Literature DB >> 35552934

Widespread Promiscuity and Cheap Weddings: Can "Low-Value" Sexual Relationships Make Certain Individuals More Sexually Conservative?

Francesca R Luberti1,2, Khandis R Blake3,4, Robert C Brooks3.   

Abstract

Attitudes toward sexual relationships can have evolutionary underpinnings because these attitudes often serve, or at least reflect, the attitude holder's mating self-interest. Sexually restricted individuals, for example, hold conservative attitudes toward same-sex and opposite-sex sexual relationships because conservative attitudes benefit their mating strategies (e.g., monogamy). Certain mating market cues, however, can shift attitudes. In two experiments recruiting Americans and Australians (total N = 1298), we took a data-driven approach to test whether experimental manipulations of (1) promiscuity among either homosexuals (gays and lesbians) or heterosexuals and (2) the financial amount that either homosexuals (gays and lesbians) or heterosexuals invest in weddings would shift attitudes toward same-sex marriage, dating, and romantic spending. In Experiment 1, we did not replicate previous findings that homosexual promiscuity affects attitudes to same-sex marriage, nor did we find any effects of priming heterosexual promiscuity. However, priming participants with the notion that either homosexuals or heterosexuals were highly promiscuous increased support for traditional relationship norms among sexually restricted Australian (but not American) men. This effect was smaller when we controlled for participant sexual orientation, because primes of high homosexual or heterosexual promiscuity increased support for these traditional norms in exclusively heterosexual Australians, but decreased support in non-heterosexual Australians. Experiment 2 found that American and Australian men's opposition to same-sex marriage increased when they were led to believe that either homosexual or heterosexual weddings were cheap, even when controlling for participant sexual orientation. Overall, results provide some support for the argument that mating market cues affect attitudes toward sexual relationships.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mating market; Same-sex marriage; Sex differences; Sexual norms; Sociosexual orientation

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35552934     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-021-02216-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  25 in total

1.  Wedding Imagery and Public Support for Gay Marriage.

Authors:  Paul R Brewer; David C Wilson; Michael Habegger
Journal:  J Homosex       Date:  2016-02-05

Review 2.  Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Benjamin M Bolker; Mollie E Brooks; Connie J Clark; Shane W Geange; John R Poulsen; M Henry H Stevens; Jada-Simone S White
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Decomposing trends in attitudes toward gay marriage, 1988–2006.

Authors:  Dawn Michelle Baunach
Journal:  Soc Sci Q       Date:  2011

4.  Cultural variations in the sexual marketplace: gender equality correlates with more sexual activity.

Authors:  Roy F Baumeister; Juan Pablo Mendoza
Journal:  J Soc Psychol       Date:  2011 May-Jun

Review 5.  When to use the Bonferroni correction.

Authors:  Richard A Armstrong
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  The relationship among sexual attitudes, sexual fantasy, and religiosity.

Authors:  Tierney K Ahrold; Melissa Farmer; Paul D Trapnell; Cindy M Meston
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2010-04-03

7.  Amounts Spent on Engagement Rings Reflect Aspects of Male and Female Mate Quality.

Authors:  Lee Cronk; Bria Dunham
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2007-12

8.  Sexual economics: sex as female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions.

Authors:  Roy F Baumeister; Kathleen D Vohs
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2004

9.  Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating.

Authors:  D M Buss; D P Schmitt
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Disgust and the politics of sex: exposure to a disgusting odorant increases politically conservative views on sex and decreases support for gay marriage.

Authors:  Thomas G Adams; Patrick A Stewart; John C Blanchar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.