Yuening Li1, Shanxue Jiang2, Ting Wang1, Yingchao Lin1, Hongjun Mao1. 1. Center for Urban Transport Emission Research, State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Urban Ambient Air Particulate Matter Pollution Prevention and Control, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University Tianjin 300071 China wangting@nankai.edu.cn dei@nankai.edu.cn hongjun_mao@hotmail.com +86-22-23504912. 2. Barrer Centre, Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London London SW7 2AZ UK.
Nowadays, environmental pollution and energy shortage are the two major global challenges in the world. According to WHO,[1] about 3 million deaths per year are related to the outdoor air pollution. Besides, soil pollution can seriously damage the ecosystem and is harmful to human health.[2] About 80.0% of global wastewater is released into the environment without treatment and polluted drinking water and poor sanitation conditions have led to 80 million deaths worldwide in 2012.[3] Regarding the energy shortage, the primary energy consumption has been increasing continuously globally,[4] and the global reserves of oil, gas and coal will be exhausted in 25, 27 and 97 years, respectively.[5] In order to solve these problems, many research efforts involving various methods have been made, and among these, biochar has drawn significant attention. According to the International Biochar Initiative,[6] biochar is defined as a solid material obtained from the thermochemical conversion of biomass in an oxygen-limited environment. Biochar, an alternative name for charcoal, is used widely in several areas, e.g., fuel energy. Biochar has many applications, which include solid biofuel,[7-9] carbon sequestration,[10] water or air pollutant adsorbents,[11-14] catalysts,[15-17] and soil amendments.[18]With the development of science and technology, people living in this age (the big data era) are surrounded by an incredible amount of information and usually have much more and easier methods to get information than they did several decades before. Even though big data can provide convenience, it can also cause confusion. For example, there are plenty of journals publishing hundreds or even thousands of new papers every year concerning biochar. Traditional reviews mainly focus on the small specific field, so people cannot easily consider or judge a special research area from the macroscale. Fortunately, scientometric evaluations based on big data can make up for this shortage.[19] For the reasons discussed above, biochar is a hot research topic that has been shown a lot of interest from researchers. Even though Coelho et al.[20] used the scientometric approach to study the research status concerning macroalgal biomass as a source of biofuel feedstock, there is no scientometric paper about the entire biochar research area on the web of science. It is therefore urgent and necessary to provide a timely update, and the aim of this paper is to utilize a scientometric approach to provide a comprehensive statistical evaluation of the research on biochar published and indexed over the last two decades (from 1998 to 2017).
Materials and methods
The data concerning biochar were obtained from the database of the Web of Science Core Collection using the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) on March 28th, 2018. The time range is from 1998 to 2017, and the search terms used in this paper were (“Charcoal*” OR “biochar*” OR “bio-char*”). According to the research results, the number of publications that met these search criteria was 18 908. Then, the “Save to other file formats” option was selected, and full records of these publications were downloaded as .txt files with the Tab-delimited (Win, UTF-8) file format, then several software programs such as Microsoft Excel, SPSS, BibExcel, and Gephi, Originlab Pro 2017 etc. were used to analyze the obtained original data. Detailed data processing procedures were available elsewhere.[19] In this paper, several major parts of these full records were studied, including document types, titles, languages, publication years, publishers, countries, keywords, citations, and research areas.
Results and discussion
Document types
These 18 908 publications were divided into 12 document types, namely article, proceedings paper, review, meeting abstract, letter, editorial material, news item, correction, book chapter, reprint, book review and biographical-item. Due to the relatively small numbers, letters, editorial materials, news items and corrections were classified as ‘others’. As shown in Fig. 1, the main type of these publications was articles, accounting for 87.7% of the total. The second and third document types were proceedings and review papers, and the percentages of these two document types were 4.98% and 3.89%, respectively. The fourth and fifth document types were meeting abstracts and others, accounting for 1.73% and 1.72%, respectively.
Fig. 1
Percentage distribution of document types.
The order of document types was similar to previous scientometric research in other research areas.[21,22] Compared with other document types, articles could better reflect the progress of the biochar area, and it was also the dominant type of these 18 908 publications; therefore, the following analysis is based on articles only.
Publishing languages
The distribution of publishing languages in these articles is shown in Fig. 2. The results demonstrated that 96.8% (16 052) of the articles were written and published in English, followed by Portuguese with 1.01%. Other languages accounted for 2.16% (358) of the total articles. The results are consistent with most researchers' expectations, after all, most SCI journals are published in English. For this reason, language cannot be used as an indicator to judge the interests of different countries concerning biochar. However, it can be inferred that The Portuguese Republic and Brazil, which are two major Portuguese-speaking countries, had good performance in biochar research.
