding large-scale drivers of
cyanobacterial blooms. Clusters of high and low cyanobacterial bloom frequencies
were identified via the Getis-Ord Gi* statistic (Getis and Ord, 1992; Ord and Getis,
1995). A lake must itself have a high average annual bloom frequency
and also be surrounded by other lakes with high average annual bloom frequencies
to be considered part of a cluster of high bloom frequencies. If a local group
of lakes has a higher Getis-Ord Gi* statistic than the global average, it is
considered a cluster of lakes with a high cyanobacterial bloom frequency. The
same reasoning is used to identify clusters of lakes with low cyanobacterial
bloom frequencies. The Getis-Ord Gi* statistic does not quantify the number of
clusters present nor does it specify which cluster a given lake falls within,
but clusters can be visually discerned from the statistical results. This
statistic was computed based on 2019 average annual lake-scale bloom frequencies
using the Hot Spot Analysis (Getis- Ord Gi*) tool in ArcGIS
10.7.1 (ESRI, 2019).Input parameters for the Getis-Ord Gi* statistic were optimized for the
2019 average annual lake-scale bloom frequency dataset. First, the
Incremental Spatial Autocorrelation tool was used to
measure spatial autocorrelation. The first distance with a declining z-score was
selected as the neighborhood search value (Figure S4). This neighborhood
search value was then used to create a spatial weights matrix using the
Generate Spatial Weights Matrix tool; the number of nearest
neighbors was set to the recommended value of 8 and row standardization was
applied which standardizes each spatial weight by the row sum, an approach
recommended when feature distribution is potentially biased. Spatial weights
from the resulting spatial weights matrix were used in the Hot Spot
Analysis (Getis-Ord Gi*) tool to conceptualize the spatial
relationships. Given a large sample size of 2,196 data points, the false
discovery rate correction was applied, which reduces resulting p-values to
account for multiple testing and spatial dependence. Each Getis-Ord Gi*
statistic has an associated z-score and p-value. A large, positive z-score and a
small p- value for a feature indicate a spatial clustering of high values. A
large, negative z-score and a small p-value indicate a spatial clustering of low
values.
Results and discussion
Annual pixel-scale cyanobacterial frequency
Pixel-scale surface bloom frequencies ranged from 0% to 100% across all
pixels for the years 2017, 2018, and 2019 (Fig.
2). The median of the distribution for 2017 was 2.7%, which was lower
compared to 2018 (median of 4.6%) and 2019 (median of 4.4%). These medians
characterize, for all pixels, the percentage of valid weekly composites whose
surface cyanobacterial abundance was above the detection limit of the sensor. A
small (1% to 2%) proportion of pixels reached a frequency value of 100%,
indicating a detectable cyanobacterial bloom was present for every valid weekly
composite considered.
Fig. 2.
Histogram of annual bloom frequency values for all satellite pixels
across CONUS for the years 2017, 2018, and 2019. The median bloom frequency
values for each year were 2.7%, 4.6%, and 4.4%, respectively.
Cyanobacterial frequency was fairly stable across years, as each
histogram exhibits a similar distribution. All years tended toward lower
frequencies, with half of the distribution falling below a bloom frequency
between approximately 3% and 5%. Generally, the distribution then continued to
decline, reaching the lowest number of instances between bloom frequencies of
75% and bloom frequencies near 100%. A small peak is apparent for bloom
frequencies of 100%, particularly for the years 2018 and 2019, which also
exhibited the highest median values.Annual pixel-scale frequencies can be used to assess relatively
small-scale (300 m) variations in surface bloom dynamics, such as for a subset
of lakes in North Dakota for the year 2019 (Fig.
