Literature DB >> 35546781

Best practice for improved accuracy: A critical reassessment of van't Hoff analysis of melt curves.

Jacob M Majikes1, Michael Zwolak2, J Alexander Liddle3.   

Abstract

Biomolecular thermodynamics, particularly for DNA, are frequently determined via van't Hoff analysis of optically measured melt curves. Accurate and precise values of thermodynamic parameters are essential for the modeling of complex systems involving cooperative effects, such as RNA tertiary structure and DNA origami, because the uncertainties associated with each motif in a folding energy landscape can compound, significantly reducing the power of predictive models. We follow the sources of uncertainty as they propagate through a typical van't Hoff analysis to derive best practices for melt experiments and subsequent data analysis, assuming perfect signal baseline correction. With appropriately designed experiments and analysis, a van't Hoff approach can provide surprisingly high precision, e.g., enthalpies may be determined with a precision as low as 10-2 kJ ⋅ mol-1 for an 8-base DNA oligomer. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35546781      PMCID: PMC9247556          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   3.699


  43 in total

1.  Van't Hoff and calorimetric enthalpies from isothermal titration calorimetry: are there significant discrepancies?

Authors:  J R Horn; D Russell; E A Lewis; K P Murphy
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2001-02-13       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  A statistical sampling algorithm for RNA secondary structure prediction.

Authors:  Ye Ding; Charles E Lawrence
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Long RNA dangling end has large energetic contribution to duplex stability.

Authors:  Tatsuo Ohmichi; Shu-Ichi Nakano; Daisuke Miyoshi; Naoki Sugimoto
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-09-04       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Melting temperatures of nucleic acids: discrepancies in analysis.

Authors:  Richard Owczarzy
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 2.352

5.  The energy landscapes and motions of proteins.

Authors:  H Frauenfelder; S G Sligar; P G Wolynes
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Quantum method for fluorescence background removal in DNA melting analysis.

Authors:  Lindsay N Sanford; Jana O Kent; Carl T Wittwer
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Revealing thermodynamics of DNA origami folding via affine transformations.

Authors:  Jacob M Majikes; Paul N Patrone; Daniel Schiffels; Michael Zwolak; Anthony J Kearsley; Samuel P Forry; J Alexander Liddle
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Optical melting measurements of nucleic acid thermodynamics.

Authors:  Susan J Schroeder; Douglas H Turner
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 1.600

9.  High-throughput methods for measuring DNA thermodynamics.

Authors:  Jin H Bae; John Z Fang; David Yu Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  DINAMelt web server for nucleic acid melting prediction.

Authors:  Nicholas R Markham; Michael Zuker
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.