Salvador Zarco-Perello1,2, David Fairclough3, Chris Dowling3, Joey DiBattista4, Rachel Austin1, Thomas Wernberg1,5, Brett Taylor6. 1. School of Biological Sciences and UWA Oceans Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia. 2. Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia. 3. Western Australian Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories, Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Government of Western Australia, North Beach, WA, Australia. 4. Australian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 5. Institute of Marine Research, His, Norway. 6. University of Guam Marine Laboratory, UOG Station, Mangilao, GU, USA.
Abstract
Global warming is modifying the phenology, life-history traits and biogeography of species around the world. Evidence of these effects have increased over recent decades; however, we still have a poor understanding of the possible outcomes of their interplay across global climatic gradients, hindering our ability to accurately predict the consequences of climate change in populations and ecosystems. We examined the effect that changes in biogeography can have on the life-history traits of two of the most successful range-extending fish species in the world: the tropical rabbitfishes Siganus fuscescens and Siganus rivulatus. Both species have established abundant populations at higher latitudes in the northern and southern hemispheres and have been identified as important ecological engineers with the potential to alter the community structure of seaweed forests (Laminariales and Fucales) in temperate regions. Life-history trait information from across their global distribution was compiled from the published literature and meta-analyses were conducted to assess changes in (i) the onset and duration of reproductive periods, (ii) size at maturity, (iii) fecundity, (iv) growth rates, (v) maximum body sizes and (vi) longevity in populations at the leading edge of range expansion in relation to sea surface temperature and primary productivity (a common proxy for nutritional resource levels). Populations at highest latitudes had shortened their reproductive periods and reduced growth rates, taking longer to reach sexual maturity and maximum sizes, but compensated this with higher fecundity per length class and longer lifespans than populations in warmer environments. Low primary productivity and temperature in the Mediterranean Sea resulted in lower growth rates and body sizes for S. rivulatus, but also lower length at maturity, increasing life-time reproductive output. The results suggest that plasticity in the phenology and life-history traits of range-expanding species would be important to enhance their fitness in high latitude environments, facilitating their persistence and possible further poleward expansions. Quantifying the magnitude and direction of these responses can improve our understanding and ability to forecast species redistributions and its repercussions in the functioning of temperate ecosystems.
Global warming is modifying the phenology, life-history traits and biogeography of species around the world. Evidence of these effects have increased over recent decades; however, we still have a poor understanding of the possible outcomes of their interplay across global climatic gradients, hindering our ability to accurately predict the consequences of climate change in populations and ecosystems. We examined the effect that changes in biogeography can have on the life-history traits of two of the most successful range-extending fish species in the world: the tropical rabbitfishes Siganus fuscescens and Siganus rivulatus. Both species have established abundant populations at higher latitudes in the northern and southern hemispheres and have been identified as important ecological engineers with the potential to alter the community structure of seaweed forests (Laminariales and Fucales) in temperate regions. Life-history trait information from across their global distribution was compiled from the published literature and meta-analyses were conducted to assess changes in (i) the onset and duration of reproductive periods, (ii) size at maturity, (iii) fecundity, (iv) growth rates, (v) maximum body sizes and (vi) longevity in populations at the leading edge of range expansion in relation to sea surface temperature and primary productivity (a common proxy for nutritional resource levels). Populations at highest latitudes had shortened their reproductive periods and reduced growth rates, taking longer to reach sexual maturity and maximum sizes, but compensated this with higher fecundity per length class and longer lifespans than populations in warmer environments. Low primary productivity and temperature in the Mediterranean Sea resulted in lower growth rates and body sizes for S. rivulatus, but also lower length at maturity, increasing life-time reproductive output. The results suggest that plasticity in the phenology and life-history traits of range-expanding species would be important to enhance their fitness in high latitude environments, facilitating their persistence and possible further poleward expansions. Quantifying the magnitude and direction of these responses can improve our understanding and ability to forecast species redistributions and its repercussions in the functioning of temperate ecosystems.