3). This region of North Dakota was chosen given confirmation of
bloom events for the year 2019 in Antelope Lake, Devils Lake, and Stump Lake
(ND DEQ, 2019). Annual pixel-scale
frequencies may assist in resource management and help inform the prioritization
of sampling efforts at the lake-scale. At Dry Lake, for example, pixel-scale
results indicated that the northern portion of the lake is more prone to bloom
events, while the southern segment of the lake is characterized by lower
frequencies. Across other lakes in North Dakota, pixel-scale annual frequencies
ranged from low values across Cranberry Lake to high values across Lake Alice
and Rush Lake. Devils Lake, the largest natural lake in the state, had fairly
consistent cyanobacterial blooms spatially, with pixel-scale frequencies nearly
all around 50%.
Fig. 3.
Annual pixel-scale cyanobacterial bloom frequency for the year 2019 at a
subset of lakes in North Dakota (ND).
Clark et al. (2017) assessed
pixel-scale bloom frequencies in Florida and Ohio using the same methods
presented here, but for the entire 2008 through 2011 period collectively.
Additionally, a threshold of 100,000 cells/mL was used as a demonstration to
correspond to the WHO high-risk value rather than a threshold reflecting the
detection limit of the sensor, which is presented here. In Florida, Clark et al. (2017) found pixel-scale bloom
frequencies to average 30% for 2008 through 2011 whereas in Ohio, Clark et al. (2017) found the average to be 5%. That
study also found the highest pixel-scale frequency observed for the state of
Florida to be 99%, which occurred in Lake Apopka, and the highest pixel-scale
frequency observed for the state of Ohio to be 83%, which occurred in Grand Lake
(commonly referred to as Grand Lake St. Marys). The fact that these values are
all lower than comparable ones reported here is consistent with expectations
given the more restrictive bloom threshold used in Clark et al. (2017).
Average annual lake-scale cyanobacterial frequency
Average annual lake-scale frequencies varied drastically across CONUS
for the year 2019 (Fig. 4). Over 68% of all
resolvable lakes had an average annual bloom frequency falling in the first
quartile (ranging between a frequency of 0% and 25%). The state of Maine had a
particularly large number of resolvable lakes falling in this range. Across
CONUS, approximately 20% of resolvable lakes had an average annual bloom
frequency falling in the second quartile and 9% of resolvable lakes fell in the
third quartile. Just under 5% of resolvable lakes had an average annual bloom
frequency exceeding 75%, with most of these lakes falling in Florida, the Texas
Gulf Coast, and the Dakotas.
Fig. 4.
Average annual lake-scale cyanobacterial bloom frequencies for the year
2019. Each point represents a lake centroid.
The National Lakes Assessment (NLA) uses field monitoring to assess the
conditions of lakes, ponds, and reservoirs across the United States. The 2012
NLA included sampling for cyanobacteria and microcystins at over 1,000 lakes
selected via stratified random sampling (U.S.
EPA, 2016). Lakes were characterized as either least, moderately, or
most disturbed based on deviations from the distribution of all studied lakes
contained within a region. That study categorized 23% of studied lakes as
moderately disturbed and 15% of studied lakes as most disturbed. The remaining
61% of studied lakes were categorized as least disturbed. While the
categorization used by the 2012 NLA differed from the bloom frequency metric
presented here, results from the two approaches are similar. Here, 68% of lakes
fell in the lowest quartile of cyanobacterial bloom frequency compared to the
61% of NLA lakes categorized as lea in the st disturbed.Average annual lake-scale frequencies for the years 2017 through 2019
indicated stability within this time period, with bloom frequencies between 0%
and 25% for most lakes across CONUS in 2017 and 2018 (Figures S5-S6). A notable difference, however,
occurred in lakes throughout the central United States and those along the
Mississippi River. For the years 2017 and 2018, many of these lakes had higher
average annual lake-scale bloom frequencies than for the year 2019. The National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Climate Data Center
(NCDC) produces annual climate reports to analyze national temperature and
precipitation and place the data into a historical perspective (NCDC, 2019). In 2019, several states in the Upper
Midwest and Northwest Rockies and Plains climate regions experienced their
wettest years on record, which included 125 years of observations as of 2019.
