| Literature DB >> 35546882 |
Chunyu Ruan1, Xiang Mao2,3,4,5,6, Shuohua Chen1, Shouling Wu1, Wei Wang2,3,4,5,6.
Abstract
Objective: The relationship between subclinical atherosclerosis and hearing impairment (HI) has not been widely considered. Brachial ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) is a good indicator of muscular artery elasticity and could be a feasible method to screen for subclinical atherosclerosis. Our study aimed to elucidate the relationship between baPWV and HI.Entities:
Keywords: PTA; baPWV; cross-sectional survey; hearing impairment; subclinical atherosclerosis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35546882 PMCID: PMC9082793 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.813628
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 5.152
Comparison of physical examination data, PTA, and HI detection rates for each baPWV quartile group.
| Variable | First quartile group | Second quartile group | Third quartile group | Fourth quartile group | |
| Age, years | 38.36 ± 9.17 | 42.18 ± 8.43 | 44.60 ± 7.90 | 47.90 ± 7.10 | <0.001 |
| SBP, mmHg | 121.64 ± 12.18 | 126.85 ± 12.51 | 131.67 ± 13.62 | 139.24 ± 15.59 | <0.001 |
| DBP, mmHg | 76.59 ± 8.85 | 80.49 ± 8.94 | 83.49 ± 9.34 | 87.97 ± 9.92 | <0.001 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 24.85 ± 3.73 | 25.06 ± 3.35 | 25.25 ± 3.20 | 25.38 ± 5.53 | <0.001 |
| TC, mmol/L | 4.45 ± 1.38 | 4.75 ± 1.43 | 4.91 ± 1.53 | 5.01 ± 1.53 | <0.001 |
| HDL-C, mmol/L | 1.34 ± 0.37 | 1.36 ± 0.58 | 1.38 ± 0.60 | 1.40 ± 0.56 | <0.001 |
| FBG, mmol/L | 5.21 ± 1.11 | 5.36 ± 1.09 | 5.56 ± 1.39 | 5.98 ± 2.01 | <0.001 |
| Smoking, n (%) | 1,278 (55.3) | 1,352 (57.3) | 1,360 (58.4) | 1,383 (60.9) | <0.001 |
| Alcohol consumption, n (%) | 158 (5.7) | 168 (6.0) | 196 (7.0) | 313 (11.2) | <0.001 |
| Physical exercise, n (%) | 122 (4.4) | 129 (4.6) | 128 (4.6) | 135 (4.8) | 0.46 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 284 (10.2) | 546 (19.7) | 919 (32.9) | 1,511 (54.2) | <0.001 |
| Diabetes, n (%) | 61 (2.2) | 124 (4.5) | 205 (7.3) | 395 (14.2) | <0.001 |
| Noise exposure, n (%) | 927 (34.3) | 759 (28.2) | 793 (29.1) | 736 (27.4) | <0.001 |
| PTA, dBnHL | 18.95 ± 8.27 | 20.12 ± 9.59 | 20.58 ± 10.46 | 22.51 ± 12.50 | <0.001 |
| HI, n (%) | 284 (10.2) | 405 (14.6) | 476 (17.0) | 656 (23.5) | <0.001 |
SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; BMI, body mass index; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol; FBG, fasting blood glucose; PTA, pure-tone average hearing threshold. The Cochran–Armitage trend test determined the p-value for a trend of categorical data changing in different subgroups, and the p-value for a trend of quantitative data changing in different subgroups was determined by linear regression analysis.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis of baPWV quartile groups for HI.