Fig. 2
Number of publications in different languages.
Publishing trend
The publishing trend for articles is shown in Fig. 3. On the whole, over 16 000 articles were published on the topic of biochar, which demonstrated that researchers had a great interest in this research field. From 1998 to 2003, the annual numbers of publications on this topic were similar, and about 400 articles were published every year. From 2005 to 2009, there was a slow increase in annual publications. However, from 2010 to 2017, there was an obvious increase in the annual number of publications, and the max annual publications number reached over 2200 in 2017. According solely to the publishing trend, before 2009, global researchers did not widely realize the importance of biochar, and their interest in biochar was limited. Under the global environmental pollution and energy shortage situation, it might be the various applications and relatively low cost of biochar that promoted its development. Besides, there was no increment plateau as shown in Fig. 3, which means that more articles might be published every year in the future. In order to better show the increment trend, the fitting method[23] was used to calculate the relation between the cumulative number of publications and years (eqn (1) with R2 = 0.9923). According to the equation, the cumulative number of articles concerning biochar from 1998 to 2020 will exceed 20 400. It should be pointed out that although the quadratic fitting method is commonly adopted by researchers to make predictions due to its simplicity, it has its limitations. Strictly speaking, it is not accurate from the perspective of data analysis because it involves a special kind of data analysis, namely time series data analysis. To be more specific, a further residual analysis often reveals autocorrelation of the residuals rather than normal distribution, the latter of which is usually an assumption of regression analysis.where Y represents the cumulative number of publications, X represents years.
Fig. 3
Number of publications per year and the cumulative number of publications on biochar from 1998 to 2017.
Publishing journals
The 16 578 articles researched in this study came from 2655 different journals. However, considering the cumulative number of articles concerning biochar for each journal, 87.6% of the journals had less than 10 articles published during the past two decades. The information from the top 20 most publishing journals is summarized in Table 1. The total number of publications concerning biochar from these 20 journals was 3285, accounting for 19.8% of the total publications in the 20 years span. For these 20 journals, the average number of articles published on the topic of biochar was 164.3 over the past 20 years. As suggested by Table 1, the top three most common publishers were Elsevier, Springer and American Chemical Society (ACS), and Elsevier had the dominating number of journals compared with the other two publishers. The 20 journals spread across 4 countries, and the United Kingdom occupied first place, taking up 40.0%. Besides, all these four countries are developed countries, which possibly indicates that there is a long way for developing countries to create their top journals concerning biochar. As revealed by Table 1 and Fig. 4, Bioresource Technology had the most articles published (417) and its H-index (64) was also the highest, while the H-indexes of other journals were in total less than 60. Moreover, the total number of citations of Bioresource Technology (14 117) was the highest. Nevertheless, in reference to the average number of citations per paper, Environmental Science & Technology occupied the first place, with the H-index being equal to 59. According to Fig. 4, the H-index had a good linear relation with an average number of citations per paper, with the Pearson correlation being significant at the 0.01 level and R2 being equal to 0.814. The number of publications per year for the top 20 most publishing journals is shown in Fig. 5. In summary, the publication trends for these 20 journals were similar to the cumulative number of publications shown in Fig. 3. However, for these 20 journals, there was a rapid increment from 2007, while the rapid increment of the total 2655 journals was from 2009. Therefore, these 20 most publishing journals could basically reflect the development trend of biochar research. Besides, the publications of four journals had a high rapid increment in the past three years, including Bioresource Technology, Chemosphere, Science of the Total Environment and Quaternary International.
Top 20 most publishing journals
ID No.
Journal name
Article numbers
Publisher
Country
1
Bioresource Technology
417
Elsevier
Netherlands
2
Holocene
282
Sagepub
United Kingdom
3
Chemosphere
236
Elsevier
United Kingdom
4
Science of the Total Environment
188
Elsevier
Netherlands
5
Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
184
Elsevier
Netherlands
6
Environmental Science & Technology
176
ACS
United States
7
Quaternary International
165
Elsevier
United Kingdom
8
Journal of Archaeological Science
147
Elsevier
United Kingdom
9
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
146
Springer
Germany
10
Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology
138
Elsevier
Netherlands
11
Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
132
Springer
United States
12
Quaternary Science Reviews
127
Elsevier
United Kingdom
13
Journal of Environmental Management
126
Elsevier
United Kingdom
14
Environmental Pollution
121
Elsevier
United Kingdom
15
Energy & Fuels
120
ACS
United States
16
PLoS One
119
PLOS
United States
17
Biomass & Bioenergy
118
Elsevier
United Kingdom
18
Journal of Hazardous Materials
115
Elsevier
Netherlands
19
Quaternary Research
115
Elsevier
United States
20
Fuel
113
Elsevier
United Kingdom
Fig. 4
Total number of citations, average number of citations per paper, and H-index of the top 20 most publishing journals.
