| Literature DB >> 27729313 |
David S Hong1, Van K Morris2, Badi El Osta3, Alexey V Sorokin2, Filip Janku4, Siqing Fu4, Michael J Overman2, Sarina Piha-Paul4, Vivek Subbiah4, Bryan Kee2, Apostolia M Tsimberidou4, David Fogelman2, Jorge Bellido4, Imad Shureiqi2, Helen Huang4, Johnique Atkins4, Gabi Tarcic5, Nicolas Sommer6, Richard Lanman7, Funda Meric-Bernstam4, Scott Kopetz2.
Abstract
In vitro, EGFR inhibition, combined with the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib, causes synergistic cytotoxicity for BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer, further augmented by irinotecan. The safety and efficacy of vemurafenib, irinotecan, and cetuximab in BRAF-mutated malignancies are not defined. In this 3+3 phase I study, patients with BRAFV600E-advanced solid cancers received cetuximab and irinotecan with escalating doses of vemurafenib. Nineteen patients (18 with metastatic colorectal cancer and 1 with appendiceal cancer) were enrolled. Three patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities. The MTD of vemurafenib was 960 mg twice daily. Six of 17 evaluable patients (35%) achieved a radiographic response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 criteria, consistent with in vivo models demonstrating tumor regressions with the triplet regimen. Median progression-free survival was 7.7 months. BRAFV600E circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) trends correlated with radiographic changes, and acquired mutations from cfDNA in genes reactivating MAPK signaling were observed at progression. SIGNIFICANCE: Vemurafenib, in combination with irinotecan and cetuximab, was well tolerated in patients with refractory, BRAF-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer, and both survival outcomes and response rates exceeded prior reports for vemurafenib and for irinotecan plus cetuximab in BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer. In vivo models demonstrated regressions with the triplet, in contrast with vemurafenib and cetuximab alone. cfDNA predicted radiographic response and identified mutations reactivating the MAPK pathway upon progression. Cancer Discov; 6(12); 1352-65. ©2016 AACR.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1293. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27729313 PMCID: PMC5562357 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Discov ISSN: 2159-8274 Impact factor: 39.397