This heavy precipitation upstream led to record flooding, resulting in damages
of $20 billion across the Mississippi, Arkansas, and Missouri Rivers (NOAA NCEI, 2021). Consequently, lakes can
become diluted from a large influx of freshwater which can reduce cyanobacterial
blooms (Berger et al., 2008). Increased
precipitation can also reduce water stratification which can lead to
underrepresentation of cyanobacteria as the bloom becomes vertically distributed
within the water column (Reynolds, 2006)
while the satellite measures only the upper layer of the water column.Presenting the distribution of average annual lake-scale bloom
frequencies can assist in the identification of lakes within a state that are
more prone to cyanobacterial blooms, as shown in Fig. 5 for a single state in each of the nine climate regions
defined by Karl and Koss (1984): Oregon
(OR) in the Northwest, Vermont (VT) in the Northeast, Nebraska (NE) in the
Northwest Rockies and Plains, Utah (UT) in the Southwest, Iowa (IA) in the Upper
Midwest, Texas (TX) in the South, Florida (FL) in the Southeast, Ohio (OH) in
the Ohio Valley, and California (CA) in the West. For each state, several lakes
and their associated cyanobacterial frequencies are labeled. These labeled lakes
were chosen as a demonstration of the frequency metric as they have water
quality information, including cyanobacterial detections, for either 2019 or
previous years.
Fig. 5.
Ranked distribution of average annual lake-scale cyanobacterial
frequencies for the year 2019 for resolvable lakes in the states of (A) Oregon,
(B) Vermont, (C) Nebraska, (D) Utah, (E) Iowa, (F) Texas, (G) Florida, (H) Ohio,
and (I) California. For each state, some lakes with documented cases of
cyanobacterial blooms either for 2019 or in previous years are labeled. The
x-axis is unitless with a range from 1 to the total number of observable lakes
in the given state.
Several of the lakes labeled in Fig.
5 had relatively low average annual lake-scale cyanobacterial
frequency for 2019, including Detroit Lake in Oregon, Lake Meredith and
Grapevine Lake in Texas, and Lake Tahoe in California. Detroit Lake, which
experienced a cyanobacterial bloom in 2018 upstream from a drinking water intake
leading to the issuance of a “Do Not Drink” advisory (The Novak Consulting Group, 2018), had an
annual frequency of 6%. Field observations support the presence of cyanobacteria
in Lake Meredith and Grapevine Lake (Trevino and
Petersen, 2020). Lake Tahoe, a highly studied ultra- oligotrophic
lake in California known for its water clarity (e.g., Beutel and Horne, 2018; Coats et al., 2016), had no detectable cyanobacteria
in any resolvable weekly composites across the lake as demonstrated through an
average annual lake-scale bloom frequency of 0%.Lakes labeled in Fig. 5 with high
average annual bloom frequencies included Lakes Jesup and Apopka in Florida,
Grand Lake in Ohio, and Lake Elsinore in California. This study found Lake
Apopka and Grand Lake to both average the highest potential bloom frequency
value of 100%. Using the same bloom frequency metric presented here, Clark et al. (2017) found bloom frequency in
Lake Apopka to be the highest in the state of Florida, reaching a maximum value
of 99% from 2008 through 2011. Similarly, Mishra
et al. (2019) found Lake Apopka to be the highest in cyanobacterial
bloom magnitude for the state of Florida from 2003 through 2011. Grand Lake is a
heavily studied reservoir in western Ohio and was once ranked nationally in the
99th percentile for microcystins by the NLA (U.S. EPA, 2009). Grand Lake was also ranked first in the state of
Ohio for cyanobacterial bloom magnitude from 2003 through 2011 (Mishra et al., 2019). At Lake Jesup, where blooms
have been noted throughout the year via satellite imagery (Coffer et al., 2020), average annual lake-scale bloom
frequency reached 98% for 2019. Lake Elsinore, which reached an average annual
lake-scale bloom frequency of 100%, had several documented lake-wide bloom
events in 2019 with high levels of microcystins detected, exceeding 20
μg/L (California State Water Resources
Control Board, 2020).Previous studies or reports also support cyanobacterial blooms at Odell
Lake (Oregon Health Authority, 2019a) and
Upper Klamath Lake (Oregon Health Authority,
2019b) in Oregon, Lake Carmi in Vermont (Vermont, 2020), Island Lake in Nebraska (Efting et al., 2011), Utah Lake in Utah
(Utah Department of Environmental Quality,
2019), Silver Lake in Iowa (Iqbal et
al., 2006), Lake O’ the Pines and Lake Palestine in Texas
(Trevino and Petersen, 2020), Lakes
Okeechobee (Rosen et al., 2017) and
George (Srifa et al., 2016) in Florida,
and Clear Lake in California (California State
Water Resources Control Board, 2020; Kurobe et al., 2013).