Climate change is affecting the life‐histories of terrestrial and marine species across the globe (Pecl et al., 2017). Global warming is forecasted to be irreversible and continue until the end of the century (IPCC, 2021). Temperature is one of the strongest environmental factors affecting the life‐histories of living organisms, including physiology, morphology and behaviour (Brown et al., 2004; Sommer, 2020). Warming at the rear and core range distribution of species can reach upper critical thresholds for biological processes, leading to range contractions if populations lack the capacity to respond (Donelson et al., 2019; Hampe & Petit, 2005). Many species are responding to increases in temperatures earlier in the year by advancing their reproductive phenology, allowing their offspring to develop under the best thermal conditions during spring and summer (Burrows et al., 2011; Cohen et al., 2018). Recent evidence also suggests that species are decreasing their average body sizes as a consequence of warming (Baudron et al., 2014; Daufresne et al., 2009; Sheridan & Bickford, 2011). These changes align with the pervasive size‐temperature patterns for endotherms (Bergmann's Rule) and ectotherms around the globe (Temperature‐Size Rule), which describe a negative relationship between the body dimensions and temperature (Atkinson & Sibly, 1997; Meiri & Dayan, 2003). Biological explanations for these patterns are still debated today but it's generally hypothesized that smaller bodies could cope better with warming by experiencing less physiological stress related to heat‐exchange and oxygen‐supply for homeotherms and ectothermic aquatic organisms respectively (Verberk et al., 2021).Global warming is also facilitating the poleward range expansion of many species. Gradual increments in temperature and extreme climatic events, such as heatwaves, are making previously uninhabitable regions more favourable for warm‐affinity species at higher latitudes (i.e. poleward; Burrows et al., 2019). This has caused an increase in diversity at several temperate regions of the world, with predictions suggesting that this will accelerate in the future (Chaudhary et al., 2021). Changes in distribution can be beneficial for the conservation of species escaping thermal stress from lower latitudes (Urban, 2020); however, these can have important economic and ecological impacts. Range‐shifting can modify natural resources between nations (e.g. fisheries) and create novel biotic interactions that destabilize the functioning and environmental services of receptive ecosystems (Blois et al., 2013; Pecl et al., 2017). Thus, identifying biological traits and ecological processes that allow changes in distribution is currently an important field of research (Sunday et al., 2015; Zettlemoyer & Peterson, 2021).Populations at the leading edge of range‐expansion could experience modifications of their life‐history traits to maximize fitness in their novel environment (Atkinson & Sibly, 1997). While increases in mean temperature around the world are important, populations moving poleward would face thermal regimes with greater seasonal fluctuations of temperature (Amarasekare & Simon, 2020; Carbonell et al., 2021). Winters tend to be more severe and longer at higher latitudes, acting as a selective force that dictates developmental rates and survival of early ontogenetic stages (Osland et al., 2021). The establishment of new populations at higher latitudes thus could greatly rely on the successful reproduction and offspring survival through life‐history adaptation. Experimental eco‐evolutionary studies on microbes and insects have shown that range‐expansions can lead to adaptations of behavioural and morphological traits that facilitate expansion by accelerating sexual maturation and increasing dispersal and reproductive output (Miller et al., 2020). For species with longer generational times, phenotypic plasticity could be key for range‐expansion (Sommer, 2020; Zettlemoyer & Peterson, 2021). Life‐history theory suggests that under longer winter seasons, populations may retard and shorten their reproductive activities to synchronize the rearing of their offspring with the warmest months in the year (Burrows et al., 2011; Cohen et al., 2018). While this would maximize offspring survival, development under lower temperatures would likely result in life‐history modifications with trade‐offs among different traits. For instance, colder environments can reduce growth rates and retard sexual maturity, but can promote longer life‐spans and greater fecundity, leading to individuals that grow larger body sizes and reproduce for longer (Angilletta et al., 2004; Sheridan & Bickford, 2011; Vila‐Gispert et al., 2002).Knowledge of these responses is important because a better understanding of the drivers of species' persistence at higher latitudes could improve the accuracy of forecasts of range‐shifts and its consequences for biological conservation and socio‐economics (Valladares et al., 2014). However, despite the increase in range‐shift studies in recent times, empirical evidence of life‐history changes driven by range‐expansion is scarce (Donelson et al., 2019). Field based studies are crucial because the magnitude and direction of change in traits will depend on the combined influence of several environmental factors. For instance, food availability is particularly important (the resource availability hypothesis), because poor nutrition results in limited somatic development even under optimal thermal conditions (Geist, 1987; Morales‐Castilla et al., 2012). In a literature review of current empirical evidence of trait changes following climate‐driven range‐expansion, Chuang and Peterson (2016) reported only ten cases of invertebrate species, which mostly focused on one particular trait. To improve our understanding on the magnitude and direction of life‐history variation for range‐shifting species, we compiled information spanning 67° of latitude and conducted a meta‐analysis of the phenological and phenotypic changes of two of the most successful range‐expanding species of fish in the northern and southern hemispheres of the world: the rabbitfish (Siganidae) Siganus fuscescens and Siganus rivulatus (Akiyama et al., 2009; Bariche et al., 2003; Zarco‐Perello et al., 2017). Specifically, we assessed how distributional shifts can affect (i) reproductive phenology: the start, peak and duration of their annual spawning period, (ii) batch fecundity (eggs per individual), (iii) minimum size at maturity, (iv) growth rates, (v) maximum body sizes and (vi) longevity. We hypothesized that range‐expanding populations will experience (1) shorter spawning periods with onsets later in the year, (2) increases in fecundity factored by fish size, (3) increases in size at maturity and (4) decreases in growth rates that will lead to (5) increases in maximum sizes and longevity, in comparison with populations in warmer regions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Species of study
Species of the family Siganidae are considered important herbivores and ecological engineers which can influence the community structure of marine ecosystems through high consumption rates of macrophytes (Fox & Bellwood, 2008). Their range‐expansion has been identified as a potential threat to the functioning of temperate ecosystems because they can contribute to overgraze the canopy‐forming seaweed that constitute the foundation species (Sala et al., 2011; Zarco‐Perello et al., 2021). This study focused on two successful range‐expanding rabbitfish species. (1) Siganus fuscescens (Houttuyn 1782) has expanded its distribution to temperate western Australia following an unprecedented intensification of the Leeuwin Current during a marine heatwave in 2011 (Zarco‐Perello et al., 2017, 2019) and to northern Japan following a gradual warming of the Kuroshio Current (Kumagai et al., 2018). (2) Siganus rivulatus (Forsskål & Niebuhr 1775) expanded its distribution from the Red Sea into the Mediterranean Sea following the opening of the Suez Canal, and continues to expand further as waters keep warming due to climate change (Azzurro et al., 2017).
