BACKGROUND: Suboptimal triage of critically ill patients with surgical sepsis may contribute to adverse outcomes. Patients transferred to a tertiary care center after spending 24 hours or longer at an outside facility were compared with patients who had early triage to a tertiary care center with the null hypothesis that management parameters and outcomes would be similar between groups. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study included 308 patients treated for surgical sepsis in a surgical intensive care unit at a tertiary care center. Patients transferred after spending more than 24 hours at an outside facility (n = 69) were compared with patients who were directly admitted or transferred within 24 hours (n = 239). Patient characteristics, management parameters, and outcomes were compared between groups. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02276066). RESULTS: Average outside facility length of stay in the delayed transfer group was 43 hours. Delayed transfer patients had higher sequential organ failure assessment (7 vs. 5, p = 0.003) and APACHE II scores (19 vs. 16, p = 0.007) on admission. The interval between admission and source control was significantly longer in the delayed transfer group (12.1 hours vs. 1.0 hours, p = 0.009). The incidence of nosocomial infection was significantly higher in the delayed transfer group (41% vs. 23%, p = 0.005). Delayed transfer was independently associated with a 10-day increase in hospital length of stay. Delayed transfer patients were less likely to be discharged home (22% vs. 59%, p < 0.001) and suffered twofold higher in-hospital mortality (14.5% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.056). CONCLUSION: Patients with surgical sepsis who spent more than 24 hours at an outside facility prior to transfer had greater initial illness severity, longer intervals between admission and source control, and more nosocomial infections compared with patients who had early triage to a tertiary care center. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Care management/therapeutic, Level IV; Epidemiologic/prognostic, Level III.
BACKGROUND: Suboptimal triage of critically ill patients with surgical sepsis may contribute to adverse outcomes. Patients transferred to a tertiary care center after spending 24 hours or longer at an outside facility were compared with patients who had early triage to a tertiary care center with the null hypothesis that management parameters and outcomes would be similar between groups. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study included 308 patients treated for surgical sepsis in a surgical intensive care unit at a tertiary care center. Patients transferred after spending more than 24 hours at an outside facility (n = 69) were compared with patients who were directly admitted or transferred within 24 hours (n = 239). Patient characteristics, management parameters, and outcomes were compared between groups. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02276066). RESULTS: Average outside facility length of stay in the delayed transfer group was 43 hours. Delayed transfer patients had higher sequential organ failure assessment (7 vs. 5, p = 0.003) and APACHE II scores (19 vs. 16, p = 0.007) on admission. The interval between admission and source control was significantly longer in the delayed transfer group (12.1 hours vs. 1.0 hours, p = 0.009). The incidence of nosocomial infection was significantly higher in the delayed transfer group (41% vs. 23%, p = 0.005). Delayed transfer was independently associated with a 10-day increase in hospital length of stay. Delayed transfer patients were less likely to be discharged home (22% vs. 59%, p < 0.001) and suffered twofold higher in-hospital mortality (14.5% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.056). CONCLUSION: Patients with surgical sepsis who spent more than 24 hours at an outside facility prior to transfer had greater initial illness severity, longer intervals between admission and source control, and more nosocomial infections compared with patients who had early triage to a tertiary care center. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Care management/therapeutic, Level IV; Epidemiologic/prognostic, Level III.
Authors: Chasen A Croft; Frederick A Moore; Philip A Efron; Peggy S Marker; Andrea Gabrielli; Lynn S Westhoff; Lawrence Lottenberg; Janeen Jordan; Victoria Klink; R Matthew Sailors; Bruce A McKinley Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Mitchell M Levy; Mitchell P Fink; John C Marshall; Edward Abraham; Derek Angus; Deborah Cook; Jonathan Cohen; Steven M Opal; Jean-Louis Vincent; Graham Ramsay Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Michael P DeWane; Kimberly A Davis; Kevin M Schuster; Scott P Erwin; Adrian A Maung; Robert D Becher Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Kirsi-Maija Kaukonen; Michael Bailey; David Pilcher; D Jamie Cooper; Rinaldo Bellomo Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tyler J Loftus; Juan C Mira; Tezcan Ozrazgat-Baslanti; Gabriella L Ghita; Zhongkai Wang; Julie A Stortz; Babette A Brumback; Azra Bihorac; Mark S Segal; Stephen D Anton; Christiaan Leeuwenburgh; Alicia M Mohr; Philip A Efron; Lyle L Moldawer; Frederick A Moore; Scott C Brakenridge Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Nee-Kofi Mould-Millman; Navneet Kaur Baidwan; Brenda Beaty; Krithika Suresh; Julia M Dixon; Chandni Patel; Shaheem de Vries; Hendrick J Lategan; Elmin Steyn; Janette Verster; Steven G Schauer; Tyson E Becker; Cord Cunningham; Sean Keenan; Ernest E Moore; Lee A Wallis; Adit A Ginde; Vikhyat S Bebarta Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2022-05-21 Impact factor: 3.697
Authors: Elizabeth Powell; Iana Sahadzic; Daniel Najafali; Emilie Berman; Katie Andersen; Leenah Z Afridi; Zoe Gasparotti; Erin Niles; Jeffrey Rea; Thomas Scalea; Daniel J Haase; Quincy K Tran Journal: Crit Care Res Pract Date: 2022-07-19