| Model | Factor | SE | Wald | OR | 95% CI | ||
| Model 1 | First quartile group | 1.00 | |||||
| Second quartile group | 0.41 | 0.08 | 24.23 | <0.001 | 1.50 | 1.28–1.77 | |
| Third quartile group | 0.59 | 0.08 | 54.16 | <0.001 | 1.81 | 1.54–2.11 | |
| Fourth quartile group | 1.00 | 0.77 | 167.74 | <0.001 | 2.71 | 2.33–3.15 | |
| Model 2 | First quartile group | 1.00 | |||||
| Second quartile group | 0.15 | 0.09 | 2.77 | 0.096 | 1.16 | 0.97–1.37 | |
| Third quartile group | 0.12 | 0.09 | 1.97 | 0.160 | 1.13 | 0.95–1.33 | |
| Fourth quartile group | 0.27 | 0.08 | 10.75 | 0.001 | 1.31 | 1.12–1.54 | |
| Model 3 | First quartile group | 1.00 | |||||
| Second quartile group | 0.15 | 0.10 | 2.25 | 0.134 | 1.16 | 0.96–1.41 | |
| Third quartile group | 0.10 | 0.10 | 1.13 | 0.289 | 1.11 | 0.92–1.35 | |
| Fourth quartile group | 0.29 | 0.10 | 8.30 | 0.004 | 1.33 | 1.10–1.62 | |
| Model 4 | baPWV × age | −0.21 | 0.08 | 7.80 | 0.005 | 0.81 | 0.70–0.94 |
| baPWV × hypertension | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.24 | 0.627 | 1.03 | 0.91–1.18 | |
| baPWV × diabetes | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.34 | 0.557 | 1.06 | 0.86–1.31 | |
| baPWV × dyslipidemia | 0.10 | 0.06 | 2.31 | 0.129 | 1.10 | 0.97–1.24 |
Model 1: HI was defined as the dependent variable, and baPWV quartiles were defined as the independent variables (using the first quartile as the control group), and logistic regression analysis was performed. Model 2: age was adjusted and added to model 1. Model 3: body mass index, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical exercise, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and noise exposure were adjusted and added to model 2. Model 4: on the basis of model 3, the interactions between baPWV quartiles and age, hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia, respectively, were corrected.
Multivariate logistic regression sensitivity analysis of baPWV quartile groups for HI.
| Factor | SE | Wald | OR | 95% CI | |||
| Model 1 | First quartile group | 1.00 | |||||
| Second quartile group | 0.13 | 0.11 | 1.23 | 0.267 | 1.14 | 0.91–1.42 | |
| Third quartile group | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.64 | 0.425 | 1.10 | 0.88–1.37 | |
| Fourth quartile group | 0.25 | 0.11 | 4.71 | 0.030 | 1.28 | 1.02–1.60 | |
| Model 2 | First quartile group | 1.00 | |||||
| Second quartile group | 0.17 | 0.11 | 2.32 | 0.128 | 1.18 | 0.95–1.46 | |
| Third quartile group | 0.18 | 0.11 | 2.71 | 0.100 | 1.20 | 0.97–1.49 | |
| Fourth quartile group | 0.25 | 0.12 | 4.44 | 0.035 | 1.29 | 1.02–1.63 | |
| Model 3 | First quartile group | 1.00 | |||||
| Second quartile group | 0.13 | 0.10 | 1.62 | 0.203 | 1.14 | 0.93–1.39 | |
| Third quartile group | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.48 | 0.489 | 1.07 | 0.88–1.31 | |
| Fourth quartile group | 0.26 | 0.10 | 6.38 | 0.012 | 1.30 | 1.06–1.59 | |
| Model 4 | First quartile group | 1.00 | |||||
| Second quartile group | 0.27 | 0.16 | 2.83 | 0.092 | 1.32 | 0.96–1.81 | |
| Third quartile group | <0.001 | 0.17 | <0.001 | 0.998 | 1.00 | 0.71–1.41 | |
| Fourth quartile group | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.95 | 0.329 | 1.20 | 0.83–1.73 |
Model 1: removed noise-exposed subjects. Model 2: removed the hypertensive population. Model 3: removed the diabetic population. Model 4: removed dyslipidemia population.
Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of HI in different age groups.
| Model | Factor | Age < 45 ( | Age ≥ 45 ( |
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | ||
| Model 1 | First quartile group | 1 | 1 |
| Second quartile group | 1.46 (1.01–2.11) | 1.06 (0.87–1.29) | |
| Third quartile group | 1.74 (1.20–2.52) | 0.99 (0.82–1.20) | |
| Fourth quartile group | 2.29 (1.54–3.42) | 1.15 (0.96–1.38) | |
| Model 2 | First quartile group | 1 | 1 |
| Second quartile group | 1.55 (1.04–2.31) | 1.04 (0.83–1.30) | |
| Third quartile group | 1.79 (1.18–2.72) | 0.96 (0.77–1.20) | |
| Fourth quartile group | 2.65 (1.68–4.19) | 1.13 (0.91–1.40) | |
| P for interaction | <0.001 | ||
Model 1: bivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted after age stratification (young subgroup: age < 45, non-young subgroup: age ≥ 45), with HI defined as the dependent variable and baPWV defined as the independent variable (the first quartile was the control group). Model 2: BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical exercise, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and noise exposure were adjusted.