Average annual state-scale cyanobacterial frequency
Average annual state-scale bloom frequencies for the year 2019 ranged
from just over 1% in Georgia to nearly 65% in Oregon (Fig. 6). Just as pixel- and lake-scale bloom
frequencies were weighted toward lower values, average state-scale bloom
frequencies tended to be as well, with several states averaging relatively low
frequency values. Of the 46 states with at least one resolvable lake, 21 states
had an average annual bloom frequency below 10% for the year 2019, while Ohio
and Oregon had average annual bloom frequencies above 50%.
Fig. 6.
Average annual state-scale cyanobacterial bloom frequencies for the year
2019. Each state is represented as a hexagon labeled with each state’s
two- letter state abbreviation. Each hexagon acts as a pie chart representing
the proportion of pixels in the state whose annual frequency indicates a bloom
is present above the detection limit of the sensor. West Virginia (WV) and
Delaware (DE) do not have any lakes that are of sufficient size and shape to be
resolvable at 300-m pixel resolution.
Similar to average annual lake-scale frequencies, average annual
state-scale frequencies suggested stability from 2017 through 2019 (Figures S7-S8). For each year,
Oregon and Ohio consistently had the highest average annual bloom frequencies,
while Wisconsin, North Carolina, Maryland, and Florida also exhibited a high
average value relative to other states. Several states had low average annual
bloom frequencies across years, and most resolvable pixels in the states of
Vermont and Georgia even experienced close to no detectable blooms for the year
2018, with average annual state-scale bloom frequencies of 2% and 1%,
respectively. As a note, Lake Champlain, which is monitored by the Vermont
Department of Environmental Conservation and experiences cyanobacterial blooms
(Shambaugh et al., 2019), is
considered in state-scale summaries for New York rather than Vermont because of
where its lake centroid falls. Results are also presented for the WHO risk
levels (Figures
S9-S11).
Across nearly all states and years, the majority of detected blooms were above
the WHO high-risk threshold (above 100,000 cells/mL), with lower proportions
falling in the WHO moderate-risk level (between 20,000 and 10,000 cells/mL) and
the WHO low-risk level (below 20,000 cells/mL). WHO risk level results are
consistent with those presented in Clark et al.
(2017).
Effect of time period used to compute cyanobacterial frequency
For the years 2017 through 2019, the beginning of each snow-free period
representing no more than 10% snow and ice cover across CONUS ranged from 16
April to 21 April, and the end of each snow-free period ranged from 13 October
to 26 November (Table
S1). The longest snow-free period occurred in 2017 when 32 weekly
composites were included, while the snow-free periods for 2018 and 2019 included
the fewest at 26 and 25 weekly composites, respectively. The long snow-free
period in 2017 is consistent with climatology, as 2017 was the third warmest
year on record for the United States behind only 2012 and 2016, averaging 12.53
°C (NOAA, 2020). This study only
used results for 2019 to compare annual frequencies to snow-free frequencies,
but data are available from additional years to explore the stability of
temporal biases presented here.Average lake-scale bloom frequency was affected by the time period of
choice (i.e., full-year versus a snow-free period) at three climate regions and
not affected by the time period of choice at the remaining six climate regions
(Table 1). In the Northwest Rockies
and Plains, the difference between annual results and those computed for just
the snow-free period was large (Wilcoxon signed-rank test effect size of 0.53).