Data collection
Quantitative information was obtained from the literature using the following two independent search criteria in the Web of Science: {*Siganus OR rabbitfish* AND *reproduction OR fecundity OR spawning*} and {*Siganus OR rabbitfish* AND *size OR length OR growth OR Age OR abundance*}. Publications with useful information were then selected, and the references cited within, as well as the publications that had cited each of these works, were reviewed in turn to obtain more publications that were not detected by the initial online searches. Siganus fuscescens and Siganus canaliculatus were considered synonyms and data from studies of these were pooled (Hsu et al., 2011). In total, we obtained 46 studies related to reproduction, 14 studies related to growth and 91 studies related to body size (including studies that included both reproduction and growth). Data collected for S. fuscescens spanned tropical, subtropical and temperate environments across the Indian and Pacific Oceans, whereas data for Siganus rivulatus spanned subtropical and temperate environments across the Red Sea and Mediterranean Sea (Figure 1 and Table S1). Data were extracted from tables and scatterplot figures using the software DataThief (Flower et al., 2016). In all cases, length was standardized to fork length (FL) using the length‐length equations reported in FishBase for S. fuscesens (Froese & Pauly, 2019), and by Shakman et al. (2008) for S. rivulatus.
FIGURE 1
Sampling locations of information collected from the literature on reproduction (spawning and fecundity), growth rates, maximum length and longevity of Siganus rivulatus and Siganus fuscescens. Maximum body size information was also obtained from studies that included both reproduction and growth. Arrows indicate the direction of range expansion towards temperate environments
Sampling locations of information collected from the literature on reproduction (spawning and fecundity), growth rates, maximum length and longevity of Siganus rivulatus and Siganus fuscescens. Maximum body size information was also obtained from studies that included both reproduction and growth. Arrows indicate the direction of range expansion towards temperate environments
Reproduction
Information about the annual onset, period and peak of spawning (specific months and duration), its relationship with the moon cycle, minimum length at maturity (mm) and fecundity was extracted only from studies (n = 18) with consistent monthly sampling across the year, which determined reproductive stages by macroscopic examination of gonads, gonadosomatic index (GSI = [gonad weight/body weight] × 100) and batch fecundity (gravimetric total number of ripe eggs per individual = Eggs in gonad subsample × total gonad weight/gonad subsample weight) across multiple length classes of female fish (Table S1).
Growth and longevity
Information on growth and longevity for both species of rabbitfish was only extracted from studies that reported growth curves based on length‐at‐age information produced from the analysis of sectioned sagittal otoliths of females and males. In addition, we estimated length‐at‐age information for populations of S. fuscescens from temperate (Perth) and tropical environments (Pilbara and Kimberley) of Western Australia (WA). Temperate WA specimens (n = 387) were collected from 2012 to 2017 by hand seine net (Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development; DPIRD), purse‐seine (donated by commercial fishermen) and spearfishing (approval AEC201527 by the Animal Ethic Committee of Curtin University given to DiBattista J.), while tropical WA specimens from the Pilbara (n = 62) and Kimberley (n = 109) were caught between 2014 to 2017 with trawl nets by DPIRD vessels (Table S2). The total length and fork lengths of all specimens were measured (mm) and their sagittal otoliths extracted, dried, mounted on a microscope glass slide with thermoplastic resin (Crystal Bond) and grinded transversally with lapping film (30 μm) to the nucleus to expose its opaque and translucent bands (Taylor et al., 2017). The opaque bands in each otolith were counted under low‐power magnification with reflected light against a black background (Figure S1). The final count was determined by a third independent reading of the otoliths and only values that matched any of the two previous readings were retained. The spawning period was determined based on the temperature‐spawning patterns found in the global literature review about reproduction (see previous section). These were set as January–February for Perth, December–January for Pilbara and November for the Kimberley region; the estimated spawning dates in each year were assigned as 1 week after the new moon based on literature (Table S1). The spawning date, date of capture and count of opaque bands were used to determine decimal ages for all individuals.von Bertalanffy growth curves (VBGF) were fitted to the length‐at‐age data (both sexes pooled) for (i) each climate (Tropical: 0–23°, Subtropical: 23–30°, Temperate: >30 °) and for (ii) each location independently for both species (Table S2), based on the original VBGF parameterization using the R package fsa (Ogle et al., 2020; R Core Team, 2019):where L|t] is the expected length at age t, L∞ is the asymptotic length, K is the growth rate coefficient (year − 1) and L0 is the expected mean length at time zero (recruitment). Parameter values were estimated with non‐parametric bootstrapping using the R package nlstools (Baty et al., 2015), except for L0 which was constrained to reported values of length at recruitment (age zero) for S. fuscescens (50 mm) and S. rivulatus (30 mm) to allow for a better comparison of the growth trajectories among locations (Bariche et al., 2004; Kanashiro et al., 1999). Average annual growth (mm/year) was extracted from the VBGF of each location for the years (age) shared by all climates for each species and used for statistical analyses. Longevity was estimated as the maximum age reported in each study of the literature review and the otolith analyzes of western Australia.