Fig. 5
Number of publications per year for the top 20 most publishing journals.
Publishing countries/regions
Viewing these 16 578 articles from the angle of publishing countries or regions, 154 countries or regions published at least one article on the topic of biochar during the past 20 years. As shown in Fig. 6, in general, the percentage of collaborative articles was 71.9%, which was much higher than that of independent articles. Further analysis found that the number of international collaborative articles was almost 1.5 times that of national collaborative articles. It was obviously seen from the situation that international cooperation was common and important in the biochar research area. In order to study the global articles distribution and country cooperation in detail, the global articles distribution and cooperation network map is shown in Fig. 7. It revealed that there were 38 countries or regions that published more than 100 articles in the 20 years span. Except for Antarctica, all the other continents had articles concerning biochar published during the 20 years period, which revealed that the biochar research is a hot research topic worldwide. According to Fig. 7, North America, East Asia, Western Europe, East South America and Oceania published more articles compared with other areas. It might be the larger energy consumption of these areas that caused the differences in research interests, which could have further led to the different publishing distributions. Among these counties or regions, the United States and China were the top two most publishing countries, and published 3625 and 2984 articles, respectively. The sum of articles for the United States and China accounted for 29.0% of the total articles. The green lines in Fig. 7 mean the cooperation between two countries or regions, and the width of the line means the cooperation times. As suggested by Fig. 7, the United States had the largest and most complicated cooperation net. Among these countries and regions, the USA had the most fruitful collaborations with China. The cooperation between the UK and USA, and between Germany and the USA occupied the second and third places, respectively.
Fig. 6
Percentage distribution of cooperation.
Fig. 7
Global article distribution and cooperation network map (countries or regions with collaborations of more than 50 times are connected by lines).
Because the USA and China were the top two most publishing countries, the growth trends for articles and citations per year in the USA and China from 1998 to 2017 were further investigated (Fig. 8). As for the growth trends of articles, the average numbers of articles per year were relatively lower for both countries during the 2002–2010 time period. The correlation between the USA and China for the growth trends of articles was negative from 1998 to 2003, while the correlation became positive since 2004. Generally, the USA had more articles published in most years, but China has undergone a rapid increment in the number of articles since 2010 and reached the highest number (802) in 2017. This progress was possibly due to more attention being directed toward environmental problems and increasing investments in scientific research.[24] From the perspective of average citations per article, China was higher than the USA in 11 years during the 20 years span. The average number of citations per article for the USA (19.13) was higher than that of China (15.55) during the 20 years period. However, it did not mean that the USA had a greater percentage of high-quality articles because China published much more articles than the USA in 2017 and the articles published in 2017 had relatively lower citations due to the time.
Fig. 8
The growth trends of articles and citations per year in the USA and China from 1998 to 2017.
Publishing institutes
The number of records containing publishing institutes was 16 527. According to these records, as a whole, over 10 000 institutes took part in the publication of articles on the topic of biochar, and 76 institutes contributed no less than 50 articles in the past 20 years span. As shown in Table 2, the Chinese Academy of Sciences published the most articles (554) among a huge number of research institutes. The United States Department of Agriculture-Agriculture Research Service (USDA-ARS) and Zhejiang University occupied the second and third places. The number of articles from the Chinese Academy of Sciences exceeded the sum from USDA-ARS and Zhejiang University. The total number of citations per institute, average number of citations per paper, and H-index of the top 20 most publishing research institutes are shown in Fig. 9. In terms of the H-index, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and USDA-ARS were both 51.0, the highest of the top 20 most publishing research institutes. However, regarding the average number of citations per paper (ANCPP) for these 20 institutes, Cornell University had a much better performance (83.7). The ANCPP for other institutes was no more than 55.0. Besides, Cornell University was the only research institute that the ANCPP was higher than the H-index, which means that the percentage of highly cited articles from Cornell University was higher.
Top 20 most publishing research institutes
ID No.