For this climate region, annual frequencies were lower than snow-free
frequencies; however, this effect size is close to the recommended cut off
between a moderate effect and a large effect, which is 0.5. In the Ohio Valley
and the Southeast, the difference between annual results and those computed for
just the snow-free period was moderate (Wilcoxon signed-rank test effect size of
0.39 and 0.42, respectively). In the Ohio Valley, annual frequencies were
slightly lower than snow-free frequencies. In the Southeast, however, annual
frequencies were higher than snow-free frequencies. The remaining six climate
regions indicated only a small difference in annual and snow-free frequencies
(Wilcoxon signed-rank test effect sizes below 0.13), indicating the two sets of
average lake-scale bloom frequencies had similar distributions.
Table 1
Results of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test comparing average annual
lake-scale frequencies to average lake-scale frequencies computed using a subset
of weekly composite to represent the snow-free period (defined as no more than
10% of CONUS surface area covered in snow and ice). Climate regions were defined
according to Karl and Koss (1984) and n
represents sample size.
Climate region
n
Annual median
Snow-free median
Effect size
Magnitude
Northeast
331
7.95%
7.87%
0.04
Small
Northwest
134
2.45%
1.43%
0.00
Small
Northwest Rockies and Plains
245
32.63%
36.01%
0.53
Large
Ohio Valley
91
11.62%
11.71%
0.39
Moderate
South
345
17.75%
16.11%
0.10
Small
Southeast
207
13.11%
3.98%
0.42
Moderate
Southwest
92
7.51%
5.32%
0.06
Small
Upper Midwest
655
11.35%
8.84%
0.08
Small
West
97
1.75%
0.83%
0.12
Small
Overall, these results indicate complex effects of removing cold-season
data from calculations of annual bloom frequency, and do not unequivocally
support the hypothesis of higher frequencies in summer months, as is commonly
assumed. In fact, the difference between medians of the two average lake-scale
frequencies was the largest for the Southeast; the median of annual frequencies
was over 13% but dropped to less than 4% when considering the subset of
snow-free weekly composites, indicative of cyanobacterial blooms throughout the
winter months, a finding supported by Coffer et
al. (2020). Southern states are also characterized by milder
conditions than northern states throughout the year, and similar air
temperatures are typically observed during southern latitude winters and
northern latitude summers.Caution should be taken in interpreting average annual cyano-bacterial
blooms frequencies between regions due to differing effects of snow and ice on
the number of available observations, in addition to normal caveats such as Sun
glint and cloud cover in these regions. Comparing average annual bloom
frequencies to those derived using a snow-free period can help stakeholders
understand potential biases introduced by the inclusion of cold-season data.
Cold-season data are particularly affected by missing observations due to snow
and ice cover, and blooms tend to be less prevalent in the cold-season across
the United States, with blooms peaking in late summer and early fall across most
of CONUS (Coffer et al., 2020). These
findings indicate that, at a broad scale, bloom frequency results are only
mildly affected by the choice of either full-year observations or a subset of
data to exclude cold-season observations. Exceptions include the Northwest
Rockies and Plains and the Ohio Valley, where annual observations tended toward
lower values than snow-free observations, and the Southeast, where annual
observations tended toward higher values than snow-free observations, indicative
of cyanobacterial blooms throughout the winter months.