Maximum size
Information about maximum size attained across different climate regimes for S. fuscescens was obtained from 45 studies reporting abundance and body length, which spanned 67 degrees of latitude (32°S–35°N) from Perth in Australia to Tateyama Bay in Japan; while 30 studies were obtained for S. rivulatus, spanning 10 degrees of latitude (28°N–39°N), from Jeddah in Saudi Arabia to Akbuk in Turkey (Figure 1 and Table S3). Only studies that reported extensive sampling of individuals per location were considered (n > 30), including the studies of reproduction and growth. The maximum length reported in each published work was extracted for statistical analyses.
Environmental variables
Time‐series of environmental data spanning the time frames of each study of reproduction and growth rates of S. fuscescens and S. rivulatus were obtained from the European Union's Copernicus Marine Service (EU's Earth Observation, 2021) for average (m), maximum (i.e. summer: max) and minimum (i.e. winter: min) monthly sea surface temperature (SST; Co) and primary productivity (mg m−2 day−1) from the products GLORYS12V1 (1/12° horizontal resolution), GLOBAL_REANALYSIS_BIO_001_029 (1/4° horizontal resolution) and OCEANCOLOUR_GLO_CHL_L4 (1/27° horizontal resolution). For the analyses of maximum body size and longevity across temperature gradients, we obtained the long‐term temperature variables for each location from the database BioOracle (Assis et al., 2018).
Statistical analyses
The duration of spawning periods (number of months), onset of spawning (month of the year when spawning starts), minimum length at maturity and maximum body size were analysed with generalized linear models (GLM) using the R package stats (R Core Team, 2019). Changes in traits were correlated with SSTm, SSTmin and SSTmax. However, collinearity among temperature covariates was detected with scatterplots and Spearman's rank correlation coefficients and only SSTmin was selected as predictor due to its stronger correlation with the dependent variables and its greater significance for physiological processes and life‐history traits across latitude (Osland et al., 2021; Taylor et al., 2019). Changes in fecundity were analysed with GLMs considering an interaction between fork length and climate (temperate, subtropical and tropical). The change of longevity across temperature (SSTmin) was analysed with generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) including “study” as random factor with the R package lme4 (Bates et al., 2015) and linear mixed quantile regression (QLMM) to the 80th and 90th percentile of the age distribution using the R package lqmm to evaluate differences specifically in the maximum ages attained by each population (Geraci, 2014).Changes in growth rates were evaluated with GLMs considering primary productivity (proxy for food abundance and nutrition) and temperature as explanatory covariates interacting with age. For the analyses of S. fuscescens, most of the covariates had collinearity, except between SSTmin and mean primary productivity (PPm, mg m−2 day−1); thus, only these variables were used. Whereas in the case of S. rivulatus, all covariates had collinearity, masking the effect of each other on growth rates; thus, we carried independent analyses considering SSTmin and PPm as explanatory variables across different ages.In all cases, model fit was checked with AICc, graphical examination of predicted versus observed values and dispersion tests using the R package DHARMa (Hartig, 2020) and p‐values were calculated with likelihood ratio tests with the R package lme4.
RESULTS
Reproductive life‐history traits
The timing of the spawning periods of S. fuscescens differed between climates, with earlier reproductive onsets in warmer environments (GLM, p < 0.01, t = 6.01; Figure 2a,c). In tropical locations, there were usually two spawning periods per year, starting in December–January followed by June–July. However, spawning began at colder winters (i.e. higher latitudes, Figure S2) only when temperatures increased above 20°C, in March–April at subtropical locations and in July–August at temperate locations, representing a phenological shift of 6 months from tropical regions. Similar patterns were observed for Siganus rivulatus, where subtropical and temperate populations began to spawn in March–May in the Red Sea and June–July in the Mediterranean Sea, representing a shift of 2 months for the onset of reproduction (GLM, p < 0.01, t = −7.7; Figure 2b,d).
