Background: BRAFV600E mutations occur in fewer than 10% of all patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) and arise from sessile serrated adenomas. Despite efficacy with targeted therapies against MAPK signaling and with immunotherapies in this population, survival outcomes for patients with BRAFV600E mutated metastatic CRC in general are poor. Characteristics distinguishing patients with BRAFV600E mutated metastatic CRC with favorable versus unfavorable outcomes have not been well annotated. Methods: Records of 187 patients with BRAFV600E mutated metastatic CRC evaluated at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2005-2020 were reviewed. Patients with the shortest and longest metastatic survival (N=25 for each group) were compared. Associations between prognostic group and clinical/pathologic features were measured by odds ratio and for median survival by log-rank testing. Results: Median metastatic survival differed between the 2 BRAFV600E mutated metastatic CRC populations (8.6 vs. 83.9 months, hazard ratio 32; P<0.0001). Patients with poor survival more commonly had hepatic involvement [75% vs. 28%, odds ratio (OR) 8.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.3-29; P=0.001]. Patients with favorable survival were more likely to develop metachronous metastases (52% vs. 16%, OR 5.7, 95% CI: 1.5-21; P=0.01) and undergo definitive locoregional therapy to metastatic disease (40% vs. 0%, OR 34.5, 95% CI: 1.9-630; P=0.01). Microsatellite instability (36% vs. 4%, OR 19.8, 95% CI: 2.2-180; P=0.008) and prior tobacco exposure (44% vs. 16%, OR 4.1, 95% CI: 1.1-15.6, P=0.04) were associated with a favorable prognosis. Durable responses to MAPK-targeted therapies and immunotherapy were noted in the favorable group. Conclusions: A small fraction of patients with BRAFV600E mutated metastatic CRC can achieve excellent long-term survival which belies conventional context and is driven by either surgical metastectomy or by systemic treatment options. While poor overall prognosis remains the recognized outcome for most patients with BRAFV600E mutated metastatic CRC, it is possible that few may achieve exceptionally favorable survival. 2022 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.
Background: BRAFV600E mutations occur in fewer than 10% of all patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) and arise from sessile serrated adenomas. Despite efficacy with targeted therapies against MAPK signaling and with immunotherapies in this population, survival outcomes for patients with BRAFV600E mutated metastatic CRC in general are poor. Characteristics distinguishing patients with BRAFV600E mutated metastatic CRC with favorable versus unfavorable outcomes have not been well annotated. Methods: Records of 187 patients with BRAFV600E mutated metastatic CRC evaluated at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2005-2020 were reviewed. Patients with the shortest and longest metastatic survival (N=25 for each group) were compared. Associations between prognostic group and clinical/pathologic features were measured by odds ratio and for median survival by log-rank testing. Results: Median metastatic survival differed between the 2 BRAFV600E mutated metastatic CRC populations (8.6 vs. 83.9 months, hazard ratio 32; P<0.0001). Patients with poor survival more commonly had hepatic involvement [75% vs. 28%, odds ratio (OR) 8.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.3-29; P=0.001]. Patients with favorable survival were more likely to develop metachronous metastases (52% vs. 16%, OR 5.7, 95% CI: 1.5-21; P=0.01) and undergo definitive locoregional therapy to metastatic disease (40% vs. 0%, OR 34.5, 95% CI: 1.9-630; P=0.01). Microsatellite instability (36% vs. 4%, OR 19.8, 95% CI: 2.2-180; P=0.008) and prior tobacco exposure (44% vs. 16%, OR 4.1, 95% CI: 1.1-15.6, P=0.04) were associated with a favorable prognosis. Durable responses to MAPK-targeted therapies and immunotherapy were noted in the favorable group. Conclusions: A small fraction of patients with BRAFV600E mutated metastatic CRC can achieve excellent long-term survival which belies conventional context and is driven by either surgical metastectomy or by systemic treatment options. While poor overall prognosis remains the recognized outcome for most patients with BRAFV600E mutated metastatic CRC, it is possible that few may achieve exceptionally favorable survival. 2022 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.
Entities:
Keywords:
BRAF; colorectal cancer (CRC); immunotherapy; metastasis; metastectomy
Authors: Michael J Overman; Ray McDermott; Joseph L Leach; Sara Lonardi; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Michael A Morse; Jayesh Desai; Andrew Hill; Michael Axelson; Rebecca A Moss; Monica V Goldberg; Z Alexander Cao; Jean-Marie Ledeine; Gregory A Maglinte; Scott Kopetz; Thierry André Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Michael J Overman; Sara Lonardi; Ka Yeung Mark Wong; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Fabio Gelsomino; Massimo Aglietta; Michael A Morse; Eric Van Cutsem; Ray McDermott; Andrew Hill; Michael B Sawyer; Alain Hendlisz; Bart Neyns; Magali Svrcek; Rebecca A Moss; Jean-Marie Ledeine; Z Alexander Cao; Shital Kamble; Scott Kopetz; Thierry André Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-01-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David S Hong; Van K Morris; Badi El Osta; Alexey V Sorokin; Filip Janku; Siqing Fu; Michael J Overman; Sarina Piha-Paul; Vivek Subbiah; Bryan Kee; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; David Fogelman; Jorge Bellido; Imad Shureiqi; Helen Huang; Johnique Atkins; Gabi Tarcic; Nicolas Sommer; Richard Lanman; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Scott Kopetz Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2016-10-11 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Rona Yaeger; Andrea Cercek; Joanne F Chou; Brooke E Sylvester; Nancy E Kemeny; Jaclyn F Hechtman; Marc Ladanyi; Neal Rosen; Martin R Weiser; Marinela Capanu; David B Solit; Michael I D'Angelica; Efsevia Vakiani; Leonard B Saltz Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-04-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Gary Middleton; Yiqun Yang; Catarina D Campbell; Thierry André; Chloe E Atreya; Jan H M Schellens; Takayuki Yoshino; Johanna C Bendell; Antoine Hollebecque; Autumn J McRee; Salvatore Siena; Michael S Gordon; Josep Tabernero; Rona Yaeger; Peter J O'Dwyer; Filip De Vos; Eric Van Cutsem; John M Millholland; Jan C Brase; Fatima Rangwala; Eduard Gasal; Ryan B Corcoran Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-02-11 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Helen Davies; Graham R Bignell; Charles Cox; Philip Stephens; Sarah Edkins; Sheila Clegg; Jon Teague; Hayley Woffendin; Mathew J Garnett; William Bottomley; Neil Davis; Ed Dicks; Rebecca Ewing; Yvonne Floyd; Kristian Gray; Sarah Hall; Rachel Hawes; Jaime Hughes; Vivian Kosmidou; Andrew Menzies; Catherine Mould; Adrian Parker; Claire Stevens; Stephen Watt; Steven Hooper; Rebecca Wilson; Hiran Jayatilake; Barry A Gusterson; Colin Cooper; Janet Shipley; Darren Hargrave; Katherine Pritchard-Jones; Norman Maitland; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Giuseppe Palmieri; Antonio Cossu; Adrienne Flanagan; Andrew Nicholson; Judy W C Ho; Suet Y Leung; Siu T Yuen; Barbara L Weber; Hilliard F Seigler; Timothy L Darrow; Hugh Paterson; Richard Marais; Christopher J Marshall; Richard Wooster; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal Journal: Nature Date: 2002-06-09 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Paul Lochhead; Aya Kuchiba; Yu Imamura; Xiaoyun Liao; Mai Yamauchi; Reiko Nishihara; Zhi Rong Qian; Teppei Morikawa; Jeanne Shen; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2013-07-22 Impact factor: 13.506