Spatial patterns in cyanobacterial frequency
In the United States, several lakes have been known to have persistent
cyanobacterial blooms, including Grand Lake in Ohio (Jacquemin et al., 2018; Mishra et al., 2019), Lake Apopka in Florida (Clark et al., 2017; Mishra et al., 2019), and Lake Champlain along the
border of Vermont and New York (Isles et al.,
2015); however, no national scale analyses have been conducted to
identify clusters of lakes with high or low frequencies of cyanobacterial
blooms. The results of this cluster analysis provide quantitative evidence for
spatial patterns that may be visually discerned based on the average annual
lake-scale cyanobacterial frequencies presented in Fig. 4, and act as the first national analysis of spatial clustering
for cyanobacterial frequency in large lakes. The Getis-Ord Gi* statistic does
not quantify the number of clusters present or specify which cluster a given
lake falls within. Nevertheless, based on average annual lake-scale
cyanobacterial bloom frequencies for the year 2019, results indicate several
spatial clusters of both high and low cyanobacterial bloom frequency across
CONUS (Fig. 7). Perhaps more importantly,
spatial patterns presented here clearly indicate that clusters transcend state,
watershed, and eco-regional boundaries.
Fig. 7.
Results of the Getis-Ord Gi* statistic applied to average annual
lake-scale cyanobacterial bloom frequencies for the year 2019. This spatial
clustering al gorithm considers both spatial location and the corresponding data
values
A lake was characterized as part of a cluster of high cyanobacterial
bloom frequencies if it had a large, positive z-score and a small p-value; 568
lakes met these criteria with 99% confidence and an additional 193 lakes met
these criteria with 95% confidence. A lake was characterized as part of a
cluster of low cyanobacterial bloom frequencies if it had a large, negative
z-score and a small p-value; 491 lakes met these criteria with 99% confidence
and an additional 97 lakes met these criteria with 95% confidence. The 847
remaining lakes did not correspond to a spatial cluster of cyanobacterial
frequency with a confidence of at least 95%. As a reminder, 300-m satellite
imagery can only resolve relatively large lakes across CONUS, so spatial
clusters may exist among lakes not observable with OLCI imagery due to pixel
size limitations. Additionally, limitations of the bloom frequency metric,
including missing data due to Sun glint, cloud cover, and snow and ice, can
affect the average annual lake-scale summaries used in this analysis which can
thus affect the resulting cluster analysis.A high frequency cluster can be found spanning North Dakota, South
Dakota, southern Minnesota, and Wisconsin. The Gulf Coast in Texas and Louisiana
contained a high frequency cluster that covers a smaller spatial extent. Nearly
all lakes in Florida were included in a high frequency cluster with 99%
confidence. Lakes throughout much of New England including Maine, Vermont, New
Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, and New York constituted a
low frequency cluster. Low frequency clusters also existed in the following
areas: the Pacific Northwest including Washington, northern Idaho, and western
Montana; central California; northern Minnesota; Michigan; the Central Plains;
and parts of the mid-Atlantic including Tennessee, western North Carolina, South
Carolina, northern Georgia, and northern Alabama.Spatial clustering algorithms have been used in previous studies to
indicate areas of increased cyanobacterial presence, but on a much smaller
spatial scale within specific waterbodies. For example, Yunus et al. (2015) identified groups of pixels with
high chlorophyll-a occurrence using data collected from Landsat-8 in Tokyo Bay
in Japan. Gaskill and Woller-Skar (2018)
used field measurements at Little Traverse Lake in Michigan to identify spatial
clusters of microcystis blooms. In Chile, spatial statistics have been used to
identify spatial clustering of cyanobacterial communities (Warren-Rhodes et al., 2007). The results of the
clustering algorithm presented here are intended for a broader application with
the potential to identify state- or regional-scale areas in which cyanobacterial
blooms persist. Additionally, while out of the scope of this study, results from
this cluster analysis can be used in combination with additional data products
to understand large-scale drivers of cyanobacterial blooms that have been
previously reported at the regional level (e.g., Myer et al., 2020).
Limitations
Several limitations exist in the quantification of pixel-scale bloom
frequencies and both lake- and state-scale summaries. Retrievals from a passive
satellite sensor can only consider contributions from aquatic constituents
present to a depth of about 2 m in clear waters in the red region of the
electromagnetic spectrum used for characterizing cyanobacteria (Mishra et al., 2005) and much less than 2 m in more
turbid waters (Wynne et al., 2010).
