Einav Kadour-Peero1, Ido Feferkorn2, Veronique Bellemare2, Suha Arab2, William Buckett2. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. einavkadour@gmail.com. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) protocol on live-birth rate (LBR) and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), in single-vitrified-blastocyst transfer MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study with FET of a single-blastocyst embryos (n = 2920 cycles) thawed 2013-2018. FET protocols were natural cycles (NC-FET) (n = 147), artificial hormone replacement treatment cycles (HRT-FET) (n = 2645), and modified NC (mNC) with hCG triggering (n = 128). Primary outcome was LBR. Adjustment for age, embryo grade, year of freezing\thawing, infertility cause, and endometrial thickness was performed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to female age, embryo grade, and endometrial thickness. LBR was higher in the mNC compared to HRT-FET cycles (38.3% vs. 20.9% P < 0.0001), and in the NC compared to HRT-FET cycles (34.7% vs. 20.9%, P = 0.0002). CPR was higher in the mNC compared to HRT-FET cycles (46.1% vs. 33.3% P = 0.0003), and in the NC compared to HRT-FET cycles (45.9% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in LBR or CPR between NC-FET and mNC-FET. Higher LBR with NC-FET and mNC-FET remained significant after adjusting for confounders (aOR 2.42, 95%CI 1.53-3.66, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The use of the convenient artificial HRT-FET cycles must be cautiously reconsidered in light of the potential negative effect on LBR when compared with natural cycle FET.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) protocol on live-birth rate (LBR) and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), in single-vitrified-blastocyst transfer MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study with FET of a single-blastocyst embryos (n = 2920 cycles) thawed 2013-2018. FET protocols were natural cycles (NC-FET) (n = 147), artificial hormone replacement treatment cycles (HRT-FET) (n = 2645), and modified NC (mNC) with hCG triggering (n = 128). Primary outcome was LBR. Adjustment for age, embryo grade, year of freezing\thawing, infertility cause, and endometrial thickness was performed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to female age, embryo grade, and endometrial thickness. LBR was higher in the mNC compared to HRT-FET cycles (38.3% vs. 20.9% P < 0.0001), and in the NC compared to HRT-FET cycles (34.7% vs. 20.9%, P = 0.0002). CPR was higher in the mNC compared to HRT-FET cycles (46.1% vs. 33.3% P = 0.0003), and in the NC compared to HRT-FET cycles (45.9% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in LBR or CPR between NC-FET and mNC-FET. Higher LBR with NC-FET and mNC-FET remained significant after adjusting for confounders (aOR 2.42, 95%CI 1.53-3.66, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The use of the convenient artificial HRT-FET cycles must be cautiously reconsidered in light of the potential negative effect on LBR when compared with natural cycle FET.
Authors: Eva R Groenewoud; Astrid E P Cantineau; Boudewijn J Kollen; Nick S Macklon; Ben J Cohlen Journal: Hum Reprod Update Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 15.610
Authors: J Tan; A Kan; J Hitkari; B Taylor; N Tallon; G Warraich; A Yuzpe; G Nakhuda Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2018-01-11 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Tarek A Gelbaya; Luciano G Nardo; Cheryl T Fitzgerald; Greg Horne; Daniel R Brison; Brian A Lieberman Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2006-04-03 Impact factor: 7.329