Mahmoud M Abdelnaby1, Tawfik A Saleh2, Mostafa Zeama1, Mahmoud Atef Abdalla1, Hossam M Ahmed1, Mohamed A Habib3,4. 1. Interdisciplinary Research Center for Hydrogen and Energy Storage (IRC-HES), King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran 31261 Saudi Arabia. 2. Department of Chemistry, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia. 3. Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, KFUPM, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia. 4. KA CARE Energy Research & Innovation Center at Dhahran, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia.
Abstract
The facile and environmentally friendly synthesis of porous organic polymers with designed polar functionalities decorating the interior frameworks as an excellent adsorbent for selective carbon dioxide capture and metal ion removal is a target worth pursuing for environmental applications. In this regard, two azo-linked porous organic polymers denoted man-Azo-P1 and man-Azo-P2 were synthesized in water by the azo-linking of 4,4'-diaminobiphenyl (benzidine) and 4,4'-methylenedianiline, respectively, with 1,3,5-trihydroxybenzene. The resulting polymers showed good BET surface areas of 290 and 78 m2 g-1 for man-Azo-P1 and man-Azo-P2, respectively. Due to the enriched core functionality of the azo (-N=N-) and hydroxyl groups along with the porous frameworks, man-Azo-P1 exhibited a good CO2 uptake capacity of 32 cm3 g-1 at 273 K and 1 bar, in addition to the remarkable removal of lead (Pd), chromium (Cr), arsenic (As), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), and mercury (Hg) ions. This performance of the synthesized man-Azo-P1 and man-Azo-P2 in the dual application of CO2 capture and heavy metal ion removal highlights the unique properties of azo-linked POPs as excellent and stable sorbent materials for the current challenging environmental applications.
The facile and environmentally friendly synthesis of porous organic polymers with designed polar functionalities decorating the interior frameworks as an excellent adsorbent for selective carbon dioxide capture and metal ion removal is a target worth pursuing for environmental applications. In this regard, two azo-linked porous organic polymers denoted man-Azo-P1 and man-Azo-P2 were synthesized in water by the azo-linking of 4,4'-diaminobiphenyl (benzidine) and 4,4'-methylenedianiline, respectively, with 1,3,5-trihydroxybenzene. The resulting polymers showed good BET surface areas of 290 and 78 m2 g-1 for man-Azo-P1 and man-Azo-P2, respectively. Due to the enriched core functionality of the azo (-N=N-) and hydroxyl groups along with the porous frameworks, man-Azo-P1 exhibited a good CO2 uptake capacity of 32 cm3 g-1 at 273 K and 1 bar, in addition to the remarkable removal of lead (Pd), chromium (Cr), arsenic (As), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), and mercury (Hg) ions. This performance of the synthesized man-Azo-P1 and man-Azo-P2 in the dual application of CO2 capture and heavy metal ion removal highlights the unique properties of azo-linked POPs as excellent and stable sorbent materials for the current challenging environmental applications.
The development of
advanced porous materials has attracted tremendous
and deep interest from both the academic and industrial scientific
communities in various fields. Porous materials such as zeolites,[1] metal organic frameworks (MOFs),[2] covalent organic frameworks (COFs),[3] porous polymers,[4] and porous carbons[5,6] have increasingly shown great promise in different energy and environmental
applications, including but not limited to catalysis, gas separation,
CO2 capture, and wastewater treatment. Porous organic polymers
(POPs) have emerged as versatile solid adsorbents for selective CO2 capture and metal ion removal due to their exceptional physical,
chemical, and mechanical properties in addition to their high surface
areas and structural diversity with the ability to introduce various
functional groups. POPs are commonly constructed by robust covalent
bonds, which make their robust porous structure a prominent porous
sorbent candidate for efficient CO2 capture.[7] On the other hand, the superior chemical stability
of the POPs with the excellent ability to survive in the harsh environmental
condition of water at different pHs makes them among the top candidates
for the removal of toxic metal ions such as mercury (Hg), arsenic
(As), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), and nickel (Ni) from wastewater.
