Literature DB >> 35552530

Spinal exposure for anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in the lateral decubitus position: anatomical and technical considerations.

Aaron J Buckland1, Carlos Leon1, Kimberly Ashayeri2, Ivan Cheng3, J Alex Thomas4, Brett Braly5, Brian Kwon6, Constance Maglaras1, Leon Eisen1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Single position surgery has demonstrated to reduce hospital length of stay, operative times, blood loss, postoperative pain, ileus, and complications. ALIF and LLIF surgeries offer advantages of placing large interbody devices under direct compression and can be performed by a minimally invasive approach in the lateral position. Furthermore, simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior column is possible in the lateral position without the need for patient repositioning. The purpose of this study is to outline the anatomical and technical considerations for performing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in the lateral decubitus position.
METHODS: Surgical technique and technical considerations for reconstruction of the anterior column in the lateral position by ALIF at the L4-5 and L5-S1 levels.
RESULTS: Topics outlined in this review include: Operating room layout and patient positioning; surgical anatomy and approach; vessel mobilization and retractor placement for L4-5 and L5-S1 lateral ALIF exposure, in addition to comparative technique of disc space preparation, trialing and implant placement compared to the supine ALIF procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: Anterior exposure performed in the lateral decubitus position allows safe-, minimally invasive access and implant placement in ALIF. The approach requires less peritoneal and vessel retraction than in a supine position, in addition to allowing simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior columns when performing 360° Anterior-Posterior fusion.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALIF; LLIF; Lateral decubitus; Minimally invasive spine surgery; Single position; Spinal exposure; Spinal fusion; Surgical approach; Technique; XLIF

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35552530     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07227-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   2.721


  9 in total

1.  Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance.

Authors:  Patrick C Hsieh; Tyler R Koski; Brian A O'Shaughnessy; Patrick Sugrue; Sean Salehi; Stephen Ondra; John C Liu
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-10

Review 2.  Potential and Limitations of Neural Decompression in Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Gernot Lang; Moritz Perrech; Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez; Ibrahim Hussain; Brenton Pennicooke; Farah Maryam; Mauricio J Avila; Roger Härtl
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Indirect foraminal decompression after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective radiographic study using a new pedicle-to-pedicle technique.

Authors:  Prashanth J Rao; Monish M Maharaj; Kevin Phan; Manil Lakshan Abeygunasekara; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Preoperative assessment of the ureter with dual-phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography for lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedures.

Authors:  Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Bungo Otsuki; Hiroaki Kimura; Shimei Tanida; Kazutaka Masamoto; Shuichi Matsuda
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2017-02-12       Impact factor: 1.601

5.  Single position circumferential fusion improves operative efficiency, reduces complications and length of stay compared with traditional circumferential fusion.

Authors:  Aaron J Buckland; Kimberly Ashayeri; Carlos Leon; Jordan Manning; Leon Eisen; Mark Medley; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; J Alex Thomas
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Adult degenerative scoliosis treated with XLIF: clinical and radiographical results of a prospective multicenter study with 24-month follow-up.

Authors:  Frank M Phillips; Robert E Isaacs; William Blake Rodgers; Kaveh Khajavi; Antoine G Tohmeh; Vedat Deviren; Mark D Peterson; Jonathan Hyde; Mark Kurd
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Indirect decompression of lumbar stenosis with transpsoas interbody cages and percutaneous posterior instrumentation.

Authors:  Antonio E Castellvi; Thomas W Nienke; German A Marulanda; Ryan D Murtagh; Brandon G Santoni
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Quantitative analysis of indirect decompression in extreme lateral interbody fusion and posterior spinal fusion with a percutaneous pedicle screw system for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Hiroshi Nomura; Akihisa Yamashita; Tetsuya Watanabe; Kenzo Shirasawa
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-06

9.  MRI measurement of neuroforaminal dimension at the index and supradjacent levels after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective study.

Authors:  Woojin Cho; Mark J Sokolowski; Amir A Mehbod; Francis Denis; Timothy A Garvey; John Perl; Ensor E Transfeldt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-02-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.