| Literature DB >> 35542498 |
Jing Zhang1, Di Zhang1, Xu Hu1, Ruiling Liu1, Zhonghao Li2, Yuxia Luan1.
Abstract
Because of the drawbacks of cytarabine (Ara-C) such as poor lipid solubility, deamination inactivation and low oral bioavailability limiting its application by oral administration, herein we propose a novel amphiphilic low molecular weight cytarabine prodrug (PA-Ara) by conjugating palmitic acid (PA) to Ara-C, making it possible to avoid the deamination inactivation by protecting the active 4-amino, as well as improving lipid solubility. Thanks to the rational design, the oil/water partition coefficient (P) of PA-Ara was improved tremendously compared with Ara-C, and the PA-Ara conjugation was stable enough in artificial digestive juice, ensuring that most molecules could be absorbed in the form of the prodrug. Results from an MTT assay conducted to measure the cytotoxicity of Ara-C and PA-Ara to HL60 (acute myeloblastic leukemia cell line) and K562 cells (chronic granulocytic leukemia cell line) showed that PA-Ara had significantly stronger antiproliferation activities than Ara-C. Significantly, we firstly compared the bioavailability of the oral fatty acid chain modified cytarabine prodrug preparation with injection and the relative bioavailability was up to 61.77% for our PA-Ara, which was much superior to that of oral Ara-C solution (3.23%). Overall, these findings make it clear that the PA-Ara suspension has the potential to be a promising new cytarabine oral preparation for leukemia therapy. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 35542498 PMCID: PMC9079750 DOI: 10.1039/c8ra01225c
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Scheme 1The synthesis route of PA-Ara.
Fig. 1(A) 1H-NMR spectra of PA-Ara. (B) FTIR spectra of Ara-C (a), PA (b) and PA-Ara (c). (C) TEM image of PA-Ara assembly.
Fig. 2Gastrointestinal stability (A) and chemical stability (B) of the PA-Ara prodrug.
Fig. 3TEM images of PA-Ara assembly after incubation in artificial gastric juice (A and B) or artificial intestinal fluids (C and D), respectively, for 1 h (A and C) and 12 h (B and D).
Fig. 4Cell inhibition ratios of different samples against HL60 and K562 cells after 24 h or 48 h incubation, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, n = 3.
IC50 (μM) of drugs against HL60 or K562 cells incubated for 24 h or 48 h
| Cell line | Incubation time (h) | IC50 (Ara-C) | IC50 (PA-Ara) |
|---|---|---|---|
| HL60 | 24 | 289.30 | 52.45 |
| 48 | 34.02 | 46.74 | |
| K562 | 24 | 315.72 | 144.59 |
| 48 | 29.64 | 8.47 |
Fig. 5Pharmacokinetic concentration–time curves in rats after administration of different formulations. (a) The curve of Ara-C after intravenous administration of Ara-C saline solution. (b-1) The curve of Ara-C after oral administration of PA-Ara suspension. (b-2) The curve of PA-Ara after oral administration of PA-Ara suspension.
Pharmacokinetic parameters of intravenous Ara-C and oral Ara-C and PA-Ara suspension
| Pharmacokinetic parameters | Intravenous Ara-C | Oral suspension | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ara-C | PA-Ara | |||
| AUC0–∞/(ng h mL−1) | 36 199.75 | 22 359.14 | 4630.77 | |
|
| 2579.92 | 1108.59 | 167.13 | |
|
| 1 | 6 | 6 | |
|
| 11.46 | 12.89 | 19.68 | |
| MRT0–∞/(h) | 14.09 | 11.87 | 29.09 | |
| Clz (L h−1 kg−1) | 0.28 | 0.45 | 4.32 | |
AUC0–∞ is the mean area under the concentration–time curve from time 0 to the last time point.
C max is the peak plasma concentration of the drug.
T max is the time point when the plasma concentration reaches its peak.
t 1/2 is the elimination half-time of the drug.
MRT0–∞ is the mean residence time which represents the average time that drug molecules reside in the body.
Clz is the volume of plasma containing the drug eliminated from the body per unit time, which stands for the clearance rate of the drug from blood.