Literature DB >> 24474321

Indirect decompression of lumbar stenosis with transpsoas interbody cages and percutaneous posterior instrumentation.

Antonio E Castellvi1, Thomas W Nienke, German A Marulanda, Ryan D Murtagh, Brandon G Santoni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The minimally invasive lateral transpsoas retroperitoneal approach to address lumbar stenosis offers advantages to traditional approaches, including sparing of the AP annulus and longitudinal ligament and less risk to the peritoneal contents and retroperitoneal vascular structures. Few studies have presented longitudinal measures of radiographic indirect decompression and relief of pain and restoration of function using the lateral approach to spine fusion. QUESTION/PURPOSES: We determined (1) whether radiographic measures suggestive of decompression were achieved after surgery and maintained 1 year after surgery, (2) whether the intervention resulted in sustained improvements in patient-reported outcomes scores 1 year after surgery, and (3) the frequency of pseudarthrosis on CT scans at 1 year after surgery in patients with moderate or severe lumbar stenosis treated with the approach.
METHODS: Between 2008 and 2012, 158 patients were surgically treated to alleviate symptoms associated with degenerative lumbar stenosis, of whom 60 (38%) were treated with lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Of these 60 patients, 36 (60%) received CT scans preoperatively and at 1-year postoperatively and were available for radiographic analysis. Of the 60 treated patients, 16 (27%) were lost to followup before 12 months, leaving the records of 44 patients available for review of patient-reported improvements in pain and return to function. Radiographic increases in disc height, foraminal area, and canal area were measured by one observer on CT scans postoperatively and at 1 year and compared to preoperative values. Patient-reported scores, including VAS pain score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), were collected preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Increases in disc height (67%, p < 0.001), foraminal area (24%-31%, p < 0.001), and canal area (7%, p = 0.011) measured immediately postoperatively were sustained at 1-year followup. VAS pain score and ODI both improved (p < 0.001) at 3 months and were maintained at 1 year. No pseudarthroses were noted radiographically.
CONCLUSIONS: The lateral transpsoas approach to interbody fusion is capable of sustaining indirect decompression of the neural structures and resolving preoperative claudication and radiculopathy. A larger series of patients with longer followup should be studied to substantiate these early clinical results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24474321      PMCID: PMC4016450          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3464-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  26 in total

1.  Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults.

Authors:  Leah Y Carreon; Rolando M Puno; John R Dimar; Steven D Glassman; John R Johnson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Commentary: An increasing awareness of the complications after transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion procedure.

Authors:  Ronald A Lehman; Daniel G Kang
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases.

Authors:  W Blake Rodgers; Edward J Gerber; Jamie Patterson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  A radiographic assessment of the ability of the extreme lateral interbody fusion procedure to indirectly decompress the neural elements.

Authors:  Leonardo Oliveira; Luis Marchi; Etevaldo Coutinho; Luiz Pimenta
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Analysis of operative complications in a series of 471 anterior lumbar interbody fusion procedures.

Authors:  Rick C Sasso; Natalie M Best; Praveen V Mummaneni; Thomas M Reilly; Sajjad M Hussain
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The reliability of the Shuttle Walking Test, the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, the Oxford Spinal Stenosis Score, and the Oswestry Disability Index in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Roland K Pratt; Jeremy C T Fairbank; Andrew Virr
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Complications of anterior lumbar surgery.

Authors:  John K Czerwein; Nikhil Thakur; Stephen J Migliori; Philip Lucas; Mark Palumbo
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Biomechanics of lateral plate and pedicle screw constructs in lumbar spines instrumented at two levels with laterally placed interbody cages.

Authors:  Aniruddh N Nayak; Sergio Gutierrez; James B Billys; Brandon G Santoni; Antonio E Castellvi
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Lateral transpsoas interbody fusion (LTIF) with plate fixation and unilateral pedicle screws: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Christopher K Kepler; Amit K Sharma; Russel C Huang
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2011-08

10.  National complication rates and disposition after posterior lumbar fusion for acquired spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Paul S Kalanithi; Chirag G Patil; Maxwell Boakye
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  31 in total

1.  Central and foraminal indirect decompression in MIS lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): video lecture.

Authors:  Eric H Elowitz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gun Keorochana; Kitipong Setrkraising; Patarawan Woratanarat; Alisara Arirachakaran; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Indirect foraminal decompression and improvement in the lumbar alignment after percutaneous cement discoplasty.

Authors:  Laszlo Kiss; Peter Pal Varga; Zsolt Szoverfi; Gabor Jakab; Peter Endre Eltes; Aron Lazary
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-04-20       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Anterior column reconstruction of the lumbar spine in the lateral decubitus position: anatomical and patient-related considerations for ALIF, anterior-to-psoas, and transpsoas LLIF approaches.

Authors:  Aaron J Buckland; Kimberly Ashayeri; Carlos Leon; Ivan Cheng; J Alex Thomas; Brett Braly; Brian Kwon; Leon Eisen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.721

6.  Development of a decision-making pathway for utilizing standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Dominik Adl Amini; Manuel Moser; Lisa Oezel; Jiaqi Zhu; Jennifer Shue; Andrew A Sama; Frank P Cammisa; Federico P Girardi; Alexander P Hughes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 2.721

Review 7.  Spinal exposure for anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in the lateral decubitus position: anatomical and technical considerations.

Authors:  Aaron J Buckland; Carlos Leon; Kimberly Ashayeri; Ivan Cheng; J Alex Thomas; Brett Braly; Brian Kwon; Constance Maglaras; Leon Eisen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.721

Review 8.  Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: What Is the Evidence of Indirect Neural Decompression? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Matteo Formica; Emanuele Quarto; Andrea Zanirato; Lorenzo Mosconi; Davide Vallerga; Irene Zotta; Maddalena Lontaro Baracchini; Carlo Formica; Lamberto Felli
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-03-20

Review 9.  Spinal Biologics in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Surgery.

Authors:  Kevin Y Chang; Wellington K Hsu
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2018-04-05

10.  Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Results of Mini-Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion Indirect Decompression for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Yutaka Kono; Hogaku Gen; Yoshio Sakuma; Yasuhide Koshika
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.