| Literature DB >> 35551223 |
Cécilia Barouillet1,2, Valentin Vasselon3,4,5, François Keck3,4, Laurent Millet6, David Etienne4,7, Didier Galop8,9, Damien Rius6, Isabelle Domaizon10,11.
Abstract
Ciliates are unicellular heterotrophic organisms that play a key role in aquatic planktonic and benthic food webs. Advances in sedimentary DNA (sed-DNA) analysis offer the possibility to integrate these bioindicators in paleoenvironmental reconstructions. In this study, we used the top-bottom paleolimnological approach and metabarcoding techniques applied to sed-DNA to compare the recent and past (i.e. prior to major anthropogenic impacts) ciliate communities of 48 lakes located along an elevation gradient. Our results show an overall decline in the β-diversity in recent time, especially in lowland lakes, which are more strongly exposed to local human pressures. Analyses of the functional groups indicate important restructuration of the food web, including the recent increase in mixotrophs. Moreover, changes in the benthic ciliates were consistent with the widespread increase in deep water anoxia. Our results provided evidence that sed-DNA can uncover information about past ciliate communities on a wide variety of lakes. Overall, our study demonstrates the potential of using ciliates as new paleoindicators, integrating information from the pelagic to the benthic zones, and providing valuable insights into ecosystem functioning through a trait-based functional community approach. As paleoindicator, they thus offer a more holistic view on the long-term changes of aquatic ecosystems.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35551223 PMCID: PMC9098483 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12041-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Location of the 48 studied lakes. The colours correspond to associated elevation range (cf. legend), the grey gradient illustrates the elevation terrain (DEM;
source: https://srtm.csi.cgiar.org/) within the geopolitical boarders of France.
Figure 2(a) NMDS of the community composition of the recent (grey dots) and past (purple dots) samples with the 95% confidence ellipses represented for each group. The past samples are labelled with their corresponding lake code (cf. Table S3), the grey lines connect recent and past samples from the same lake. Note: some labels are missing to avoid overlapping labels. (b) Spider plot showing the location of the geometric median of each group (i.e. past and recent) and illustrating the distance of the recent and past samples related to the geometric median of their respective group. (c) Distribution of the distances between samples and group geometric median (i.e. centroid) for recent and past samples, the geometric median of each group is indicated by the dotted line.
Figure 3Distribution of the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity coefficients between recent and past samples (black dot) according to lake elevation (m). The fitted regression tree model (n = 48 lakes) identified a split at 1400 m and is represented by black lines (mean values). Gray shading represents the 95% confidence intervals around the means.
Figure 4Dendrogram illustrating the results from the hierarchical cluster analysis. On the right side of the figure, the ciliate community composition is represented as the relative abundance of classes and subclasses (% of DNA reads). The sample labels correspond to the lake code (cf. Table S3) followed by “_T” or “_B” indicating the recent (i.e. “top”, in blue) or past (i.e. “bottom”, in red) samples respectively. In the legend, ClassName_NA was used whenever the Subclass could not be assigned.
Figure 5Amplitude of change in the functional groups between the recent and past samples according to (a) the feeding ecology and (b) limnetic habitat preferences. Magnitude of change is expressed in log2 fold change, as estimated by the DESeq2 analysis (n = 48 lakes). Dark green bars represent groups for which the change was found significant according to the two-sided Wald test corrected with the Benjamini and Hochberg method (p-value < 0.05), while the light grey bars represent groups for which the change was not significant. Horizontal lines show the standard error.
Description of the ciliates functional traits categories.
| Categories associated with the limnetic habitat | Benthic (oxic conditions) | Ciliates that can be found in the littoral zone or well-oxygenated bottoms (some of these benthic ciliates can migrated to the anoxic–oxic layer of the pelagic zone when the bottom of the lake become anoxic during stratification periods) |
| Commensals or Parasites | Freshwater ciliates that are either endocommensals of bivalves or ectocommensals of fish, or parasites of fish | |
| Facultative or obligate anaerobe | Facultative or obligate anaerobe living in the benthic environment but also includes some taxa able to live in anaerobic deep waters | |
| Pelagic | Euplanktonic ciliates | |
| Sessile | Ciliates for which their life cycle includes a stage attached to a substrate (usually stalked ciliates) | |
| Categories associated with foraging strategies | Herbivorous | Algivores |
| Bacterivores | Ciliates that exclusively feed on bacteria, these ciliates are usually associated with the benthic environment or found in the metalimnion of highly productive lakes | |
| Predators | Regroup: (1) Ciliates that feed on other ciliates or even small metazoans; (2) Omnivorous ciliates feeding on algae, bacteria and other small ciliates | |
| Commensals and parasites | Regroup parasites, bacterivores and histophage ciliates; commensals and parasitic ciliates were kept separated, as they are more likely to be directly influenced by the presence/absence of their hosts rather than influenced by changes in the biotic and abiotic factors of the surrounding environment | |
| Fungivorous | This category contains only one species found in our samples | |
| Mixotrophs | Phagotrophic ciliates that harbor algal endosymbionts or sequester plastids from their algal prey; mixotrophic ciliates thus tend to be also algivores |