Literature DB >> 35546736

Prolonged casualty care: Extrapolating civilian data to the military context.

Nee-Kofi Mould-Millman1, Navneet Kaur Baidwan, Brenda Beaty, Krithika Suresh, Julia M Dixon, Chandni Patel, Shaheem de Vries, Hendrick J Lategan, Elmin Steyn, Janette Verster, Steven G Schauer, Tyson E Becker, Cord Cunningham, Sean Keenan, Ernest E Moore, Lee A Wallis, Adit A Ginde, Vikhyat S Bebarta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Civilian and military populations alike are increasingly faced with undesirable situations in which prehospital and definitive care times will be delayed. The Western Cape of South Africa has some similarities in capabilities, injury profiles, resource limitations, and system configuration to US military prolonged casualty care (PCC) settings. This study provides an initial description of civilians in the Western Cape who experience PCC and compares the PCC and non-PCC populations.
METHODS: We conducted a 6-month analysis of an ongoing, prospective, large-scale epidemiologic study of prolonged trauma care in the Western Cape (Epidemiology and Outcomes of Prolonged Trauma Care [EpiC]). We define PCC as ≥10 hours from injury to arrival at definitive care. We describe patient characteristics, critical interventions, key times, and outcomes as they may relate to military PCC and compare these using χ 2 and Wilcoxon tests. We estimated the associations between PCC status and the primary and secondary outcomes using logistic regression models.
RESULTS: Of 995 patients, 146 experienced PCC. The PCC group, compared with non-PCC, were more critically injured (66% vs. 51%), received more critical interventions (36% vs. 29%), and had a greater proportionate mortality (5% vs. 3%), longer hospital stays (3 vs. 1 day), and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores (5 vs. 3). The odds of 7-day mortality and a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of ≥5 were 1.6 (odds ratio, 1.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-3.74) and 3.6 (odds ratio, 3.69; 95% confidence interval, 2.11-6.42) times higher, respectively, in PCC versus non-PCC patients.
CONCLUSION: The EpiC study enrolled critically injured patients with PCC who received resuscitative interventions. Prolonged casualty care patients had worse outcomes than non-PCC. The EpiC study will be a useful platform to provide ongoing data for PCC relevant analyses, for future PCC-focused interventional studies, and to develop PCC protocols and algorithms. Findings will be relevant to the Western Cape, South Africa, other LMICs, and military populations experiencing prolonged care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management; Level IV.
Copyright © 2022 Written work prepared by employees of the Federal Government as part of their official duties is, under the U.S. Copyright Act, a “work of the United States Government” for which copyright protection under Title 17 of the United States Code is not available. As such, copyright does not extend to the contributions of employees of the Federal Government.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35546736      PMCID: PMC9323558          DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.697


  32 in total

1.  Ahead of the curve: Sustained innovation for future combat casualty care.

Authors:  Todd E Rasmussen; David G Baer; Andrew P Cap; Brian C Lein
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.313

2.  Reducing time-to-treatment decreases mortality of trauma patients with acute subdural hematoma.

Authors:  Homer C N Tien; Vincent Jung; Ruxandra Pinto; Todd Mainprize; Damon C Scales; Sandro B Rizoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Trauma registry comparison: six-year results in trauma care in Southern Finland and Germany.

Authors:  T Brinck; L Handolin; T Paffrath; R Lefering
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 4.  Acute renal failure complicating muscle crush injury.

Authors:  Z A Abassi; A Hoffman; O S Better
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.299

Review 5.  Management of non-compressible torso hemorrhage: An update.

Authors:  Zhi-Yang Zhang; Hua-Yu Zhang; Tomer Talmy; Yong Guo; Si-Ru Zhou; Lian-Yang Zhang; Yang Li
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2021-03-26

Review 6.  The acute management of trauma hemorrhage: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Nicola Curry; Sally Hopewell; Carolyn Dorée; Chris Hyde; Karim Brohi; Simon Stanworth
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Delayed interhospital transfer of critically ill patients with surgical sepsis.

Authors:  Tyler J Loftus; Quran Wu; Zhongkai Wang; Nicholas Lysak; Frederick A Moore; Azra Bihorac; Philip A Efron; Alicia M Mohr; Scott C Brakenridge
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.697

8.  Which score should be used for posttraumatic multiple organ failure? - Comparison of the MODS, Denver- and SOFA- Scores.

Authors:  Matthias Fröhlich; Arasch Wafaisade; Anastasios Mansuri; Paola Koenen; Christian Probst; Marc Maegele; Bertil Bouillon; Samir G Sakka
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 9.  Management of severe trauma worldwide: implementation of trauma systems in emerging countries: China, Russia and South Africa.

Authors:  Jing Zhou; Tianbing Wang; Igor Belenkiy; Timothy Craig Hardcastle; Jean-Jacques Rouby; Baoguo Jiang
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Faster on-scene times associated with decreased mortality in Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) transported trauma patients.

Authors:  Hannah Pham; Yana Puckett; Sharmila Dissanaike
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2017-10-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.