Cyanobacterial blooms, however, can exist at many depths throughout the water
column and have the ability to regulate their buoyancy in an effort to find more
ideal environmental conditions (Bartram and
Chorus, 1999); thus, in situ observation networks at
depth remain essential. Graham et al.
(2008) described six potential water column distributions of
cyanobacteria: (1) shoreline, near-shore, and open water accumulations and
scums, (2) even distribution throughout the photic zone or epilimnion, (3)
specific depth in the photic zone, (4) metalimnetic bloom, (5) even distribution
throughout the entire water column, and (6) under ice bloom. Satellite remote
sensing has the potential to characterize cyanobacterial blooms in four of these
scenarios; ocean color satellites are unable to retrieve information about the
water column in the presence of ice cover, and a metalimnetic bloom could be at
a depth the satellite signal does not reach, but this scenario was noted as more
of a concern for drinking water supplies. While cyanobacterial blooms can exist
at many depths within the water column, recreational exposure, at least, is
primarily limited to the surface. This study did not consider
satellite-retrieved water transparency, which could be combined with
satellite-retrieved cyanobacterial abundance to estimate the maximum depth of
the satellite signal. Information quantifying the depth of the satellite signal
would provide insight regarding the portion of the water column being
characterized by the cyanobacterial frequency metric.Results presented here are based on 300-m satellite imagery, which has
limitations at the lake- and state-scales as both areas within each resolvable
lake are excluded from analysis, including narrow reaches and pixels along the
land/water interface, and lakes within each state are excluded from analysis if
they cannot accommodate at least one, 300-m water-only pixel after applying the
exclusion criteria described in Section
2.1. Schaeffer and Myer (2020)
assessed the coverage of estuaries and sub-estuaries across the United States
with various spatial resolutions. Satellite platforms with higher spatial
resolution could improve both lake- and state-scale characterizations. One such
satellite sensor is ESA’s Sentinel-2 satellite platform. However, while
chlorophyll-specific algorithms have been developed for Sentinel-2 imagery
(Gilerson et al., 2010; Pahlevan et al., 2020), cyanobacteria-
specific algorithms have not been demonstrated for large-scale assessments
because of limitations in the spectral capabilities of the satellite
instrumentation. We did not investigate if results presented here can be
interpolated to smaller lakes, although satellite imagery offering a finer
spatial resolution could help address this limitation. And while higher spatial
resolution imagery can improve data coverage, additional limitations can emerge.
For example, for large scale data processing, automated pixel flagging for
non-water objects such as boats, bridges, marinas, and even migratory birds
would be required as the average reflectance within a finer spatial resolution
pixel can be dominated by such artifacts, a limitation less problematic in
coarser, 300-m satellite imagery.Potential biases resulting from missing data due to snow and ice extent
in the winter months were explored, but other limitations in satellite data
collection exist that could result in problematic comparisons when considering
lakes or states in different regions. Cloud cover, for example, reduces temporal
coverage, and comparisons across states with differing patterns in cloud cover
could be biased. An analysis such as that presented here for snow and ice could
be applied to cloud cover, but the assumptions are less straightforward because
the spatial and temporal distribution of cloud cover can be more varied. An
additional limitation of satellite image acquisition whose potential biases on
annual cyanobacterial frequency metrics was not explored is Sun glint, which
hinders data collection, particularly in the summer months and at lower
latitudes due to changes in solar elevation.This study focuses on the temporal frequency of cyanobacterial blooms
and does not characterize cyanobacterial spatial extent (Urquhart et al., 2017), occurrence (Coffer et al., 2020), nor magnitude (Mishra et al., 2019), which have been explored in
previous studies. Data are quality flagged and discarded in the presence of Sun
glint, cloud cover, or snow and ice. The snow and ice mask presented in Urquhart and Schaeffer (2020) is likely
more conservative than is needed but currently offers the most comprehensive and
consistent product available. This study demonstrated that eliminating pixels
during the cold season because of snow and ice cover can create bias in certain
climate regions. Additionally, cyanobacterial blooms have been noted under ice,
including some blooms containing cyanotoxins (Bertilsson et al., 2013; Hampton et
al., 2017; Üveges et al.,
2012; Wejnerowski et al.,
2018).