Research institute
Article numbers
Country
1
Chinese Academy of Sciences
554
China
2
USDA-ARS
296
USA
3
Zhejiang University
175
China
4
Spanish National Research Council
163
Spain
5
University of Florida
152
USA
6
Cornell University
127
USA
7
University of Sao Paulo
127
Brazil
8
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
119
China
9
University of Illinois
115
USA
10
Kangwon National University
112
South Korea
11
Nanjing Agriculture University
108
China
12
University of Bern
105
Switzerland
13
The National Center for Scientific Research
95
France
14
University of Oxford
94
UK
15
The University of Queensland
94
Australia
16
The Australian National University
93
Australia
17
University of Minnesota
93
USA
18
The University of Edinburgh
91
UK
19
Federal University of Vicosa
90
Brazil
20
The University of Newcastle
88
Australia
Fig. 9
Total number of citations per institute, average number of citations per paper, and H-index of the top 20 most publishing research institutes.
Over 60% of the articles were published as a result of the cooperation between at least two research institutes. Furthermore, 501 pairs of institutes took part in the publication of articles and published one or more articles together. Among these institutes, the connection between Chinese Academy of Sciences and University of Chinese Academy of Sciences was the strongest and they published 36 articles together. However, the cooperation times for other institutes were no more than 10. As suggested by Fig. 10, in summary, the cooperation among these research institutes was not strong, and the network graph is relatively simple and clear. Among the top 20 most publishing research institutes, Chinese Academy of Sciences and USDA-ARS ranked top two in terms of the cooperation times, and both had collaborations with 4 different research institutes. Interestingly, Chinese Academy of Sciences and USDA-ARS had good performances in publishing articles on the topic of biochar, but there was no cooperation between them. It is reasonable to infer that more studies will be published if the Chinese Academy of Sciences and USDA-ARS cooperate together in the future.
Fig. 10
Research Institute collaboration network graph (Institutes whose collaborations exceeded 5 times are connected by lines. The size and the color of the circles represent the number of research institutes connected; a bigger and brighter circle means that more research institutes were connected with this institute. The width and color of the connecting line represent the connection times; a thicker and brighter line means more connections between two institutes. 1-Chinese Academy of Sciences; 2-United States Department of Agriculture-Agriculture Research Service; 3-Zhejiang University).
Most-cited papers
The top 20 most-cited articles on the topic of biochar during the past 20 years period are summarized in Table 3, and citations, journal name, research category and published year (shown in reference column in Table 3) were collected as well. It should be noted that the research categories in Table 3 are not mutually exclusive, and were the major research direction of one article. For instance, an article may have also involved materials analysis but the major aim or direction of the article was soil remediation. Hence, the research category of this article was also classified as soil remediation instead of materials. As revealed in Table 3, the biochar had a lot of applications and the research categories were also various, while the materials were the most studied. Besides, the citations number for the materials was the highest among the 9 research categories. From the perspective of the journal, it was obvious that the article published in Nature had the highest citation number, while Environmental Science & Technology had the most articles (4) that were selected as the top 20 most-cited articles.
Top 20 most-cited articles
No.
Citations
Journal name
Research category
Reference
1
1973
Nature
Material
25
2
863
Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Medicine
26
3
706
Environmental Science & Technology
Material
27
4
694
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Material
28
5
693
Forest Ecology and Management
Forestry
29
6
685
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy
30
7
660
Plant and Soil
Agriculture
31
8
611
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Energy
32
9
534
Nature Communications
Geochemistry & geophysics
33
10
533
Australian Journal of Soil Research
Soil remediation
34
11
527
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy
35
12
524
Advances in Environmental Research
Water treatment
36
13
516
Environmental Science & Technology
Water treatment
37
14
451
Organic Geochemistry
Geochemistry & geophysics
38
15
443
Plant and Soil
Agriculture
39
16
438
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
Soil remediation
40
17
438
Environmental Science & Technology
Water treatment
41
18
431
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
Soil biology
42
19
415
Plant and Soil
Agriculture
43
20
413
Environmental Science & Technology
Materials
44
Title analysis
As suggested by Fig. 11, for the occurrence frequency, “biochar” and “charcoal” occupied the first and second place, respectively. This was due to biochar and charcoal being the research terms and also the topics of this paper and was in agreement with the expectation. The third highest frequency word was “soil”, which indicated that research concerning soil was the most frequent subfield. This was reasonable because it was demonstrated that land degradation would have a great negative influence on the food security and crop yields worldwide.[45] The reasons causing land degradation were various, including growing exhaustive crops, using too much chemical fertilizers and using improper agriculture practices.[46,47] Biochar had some good characteristics, including being rich in nutrients, improving the nutrient utilization efficiency of crops, adjusting soil pH and removal of soil pollutants, etc.[48-52] Due to these characteristics, biochar could improve the soil quality, thus the research concerning biochar and soil(s) were relatively hotter. The further analysis of these 2062 articles containing soil or soils revealed that “carbon” and “effects” were the first and second most used words, after soil(s) and biochar. Therefore, research concerning carbon and biochar effects were the most frequently studied in the soil subfield during the past 20 years. Besides, “activated”, “adsorption”, “removal” and “production” were another four common words appearing in the titles. It is possible that related researches were also hot subfields of biochar. In order to get a comprehensive analysis, the keyword analysis was also studied and showed similar results to Section 3.7 and 3.8. The information is given in detail in the ESI.†
Fig. 11
Word cloud generated from the top 500 titles based on frequency.
