Literature DB >> 19496589

Storage of hydrogen, methane, and carbon dioxide in highly porous covalent organic frameworks for clean energy applications.

Hiroyasu Furukawa1, Omar M Yaghi.   

Abstract

Dihydrogen, methane, and carbon dioxide isotherm measurements were performed at 1-85 bar and 77-298 K on the evacuated forms of seven porous covalent organic frameworks (COFs). The uptake behavior and capacity of the COFs is best described by classifying them into three groups based on their structural dimensions and corresponding pore sizes. Group 1 consists of 2D structures with 1D small pores (9 A for each of COF-1 and COF-6), group 2 includes 2D structures with large 1D pores (27, 16, and 32 A for COF-5, COF-8, and COF-10, respectively), and group 3 is comprised of 3D structures with 3D medium-sized pores (12 A for each of COF-102 and COF-103). Group 3 COFs outperform group 1 and 2 COFs, and rival the best metal-organic frameworks and other porous materials in their uptake capacities. This is exemplified by the excess gas uptake of COF-102 at 35 bar (72 mg g(-1) at 77 K for hydrogen, 187 mg g(-1) at 298 K for methane, and 1180 mg g(-1) at 298 K for carbon dioxide), which is similar to the performance of COF-103 but higher than those observed for COF-1, COF-5, COF-6, COF-8, and COF-10 (hydrogen at 77 K, 15 mg g(-1) for COF-1, 36 mg g(-1) for COF-5, 23 mg g(-1) for COF-6, 35 mg g(-1) for COF-8, and 39 mg g(-1) for COF-10; methane at 298 K, 40 mg g(-1) for COF-1, 89 mg g(-1) for COF-5, 65 mg g(-1) for COF-6, 87 mg g(-1) for COF-8, and 80 mg g(-1) for COF-10; carbon dioxide at 298 K, 210 mg g(-1) for COF-1, 779 mg g(-1) for COF-5, 298 mg g(-1) for COF-6, 598 mg g(-1) for COF-8, and 759 mg g(-1) for COF-10). These findings place COFs among the most porous and the best adsorbents for hydrogen, methane, and carbon dioxide.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19496589     DOI: 10.1021/ja9015765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  97 in total

1.  Microfluidic-based Synthesis of Covalent Organic Frameworks (COFs): A Tool for Continuous Production of COF Fibers and Direct Printing on a Surface.

Authors:  Afshin Abrishamkar; David Rodríguez-San-Miguel; Jorge Andrés Rodríguez Navarro; Romen Rodriguez-Trujillo; David B Amabilino; Ruben Mas-Ballesté; Félix Zamora; Andrew J deMello; Josep Puigmarti-Luis
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Isoreticular synthesis and modification of frameworks with the UiO-66 topology.

Authors:  Sergio J Garibay; Seth M Cohen
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 3.  Rationally synthesized two-dimensional polymers.

Authors:  John W Colson; William R Dichtel
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 24.427

Review 4.  Perturbations and 3R in carbon management.

Authors:  Deepak Pant; Virbala Sharma; Pooja Singh; Manoj Kumar; Anand Giri; M P Singh
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 5.  Opportunities of Covalent Organic Frameworks for Advanced Applications.

Authors:  Yanpei Song; Qi Sun; Briana Aguila; Shengqian Ma
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 16.806

6.  Stability and electronic properties of 3D covalent organic frameworks.

Authors:  Binit Lukose; Agnieszka Kuc; Thomas Heine
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  Improving the hydrogen storage properties of metal-organic framework by functionalization.

Authors:  Liangzhi Xia; Qing Liu; Fengling Wang; Jinming Lu
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 1.810

8.  Open carbon frameworks - a search for optimal geometry for hydrogen storage.

Authors:  Bogdan Kuchta; Lucyna Firlej; Ali Mohammadhosseini; Matthew Beckner; Jimmy Romanos; Peter Pfeifer
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 1.810

9.  Thiophene-based covalent organic frameworks.

Authors:  Guillaume H V Bertrand; Vladimir K Michaelis; Ta-Chung Ong; Robert G Griffin; Mircea Dincă
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Lightweight nanoporous metal hydroxide-rich zeotypes.

Authors:  Benjamin T R Littlefield; Mark T Weller
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.