FIGURE 2
Period (continuous lines) and peak of spawning (arrows) with respect to sea surface temperature fluctuations (dashed lines; a, b), onset of annual spawning (c, d) and duration of spawning period (e, f) across minimum annual temperature in different climate regimes for the rabbitfish Siganus fuscescens and Siganus rivulatus. Error bands represent 95% confidence intervals of the regressions calculated with the function “predict” of the R package stats
Period (continuous lines) and peak of spawning (arrows) with respect to sea surface temperature fluctuations (dashed lines; a, b), onset of annual spawning (c, d) and duration of spawning period (e, f) across minimum annual temperature in different climate regimes for the rabbitfish Siganus fuscescens and Siganus rivulatus. Error bands represent 95% confidence intervals of the regressions calculated with the function “predict” of the R package statsThe duration of the spawning period for both species had a significant positive correlation with winter temperatures, where populations had shorter spawning periods as temperature decreased (GLM, p < 0.01, t = 7.1; Figure 2e). Siganus fuscescens in the tropics had spawning periods of up to 7 months, while in subtropical and temperate locations, they lasted between 3–4 months and only 2 months, respectively. Similarly, the spawning period of S. rivulatus in the Red Sea lasted 4–7 months, whereas at higher latitudes in the Mediterranean Sea, this was reduced to 1–2 months (GLM, p < 0.01, t = 4.0; Figure 2f).Minimum length at maturity (MLM) for S. fuscescens had a significant negative correlation with SSTmin (GLM, p = 0.01, t = −3.8; Figure 3a). Reproductive S. fuscescens in the tropics (5oS–10oN) were as small as 120 ± 14 mm in length, whereas fish matured at lengths of 150 ± 10 mm in the subtropics (22–27oN) and 199 ± 31 mm in temperate locations (33–35oN). This relationship was not found across the latitudinal range of S. rivulatus (GLM, p = 0.7, t = −0.03; Figure 3b), where MLM did not differ significantly between populations in the Red Sea (21oN, 125 ± 13 mm) and the Mediterranean Sea (37oN, 133 ± 6 mm).
FIGURE 3
Relationships between minimum length at maturity across minimum annual temperature (a, b) and fecundity (millions of eggs) and fork length interacting with climate (c, d) for the range‐extending rabbitfish Siganus fuscescens and Siganus rivulatus. Error bands represent 95% confidence intervals of the regressions derived from the function “predict” of the R package stats
Relationships between minimum length at maturity across minimum annual temperature (a, b) and fecundity (millions of eggs) and fork length interacting with climate (c, d) for the range‐extending rabbitfish Siganus fuscescens and Siganus rivulatus. Error bands represent 95% confidence intervals of the regressions derived from the function “predict” of the R package statsFecundity varied according to the interaction between fish length and climate (GLMs, p < 0.01; Figure 3c,d). Populations of S. fuscescens in temperate locations had the highest number of eggs per individual on average across all fish length classes. The highest batch fecundity at maximum lengths (350 mm) in the tropics was 661,251 eggs ind‐1, which was significantly lower than subtropical (1,164,209 eggs ind‐1) and temperate individuals (1,063,377 eggs ind‐1) of the same length (Figure 3c). Populations of S. rivulatus from temperate climates had higher average fecundity than populations of the Red Sea, but only at higher length classes (Figure 3d). The highest fecundity reported at subtropical locations was 488,408 eggs ind‐1, while at temperate locations was 937,568 eggs ind‐1 at comparable lengths (227 mm).
Growth rates, maximum size and longevity
Temperate populations of S. fuscescens had lower von Bertalanffy growth coefficients (k, 0.4–0.6) but higher asymptotic lengths (L∞, 300–326 mm) than subtropical (0.58–0.8, 300 mm) and tropical populations (1–1.16, 250–256 mm; Figure 4a, Table S2). Growth rates in the first year of life were higher in the tropics (153 ± 21 mm), followed by the subtropical (134 ± 7.9 mm) and temperate populations (103 ± 8.6 mm). However, by the second year, length increments of tropical fish fell below other regions, and by the third and subsequent years, temperate populations had the highest growth rates (Figure 4c). This resulted in a significant interaction between SSTmin and Age (GLM, p = 0.018), where individuals grew faster under the warmer winter conditions of the tropics but only during their first year of life (Figure 4e). Primary productivity (PPm) varied widely across the range of sampling locations but was not significantly related to growth rates (GLM, p = 0.53, Table S4, Figure 4g).