These toxic metal ions are a serious problem for the environment as
well as for human consumption.[8]Researchers
have devoted great effort to develop a wide range of
functional porous organic polymers such as covalent organic frameworks
(COFs),[3,9] covalent triazine frameworks (CTFs),[10,11] porous aromatic frameworks (PAFs),[12] conjugated
microporous polymers (CMPs),[13,14] polymers with intrinsic
microporosity (PIMs),[15,16] and hyper-cross-linked polymers
(HCPs).[17−19] Despite the varieties of developed POPs, their large
scale industrial implementation is still challenging due to the low
yield and costly starting materials for the synthesis (e.g., COFs
and CMPs), the expensive catalysts used (e.g., CMPs and PAFs), and
the high synthesis temperature (e.g., PAFs and CTFs). Azo-linked POPs
have recently attracted significant interest due to their facile,
green synthesis at low temperature in water and high yield. The facile
synthesis and diversity to introduce polar functional groups and Lewis
basic sites (known to have good binding to CO2 gas) pave
the way for the azo-linked POPs to be efficient solid sorbents for
CO2 capture and metal ion removal from wastewater. The
azo-linked POPs with nitrogen double bonds (N=N, azo bond)
work as selective binding sites for the CO2 and metal ions
without compromising the chemical stability.[20−23]Here, we present the facile
and green synthesis of azo-linked porous
organic polymers bearing accessible polar phenolic and azo functional
groups. The synthetic strategy of the novel azo polymers is based
on the diazotization of aromatic diamines, typically 4,4′-diaminobiphenyl
(benzidine) or 4,4′-methylenedianiline, and then coupling with
the 1,3,5-trihydroxybenzene moiety in water (Scheme ). The resulting frameworks were fully characterized,
and their permanent porosity was proved. The CO2 capture
and CO2/N2 selectivity were studied for the
azo-linked POPs. Furthermore, due to the designed chelating sites
of these polymers, the selective removal of heavy-metal ions from
wastewater was also investigated.
Scheme 1
Synthesis of the Azo-Linked Polymers
man-Azo-P1 (a) and man-Azo-P2
(b)
Experimental Section
Materials
and General Techniques
All chemicals and
reagents were used as received without further purification. Biphenyl
(99% purity), 1,3,5-trihydroxybenzene (phloroglucinol, 98%), 4,4′-methylenedianiline
(97% purity), sodium nitrite (98% purity), and sodium carbonate (98%
purity) were purchased from Alfa Aesar. Nitric acid (70%), sulfuric
acid (98%), hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37%), and toluene (high purity)
were obtained from Acros. Methanol (99.9% purity), N,N′-dimethylformamide (DMF, 99% purity) and
Pd/C (5% w/w) were purchased from Millipore Sigma. Ultrapure water
was obtained using a Milli-Q Ultrapure instrument. For the metal removal
analysis, standard solutions (1000 ppm) containing lead (Pb(II)),
mercury (Hg(II)), arsenic (As(III)), copper (Cu(II)), chromium (Cr(III)),
and nickel (Ni(II)) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used to
prepare the required solutions for testing with a predetermined initial
concentration. For gas sorption analysis, nitrogen gas (99.999% purity),
carbon dioxide gas (99.99% purity), and helium (99.999% purity) were
supplied from Air Liquide, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Gas Sorption
Measurements
Porosity and low-pressure
gas uptake measurements were conducted using a Quantachrome Quadrasorp
Evo volumetric analyzer. The samples were activated before the measurement
by heating at 110 °C under reduced pressure (<50 mTorr). For
the N2 isotherms for the BET surface area calculation,
liquid nitrogen was used, while for the gas uptake at 0 and 25 °C
a water chiller circulator was used for cooling.
Metal Ion Removal
Studies
Adsorption experiments were
performed to evaluate the prepared materials for the removal of metal
ions from aqueous media. The effect of the related experimental conditions
such as adsorbent dosage, solution pH, and contact time was investigated
at atmospheric temperature. Metal ion detection was performed in triplicate,
and the average was considered to calculate the percent removal aswhere the initial and final
metal ions concentrations are Ci and Cf, respectively.The capacities of adsorption
were evaluated by the equationwhere C refers to the metal concentration
at any time t, V represents the
volume of metal solution (L), m denotes the mass
of the adsorbent (mg), and q refers to the adsorption capacity of
the prepared polymer.The developed polymers were subjected
to a five-cycle adsorption/desorption
test to estimate their reuse performance. After adsorption, the metals
were desorbed from the polymers using 10 mL of 0.5 mol L–1 HCl. Thus, the adsorbent (polymer) was treated with HCl solution
with stirring for 10 min to ensure all metals were desorbed from the
polymer. The polymer was then separated from the solution and allowed
to dry. It was then used for the adsorption in the next cycle.