Research category analysis
In this section, the research categories discussed were defined by the Web of Science as shown in the SC column. There were 16 572 articles having research categories classified by the Web of Science, and these articles came from 124 different research areas. The total number of appearances of these research categories was 27 811, and every article had 1.68 categories on average. ESE (environmental sciences & ecology), AGR (agriculture), CHE (chemistry) and ENG (engineering) were the top four most common research categories and the only four categories that appeared over 2000 times. Besides, the total appearance time of these four research categories were 10 652, which reached 38.30% of the total appearance times of entire articles. The numbers of articles and average citations per paper in the top four research categories every year from 1998 to 2017 were analyzed (Fig. 12). For these four research categories, in most of the years, there were more articles published than former years. Besides, the increment rate of ESE was the most rapid among these four categories. From the viewpoint of average citations per paper for these four categories, the trend was similar. The average number of citations per paper for ESE was higher than that of AGR before 2002, while the situation was the opposite after 2002. The average number of citations per paper for CHE was lower compared to ENG, and occupied fourth place among these four research categories. Further analysis found that some articles concerning soil and soil remediation were classified as agriculture by the Web of Science, and the serious land degradation situation discussed in Section 3.7 might explain the growth trend for agriculture articles.
Fig. 12
Number of articles and average citations per paper in the top four research categories every year from 1998 to 2017.
Conclusion
In this article, a comprehensive statistical study was conducted based on the 18 908 publications related to biochar by using the scientometric approach. Over 16 000 articles were published on the topic of biochar, accounting for 87.7% of the total publications, which demonstrated that researchers had a great interest in this research field. Besides, about 96.8% (16 052) of the articles were written and published in English, followed by Portuguese with 1.01%. The increment speed of the annual number of publications was rapid from 2010 to 2017, and it was predicted that the cumulative number of articles concerning biochar will reach 20 000 by 2020. The articles researched in this study came from 2655 different journals, and Bioresource Technology had the most related articles published, the highest H-index and the most total citations. Viewing these articles from the angle of publishing countries or regions, 154 countries or regions published at least one article, and all the continents except Antarctica had articles published during the 20 years period. The percentage of collaborative articles was 71.9%, and the cooperation between the USA and China was the most fruitful. Besides, the Chinese Academy of Sciences was the most publishing research institute. Also, over 60% of the articles were published as a result of institute cooperation, and the connection between the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences was the strongest. From the publishing journal perspective, the articles published in Nature had the highest number of citations, while Environmental Science & Technology had the most articles (4) that were selected as the top 20 most-cited articles. ESE, AGR, CHE and ENG were the top four most common research categories among the 124 categories. Furthermore, the AGR category had the highest number of average citations for these top four categories.
Authors: Jawaria Sadaf; Ghulam Abbas Shah; Khurram Shahzad; Nadeem Ali; Muhammad Shahid; Safdar Ali; Rai Altaf Hussain; Zammurad Iqbal Ahmed; Bouba Traore; Iqbal M I Ismail; Muhammad Imtiaz Rashid Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Joanne van Ryn; Joachim Stangier; Sebastian Haertter; Karl-Heinz Liesenfeld; Wolfgang Wienen; Martin Feuring; Andreas Clemens Journal: Thromb Haemost Date: 2010-03-29 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: Dominic Woolf; James E Amonette; F Alayne Street-Perrott; Johannes Lehmann; Stephen Joseph Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2010-08-10 Impact factor: 14.919