FIGURE 4
von Bertalanffy growth curves (a, b), corresponding average length increments by age (c, d) and the effect of winter temperatures (e, f) and primary productivity (g, h) on growth rates across latitude as reported in the literature for the rabbitfish Siganus fuscescens and Siganus rivulatus in temperate, subtropical and tropical locations. Maximum age reported in the tropics in panel A was 3 y/o, further years represent predicted length. Error bands represent 95% confidence intervals of the regressions derived from bootstrapping using the R package nlstools for von Bertalanffy growth curves and the function “predict” of the R package stats for panels e–h
von Bertalanffy growth curves (a, b), corresponding average length increments by age (c, d) and the effect of winter temperatures (e, f) and primary productivity (g, h) on growth rates across latitude as reported in the literature for the rabbitfish Siganus fuscescens and Siganus rivulatus in temperate, subtropical and tropical locations. Maximum age reported in the tropics in panel A was 3 y/o, further years represent predicted length. Error bands represent 95% confidence intervals of the regressions derived from bootstrapping using the R package nlstools for von Bertalanffy growth curves and the function “predict” of the R package stats for panels e–hOn the other hand, temperate populations of S. rivulatus had lower k coefficients (0.14–0.27) and L∞ (252–310 mm) than subtropical populations (0.33–0.72; 273–336 mm; Table S2, Figure 4b). Growth rates in the first year of life were higher in the subtropical (100 ± 13.8 mm) versus the temperate locations (48.4 ± 7.9 mm), and this was maintained in the second (60.7 ± 3.4 vs. 38.4 ± 5.5 mm) and third years (37.8 ± 4.6 vs. 30.5 ± 3.8 mm), except for the fastest growing population in the Red Sea (Shalatein, Egypt), which also had the steepest decrease in growth rate with age, having lower length increments than temperate populations by the fourth year. The growth in other subtropical populations equaled those of temperate populations until the fifth year (20 ± 1 vs. 19.4 ± 1.7 mm; Figure 4d). SSTmin and PPm were higher in subtropical regions and both had a significant relationship with growth rates and significant interactions with age in independent statistical tests (GLM, p < 0.05, Table S4, Figure 4f,h).The maximum sizes of S. fuscescens had a significant negative correlation with SSTmin, where biggest sizes were found in colder climates (GLM, p < 0.01, t = −7.8; Figure 5a). Similarly, longevity increased as winters got colder, from up to 3 years of age in the tropics to 8 years in the subtropics and 13 years in temperate locations at the highest latitude (QLM0.9, p < 0.01; GLM, p < 0.01, t = −5.7; Figure 5c). The maximum sizes of S. rivulatus had a significant positive correlation with SSTmin, achieving bigger body sizes in warmer climates (GLM, p < 0.01, t = 3.2; Figure 5b), while longevity increased from 4–5 years in the subtropics to 10 years in the coldest temperate location (QLM0.8, p < 0.01; GLM, p < 0.01, t = 3.3; Figure 5h).
FIGURE 5
Relationships between maximum body size (a, b) and longevity (c, d) of the range‐expanding rabbitfish Siganus fuscescens and Siganus rivulatus with winter sea surface temperature in temperate, subtropical and tropical locations across their global distributions. Dashed lines in c and d represent quantile regression at the 90th percentile. Error bands represent 95% confidence intervals of the regressions derived from the function “predict” of the R package stats
Relationships between maximum body size (a, b) and longevity (c, d) of the range‐expanding rabbitfish Siganus fuscescens and Siganus rivulatus with winter sea surface temperature in temperate, subtropical and tropical locations across their global distributions. Dashed lines in c and d represent quantile regression at the 90th percentile. Error bands represent 95% confidence intervals of the regressions derived from the function “predict” of the R package stats
DISCUSSION
In this study, we sought to advance our understanding on how life‐history traits can change in response to shifts in distribution to higher latitudes. For this, we analysed how the phenology and life‐history traits of two of the most successful range‐expanding species of fish differed between their original warmer ecosystems and their temperate habitats. We found that most of our hypotheses were supported, with a few exceptions, as temperature and primary productivity changed across time (age) and space.Our results on phenological changes showed that populations at the leading edge of range expansion had shorter reproductive periods with later onsets, similar to previous findings (Slesinger et al., 2021). Shorter reproductive periods at higher latitudes are suggested to be an adaptation to the seasonality of physical and biological factors. Restricting spawning within the best conditions of temperature and food availability for larval development increases chances of survival, thereby maximizing recruitment success (Conover, 1992; Pankhurst & Porter, 2003). Many fish species at high latitudes spawn in spring and early summer, when temperatures are increasing, allowing longer growing seasons for their recruits and the ability to reach larger sizes. This increases their capacity to survive low temperatures and starvation and minimizes predation during the following winter (Sogard, 1997). Progeny spawned in late summer or autumn would be exposed to low and potentially lethal temperatures in the subsequent winter, leading to higher mortality rates (Hurst, 2007). We found that the spawning periods of rabbitfish populations started earlier and were reduced as winter temperatures decreased with increased latitude. Thermal seasonality in tropical regions was very low, within temperatures linked with peak spawning for S. fuscescens (~28°C). This results in long reproductive periods with bimodal peaks of spawning, similar to other species of rabbitfish in the tropics (Taylor et al., 2017). On the other hand, rabbitfish experienced wide seasonal fluctuations in subtropical and temperate regions and lower temperatures associated with peak spawning, restricting their reproductive