Characterization
Instruments
The high-resolution solid-state
cross-polarization magic angle spinning 13C nuclear magnetic
resonance (CP-MAS 13C NMR) spectra were obtained on a JEOL
ECA-600 spectrometer (14.1 T) equipped with an additional 1 kW power
amplifier. The pulse was set at 3.8 μs, and 10000 scans were
accumulated with spinning at 15 kHz and a 5 s delay. A 4 mm ZrO2 rotor was used. The chemical shifts were referenced to the
carbon species of adamantane at 38.52 and 29.47 ppm. Fourier transform
infrared (FT-IR) spectra were obtained on a PerkinElmer 16 PC spectrometer
using KBr pellets. The spectra were recorded from 4000 to 500 cm–1. The FT-IR signals were identified as follows: br,
broad; s, strong; m, medium; w, weak. The SEM images and the elemental
composition (C and N) contents of the polymers were determined from
an EDX analysis using a Quattro S field-emission scanning electron
microscope (FESEM). The thermal stability of the synthesized azo polymers
was identified by a thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) using a TA Q500
instrument under an air flow with a heating rate of 10 °C/min.
Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) was carried out using a Rigaku MiniFlex
II instrument with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.541 Å).
For the metal removal studies, a Plasma Quant PQ 9000 ICP-OES instrument
was used to determine the metal contents.
Material Synthesis
According to previous literature,
the synthesis of the 4,4′-diaminobiphenyl (benzidine) monomer
was started by the nitration of biphenyl, and then the resulting 4,4′-dinitrobiphenyl
was reduced using Pd/C in ethanol to produce high-purity 4,4′-diaminobiphenyl.[24] The syntheses of man-Azo-P1 and man-Azo-P2 were
carried out by following the reported procedure[25] with some modifications. The coupling reaction to form
the azo POPs was carried out through two in situ steps:
first the formation of the diazonium salts and then coupling with
hydroxybenzene.
Synthesis of man-Azo-P1
4,4′-Diaminobiphenyl
(9 mmol, 1.6 g) was suspended in 20 mL of DI water and concentrated
HCl (4.2 mL) in a 100 mL round flask, and the mixture was stirred
in an ice bath (0–5 °C) or 15 min; after that a precooled
sodium nitrite solution (27 mmol, 1.95 g in 10 mL) was added dropwise.
At this point, a clear solution of the diazonium salt was formed.
The solution was stirred at 0 °C for 30 min and then neutralized
to pH 7–8 using drops of a saturated NaCO3 aqueous
solution. In another 50 mL round flask, a precooled solution of phloroglucinol
(6 mmol, 0.67 g in 30 mL) was neutralized to pH 7–8 using drops
of saturated NaCO3 aqueous solution, which was subsequently
added dropwise to the diazonium salt solution. The instantaneous precipitation
of a dark brown polymer occurred with the addition. The reaction was
then stirred for 12 h. The product was separated by filtration under
reduced pressure and repeatedly washed with water and once with methanol
and then washed with 30 mL of DMF with stirring for 2 h. After that,
the product was filtered and subjected to Soxhlet extraction with
methanol for 24 h. Finally, the product was dried in a vacuum oven
(pressure less than 100 mTorr) at 75 for 12 h (1.45 g, 80% yield).
Anal. Calcd for C48H32N12O6: C, 66.04; H, 3.69; N, 19.25. Found experimentally from the EDX
analysis: C, 70.3; N, 12.7. FT-IR (KBr, cm–1): 3404
(br), 1610 (m), 1402 (m), 1308 (w), 105 (w).
Synthesis of man-Azo-P2
man-Azo-P2 was synthesized
by following the same procedure as for man-Azo-P1 except using 4,4′-methylenedianiline
(9 mmol, 1.78 g) and adjustment of the pH to only 4 instead of 8 to
produce a brown polymeric product (2.4 g, yield 98%). Anal. Calcd
for C48H32N12O6: C, 66.95;
H, 4.18; N, 18.37. Found experimentally from the EDX analysis: C,
21.7; N, 8.9. FT-IR (KBr, cm–1): 3404 (br), 2756
(w), 1610 (m), 1402 (m), 1308 (w), 105 (w).
