| Literature DB >> 35557601 |
Gian Nicola Angotzi1, Lidia Giantomasi1, Joao F Ribeiro1, Marco Crepaldi2, Matteo Vincenzi1, Domenico Zito3, Luca Berdondini1.
Abstract
Advancements in stem cell technology together with an improved understanding of in vitro organogenesis have enabled new routes that exploit cell-autonomous self-organization responses of adult stem cells (ASCs) and homogenous pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) to grow complex, three-dimensional (3D), mini-organ like structures on demand, the so-called organoids. Conventional optical and electrical neurophysiological techniques to acquire functional data from brain organoids, however, are not adequate for chronic recordings of neural activity from these model systems, and are not ideal approaches for throughput screenings applied to drug discovery. To overcome these issues, new emerging approaches aim at fusing sensing mechanisms and/or actuating artificial devices within organoids. Here we introduce and develop the concept of the Lab-in-Organoid (LIO) technology for in-tissue sensing and actuation within 3D cell aggregates. This challenging technology grounds on the self-aggregation of brain cells and on integrated bioelectronic micro-scale devices to provide an advanced tool for generating 3D biological brain models with in-tissue artificial functionalities adapted for routine, label-free functional measurements and for assay's development. We complete previously reported results on the implementation of the integrated self-standing wireless silicon micro-devices with experiments aiming at investigating the impact on neuronal spheroids of sinusoidal electro-magnetic fields as those required for wireless power and data transmission. Finally, we discuss the technology headway and future perspectives.Entities:
Keywords: 3D cell cultures technologies; biointerface engineering; biological model; complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS); inductive link; neural recording; organoids; radio frequencies (RF) waves
Year: 2022 PMID: 35557601 PMCID: PMC9086958 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.842265
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 5.152
Performance Specifications of our solution in comparison to other State-of-the-Art Systems.
| References |
|
|
|
| This work(*) | |
| Application | Recording | Recording | Recording | Recording | Stimulation | Recording |
| Communication | Wired to external DAQ | Wired to external DAQ | Wireless optical | Wireless ultrasound | Wireless RF | Wireless RF |
| Native process | Passive electrodes | Passive electrodes | CMOS 180 nm | N/A | CMOS 130 nm | CMOS 130 nm |
| Post-processing | N/A | N/A | PVLED on CMOS | Piezo on CMOS | Fully CMOS compatible | Fully CMOS compatible |
| Power consumption [μW] | N/A | N/A | 1 | N/A | <50 | 6.18 |
| Model |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Organoids | Organoids | (mouse CNS) | (mouse PNS) | (mouse CNS) | organoids | |
| Volume [mm3] | N/A | N/A | 0.0008 | 2.4 | 0.009 | 0.0005 |
* System not fully released.
FIGURE 1Concept view of Lab-in Organoids: active devices seamlessly integrated into developing organoids can be used for monitoring their bioelectrical activity over the entire life span.
FIGURE 2CMOS μRADIO. Panel (A) Image of a chip prototype integrating multiple instances of a 100 × 100 μm2 μRADIO, two of which include additional circuits for testing purposes. Panel (B) block diagram of the μRADIO showing in green test circuits that are connected to IO pads (test point P1–P7) and, inset, circuit schematic of the AC-input low-noise bio amplifier. Panel (C) analog waveforms previously reported in Angotzi et al. (2019b) measured on different circuit nodes from a device under test for distinct modes of operation (power up addressing, readout). Panel (D) Power distribution of the backscattered signal measured on node P1 for different voltages applied at the input of the voltage controlled oscillator (P6). Panel (E) post-layout simulations of the demodulated VCO output (top, blue trace) when the Low Noise Amplifier is stimulated with a synthetic neural trace (bottom, green trace).
FIGURE 3Biological effects of sinusoidal RF EM field (2–6 GHz) on neuronal spheroids activity and viability. (A) Representative confocal immunofluorescence images of neuronal spheroids used as controls (C1, C2, C3) and spheroids exposed to the EM field for 15, 30, and 60 min. Spheroids were stained against cFos (green) and all cell nuclei (Heachst, blue). Scale bar: 50 μm. (B) Quantitative analysis showing the percentage of cFos-positive (cFos+) cells out of the total cells (Heachst). The graph shows the mean ± SD, n = 4–6 per group. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. (C) Percentage of viable neuronal cells after exposure to the EM field for 15, 30, and 60 min. The graph shows the mean ± SD of three experiments performed separately with eight spheroids per group per experiment. *P < 0.05. C1, control spheroids, always kept in the incubator; C2, control spheroids, kept outside the incubator for 30 min; C3, control spheroids, kept outside the incubator for 60 min.