periods to the months when temperatures increased, becoming strict spring‐spawners (Pankhurst & Porter, 2003). Differences were lower between temperate and subtropical populations of S. rivulatus (1–3 vs. 4–7 months, respectively), likely because maximum temperatures in the temperate Mediterranean Sea can reach similar values to the subtropical Red Sea during summer. However, increases and decreases in temperature are steeper in the temperate locations, providing narrower thermal windows for reproduction and growth, influencing the onset and duration of the spawning period.The shorter spawning periods of populations of rabbitfish at higher latitudes were potentially compensated with an increase in fecundity per fish length, supporting our second hypothesis stating that range‐shifting populations would experience an acceleration in oogenesis. This trend has been found in other freshwater and marine species, where tropical populations have longer spawning seasons but lower fecundity (Vila‐Gispert et al., 2002). The fecundity of both species of rabbitfish followed a similar pattern, where larger fish and colder winters resulted in higher egg production. Temperate populations of S. fuscescens had twice the fecundity in the smaller length class (FL, 220–250 mm) and three times greater fecundity at the biggest length class (300–350 mm) versus tropical populations; while differences between temperate and subtropical populations remained relatively stable across all length classes (1.5–1.8×). Similarly, the fecundity of temperate populations of S. rivulatus was higher by 1.4× in the lowest length class (110–150 mm) and by 2× in the biggest length class (>200 mm) vs subtropical populations. Fecundity has direct implications for recruitment success in natural environments; and greater egg production can compensate for narrower reproductive windows in colder climates (Conover, 1992). Faster egg production seems to start immediately after reaching maturity in both species of rabbitfish, thus, this can have important implications in the energy allocation for other biological processes, which are significantly modulated by temperature and nutrition (McBride et al., 2015).Changes in the other life‐history traits of S. fuscescens across the thermal gradient of its geographic distribution fit the expected patterns predicted by the temperature‐size rule (TSR), corroborating the rest of our hypotheses. The biological processes explaining the TRS are still under debate; however, recent evidence supports the hypothesis that aquatic ectotherms with bigger bodies have limitations of oxygen supply under warmer environments (Verberk et al., 2021). This suggests that there might be selective pressures on individuals with genotypes prone to suffer oxygen supply limitations, favouring smaller body sizes and earlier maturity in warm environments (Pauly, 2021; Rubalcaba et al., 2020). Energetic cost of oogenesis is high and its oxygen requirements are added to those of somatic maintenance and routine activities, reducing the aerobic scope of organisms and prompting earlier sexual maturation in warmer environments before reaching untenable levels of respiratory distress (Forster et al., 2012; Pauly, 2021). The growth patterns of S. fuscescens across climates corroborated this, whereby tropical populations had faster initial growth but asymptoted to reach maturity sooner at smaller sizes compared with range‐expanding populations experiencing colder winters. Higher latitude populations had lower growth rates, greater length/age at maturity, longer maximum sizes and lifespans.Patterns of change in the life‐history traits of S. rivulatus across climates did not meet the predicted outcomes by the TSR, except for changes in longevity. Range‐extending populations had lower growth rates as expected; however, this did not translate into bigger body sizes and length at maturity than subtropical populations. A plausible explanation could be the differences found in primary productivity and temperatures between regions. The Mediterranean Sea is considered one of the seas with lower levels of nutrients in the world (Azov, 1991) and in combination with low temperatures could result in smaller bodies (Atkinson & Sibly, 1997; Munday et al., 2008), maturation earlier than expected and increased longevity (Berrigan & Charnov, 1994; Perrin, 1995). Reaching maturity sooner could be a life‐history adaptation to maximize their life‐time reproductive output (Berrigan & Charnov, 1994). Unlike populations living in warmer climates, temperate populations would not have limitations of aerobic scope, since metabolic rates would be low; however, given their very slow growth rates, reaching maturity at bigger sizes, as predicted by the TSR, would shorten their overall reproductive output considerably, carrying a high cost in fitness. For instance, maturing at the same size as temperate populations of S. fuscescens (200 mm) would take 5 years, risking complete reproductive failure for those individuals that perish before reaching maturation. This agrees with previous meta‐analyses where a positive relationship was found between age at maturity and maximum age for all species of fish worldwide (Thorson et al., 2017).The observed changes in longevity agreed with our hypothesis, where expanding populations of S. rivulatus and S. fuscescens experiencing the coldest winters had the oldest individuals (10–13 y/o respectively), in comparison with subtropical (5–8 y/o) and tropical populations (1–3 y/o). This pattern has been described for ectotherms and endotherms (Lee et al., 2013; Rollo, 2002; Taylor et al., 2019), and its possible causes have been linked to intrinsic (senescence) and extrinsic processes (mortality rates) which can be modulated by temperature, such as higher cellular oxidative damage (Burraco et al., 2020) and higher predation rates in warmer environments related to higher metabolic demands in carnivorous species (Lima & Dill, 1990; Werner & Anholt, 1993). Predation rates on rabbitfish at the leading edge of range expansion is uncertain, since populations will interact with new and heterogeneous communities of predators in each location. Nonetheless, predation may be low given that