Results and Discussion
Synthesis
Strategy for the Azo-Linked Polymers man-Azo-P1 and
man-Azo-P2
To realize the green and facile synthesis of robust
N-rich POPs as solid sorbents that can work to solve practical energy
and environmental challenges, we targeted the utilization of the azo-coupling
reaction of aromatic diamines and phenolic moieties (Scheme ). The resulting azo group
(−N=N−) and the adjacent OH can lead to the selective
binding of CO2 and heavy-metal ions. Although several methods
have been investigated for the azo-coupling reaction, our synthetic
design and monomer selection were chosen to optimize the azo-coupling
reaction in which the water is the solvent, and no temperature or
expensive catalyst was required. We employed the diazotization of
4,4′-diaminobiphenyl and 4,4′-methylenedianiline using
NaNO2 and a catalytic amount of concentrated HCl in water
at 0 °C. After that, coupling with the activated 1,3,5-trihydroxybenzene
produces the respective highly cross-linked azo polymers man-Azo-P1
and man-Azo-P2. Subsequently, the resulting polymers were purified
by filtration and washing with water, methanol, and DMF and then Soxhlet
extraction by methanol to remove any inorganic salts and unreacted
materials.
Structure Characterization
The successful
formation
of the azo-linked polymers was confirmed by the solid-state cross-polarization
magic angle spinning (CP-MAS) 13C NMR and the Fourier transform
infrared (FT-IR) spectra (Figure ). The characteristic CP-MAS 13C NMR signals
for the two monomer units constructing both man-Azo-P1 and man-Azo-P2
were assigned as follows (Figure a): (i) the peak at δ 117 ppm corresponds to
aromatic carbons of the 1,3,5-trihydroxybenzene attached to the azo
group (carbon 1, Cph–N=N−).
Figure 1
Structure characterization
of the synthesized polymers: (a) CP-MAS 13C NMR spectra
with the corresponding peak assignments of
FTIR spectra of (b) man-Azo-P1 (c) and man-Azo-P2 polymers and their
corresponding monomers.
Structure characterization
of the synthesized polymers: (a) CP-MAS 13C NMR spectra
with the corresponding peak assignments of
FTIR spectra of (b) man-Azo-P1 (c) and man-Azo-P2 polymers and their
corresponding monomers.In comparison, the peak
at δ 140 ppm is assigned to the aromatic
carbon attached to the OH group (carbon 2, C–OH). (ii) Peaks
at δ 117, 128, and 140 ppm are characteristic of 4,4′-diaminobiphenyl
and 4,4′-methylenedianiline aromatic carbons. (iii) δ
40 ppm is the characteristic peak for the methylene (−CH2−) linkage of the 4,4′-methylenedianiline monomer
of man-Azo-P2, which is not present in the 13C NMR spectrum
of man-Azo-P1. Together, these assigned signals provide direct evidence
for the successful construction of the azo polymers from their corresponding
monomers. The FT-IR spectra provide additional structure elucidation
for the azo-linkage formation between the diamine and the 1,3,5-trihydroxybenzene
(Figure b,c). The
vibrational band around 1400 cm–1 confirms the presence
of the azo (−N=N−) group.[23,26] On the other hand, the disappearance of the NH2 bands
of the monomers (two sharp bands around 3400 cm–1) in the resulting polymers is also direct evidence of the azo coupling
formation of the diamine monomers. In comparison, the broad band centered
at 3404 cm–1 in the polymers is attributed to the
1,3,5-trihydroxy monomer in the structure. The powder X-ray diffraction
analysis of the synthesized Azo-man-P1 and Azo-man-P2 has demonstrated
the amorphous nature of both materials with a broad peak centered
at around 20°, as shown in Figure S3. The SEM images show the amorphous microstructures of the samplse
with irregular shapes (Figures S4 and S6). A TGA study and DSC analysis proved the thermal stability of the
polymers and (Figures S1 and S2). The first
decomposition after the solvent removal started at around 300 °C
for man-Azo-P1 and at around 250 °C for man-Azo-P2.