Applications
This study provides the first national scale application of a cyanobacterial
frequency metric introduced at a regional scale in Clark et al. (2017). Source code, documentation, and results
accompanying this manuscript can be found at doi:10.23719/1520731.
The methods presented here can be adjusted to categorize different cyanobacterial
concentrations (e.g., WHO risk thresholds), depending on stakeholder needs and
requirements. Moreover, while annual frequencies were presented here, the same
methods can be altered to compute seasonal or monthly frequencies as well. Lake- and
state-scale frequency results may assist in the prioritization of sampling resources
and mitigation efforts. Seasonal comparisons may provide guidance on the
interpretation of average annual bloom frequencies, indicating regions in which
annual results may be slightly biased by the inclusion of cold-season data.Pixel-scale frequencies can assist in identifying segments of a lake that
are more prone to cyanobacterial blooms, which can be of particular interest if the
lake is used for recreational activities or if it contains a drinking water intake.
A successful use case of cyanobacterial bloom frequency results presented here
occurred in Salem, Oregon. In 2018, vulnerable residents in the city of Salem were
under a “Do Not Drink” advisory for several weeks after elevated
levels of cyanotoxins were detected in finished drinking water (The Novak Consulting Group, 2018). Preliminary bloom
frequency results were presented to the city of Salem for Detroit Lake, upstream
from the intake, to identify areas of high cyanobacterial frequency and prioritize
sampling.Moreover, many studies have claimed an increase in the frequency of
cyanobacterial blooms (Anderson et al., 2002),
but few studies have actually quantified such changes across the United States.
While this study does not offer a trend analysis, it does present a consistent
metric that can be used to assess changes in cyanobacterial frequency as a longer
time series becomes available with ongoing satellite data collection within the
limitations specified earlier. Assuming availability of the full constellation of
Sentinel-3 satellites, at least 25 years of imagery are expected to be available
since the launch of Sentinel-3A in 2016 and can be used to improve our ability to
quantify trends in cyanobacterial frequency.
Authors: Gina Perovich; Quay Dortch; James Goodrich; Paul S Berger; Justin Brooks; Terence J Evens; Christopher J Gobler; Jennifer Graham; James Hyde; Dawn Karner; Dennis O'Shea; Valerie Paul; Hans Paerl; Michael Piehler; Barry H Rosen; Mary Santelmann; Pat Tester; Judy Westrick Journal: Adv Exp Med Biol Date: 2008 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Sachidananda Mishra; Richard P Stumpf; Blake Schaeffer; P Jeremy Werdell; Keith A Loftin; Andrew Meredith Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2021-01-30 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: John M Clark; Blake A Schaeffer; John A Darling; Erin A Urquhart; John M Johnston; Amber Ignatius; Mark H Myer; Keith A Loftin; P Jeremy Werdell; Richard P Stumpf Journal: Ecol Indic Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 4.958
Authors: Blake A Schaeffer; Sean W Bailey; Robyn N Conmy; Michael Galvin; Amber R Ignatius; John M Johnston; Darryl J Keith; Ross S Lunetta; Rajbir Parmar; Richard P Stumpf; Erin A Urquhart; P Jeremy Werdell; Kurt Wolfe Journal: Environ Model Softw Date: 2018 Impact factor: 5.288
Authors: Alberto Mozo; Jesús Morón-López; Stanislav Vakaruk; Ángel G Pompa-Pernía; Ángel González-Prieto; Juan Antonio Pascual Aguilar; Sandra Gómez-Canaval; Juan Manuel Ortiz Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-08-08 Impact factor: 4.996