rabbitfish possess poisonous spines and because native predators may not recognize them as prey (HilleRisLambers et al., 2013).Fishing, like predation, increases mortality rates and can affect the size and age structure of fish populations in synergy with environmental variables (Ahti et al., 2020; Hunter et al., 2015; Morrongiello et al., 2021). We could not perform quantitative analyses of its effect in our study because species‐specific information on fisheries landings of rabbitfish is lacking around the world; the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations reports total yearly catches at low taxonomic (family) and geographic resolution (country; FAO‐FIGIS, 2019). However, available evidence indicates that this could have a minimal impact in the general patterns found. For instance, in Western Australia rabbitfish are not commonly targeted and only are caught as bycatch, yet the patterns between tropical and range‐extending populations held. Fisheries effect on the traits of S. rivulatus may be low in the Red Sea, because individuals were larger (>250 mm) despite that trammel nets used in the region select for fishes >150 mm (Saber & Gewida, 2020); however, we cannot discard a potential fishery effect in the Mediterranean Sea since nets target fishes >200 mm, which could include the oldest and bigger individuals (Cerim et al., 2020; Soykan, 2020). Nonetheless, the global analyses of maximum sizes were robust. For instance, of the 45 studies examined about S. fuscescens across climates, maximum sizes below 250 mm were only reported in tropical locations from a total sample of 54,634 individuals. Likewise, of the 30 studies of S. rivulatus, maximum sizes below 200 mm were only reported in temperate locations from 32,563 fish individuals.Climate change is influencing fish phenology, life‐history traits and geographic distributions. Our results showed that these responses interplay in a predictable way by ecogeographical rules, as most of our hypotheses were supported. However, we also found that effects can vary among species, depending on the interaction between changes in temperature and other important factors such as primary productivity and its related influence on nutrition. Rising temperatures at low latitudes are affecting fish populations by reaching upper critical thresholds for core biological activities, reducing fitness, and leading to range contractions. In contrast, populations at the leading edge of range expansions, experiencing stronger seasonal fluctuations with colder winters, will need to adapt their life‐history strategies to maximize fitness. We showed that this may be reflected in range‐expanding rabbitfish through shorter reproductive periods occurring only when temperatures are rising in spring, which increases the survival of their progeny. In addition, higher fecundity and greater longevity could maximize their lifetime reproductive output, favouring their persistence at higher latitudes and further range expansions in the future, as temperatures rise and oceanographic variables favour the dispersal of higher numbers of eggs and larvae to nursery grounds at higher latitudes. The results of this study reflect the phenological and phenotypic adaptability that some range‐expanding species could have in terms of the interacting characteristics of reproduction, growth, and longevity. These are important aspects to consider when predicting future species redistributions and their related impacts on the functioning and productivity of natural ecosystems.
AUTHORS' CONTRIBUTIONS
S.Z.‐P. and B.T. conceived the ideas and designed methodology; S.Z.‐P., D.F., C.D., J.D., R.A. and T.W. collected the data; S.Z.‐P. analysed the data; S.Z.‐P. led the writing of the manuscript. All authors contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.Supinfo S1Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Janneke HilleRisLambers; Melanie A Harsch; Ailene K Ettinger; Kevin R Ford; Elinore J Theobald Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2013-07-22 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Jennifer M Sunday; Gretta T Pecl; Stewart Frusher; Alistair J Hobday; Nicole Hill; Neil J Holbrook; Graham J Edgar; Rick Stuart-Smith; Neville Barrett; Thomas Wernberg; Reg A Watson; Dan A Smale; Elizabeth A Fulton; Dirk Slawinski; Ming Feng; Ben T Radford; Peter A Thompson; Amanda E Bates Journal: Ecol Lett Date: 2015-07-20 Impact factor: 9.492
Authors: Gretta T Pecl; Miguel B Araújo; Johann D Bell; Julia Blanchard; Timothy C Bonebrake; I-Ching Chen; Timothy D Clark; Robert K Colwell; Finn Danielsen; Birgitta Evengård; Lorena Falconi; Simon Ferrier; Stewart Frusher; Raquel A Garcia; Roger B Griffis; Alistair J Hobday; Charlene Janion-Scheepers; Marta A Jarzyna; Sarah Jennings; Jonathan Lenoir; Hlif I Linnetved; Victoria Y Martin; Phillipa C McCormack; Jan McDonald; Nicola J Mitchell; Tero Mustonen; John M Pandolfi; Nathalie Pettorelli; Ekaterina Popova; Sharon A Robinson; Brett R Scheffers; Justine D Shaw; Cascade J B Sorte; Jan M Strugnell; Jennifer M Sunday; Mao-Ning Tuanmu; Adriana Vergés; Cecilia Villanueva; Thomas Wernberg; Erik Wapstra; Stephen E Williams Journal: Science Date: 2017-03-31 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Fernando Valladares; Silvia Matesanz; François Guilhaumon; Miguel B Araújo; Luis Balaguer; Marta Benito-Garzón; Will Cornwell; Ernesto Gianoli; Mark van Kleunen; Daniel E Naya; Adrienne B Nicotra; Hendrik Poorter; Miguel A Zavala Journal: Ecol Lett Date: 2014-09-09 Impact factor: 9.492
Authors: Tom E X Miller; Amy L Angert; Carissa D Brown; Julie A Lee-Yaw; Mark Lewis; Frithjof Lutscher; Nathan G Marculis; Brett A Melbourne; Allison K Shaw; Marianna Szűcs; Olivia Tabares; Takuji Usui; Christopher Weiss-Lehman; Jennifer L Williams Journal: Ecology Date: 2020-09-02 Impact factor: 5.499
Authors: Juan G Rubalcaba; Wilco C E P Verberk; A Jan Hendriks; Bart Saris; H Arthur Woods Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-11-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Salvador Zarco-Perello; David Fairclough; Chris Dowling; Joey DiBattista; Rachel Austin; Thomas Wernberg; Brett Taylor Journal: J Anim Ecol Date: 2022-05-17 Impact factor: 5.606