Porosity and
Pore Structure
After structure characterization
of the synthesized azo-linked polymers, the permanent porosity of
the materials was investigated by measuring the adsorption–desorption
nitrogen isotherms at 77 K (Figure a). The N2 isotherms reveal high uptake
at the low-pressure region (P/P0 < 0.001) for both man-Azo-P1 and man-Azo-P2, indicating
the presence of micropores within the frameworks. The higher uptake
at the higher pressure (P/P0 < 0.5) is due to the capillary condensation of the N2 in the meso- and macropore behavior. The pore size distribution
(PSD) was estimated using quenched solid density functional theory
(QSDFT) model which quantitively represents the surface geometrical
inhomogeneity in terms of roughness parameters, including micro-/mesopore
structures. The PSD proves that man-Azo-P1 is mainly a micropore material
while man-Azo-P2 has both micropore and mesopore textures (Figure b) that may be attributed
to the flexibility of the 4,4′-methylenedianiline monomers
of the azo-man-P2 framework. The calculated Brunauer–Emmitt-Teller
(BET) surface aresa of man-Azo-P1 and man-Azo-P2 were found to be
290 and 78 m2 g–1, respectively. The
BET surface areas, and pore volumes, and diameters are summarized
in Table .
Figure 2
(a) N2 sorption isotherms at 77 K for man-Azo-P1 (red,
circles) and man-Azo-P2 (blue, rhombohedra). (b) Pore size distribution
(PSD) of man-Azo-P1 (red) and man-Azo-P2 (blue). Filled and open markers
represent the adsorption and desorption isotherms, respectively. Solid
lines are used for clear visualization.
Table 1
Surface Areas and Pore Parameters
of the Synthesized man-Azo-P1 and man-Azo-P2 Materials
sample
BET surface
area (m2 g–1)
Langmuir
surface area (m2 g–1)
PSDa (nm)
pore volume (cm3 g–1)c
man-Azo-P1
290
450
0.3
0.33
man-Azo-P2
78
123
59.6
0.15
PSD calculated by the QSDFT model.
DFT accumulated pore volume.
PSD calculated by the QSDFT model.DFT accumulated pore volume.(a) N2 sorption isotherms at 77 K for man-Azo-P1 (red,
circles) and man-Azo-P2 (blue, rhombohedra). (b) Pore size distribution
(PSD) of man-Azo-P1 (red) and man-Azo-P2 (blue). Filled and open markers
represent the adsorption and desorption isotherms, respectively. Solid
lines are used for clear visualization.
CO2 Gas Uptake Measurements
Inspired by
the intrinsic microporosity of the developed man-Azo-P1 and man-Azo-P2
materials and the subunit core polar functionality of the frameworks,
we were encouraged to investigate the CO2 adsorption capabilities.
The thermodynamic adsorption measurements for CO2 and N2 were assessed at two different temperatures (273 and 298
K) to evaluate the capacity of man-Azo-P1 and man-Azo-P2 toward CO2 capture. As shown in Figure a, man-Azo-P1 has a high uptake capacity in comparison
to man-Azo-P2, although they have similar functionalities. However,
this is due to the difference in the surface area. The steep high
CO2 uptake and low pressure for both materials in comparison
to the poor uptake for N2 indicate the strong affinity
of the synthesized azo polymers toward the CO2 thanks to
the CO2-philic functional groups (−N=N–
and OH) in the frameworks. The CO2 uptake capacities were
found to be 32 and 20 cm3 g–1 at 273
K and 1 bar for man-Azo-P1 and man-Azo-P2, respectively, in comparison
with only 1.4 and 1.4 cm3 g–1 at 273
K and 1 bar for the N2 uptake. It is worth mentioning the
high affinity of man-Azo-P1 toward CO2 in comparison to
the low CO2 uptake for man-Azo-P2. In contrast, similar
uptake capacities for N2 indicate the crucial role of the
high surface area and microporosity in addition to the polar functionality.
