Jacob Levron1, Gil M Yerushalmi, Masha Brengauz, Itai Gat, Eldad Katorza. 1. IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel, Affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University , Tel Aviv , Israel and.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: There are two most popular protocols for Frozen Embryo Transfer: the natural and the E2&P4 replacement cycles. There is still a controversy whether one is superior over the other. PURPOSE: To compare the outcome in patient groups undergoing FET following these protocols. METHODS: About 1235 FET cycles were retrospectively analyzed during a period of 12 years. In 798 cycles (group A), the natural cycle protocol was used, and in 437 cycles (group B), the exogenous E2&P4 administration protocol was used. RESULTS: The average patient age was 32.11 ± 0.27 years in group A and 32.94 ± 0.19 years in group B (p<0.05). The endometrial thickness was 9.54 ± 0.11 mm and 8.95 ± 0.13 mm in groups A and B, respectively (p<0.001). The peak serum E2 level was 162.51 ± 8.97 pg/mL and 250.78 ± 33.67 pg/mL in groups A and B, respectively (p<0.001). The implantation, clinical pregnancy, and ongoing pregnancy rates in groups A and B were 6.47%, 12.91%, and 10.4% versus 4.26%, 8.47%, and 5.95%, respectively (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Natural endometrial preparation yields better outcome in compare with exogenous E2&P4 in FET cycles with higher endometrial thickness, implantation, and clinical pregnancy rates.
INTRODUCTION: There are two most popular protocols for Frozen Embryo Transfer: the natural and the E2&P4 replacement cycles. There is still a controversy whether one is superior over the other. PURPOSE: To compare the outcome in patient groups undergoing FET following these protocols. METHODS: About 1235 FET cycles were retrospectively analyzed during a period of 12 years. In 798 cycles (group A), the natural cycle protocol was used, and in 437 cycles (group B), the exogenous E2&P4 administration protocol was used. RESULTS: The average patient age was 32.11 ± 0.27 years in group A and 32.94 ± 0.19 years in group B (p<0.05). The endometrial thickness was 9.54 ± 0.11 mm and 8.95 ± 0.13 mm in groups A and B, respectively (p<0.001). The peak serum E2 level was 162.51 ± 8.97 pg/mL and 250.78 ± 33.67 pg/mL in groups A and B, respectively (p<0.001). The implantation, clinical pregnancy, and ongoing pregnancy rates in groups A and B were 6.47%, 12.91%, and 10.4% versus 4.26%, 8.47%, and 5.95%, respectively (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Natural endometrial preparation yields better outcome in compare with exogenous E2&P4 in FET cycles with higher endometrial thickness, implantation, and clinical pregnancy rates.
Authors: Snigdha Alur-Gupta; Margaret Hopeman; Dara S Berger; Clarisa Gracia; Kurt T Barnhart; Christos Coutifaris; Suneeta Senapati Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 7.329