The CO2 uptake capacity of man-Azo-P1 is comparable with
those of previously reported porous organic polymers at 273 K and
1 bar. These include the crystalline covalent organic frameworks;
(COF-5, 29.9 cm3 g–1; COF, 8:32 cm3 g–1; COF-10, 27.0 cm3 g–1).[27] However, the uptake
is lower than for other amine cross-linked polymers due to the lower
surface area (PTPM-1 38.6 cm3 g–1, mPTPM-1
43.3 cm3 g–1;[28] NCMPs 56.0 cm3 g–1;[29] polycarbazole network PCZNs 38.1–71.2 cm3 g–1;[30] HCMP-1 38 cm3 g–1)[31] and other
Azo-POPs with similar functionalities such as Azo-COPs (22.4–33.6
cm3 g–1)[32] and triptycene azo polymers (TAP-1 48.4 cm3 g–1, TAP-2 71.8 cm3 g–1).[23]
Figure 3
Gas sorption analysis of man-Azo-P1 (red, circles) and man-Azo-P2
(blue, rhombohedrons) at 273 K (a) and 298 K (b). Ideal adsorption
solution theory (IAST) CO2/N2 selectivity at
273 K (red) and 298 K (blue) of man-Azo-P1 (c) and man-Azo-P2 (d).
Gas sorption analysis of man-Azo-P1 (red, circles) and man-Azo-P2
(blue, rhombohedrons) at 273 K (a) and 298 K (b). Ideal adsorption
solution theory (IAST) CO2/N2 selectivity at
273 K (red) and 298 K (blue) of man-Azo-P1 (c) and man-Azo-P2 (d).
Coverage-Dependent Enthalpy of Adsorption
and CO2/N2 Selectivity
Encouraged by
the good thermodynamic
CO2 uptake of the synthesized azo-linked polymers and a
further understanding of the interaction of the man-Azo-P1 and man-Azo-P2
with the adsorbed CO2 molecules, we calculated the coverage-dependent
enthalpy of adsorption (Qst). The Qst values were estimated by fitting the CO2 and N2 isotherms at 273 and 298 K using a viral
type expansion equation (eq S1 in the Supporting
Information). The initial Qst values (at
zero coverage) for man-Azo-P1 and man-Azo-P2 for CO2 were
40 and 23 kJ mol–1, respectively, in comparison
to only 4.4 and 22.0 kJ mol–1 for N2,
indicating the strong binding of CO2 with the polymer frameworks.
These Qst values are high enough for favorable
physical adsorption of CO2 but are still not very high,
as for the aliphatic amine-based sorbents in which the strong binding
with CO2 forming a carbamate needs high energy for regeneration.[18,33,34] The CO2/N2 selectivity was estimated using the ideal adsorption solution theory
(IAST) model. As such, man-Azo-P1 showed a good CO2/N2 selectivity of about 80 at 1 bar and 273 K (Figure c).
Metal Ion Removal Application
The prepared polymers
man-Azo-P1 and man-Azo-P2 were evaluated for their efficiency in the
adsorption of metal ions from aqueous media. As shown in Figure , the results indicated
that both polymers have high efficiency toward the adsorption of the
metal ions. However, man-Azo-P1 showed slightly better performance
compared with man-Azo-P2, which can be explained by its higher surface
area and porous structure. In addition, the possible mechanisms of
interactions include the formation of complexes, surface complexation,
π–metal interactions, and interactions with functional
groups, as well as electrostatic interactions.[35−37] As it showed
better performance, man-Azo-P1 was selected for further investigation.
The prepared polymer man-Azo-P1 was evaluated with regard to the contact
time effect on the adsorption of metal ions from aqueous media.
Figure 4
Adsorption
efficiencies of (i) man-Azo-P1 (red) and (ii) man-Azo-P2
(blue) for the simultaneous removal of metal ions. Conditions: initial
concentration 100 ppm, contact time 120 min, pH 6, and dosage of 25
mg/20 mL.
Adsorption
efficiencies of (i) man-Azo-P1 (red) and (ii) man-Azo-P2
(blue) for the simultaneous removal of metal ions. Conditions: initial
concentration 100 ppm, contact time 120 min, pH 6, and dosage of 25
mg/20 mL.To get insights into the capacity
of polymers for metal adsorption,
the capacity was presented in milligrams of the metal per gram of
polymer, as shown in Figure . The capacity of adsorption of metal ions increased with
the increase of contact time. At contact times of around 90 and 120
min, the adsorption was almost constant, indicating an equilibrium.
Figure 5
Effect
of contact time on the efficiency of the polymer man-Azo-P1
for the removal of metal ions: lead (dark blue), chromium (orange),
arsenic (gray), nickel (yellow), copper (light blue), and mercury
(green).
Effect
of contact time on the efficiency of the polymer man-Azo-P1
for the removal of metal ions: lead (dark blue), chromium (orange),
arsenic (gray), nickel (yellow), copper (light blue), and mercury
(green).The effect of man-Azo-P1 dosage
was investigated as in Figure a. By an increase
in the dosage, the adsorption increased; this can be explained by
the presence of more surface area and active functional groups to
interact with the metal ions. The effect of the pH of the solution
was also studied in the range between 3 and 7. It can be seen in Figure b that, by increasing
the pH, the removal of metal ions increased. At pH 3, the removal
was low, which can be explained by the presence of more protons that
compete with the positively charged metal ions.[38] At higher pH, there are fewer protons and most partially
negatively charged functional groups are ready to interact with the
metal ions. The presence of nonbonding electrons on oxygen and nitrogen
also plays a significant role in interacting with negatively charged
metal ions.[39] These results highlight the
high removal performance of the synthesized azo-polymerscomparable
with those reported in the literature.[40,41] man-Azo-P1
showed promising recycling performance for removing metals even after
five cycles of adsorption/desorption (Figure ). The excellent performance of the reported
polymers indicates that they can be used several times due to their
easy regeneration. Therefore, the reported polymers can be recommended
for water treatment. The highest capacity was for the removal of lead,
chromium, and arsenic, followed by nickel, copper, and mercury, which
showed slightly less capacity.
Figure 6
(a) Effect of polymer P2 dosage of (i)
5, (ii) 15, (iii) 25, (iv)
35, and (v) 50 mg/20 mL, on the removal of metal ions. Conditions:
contact time 120 min and pH 6. (b) Effect of pH (3, 4, 5, 6, and 7)
on the efficiency of the polymer P1 for the removal of metal ions.
Condition: contact time 120 min.
Figure 7
Excellent
performance of man -Azo-P1 for metal removal over five
cycles. Conditions: dosage 50 mg, pH 6, and time 120 min.
(a) Effect of polymer P2 dosage of (i)
5, (ii) 15, (iii) 25, (iv)
35, and (v) 50 mg/20 mL, on the removal of metal ions. Conditions:
contact time 120 min and pH 6. (b) Effect of pH (3, 4, 5, 6, and 7)
on the efficiency of the polymer P1 for the removal of metal ions.
Condition: contact time 120 min.Excellent
performance of man -Azo-P1 for metal removal over five
cycles. Conditions: dosage 50 mg, pH 6, and time 120 min.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the synthesis and scale-up
of two azo-linked polymers
denoted man-Azo-P1 and man-Azo-P2 were achieved in water as a solvent
at low temperature (0 °C) via diazotization of 4,4′-diaminobiphenyl
(benzidine) and 4,4′-diaminodianiline with phloroglucinol.
The synthesized man-Azo-P1 polymer showed a good BET surface area
of 290 m2 g–1, which is higher than that
of man-Azo-P2 of 78 m2 g–1 that was attributed
to the role of the rigidity of the starting 4,4′-diaminobiphenyl
monomer in comparison to the flexible 4,4′-methylenedianiline.
The man-Azo-P1 material showed good CO2 uptake, due to
the good surface area and the polar azo and hydroxy functional groups
decorating the porous structure. Additionally, the synthesized materials
were explored for the removal of toxic metal ions from water. Both
materials showed high capabilities for removing different metal ions
with 100% removal for Cr and Pb. Such results demonstrate the great
potential of the synthesized azo-linked POPs for environmental application.
Authors: Xiangyang Wu; Samuel J Cobbina; Guanghua Mao; Hai Xu; Zhen Zhang; Liuqing Yang Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2016-03-11 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Hasmukh A Patel; Sang Hyun Je; Joonho Park; Dennis P Chen; Yousung Jung; Cafer T Yavuz; Ali Coskun Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2013 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Oussama M El-Kadri; Tsemre-Dingel Tessema; Ruaa M Almotawa; Ravi K Arvapally; Mohammad H Al-Sayah; Mohammad A Omary; Hani M El-Kaderi Journal: ACS Omega Date: 2018-11-14